US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Trump just pardoned our disgraced beloved Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich.
a weird part of the celebrity apprentice contracts was a "get out of jail free card" trump gave every celebrity that appeared on the show, i guess Rod finally decided to use his.
If I had to guess Roberts is talking to these judges or others behind the scenes because he does not want to take these cases (I mean they don't have anything besides "because I said so" in most of rulings its laughable) because if he has to take them he knows Trump will just get free wins.
one of the best things to come out of the abortion issue was that the leak forced Roberts hand, he was 100% trying to pull another "compromise" like he does with every other fucking issue.
 
No, even Wikipedia acknowledges that it's a rumor. This is just part of the globohomo trend of "every unmarried person from the past was queer and would support LGBTQFJQOJA rights today."

View attachment 6968852
It's the new "every person who's not 100% typical for his time has autism."
 
Roberts doesn't want to be ruling on cases about executive power for the rest of his time as Chief Justice so I would expect a wide ruling. If he passes something narrow he will be doing them every week for the rest of his life.
Strictly speaking there is also a standing issue here that could cause this to be punted. By what right does the State of New York have standing to sue over how the US President conducts administration of the US Treasury? Their hook is New York residents are in the treasury database, but that is a thin reed all things considered. The easiest solution for SCOTUS is to not provide one at all. Just say that bitch Letitia James does not have standing to sue since she's not a member of the Federal Government.
 
No, even Wikipedia acknowledges that it's a rumor. This is just part of the globohomo trend of "every unmarried person from the past was queer and would support LGBTQFJQOJA rights today."

View attachment 6968852
Re: to this, I checked Wikipedia's references and it's this NPS page, that's unreferenced.

1739247698072.png

Link Archive

Trump needs to scrub through these other government pages that have woke shit like this.
 
At the risk of sounding 🧩 there's been a push in recent years to make everything ugly and sterile, and I believe it's on purpose. It's to demoralize people.
Oh absolutely. I could go into a schizo-rant about this but let’s just say that there’s a concerted effort to make everything ugly. From art, to music, to architecture, to entertainment. Ever wonder why modern cities are designed the way they are? Do you know why Rome was designed to be grandiose and awe-inspiring? Compare those buildings to today. The short of it is that every aspect of life is designed to create a depressed population, and a depressed population is easier to control.

Also I’ll just drop this here.
IMG_3012.jpeg
Corporate Memphis.
 
Don't get too excited
its neat to know the GOP only gets 3 fun weeks every 4 years if they win the presidency
Can we name Fort Lee after the Lee that lead the Americans during the battle of Castle Itter?
there's a guy named Robert E Lee that did a lot of USO shows, i say we honor those people by naming all the Fort Lee stuff after him.
Baron Von Steuben was gay?
thats what they charged him with when he fled his home country to come to the US. plus if he wasn't a fruit why would he have had to flee his home country?
 
I was talking more about Alegria and movements like Brutalism to a lesser extent. Bauhaus does exist but now things like it are everywhere.
The entire 20th century was filled with psyops trying to convince you to embrace the death of beauty. It's true that they've won because it seems that all resistance died with 9/11. It's part of why everybody complains about 2000s fashion and how awful aesthetics have been in the 21st century.
 
Wikipedia desperately wants it to be true, but there is no evidence for it beyond the fact that the man was literally married to the Army and never married an actual woman.
People will call Mattis gay in the future as well because he's never married. When in reality it's autism solely dedicated to perfecting warfare. Many such cases in history. Also, it's hard to have a marriage when you're in the military so dedicated to your career. Some Men don't want to put someone through that.
 
Last edited:
I don't think the death of beauty is the aim, or on purpose. I believe it occurred because 'we' lack the skills to make beauty and aesthetically pleasing products.

It's why everything is straight lines, bland and simplistic. The people making the media are incompetent, they're just lucky that enough retards exist to be happy with whatever jangly-keys level of slop they get fed.

However, this would make a good topic for a deep thought thread and one where we could view some beautiful artwork.
 
The most important thing in choosing a piece of art is that you buy art that you like, that makes you feel happy. People who buy art just because other people say it's cool or valuable help promote shitty artworks like the Piss Jesus and Banana Taped to A Wall. That's why I'm not quoting anybody's particular posts about Thomas Kinkade; if you like him, good for you, buy his stuff and be happy; go with God.

But Thomas Kinkade does not make me happy. Thomas Kinkade is a hack. I strongly dislike him, for a number of reasons. Once you've seen it, you can't unsee it.

My first reason for disliking Kinkade is his work itself. If I stand and look at ANY of Thomas Kinkade's works, including and especially any work that is generally popular and has sold thousands and thousands of copies, I will spot a continuity error every single time. The most common error I see is a lack of a shadow where there should be a shadow. The second error is an inconsistency in light source, which is epidemic in his work. His "cozy cabins" always look like they're on fire to me, because the light is coming from everywhere at once, and that's just not the way that light works. I could go on about this for a week, so I won't.

My other issue with Kinkade is his business practices. Kinkade hires college art graduates and sets them to cranking out Kinkades like a bitch cranks out puppies. Kinkade himself shows up once a month or so, puts the last few brush strokes on the canvases, and BAM! Signed Kinkade, $1,000 please. You could say, "At least the artists have a job," but working for Kinkade seems to burn out any talent or inspiration that these young artists ever had. I've known at keast 2 ex-Kinkades, and none of them are still artists after working for him. Kinkade even sold prints on QVC to lonely grandmas who couldn't resist that house-on-fire look. Kinkade has whored himself out further by now creating branded Disney, Marvel, and Harry Potter artworks. Atrocious. He's not even pretending to be an artist any more, he's just going for the money now. Thomas Kinkade's real talent isn't painting, it's in the monetization of his work where he's shown his true genius.

If you want to talk about a True and Honest American Artist who didn't specialize in crucifixes floating in a fishbowl full of piss, look no further than Bob Ross. Sure, Bob Ross had happy accidents and cranked out paintings pretty fast, but at least he was the one who painted them. Bob Ross made very little money for his paintings and getting a hold of one is not easy because of the war between his former business partners and his heirs, but someday, someday, I hope to see his work get half the attention that grifter Thomas Kinkade has.
 
Back