- Joined
- Aug 17, 2018
Rockstar Games has their own official Discord channel for GTA Online, GTA 6, Red Online and other R* titles. As expected, it's a shitstorm.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIBERTYCITYHARDCORELIBERTYCITYHARDCORELIBERTYCITYHARDCORE! FUCK! YOU!GTA 3 has the best radio stations.
Always the Bostonians...
Its so much better than the wall of trash that was the IV soundtrack. VC and SA were still the best, though.the radio in GTAV is pretty shit aside from radio ga ga, roundabout and in the wake of poseidon
Naming the shittiest songs of Queen and Yes, lol.the radio in GTAV is pretty shit aside from radio ga ga, roundabout and in the wake of poseidon
The Xbox and PSP allowed for players to create their own radio stations with their console's respective media player features. The Xbox 360 did allow you to play your own music too in the background, but it wasn't an official feature.But i'll be forever grateful that the PC Master Race gets their own Radio station, while console peasants literally have to listen to the same 10 good songs over and over like morons, lol.
The Episodes From Liberty City stations are pretty great too.LIBERTYCITYHARDCORELIBERTYCITYHARDCORELIBERTYCITYHARDCORE! FUCK! YOU!
Vice City had some banger 80s Metal, too.
I don't hate GTA IV's soundtrack, the music taste for the base game felt weaker than its predecessors. Vladivostok FM, The Journey, and The Vibe 98.8 were my go-to radios. Eastern European rap music, trance music, 00s R&B helped diversify the urban jungle that Liberty City was fostered on not unlike NYC.Its so much better than the wall of trash that was the IV soundtrack.
I thought somebody has upscaled the original video to modern resolutions at the least.The video above is only available in 360p quality and no other higher quality version of it seems to exist. You'd think after 20 years SA fans would attempt to recreate the movie with the tools they have now, but AFAIK no attempt has been made yet.
They won't do that anymore. They're like Nintendo in that regard where they don't want the public to know a damn thing other than how to open up their wallet and they view them so lowly as to not feel that they deserve to see what goes into the slop they buy. It's the same reason why both of them are so cucked when it comes to mods and reverse engineering projects.Admittedly I would like it if Rockstar provided something resembling a peek behind the curtain of what goes on in development.
How they will navigate turning off GTA Online while pushing people to buy GTA6 and not playing GTAO, will be fun to see.Strauss Zelnick says that "[their company] has shown a willingness to support legacy titles," which he is alluding to GTA Online's lifespan after GTA 6 releases this year. Well, of course they'd still have to support GTA Online since it's their lucrative cash cow to date. I'm still calling bullshit on that claim since R* abandoned Red Dead Online while still supporting GTA Online, an older title I may add, with major content updates.
It's understandable though. Red Dead just made no money from microtransactions. First it was way too easy to get gold, via the day objectives and the streak, where you had to do objectives for 30 days and then you got the maximum gold (3 gold per objectives i think?) forever and ever. When Rockstar nerfed it to hell (.2 gold per objective, .5 after 2 weeks, total reset after 30 days so you're back at .2) that came way too late, the damage, so to speak, was already done and there just wasn't anything to buy. How many horses do you need? It's not as attractive as a car collection with different car classes. not a lot of weapons either and they never got around to houses you could buy. It's actually hilarious that considering how insanely greedy Take2 is and that they are the grand masters of milking a player base to oblivion (see NBA 2K which is a hundred times worse than GTA Online) they completely screwed up with RDO.Strauss Zelnick says that "[their company] has shown a willingness to support legacy titles," which he is alluding to GTA Online's lifespan after GTA 6 releases this year. Well, of course they'd still have to support GTA Online since it's their lucrative cash cow to date. I'm still calling bullshit on that claim since R* abandoned Red Dead Online while still supporting GTA Online, an older title I may add, with major content updates.
Can you explain that logic? If they bought stuff from GTAO, R* has already got their money. Maybe newer players may be hesitant to buy stuff for an older game.Every player who chooses GTA6 over GTAO is lost revenue over a time frame.
I would prefer if GTA6's online world would be barebones, as GTA Online turned into an open world quasi-military, futuristic anarchy state. That's actually why I liked RDO for its simpler setting despite its unforgiving blind learning curve.It literally was just a bare bones GTA Online set in the "wild west" without featuring any actual wild west stuff outside of the bounties, because dragging dead animals around so the drunk asshole at your shitty homeless camp can produce something just isn't fun.