State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Rekieta, Kayla Rekieta, April Imholte

[prolapsed_cranium]

Remember, this absolute, utter moron thinks you're dumb enough to believe a tiny incidental contact with his cocaine-contaminated property would cause a cop's glove to cause cocaine to metabolize to the point of being ten times over the limit for a positive. For metabolites. Not for cocaine. The cocaine magically metabolized outside the body like only a liver could ordinarily do.

Apparently there was a Ghost Liver flying around metabolizing cocaine.

This is what this brain-dead lying faggot cuck expects you to believe.

Not only that, but his claim that the lab is contaminated or tested the wrong sample.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

Not only that, but his claim that the lab is contaminated or tested the wrong sample.

And that the state refused to retest when asked to do so!

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

What Nick is talking about is a Plea Colloquy. A series of questions the judge asks a defendant when they plea guilty to make sure everything is above board.

THe idea that Wentzell wasn't prepared to take a plea when he probably does that shit multiple times a day is absolute bullshit lying. That means something happened at the last plea that prevented it. Nick said something that made the judge go 'Uhhh sounds like you're saying you're not guilty or you're being forced to plead guilty so I can't take your plea'

Nick probably said something about being forced by the state to plead which put the brakes on the whole thing.

A plea colloquy is generally something like this


and so on and so on, and they also get to questions like


This goes to the voluntariness of the plea.

And something Nick said, at some point in the Colloquy made the judge slam the brakes.

Cross-posting above for information on plea colloquy.

Remember, this absolute, utter moron thinks you're dumb enough to believe a tiny incidental contact with his cocaine-contaminated property would cause a cop's glove to cause cocaine to metabolize to the point of being ten times over the limit for a positive. For metabolites. Not for cocaine. The cocaine magically metabolized outside the body like only a liver could ordinarily do.

Apparently there was a Ghost Liver flying around metabolizing cocaine.

This is what this brain-dead lying faggot cuck expects you to believe.

He talked kn enough vagueness that it might take in a sympathetic viewer who is also uninformed.

I do not belive for a second that he will even pull together something cogent to explain the 'testing error'. Nick likes to live in a world of double-speak and shades of truth. He is pulling the same 'they never watched MY video' shite.

 

[Dixieland Buckaroo]

All indications we had (Kay was there again?) was that there was no judge, the talks were in private and off the record. Nick was just lying on NLO / WATP.

 

[Pagan Min]

Nick was just lying on NLO / WATP.

How could you tell he was lying???

A) His lips were moving; and
B) He didn't have a dick in his mouth

 

[AnOminous]

I do not belive for a second that he will even pull together something cogent to explain the 'testing error'.

Remember, his "story" is that they smeared cocaine all over his daughter's hair which resulted in a false positive. Then they tested the wrong sample, from where? Who knows. But anyway, somehow the wrong sample inherited the cocaine from the cop touching his daughter's hair.

Then the result was wrong on top of that. But that's still because the magic wrong hair sample magically inherited cocaine from the original cop. And he has the proof on video, but he screams like Satan when you try to get that video. "MUH KEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEDS!"

 

[DiabeticSydePhil]

Its a shame the judge will probably let Nick take the plea deal to get this shit over with instead of forcing him to go to trial because he won't stop running his mouth about how they're railroading him.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

"MUH KEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEDS!"

Are only relevant when Nick can use them as a flex to support his "great dad" persona, or when he can use them to deflect criticism.

We all know the conditions in that house were abysmal and Nick removing himself from the picture, but leaving the money flowing so the kids are financially secured, would actually help them.

 

[AnOminous]

We all know the conditions in that house were abysmal and Nick removing himself from the picture, but leaving the money flowing so the kids are financially secured, would actually help them.

And we also know just last night, a child appeared on Nick's stream, starving and begging for food, and he said he was too busy groveling to a fat pedophile to bother.

 

[Iron Hamster]

I found this statement to be odd:

I never will and it's one of the most frustrating parts of this is that I will never have an opportunity to defend that
allegation I I just won't and I'll never get to ask them how do you think it happened

Sure you could. Go to trial.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

Remember, his "story" is that they smeared cocaine all over his daughter's hair which resulted in a false positive. Then they tested the wrong sample, from where? Who knows. But anyway, somehow the wrong sample inherited the cocaine from the cop touching his daughter's hair.

Then the result was wrong on top of that. But that's still because the magic wrong hair sample magically inherited cocaine from the original cop. And he has the proof on video, but he screams like Satan when you try to get that video. "MUH KEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEDS!"

Nick is one who probably fell overly in love with the legal profession's ability to hold contradictory positions and still prevail as a matter of law rather than fact. He is trying to apply some version of what I understand the 'reasonable doubt' standard to be.

If you can throw enough chaff in the air and just one parallel logical path argument works, you still prevail. Granted it might not be on the merits, but you can crow about 'winning the case.

I found this statement to be odd:



Sure you could. Go to trial.

That would cut into his time to drive his children around! Don't you know they have over 100 miles in a day to get to all their activities!

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

I found this statement to be odd:



Sure you could. Go to trial.

Oh, you silly. Nothing, including all of his legal matters, is in any way within Nick's control. Operatives either put a rock on his right foot or sabotaged his car, forcing him to speed. Over and over. They also ran his brand new car into a ditch, forced him to keep felonious levels of coke in his home, unsecured and around children, ginned up the metabolites in his kid's hair, disabled his and Kayla's hands so they couldn't do laundry, fold it, clear a space for kids to eat, make kids food, or clean that nasty kitchen. They even blocked all CLE programming From reaching his computer and disabled all bill-paying sites and applications, stole his checkbook, and caused the bank to refuse to give him money.

You don't know what it's like literally to be Jesus Christ, unfairly persecuted and prosecuted by the malicious legal web of conspirators in Kandiyohi County, you heretic. Nick does.

That St. Andrew's cross in the bag under the bed? In Scandinavian, Kandiyohi means Golgotha.

 

[Potentially Criminal]

@AnOminous and @Potentially Criminal , what questions would these possibly be that held up his deal?

The plea colloquy. It can take 15-20 minutes easily to do a plea. Lots of questions are asked on the record (THIS IS KIND OF A GENERIC OVERVIEW)

• Your age
• Your level of education & literacy (that you understand the plea form and the hearing)
• Nationality (you can get deported or denaturalized for certain crimes)
• Mental health situation
• Whether you're sober (not just illegal drugs but anything prescriptions that can affect your judgement)
• What your actual charge is
• Potential penalties
• Terms of the proposed plea agreement
• That the signature on the plea form is actually Nick's
• Appeal rights
• All the trial rights you'd give up to plea
  • Jury trial/Bench trial
  • Present evidence
  • Cross-examine state's evidence
  • Right to testify
  • Subpoena witnesses
  • Right to remain silent, and nobody can make a negative inference about it
  • Guilt established via proof beyond a reasonable doubt as to all elements
• Satisfied with your attorney's representation
• Understand what a Guilty/No Contest plea entails
• The court is not bound by the plea agreement

Then the court will then get to Nick's allocution. He's going to have to admit to whatever it is he's entering a plea to. Most judges will do "The indictment says on X day your did Y......Tell me, what happened" Nick doesn't have to get too in depth. Merely saying "I knowingly possessed a bunch of cocaine exceeding 25 grams" would be enough.

From there the Court may have some other questions or clarifications, and then the State usually goes and will usually say "Had this case gone to trial, it would be proven beyond a reasonable doubt that Nick Rekieta did......blah blah blah"

After that the Court will accept his plea and find him guilty. They'll set a sentencing date and Nick will be ordered to comply with the Presentence Investigation from the probation department. Bond may or may not get modified at this point.

I really can't even speculate since Nick is just a lying liar who lies. It could be completely made up, bogus nonsense.

He's also massively retarded and doesn't have experience at this.

If I had to guess, the judge didn't have time for it after all the gay horsetrading that Nick was trying to do. Wentzell wasn't going to gum up the rest of his day just for Balldo.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

If I had to guess, the judge didn't have time for it after all the gay horsetrading that Nick was trying to do. Wentzell wasn't going to gum up the rest of his day just for Balldo.

Man, Nick should have listened to you 9 months ago and just followed every step of your advice.
All he achieved since then is burn every bridge with non-retarded lawyers and people he described as his friends.
On the other hand I am glad we have you here lawsplaining the interwebs for us Kiwitards.

 

[Thomas Talus]

Then the court will then get to Nick's allocution. He's going to have to admit to whatever it is he's entering a plea to. Most judges will do "The indictment says on X day your did Y......Tell me, what happened" Nick doesn't have to get too in depth. Merely saying "I knowingly possessed a bunch of cocaine exceeding 25 grams" would be enough.

Out here they usually just ask the attorney for the defendant whether there is a factual basis for the claims.

 

[thebigdream]

Whether you're sober (not just illegal drugs but anything prescriptions that can affect your judgement)

Ah I found exactly where the negotiations broke down then.

What do you mean by *hic* sober?

 

[AltisticRight]

@House Cat and @AltisticRight , how does his explanation of the metabolites and testing methods and error compare to reality?

I need to stop being lazy and finish that "effortpost". Maybe later in the week.
Long story short there is no error unless there was a catastrophic event, like the machine malfunctioning or the operator malfunctioning (i.e. did something monumentally retarded).
Loading ELISAs (hehe) into a GC-MS is easier than printing a few documents from court terminals. It's nowadays 100% automated. The machine reads the datamatrix, loads the results into the correct profile, and generates the entire report.
Skelly doesn't understand a thing which is fine, but he's pretending to be some kind of expert after reading 40 free abstracts he cannot understand. This retard bitched about how hard entry level mathematics was in college (hint: it's not, it's barely harder than Year 12 stuff), he should shut the fuck up about fields he clearly doesn't understand. He doesn't even understand his own "field" -- law. He doesn't understand what went up his nose. He is a worthless retarded faggot that only got popular and wealthy because a dozen stars aligned to form the shape of a balldo.

 

[Dumpster dived waifu]

Skelly doesn't understand a thing which is fine, but he's pretending to be some kind of expert after reading 40 free abstracts he cannot understand

Bold of you to assume the junkie didn't just ask ChatGPT like a fucking retard.

 

[AltisticRight]

Bold of you to assume the junkie didn't just ask ChatGPT like a fucking retard.

ChatGPT does retard stuff but even that bot wouldn't be retarded enough to claim "metabolises outside of the human body".
It's just skelly's fantasies.

 

[Melty Butter]

I don't know where to crosspost anymore. Melton's thread? Aarons?

Anyway, here's my silly post from the Rekieta thread about the County Attorneys in Kandiyohi and Stearns who might both be prosecuting Nick.

Oooh, I'll bite. Who can resist a possible DA ("County Attorney" in this case) slapfight to get Rekieta?

In one corner: SHANE BAKER, a veteran fighter who has served in the role since 2013.