Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 17.7%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 94 26.5%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 57 16.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 137 38.6%

  • Total voters
    355
Yes, defamation causing a loss of income (Nick's) due to reputational damage. Nick and Kayla (and even April) could also argue some version of pain and suffering because of Aarons's public disclosures.


The point might be to bankrupt Aaron with legal fees.


April and Kayla can either deny the polycule, and later thruple, or say that it was meant to be confidential. The case law on this might be interesting considering that Nick admitted to April being his "girlfriend" and all the public cum-eating disclosures after Aaron spilled all of the salacious details.

One interesting issue: Nick's eldest will be 18 years old in November. What does he know? And what did the kids say to CPS or their grandparents?

The face-licking of Aaron and the hot tub video would be the most obvious pre-salacious disclosures that would make the case challenging and funny. Also hilarious is that we're back to the anti-SLAPP issues that occurred in the Monty case (MN is anti-SLAPP but it's very narrowly defined IIRC).

Anyway, I would argue that Nick has a case. Kayla has an HRO against Aaron and the polycule was called a Qover in an obvious "agreement" among the four to keep it under cover. Is that considered a contract, lol?
To be honest, I hope there is a trial and it doesn't settle out of court. We were cheated of our lolcows showdown in the criminal one, We're owed this
 
What exactly would Nick sue Aaron for that would actually win him anything in court?
He's likely not going to win any battle in court but if you think about it, he gets to win the war. You need to lose a few battles to win the war.

He is a self-admitted exhibitionist. He gets to satiate his wicked exhibitionist humiliation fetish by gracing himself in front of a jury that would be viewing the slatternly photos he and his wife produced. Many of them were disseminated among their sick LOCALS cult. This likely turns him on. He gets to humiliate his wife, the mother of his children, which allows him to relive the cuckold experience he had at Hedonism II, and when the Qover didn't implode.

Remember Skelly being a peeping tom as Aaron was pounding the living Hell out of his wife which squeezed every essence out like a high end made in Italy pasta machine does to dough? He'll enjoy his ex-lover's presence in the court and revel in the loud moaning he no doubt spanked to by the doorknob.

Furthermore, he gets to giggle smugly while eating a single Dorito as Aaron Imholte's thread furthers the retarded debate of "you're either against him or you're sweeping". That'll teach those Scandinavian incel prudes of the annoying bird forum. SUFFAH. Whether Aaron wins or loses, there's going to be Reddit tier infighting over there. It's a win-win for nitrous Nick.

If there's any similarities between the two scorned lovers, it's that nobody ruins their lives better than the consequences of their own retarded actions. They're a match made in Hell. One dabbles in being a coach while the other dabbles in being a lawyer. And they sucked each other's penises because they're homosexuals.

And lol
6979828-94ba8f84fe97bd36d7a90737f55ca902.webp
Careful skelly, a morbidly obese ragepig that's barely taller than your washing machine is eyeing at your slampig.
 
Last edited:
Am I misremembering things or did Kayla say (I believe during her first appearance on Nick’s show, where she cried) that she wanted her kids to get high at home, with her, when they were ready to experiment with drugs?
Is this just the apotheosis of my dad giving me a beer before I went to college so I wouldn't be "winging it" when I got to my first party?

I don't remember this, but the Rekietas are so off their collective nut, that I wouldn't be surprised. Though I doubt it was something like, "I hope to do cocaine with my kids one day", low as my opinion of them is, I doubt she'd be that depraved, and that transparently.
 
I wonder if Rekieta's kids ever ask either parent, "How did Aaron get a naked photo of mom?"
They don’t have to ask: They’ve all had unrestricted internet access since they were able to hold an iPad. Anything they miss, the oldest’s classmates make damn sure he’s informed about in excruciating detail.
 
So... another week without any work but superchatting fat homosexual pedophiles?
It IS TO a real job, you nerd!
Nick should sue himself for lost income since his awful behavior keeps him from working.
Careful skelly, a morbidly obese ragepig that's barely taller than your washing machine is eyeing at your slampig.
Xander and Rozie can get another half-sibling in the Ralpha-clan. Xannie-Marie Ralph-Imholte.
Imagine Nick getting into a "fistfight" with Ralph, holy shit.
 
He wasn't even able to deal with a washing machine that's a tad shorter and a lot lighter than the ragepig. He might be one of the only men piggytits can beat up with ease.
I imagine Nick's delicate effete back-hand slaps would bounce harmlessly off

:gunt: The Gunt:gunt:

And Nick would have to bend down to reach Ralph which would put his back out, leading to a tasty pain prescription or four. Ralph could also distract Nick with his third tit, driving Nick into a jealous rage since his ruined wife only has two.
 
Am I misremembering things or did Kayla say (I believe during her first appearance on Nick’s show, where she cried) that she wanted her kids to get high at home, with her, when they were ready to experiment with drugs?
This is on the remarkably comprehensive Kayla Rekieta OP :
During a stream in late October 2022 even more things were revealed, including:
  • Kayla loves weed, and doesn’t think her children should do it until their brains are finished developing (it’s okay for Kayla because she’s almost 40 and doesn’t need her brain). When they are ready (age 21) Nick and Kayla want to do drugs with their kids.
I, too, recall something closer to what you remember but I thought Nick said it.
...
Separately...while I was on Kayla's OP, I noticed this which is interesting wrt the defamation case that Nick may be filing against Aaron:
Kayla sent the following message to Aaron, which he took as a threat:

When the Qover [section missing] we all promised that if it dissolved we wouldnt go after each other online. We all have things to lose. What if it gets back to Ashley that you enjoyed molly quite often and had a relationship outside your marriage with someone you brought around the kids? You are not invincible.”
This sounds a LOT more like Nick than Kayla and, yes, it reads as a threat.
 
This is on the remarkably comprehensive Kayla Rekieta OP :
It's gone from "We don't do drugs" to "we tried drugs once on vacation, never in the house" to "we did drugs in the house, but never around the kids" to "we'd love to try drugs with our kids when they're old enough"

Soon it'll be "we gave our kids cocaine and that's a good thing!"
 
A civil case would be around damages suffered by Kayla as a result of Aaron's actions. Presumably reputational or emotional damages suffered as a result of the "revenge porn" incident.
What damages? She was a zombified, pilled out useless lunatic before whatever happened, she's still exactly that, a worthless lump.
 
If so, he's right that his lawyer was incompetent, because only an incompetent would file fagbabble that Nick wrote.
If what Geno said in true and Nick was directing Kayla's lawyer, then there is much bigger faggotry at work. She was supposed to stand for her client, which was Kayla, not post Nick's autistic arguments and fight the gubernment.

Really questionable that she would risk her clients liberty by going along with the bullshit Nick has been pulling.
 
Am I misremembering things or did Kayla say (I believe during her first appearance on Nick’s show, where she cried) that she wanted her kids to get high at home, with her, when they were ready to experiment with drugs?

You are correct. It was in late October 2022 on a stream with Legal Vices (Jeff), Potentially Criminal (Sean), and Divinity Said a couple months after Hedonism II.

Kayla was gushing over Divinity taking a hit on her bong after one of Nick's toasts. Kayla wanted to get high with her kids. She initially put the age at 18, but then shifted to whenever they were mature enough mentally. Nick expressed wanting to do things with his sons involving whisky at age 21, fantasizing that they would ask Nick to teach them "what's good about it". The panel are all smiles about this.

The theme was wanting to share "firsts" in the form of vices with one's offspring. Given that this was during a time when Nick started getting heavily into drugs (notably cocaine use) and his favorite child later tested overwhelmingly positive for exposure to cocaine at eight years old, it all makes a sad kind of sense that things have gotten so bad given Nick and Kayla's warped values.

Nick wanted to share his life with his kids. Unfortunately for them, Nick's life was wrapped up in degenerate sex and cocaine use. It honestly makes his stance on "destigmatizing the bedroom" between parent and child that much more suspect (he has notably spoken about this in relation to his parents as well as his own children).

 
What damages? She was a zombified, pilled out useless lunatic before whatever happened, she's still exactly that, a worthless lump.
I'm sure the swinging whore who showed her ass multiple times in group chats was traumatized by a nude she sent was shown to 1 other person and then never leaked

This is 100% Greer style lawfare if it happens
 
She initially put the age at 18, but then shifted to whenever they were mature enough mentally.
How long do you think before they go from "giving drugs to children that are mature enough" to "sex with children is ok if they are mature enough"?

Really concerning opinions for parents.
 
Back