Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.8%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 55 12.1%
  • This Year

    Votes: 72 15.9%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 152 33.5%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 108 23.8%

  • Total voters
    454
Aww, look how optimistic the Judge came across in that transcript. Look at him throwing around words such as 'discovery' and 'timely' like rice at a wedding. He even let Russell have a mini plight sperg. Truly heartwarming.

And now, three months on, I can only imagine his heart dropping through his boots whenever
Greer v A Website pops up on his monitor.
 
There's a lot of people who have actually never really been to their local court house and wouldnt know...and most who have just go straight to wherever you get whatever permit/pay traffic ticket and leave, so I'm not surprised if even people following this thread dont know what you're talking about because they've never observed a live trial or walked around outside their courthouse to see it.

View attachment 7004297
You have to go to the court yard to find it typically.
we don't have those at our local courthouses since they're all either new construction or updated construction.
View attachment 7004701
What does that even mean?
"Defendants didn't honor their meet and confer"
"A meet and Confer was held"
Seems like they met but didn't confer anything, greer plightsperged about the Hardin's motion and no discovery talk took place.
The sheer amount of retardation The Hardship is having to go through to get ONE SINGLE PAGE of discovery is mind-boggling to me. I fear you are right that the actual central issue can never be decided at this rate until 2029. We are gonna have to do about three more sets of fundraising just to get there.

I know right? It sucks how this fucking lolsuit is setting precedents on fair use. it sucks SCOTUS didn't take up the issue about posting the takedown notice and laughing at it. That should be a first amendment 3point swish.
 
as Greer puts it, "forthvoming"
That's how he says it. He's just spelling by sounding-out.

how do actual attorneys, ones that aren't schizoposting from their phone out of a rented uber, keep track of such a clusterfuck of a case?
Organizational skills and cognitive capacity. It's a scarce set of abilities, and that's why the market will let them charge so much for an hour's work. Normal people can't do what good lawyers do.
 
I wonder how Hardin manages to reference specific bullet points from ECFs that were added to the docket years ago without photographic memory.
The docket can be viewed online, you know. You can also download the pleadings to your computer to refer back to. A bit of 'tism and the ability to write semi-coherently are all you really need, and there are examples of the Most Minimally Competent among us that challenge the latter on a regular basis.
 
Re: the scheduling conference transcript

9hzd3p8kjkp91.jpeg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's worth asking now: What, exactly, does Greer think he can move for sanctions on against Hardin now? Previously (last month), he was harping on the "violation" of the SPO:
I suspect three points in his forthvoming nonsense:
1) That Hardin violated the 'spirit' of the SPO, taking advantage of Schrödinger's retard who is somehow at once a master paralegal (smart enough to intervene in cases he is not a party to) and yet also can't be expected to fucking read the basics of how to lawsuit 101
2) That Hardin is filing frivolous motions to try and bury aforementioned retard in paperwork (while, again Russ still has time to fuck around in legal matters that have nothing to do with him) and,
3) as said above, that Hardin somehow refuses to settle the lawsuit on the super very totally fair grounds that Greer dictates.

Of these, #2 is the only one that even makes sense as a concept, but it's still not going to work as the court is actually sanctioning Greer. No one is going to get dinged for WINNING motions for a client.
 
2) That Hardin is filing frivolous motions to try and bury aforementioned retard in paperwork (while, again Russ still has time to fuck around in legal matters that have nothing to do with him) and,
Of these, #2 is the only one that even makes sense as a concept, but it's still not going to work as the court is actually sanctioning Greer. No one is going to get dinged for WINNING motions for a client.

I agree he will very likely try this approach, but all Hardin has to do is remind the court that Greer is the PLAINTIFF, that HE is the one who brought this action, and that HE has been dragging it out for years while repeatedly lying and disrespecting the court and the process. The defendant has every right to defend himself. If you don't like the rules of order and civil procedure, maybe don't sue people.
 
All Hardin has to do to avoid Greers brilliant play is to Vome to the table and give Greer what he want! Vome on, it's not that complicated. Greer won't Vome to Hardin, not until Hardin shows he's a neutral party in this dispute.
1740088082412.png
Just delete the thread, and there will be an end to the retard filings
 
I agree he will very likely try this approach, but all Hardin has to do is remind the court that Greer is the PLAINTIFF, that HE is the one who brought this action, and that HE has been dragging it out for years while repeatedly lying and disrespecting the court and the process.
It's probably forthcoming, but I'm waiting for Hardin to file a detailed list of every court case Russ has been involved in, cross-referenced against the few Russ sent in his "litigation history document" on Jan 14th. It'll show the discrepancies between what Russ willingly discloses, and what the Defense was forced to discover on their own. I'm sure that'll be worth another sanction, once the production timeline completely runs out.
 
I was half-joking when I speculated that Greer would do something completely retarded like attach one of the emails he marked as protected as an exhibit, and yet here we are. I'm sure Hardin's latest notice filed earlier today will provoke further sperging from Greer. I look forward to him telling the judge that he was too busy filing complaints against Hardin with the Virginia bar to submit the five pages due this coming voming Monday. This is the lolsuit that keeps on giving.
 
you know this also will include any & all youtube video also.

Which, of course, will be Joshy's fault because he allowed a link/embed on the site and Greer has a STRONG suspicion that the YT account is owned by a farmer, so it's the Farms' problem. Josh could just have taken it down or un-masked the account posting through link, but he didn't want to be reasonable with Russ.
 
Back