US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Got a good translation?
I'm also not a Classical Chinese scholar! But what I have noticed is that the original texts I have looked at tend to be very terse, sometimes with rhythms or symmetries in the characters that don't translate well to English sentence structures. So some translations focus on capturing the poetic aspects (but still don't really succeed).

The other issue is that because there's a lot of explanatory detail missing, you have to choose one of many possible interpretations to translate, which means the reader often gets the translator's take instead of the (presumably intentional!) ambiguity of the original.

So my take is that there aren't any, but I couldn't do better.
 
Territory first. They only get statehood until all lefties are purged and drafted to Ukraine.
What are the pros and cons of being a territory vs a state? Wouldn't being a territory be better in the short term as it allows more independence on some things?
 
I wonder how many fast food workers will develop health issues from breathing in the vapors of frying oils. Its been coming out that people have developed lung issues from breathing in fumes from the butter they put in popcorn at the movies
What are the pros and cons of being a territory vs a state? Wouldn't being a territory be better in the short term as it allows more independence on some things?
After the way the Leaf Fags have treated us, they need to be kept on a short leash. Plus if given statehood and a chance to vote, we'll be importing their voting habits/consequences that we see today right into our elections.
 
Last edited:
Double posting because i can't add this on mobile. sorry everyone.



might as well fold that into the Real ID.
Honestly they should, then they can use our passport number instead of our SSN for everything. Or just give us all a national id number like other nations have.
Hence the solution... Tarrifs!
You could tarrif the Chinese light bulbs until they are uncompetitive with US manufactured ones.
Or you could collect tarrifs and use those funds to build highly automated and efficient US factories that are lower price and better quality than the Chinese slop.
Tarrifs don't always work because countries will just build the product 99% in one place, and then 1% in a country that isn't getting tarrifs. you need legislation to combat this but that requires Congress to actually do something.




Blocking China and Chinese nationals from owning US land is something Trump has said he might fix. I hope he does.
I agree but it should be all foreigners. If you don't have at least a green card you can't buy.



Trump keeps talking about reciprocal and fair deals. The MAGA political party will hopefully continue that line of logic.

a) Monopolies are either "natural" or "unnatural". Natural require government caretaking (state ownership, or heavily regulated). Unnatural I would prefer not exist. Unnatural exist from criminal collusion or artificial barriers (like regulatory capture).
If the feds actually cared they would have broken up google, apple and Microsoft long ago. The banks too but that's a different story.



b) Agree. I would go further.

c) Tariffs fix corporations shipping jobs and factories overseas.
It can or it could force manufacturers to other nations.


Enforcing existing illegal labor laws fixes domestic.
We need to go after the corporations and people who hire illegals. It should be a major crime to knowingly hire illegals.


Trusting Soviet era propaganda, sure.

China’s first tech accomplishment was The Great Firewall, preventing its internal citizens from interacting with the rest of the world. I’ll trust leaked video from China more than a state funded “influencer”
I'm just saying to be critical of them too. For example China is attempting to stop corruption but it's because internally the CCP fears it can lead to greater unrest. Does that mean corruption is stamped out? Fuck no, it just means lower level corruption is less common. So cops will stop directly asking you for cash bribes but if you want to get some project done you still need to "grease some wheels." The CCP lives and dies on the message that only they can make china the middle kingdom again. And only they will uplift everyone (as opposed to those dirty capitalists who only uplift the rich etc etc). As such the CCP has to ensure that at least on paper to the average Chinese citizen things are getting better. China is too large and has too many people to force a North Korea style government on everyone but they can placate their people with flashy toys and simple life upgrades. The issue is that the system is extremely delicate, like China*badum tish*. So any upset has the possibility of collapsing it.


When China established it's Zero covid policy it was so restrictive that protests broke out, and if you're an authoritarian state those protests can easily snowball. So it's best to prevent protests as much as possible and you do that by controlling information and preventing large scale dessent from forming.
 
I will say that I'm worried about Trump's plan to start taxing American food exports in April.

I understand why he wants to do this, he wants to make exporting food less economic than selling it to Americans for cheaper, but I don't think this is going to end well, I'm afraid it's going to cause out agriculture sector to start suffering mass bankruptcies. Domestic food prices would fall which is great for most Americans but I'm worried about our long term farming sector.

The only way that works is if you increase benefits and subsidies for American farmers so that they can survive being forced to sell to a less profitable market.
 
I will say that I'm worried about Trump's plan to start taxing American food exports in April.

I understand why he wants to do this, he wants to make exporting food less economic than selling it to Americans for cheaper, but I don't think this is going to end well, I'm afraid it's going to cause out agriculture sector to start suffering mass bankruptcies. Domestic food prices would fall which is great for most Americans but I'm worried about our long term farming sector.

The only way that works is if you increase benefits and subsidies for American farmers so that they can survive being forced to sell to a less profitable market.
Maybe American farmers should grow shit other than corn?
 
I will say that I'm worried about Trump's plan to start taxing American food exports in April.

I understand why he wants to do this, he wants to make exporting food less economic than selling it to Americans for cheaper, but I don't think this is going to end well, I'm afraid it's going to cause out agriculture sector to start suffering mass bankruptcies. Domestic food prices would fall which is great for most Americans but I'm worried about our long term farming sector.

The only way that works is if you increase benefits and subsidies for American farmers so that they can survive being forced to sell to a less profitable market.
I don't see any problem with it. Let the farms starve and we starve out all the wonderful farmland that China and Gates bought.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheGuntinator
What are the pros and cons of being a territory vs a state? Wouldn't being a territory be better in the short term as it allows more independence on some things?
States get voting representatives in Congress and electoral votes that count for choosing the President, territories do not. Everything else is irrelevant.
 
Found some nice Facebook cringe. Whoever probably got it off Reddit.
I believe the 114 billion number comes from independent research from Mensa which claims to be non-partisan or affiliated with any political organization (although that doesn't necessarily mean the researchers weren't biased). From what I gathered with my cursory glance through the text was that they were specifically debunking Trump's dollar amount claims regarding US aid to Ukraine. I saw the info posted up on facebook by a liberal associate, saved it and forgot about it.
 
Back