Megathread Trannies posting their L's Online - Heckin valid people posting their funny misfortunes on the internet

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
The only compelling argument I've heard so far is that it might be hard to enforce since it falls on the employees to keep an eye and check. It's still a dumb argument because 99% of the time you can just use your eyes to tell.
It's not a compelling argument at all. We have had gender segmented bathrooms ever since bathrooms were first invented, and it's worked pretty well. I don't see how it would be any more difficult to keep out men in dresses than normal men.

Maybe I'm powerleveling here, but I've had to deal with a man in the women's bathroom at work once, and it wasn't any worse than dealing with other customers that doesn't follow the rules.
 
A trans comes to the sober realisation that yes xhe doesn't pass and that yes people are just humoring xer despite "conforming to a very feminine ideal of appearance, I wear makeup every night at work, and you know, I have my hair long". Because that's what makes a woman.
It's 20 minutes of beautiful sneed, I highly recommend :story:
bonus quote: "Transition has not helped my body dysphoria at all". Uh oh!

View attachment 6816472
I don’t know why I wasted 20 minutes of my night watching all of this but I did. These people are so endlessly frustrating. He’s so close to getting it. Yes, a biological woman can cut her hair short, not wear makeup and dress casually and still be recognised as a woman. It’s almost like there’s more to being a woman than makeup, hair and clothes.
 
Is it dysphoria that I gave myself?
You've lost your self-respect and dignity not just as a person but as a man. That isn't something easily gotten back after you lose it. That's why it's considered such a big deal despite what some would try to say about that being "toxic". This man is disgusted with himself and probably will remain so for a very long time if not his whole life. This is the life you chose and etc.

Never let your bros be hoes.
 
It's not a compelling argument at all. We have had gender segmented bathrooms ever since bathrooms were first invented, and it's worked pretty well. I don't see how it would be any more difficult to keep out men in dresses than normal men.

Maybe I'm powerleveling here, but I've had to deal with a man in the women's bathroom at work once, and it wasn't any worse than dealing with other customers that doesn't follow the rules.
Oh for sure, it's still a dumb argument and you can easily circumvent it by just having the bathroom under lock and having the customers ask for the key, 99% of them can't pass for shit and it's extremely easy to tell.
 
Probably because you invoked astrological imagery, ex. women and their “lunar” quality. That sort of correspondence talk is entirely speculative. Interesting, but not empirical. And arguably a touch off-topic, although I tend to be amenable to the natural shifts and subtopics within a conversation.
That makes sense, thanks. I only mean that stuff as psychological shorthand; the occult worldview is an antipsychotic coping mechanism—not an honest paradigm. It's the same as naturalism in that respect, but in reverse. Occultism says that your mind holds reality together, whereas naturalism says that reality holds itself together.

Both are copes designed to stave off the inevitable psychosis that results from abandonment of (or by) a creator diety to hold it all together—world; mind; the six directions. It's like they think the world works on Wile. E. Coyote rules: you can walk off a cliff and stay suspended in midair, as long as you don't look down. Not so. Not so. Borrowed hang-time.

Never let your bros be hoes.
You can't un-suck a johnson, as the old saying goes. At the same time, nothing essential to manhood is unrecoverable.

These people are so endlessly frustrating. He’s so close to getting it
I've said it elsewhere in this thread, but it's more effective to deny them the false premise that they believe what they're saying than it is to argue with them.

Arguing puts them into the role of the defender; the one-who-believes. It reinforces the LARP. They have a script for attacks on their philosophy, but not on their faith.

Telling one he didn't believe what he was saying was the only successful breakthrough I've had with one, although he may not have been marinated in those juices too long.
 
Last edited:
Speaking of things that I've never heard a man discuss or describe: being so overwhelmed with positive emotions that they get an erection. No 'just got the big promotion erection', no 'holding my newborn child for the first time' erection, no 'wedding alter erection'. Somehow the only only emotions that can stiffen a dick are gender euphoria.
This is the thing that really freaking gets me when troons try to claim that AGP doesn't exist. It's bizarre to me that anyone anywhere could claim AGP isn't real when I could go on r/MTF at any time and find thousands of posts about euphoria boners. These men are literally talking in the open about getting erections while wearing women's clothes and invading women's spaces, and then turn around and say they ain't AGP hons.

Troons are delusional when they claim this doesn't provide evidence for AGP, we know that -- but how have normies not figured this out yet? Like, wouldn't most normies agree that 1) an erection is proof of sexual arousal, 2) when someone says, "If I do xyz, I get an erection," that means I am sexually aroused by xyz, and 3) if trannies are sexually aroused by pretending to be a woman, then that's evidence for AGP.

So do normies just not know about the thousands of posts on r/MTF talking about euphoria boners? Or do they know and they just don't care?

Seriously, has anyone had any luck peaking people with the whole euphoria boner thing?
 
So do normies just not know about the thousands of posts on r/MTF talking about euphoria boners? Or do they know and they just don't care?
Normies do not seek out troon Reddit posts to read through. The people who aren't trannies and do know about it are "true believer" types that are on the bandwagon for other reasons beyond "the tv told me it was nice to allow this".
 
This is the thing that really freaking gets me when troons try to claim that AGP doesn't exist. It's bizarre to me that anyone anywhere could claim AGP isn't real when I could go on r/MTF at any time and find thousands of posts about euphoria boners. These men are literally talking in the open about getting erections while wearing women's clothes and invading women's spaces, and then turn around and say they ain't AGP hons.

Troons are delusional when they claim this doesn't provide evidence for AGP, we know that -- but how have normies not figured this out yet? Like, wouldn't most normies agree that 1) an erection is proof of sexual arousal, 2) when someone says, "If I do xyz, I get an erection," that means I am sexually aroused by xyz, and 3) if trannies are sexually aroused by pretending to be a woman, then that's evidence for AGP.

So do normies just not know about the thousands of posts on r/MTF talking about euphoria boners? Or do they know and they just don't care?

Seriously, has anyone had any luck peaking people with the whole euphoria boner thing?
It's been my experience that most people have no idea about the "euphoria boners" and quickly realize what troonism is actually about when they are subjected to interactions (real or virtual) with actual troons. They believe the sanitized version about "brain sex" (a phenomenon that becomes totally meaningless when you control for homosexuality) or "gendered souls" if they're the more woo-type, and they also tend to take everything troons say about their childhood experiences at face value. Such as "I've felt I was a girl since I was three but comp het and oppressive gender roles are the reason I've been married three times and have six kids". Obviously bullshit if you look past the surface, but most normies don't because it doesn't occur to them to question the dogma, because they've had no reason to. The overwhelming majority believe all troons are homosexual, because that's how it used to be. They also believe any troon that enters a women-only space is "post-op".

What usually peaks people are personal experiences.
 
Troons are delusional when they claim this doesn't provide evidence for AGP, we know that -- but how have normies not figured this out yet? Like, wouldn't most normies agree that 1) an erection is proof of sexual arousal, 2) when someone says, "If I do xyz, I get an erection," that means I am sexually aroused by xyz, and 3) if trannies are sexually aroused by pretending to be a woman, then that's evidence for AGP.

So do normies just not know about the thousands of posts on r/MTF talking about euphoria boners? Or do they know and they just don't care?
> normgroid goycattle
> mentally entertaining potentially uncomfortable truths


Not only do they not know, but they don't want to know.

Not only do they not want to know, but if you show them, they'll forget it.

If they're true normalfags, that is. The TV doesn't just give them information: it dictates the heuristics their attention faculties use to prioritize what gets stored as memories.

Nietzche (I've heard) said that in his time prayer had been replaced by the newspaper. Then it was the TV, and now the algorithm. It's why I use a self-curated RSS feed, personally. My only algorithm is homeless people telling me what books to buy.
 
Last edited:
An interesting fact about damselflies is that they can't rape (which in my book is pretty cool—the inabilty, not rape); while the male grasps the female's neck, the female has to lift her "tail" back to meet the male. They make a heart shape when connected.

I don't want to have sex with bugs.
See now come on, people. This is gold.

1736552542708.png
 
Normies do not seek out troon Reddit posts to read through. The people who aren't trannies and do know about it are "true believer" types that are on the bandwagon for other reasons beyond "the tv told me it was nice to allow this".
Or they're the autistic weirdos who find trans people fascinating and endlessly amusing.

I mean, no one here, of course, everyone here is totally normal. But other weirdos elsewhere.
 
Do women who get tattoos like that actually call them "tramp stamps"? I figured that was an insult used to deride the taste/aesthetic of those women rather than an objective way to describe a "lower back tattoo". I guess some "anti slut-shaming" woketard might try to "reclaim" that slur, but women even today are generally sensitive to being called sluts or tramps either directly or through inference.
I have heard women refer to them as tramp stamps in current times, but women didn't call them that back in the day unless they were making fun of other women, and no gets them anymore as far as I know. I think tramp stamps are still widely regarded as trashy.

On top of that, his says "I love anal". If I saw that no context, I'd assume we were making a joke. The fact he posted it legitimately is hilarious, but it's also kinda gross because why would a group of women care he got an "I love anal" tattoo? If anything they should have been mad at him for being creepy, but he was lucky and most of them took it as a joke. Maybe the idiot has a humiliation kink or something.

So do normies just not know about the thousands of posts on r/MTF talking about euphoria boners? Or do they know and they just don't care?
Since I was on the normie train a week ago, I will give you what I assumed back then. Prior to the incident that led me to this forum, I had very much forgotten AGP was a thing. I did not think that mtf trannies were just living out their AGP because AGP wasn't even on my mind. If anything, I just assumed it was cross-dressers who suffered perversions like AGP (men who like wearing women's clothes but are not identifying as trans).

People who support trans rights believe that these men are female in their heads and have been since birth. I visited my local library and went to the trans section, and there were several books about how the trannies thought they were girls since childhood. That is the narrative, but I don't believe them anymore. Plus, kids don't know what tf they're talking about.

most people have no idea about the "euphoria boners" and quickly realize what troonism is actually about when they are subjected to interactions (real or virtual) with actual troons. They believe the sanitized version about "brain sex" (a phenomenon that becomes totally meaningless when you control for homosexuality) or "gendered souls" if they're the more woo-type, and they also tend to take everything troons say about their childhood experiences at face value ....... What usually peaks people are personal experiences.
Yes, this is exactly it. Which is similiar to what I said above, and my personal experience with a troon lead me to posting here.
 
Not an option for most of us in Europe, I'm afraid. I have my dog. He's only 5 pounds and has cataract in both eyes, but he can detect motion that's not me from a mile away.
Dog is always helpful, even a little one will give you the drop and a big one can glower in your window and deter thieves and men proactively by staring at them and barking as they case the house. In man vs. dog, man usually gets his ass kicked if the dog is 60lbs plus. But knife or gun typically beats dog so an armed man could subdue even a giant dog

Yoorup laws notwithstanding tho: If you use it in the clutch in self-defense I think it's worth it to deal w/ specious firearms charges... at least you got out w your life!

I once met a woman that was stronger than me, and she worked on a farm. I started working out after that so I could beat women.
lol that seems mildly embarrassing for you, and not a chance I'd like to take on a male assailant, weightlifting and such notwithstanding. My best guess is, if they're having a go at me, a given man probably thinks he'd win, and odds are he's right.

Do women who get tattoos like that actually call them "tramp stamps"? I figured that was an insult used to deride the taste/aesthetic of those women rather than an objective way to describe a "lower back tattoo". I guess some "anti slut-shaming" woketard might try to "reclaim" that slur, but women even today are generally sensitive to being called sluts or tramps either directly or through inference.
That tattoo is so regrettable I want to set up a deadpool on its laser-removal
He makes some good metaphysical points. Symbolism is powerful. I enjoy his posts, anyway. 🧩
Fair enough a good schizoposter is a fine thing
It’s almost like there’s more to being a woman than makeup, hair and clothes.
Some of them think that if they shave it's enough to "male-fail", all I got to say is, there's ten million plus white guys in the US whose beards are patchy and embarrassing and have to shave daily to look nice, and they are never misgendered. It's brow width and face shape the size of the eyes and lips, idk, a je ne sais quoi, a lunar quality lol

See now come on, people. This is gold.

View attachment 6843730
Yeah I take it all back. My only notes for our new friend is, "I do not want to have sex with bugs" is one of those statements you shouldn't need to explicitly say and the more you repeat it and talk about bug sex the more suspicious it seems.
 
My only notes for our new friend is
No hard feelings, but I'm not interested in one-sided conversations—which is what this is right now. You didn't answer any of my questions from that post.

Genuinely, no hard feelings.

That is the narrative, but I don't believe them anymore. Plus, kids don't know what tf they're talking about.
It's so gruesome out there, man. I don't think there's any realistic way to protect kids right now; you have to treat everyone like they're growing up as an abuse victim. We have to teach adults normal human dynamics that they should've learned in childhood.

Tons of men think it's normal to masturbate to cartoons. Like, Nickelodeon. Disney Channel. Not just anime. As adults. Think about that for a moment.
 
Do you conjugate according to gender if the gender of the person is known? For example, would you say "Un beau enfant" if you knew you were referring to a boy, and switch to "Une belle enfant" for a girl, or does the noun always retain its grammatical gender no matter what?
Yes we do conjugate according to the gender, your example is good (but instead of "un beau enfant" it will be "un bel enfant" the masculine of "belle" because it begin with a vowel)
If the gender is unknow the masculine is the default.
While some words are technically neutral like enfant, it's not always the case:
une maison (a house) will always be une maison -> always female pronoun + unique word,
and a male cat = un chat / a female cat = une chatte -> gendered pronoun + gendered word.

French is a shitshow of a language I know :)

Kinda Ninja'd by @Sangria Nigger
 
On top of that, his says "I love anal". If I saw that no context, I'd assume we were making a joke. The fact he posted it legitimately is hilarious, but it's also kinda gross because why would a group of women care he got an "I love anal" tattoo? If anything they should have been mad at him for being creepy, but he was lucky and most of them took it as a joke. Maybe the idiot has a humiliation kink or something.
Someone ITT was talking about how men (all of them) write like Hemingway, in a terse, economical style. This tat is a good example of that, in that in three words this sex-obsessed troon manages to communicate his lunacy in a way I never could in 10,000 words.
I visited my local library and went to the trans section, and there were several books about how the trannies thought they were girls since childhood. That is the narrative, but I don't believe them anymore. Plus, kids don't know what tf they're talking about.
That narrative is a little outdated, since it doesn't explain the numerous examples ITT of troons trooning out later in life, not to mention prominent media examples like the esteemed Contrapoints, his son Abigail, or Jimquisition, Julia Serrano, Zinnia Jones, Kevin Gibes, Jonathan Yaniv, Chelsea Manning, etc. etc., all of whom were well above drinking age before trooning out.
No hard feelings, but I'm not interested in one-sided conversations—which is what this is right now. You didn't answer any of my questions from that post.
I was more talking to Larry David Changes Account Names, but my proper response to you is that I didn't read your post carefully enough and the metaphysical gender stuff will always squick me as wrong because it tends to cast women as the lesser, e.g. the moon to the male sun. But after the comments about sexy bugs and bug sex I look forward to your career with great interest, Palapatine-style.
DO IT. SHITPOST WITH ALL YOUR HATRED.
 
Yes we do conjugate according to the gender, your example is good (but instead of "un beau enfant" it will be "un bel enfant" the masculine of "belle" because it begin with a vowel)
If the gender is unknow the masculine is the default.
While some words are technically neutral like enfant, it's not always the case:
une maison (a house) will always be une maison -> always female pronoun + unique word,
and a male cat = un chat / a female cat = une chatte -> gendered pronoun + gendered word.

French is a shitshow of a language I know :)

Kinda Ninja'd by @Sangria Nigger

In Mexican Spanish you might say of a newborn El Niño está niño or niña when telling the family about it.
 
Troon on a subreddit devoted to women complains that the world doesn't revolve around him
View attachment 6843899
So the official troon narrative of "Jaia" is that he was a victim because he was beaten up and they are just leaving out the part where this was subsequent to his having stabbed a guy to death for cutting in line. If that isn't the most telling display of troon framing and rhetoric I've ever seen...
 
Back