Fucking hell. No, it most definitely does have a specific doctrine. FFS. Mussolini wrote it out in simple to understand words.
Fascism is a form of government where the apparatus of the state/local governments, civil organizations, corporations, etc, are all bound together with the common goal of advancing the interests of a party (not political, but a group.) In the Italian Fascist school, all these groups were working to advance The State (Of Italy in this case), while the German/North European Fascism instead was advocating for a concept of
Der Volk, the ethno-nationalist cultural group of its citizens.
In either case, a strong economy through alignment of all its parts was core, either to make The State powerful and wealthy, or its ethnocultural group. Either system was also prone to authoritarianism, which is a component or character of a government system (not a system unto itself), but the Italian school especially since The State was primary and its citizens expected to sacrifice their lives and freedoms (slavery, essentially) for Italy, whereas the Northern European could be considered less so since a greater degree of individual liberty was integral to preserving the character of
Der Volk.
None of that matters when the federal employees union itself is ruled unconstitutional. There's a non-zero chance one of the stupid lawsuits they've already filed could result in that.
Call it 4D chess or just blind arrogance, but a host of unconstitutional shit might get axed from this reflexive contrary campaign of lawsuits. There is a
a lot of things that have been going on for decades just because nobody has had the stones to say no. When everybody is in on the grift, nobody calls out obvious bullshit, right? Now, Trump is, and because the Depp State has gotten used to these false systems (they grew up with them) now they go running to judges expecting the bullshit to be upheld.
Like, for example, the bullshit with Hampton Dellinger, who is the head of the "
Office of Special Counsel" which
Congress created as an
'Independent Agency' empowered with
'executive powers to investigate and prosecute' but is simultaneously 'outside the Chief Executive (President)'s control.' Now, reading that sentence should already be tripping your bullshit alarms, because the Constitution only defines three branches of government, there is no fourth 'independent' branch. It is impossible under the Constitution for Congress to A) define a fourth branch of government and B) Usurp the power of the Executive to prosecute.
Now, according to Congress and their un-Constitutional 'law' establishing the OSC, Dellinger was to have 5 years (Trump's entire term) running a ~150 person agency empowered to investigate
Federal Fraud. The implications of having Biden's handpicked hatchet man running an
investigation/prosecution agency within Trump'a administration being obvious, Dellinger was promptly fired. Dellinger then sued, and a DC commie judge entered a TRO to
force Trump to reinstate Dellinger and recognize his authority.
Obviously a
District Trial Court telling the
Chief Executive how to run the executive branch is a problem. It is prima facie un-Constitutional, there is Supreme Court precedence regarding this, and the fig leaf of 'well Congress said he can only be fired for cause!' is like a screen door on a submarine because
Congress has no authority to infringe on the Executive either. The judge
should have given Dellinger a big cash reward for back pay and hurt fee-fees, but was instead so focused on Orange Man Bad that they instead entered an insane order commanding Trump to restore Dellinger to office, recognize his authority as Special Counsel, and barring Trump from firing Dellinger
even for cause.
Now that they scored that temporary 'win' Dellinger and the Judge can't back down, and the DC appeal Court has just as bad a case of TDS, so its not going to stop there. This will go to the Supreme Court, who are already pissed off about it and have been signally desperately for the lower courts to stop this bullshit. The lower courts, however, will not stop and they will force the issue to the bitter end.
That end will probably involve the entire end of not just Dellinger, but the entire idea of an
Independent Agency because, as I explained, every government group
must go under the umbrella of one of the three branches and be answerable to that branch. That means that several very large, very powerful groups in DC will be in deep peril and subject to complete razing or wholesale dissolution. Agencies like:
- The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)
- The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB)
- The Election Assistance Commission (EAC)
- The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
- The Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
- The Federal Election Commission (FEC)
- The Federal Reserve System
- The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)
- The Office of Special Counsel (OSC)
- The United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
I know, please don't start weeping at the thought that all these agencies would be dissolved! The parts that aren't treasonous might be salvaged! Its a needle in a haystack, but we can certainly try to save some diamonds in the rough.
