Cultcow Russell Greer / Mr. Green / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

[YouTube Autist]

I wonder if we'll ever hear tell of this again.

Have you considered writing a song and then suing?

That only works if you're disabled.

 

[RustyNail(her)]

At every job we know of where this dude has been employed, he's sexually harassed women. That's from people who were actually at those jobs, including the guy who took a picture of his paralegal degree, thus proving he was actually in the same building.

He's had other jobs we don't know much about, but I assume he's just as much of a sex creep there and at least some of his firings were because of it. It would probably open up any business to liability NOT to fire this creep once he did that, because that would constitute allowing a "hostile workplace environment" to allow a sex pest to creep at will.

I think it was mentioned once he got caught using company log-ins to look up information on people. I don't think it was ever explained in detail, just that he was fired for accessing information that was irrelevant to what he was working on.

That honestly might have been the job with the Utah AG that got him that badge he was so proud of wearing.

 

[StinkySnack]

I think it was mentioned once he got caught using company log-ins to look up information on people. I don't think it was ever explained in detail, just that he was fired for accessing information that was irrelevant to what he was working on.

That honestly might have been the job with the Utah AG that got him that badge he was so proud of wearing.

Jesus fucking Christ, why does this shit keep getting repeated over and over and over after it's been corrected so many times? I genuinely don't get it?

AGAIN: During his firing from one of the law firms he worked at, he claimed that his employer told him they were worried he MIGHT use their systems to mishandle client information,

THAT'S IT. He was never *caught* doing anything.

But that snippet does not at all suggest he was fired for using firm resources to stalk. It's fairly clear that the firm discovered Russ's frivolous lawsuits post-hiring, and used the "might mishandle client information" as an easy way to fire him. Mishandling client information has nothing to do with using a database to look up non-client random/celebrity women's personal information. It's been repeated over and over on this forum that "RUSS WAS DEFFO FIRED BECAUSE HE USED THE LAWFIRMS DATABASE TO STALK WOMEN!" when there is zero evidence to support that.

edit: spelling

People make up elaborate stories for cartoon characters, it's only natural they do it for lolcows as well.

Not sure if we ever determined he did, but he was let go from a law firm because he was suing Taylor Swift, and they were concerned he would use company resources to further his idiocy. Had he done so, the firm he worked for could have been sued, so they were right to let him go.

No. We have no evidence he ever did such a thing. @Constellationzero is confused. He was fired by a law firm in the past, and one of the reasons they gave him was that they were worried he may use company resources to track down Taylor Swift or other women.

 

[obsdj]

Jesus fucking Christ, why does this shit keep getting repeated over and over and over after it's been corrected so many times? I genuinely don't get it?

AGAIN: During his firing from one of the law firms he worked at, he claimed that his employer told him they were worried he MIGHT use their systems to mishandle client information,

THAT'S IT. He was never *caught* doing anything.

That's a lot of excitement for something he claimed. He claims a lot of things that have a faint patina of truth but are actually a different species.

Seems like nobody knows whether he did it or not. But when a pathological liar makes a big freaking deal of claiming "I was fired because they were afraid I might do xyz," it strongly suggests he actually did do xyz but he's trying to spin it as the bosses being the unreasonable paranoid bad guys because the pathological liar would never do such a thing, how could you even think that, don't you trust me, why would I lie?

That being said, I think "We don't know for sure, he spun the story this way but blah" would be a more accurate admonition than "THAT NEVER HAPPENED."

 

[StinkySnack]

That being said, I think "We don't know for sure, he spun the story this way but blah" would be a more accurate admonition than "THAT NEVER HAPPENED."

As far as we know, for the purposes of this thread, it did not happen. I'm not sure why you're concerned with semantics here. It's one of the oft repeated "RUSSELL ACTUALLY DID THIS THING" stories that is completely inaccurate and has been corrected numerous times.

When we start with the "oh maybe Russell did this" or "maybe Russell did that", people start interpreting it as "RUSSELL DEFINITELY DID THAT" and we end up with this exact issue of false information being repeated year after year.

 

[obsdj]

I'm not sure why you're concerned with semantics here.

I'm that guy. And I don't want to give Greer the benefit of the doubt on something he might actually be guilty of doing. He might not have done it, but knowing him as we do, and obsessively combing through his every spittle-flecked statement as is our wont, then again he might've. I do agree that "HE TOTALLY DID IT" should be corrected, but not with "THAT NEVER HAPPENED" since hey, it might've because see above.

 

[StinkySnack]

I'm that guy. And I don't want to give Greer the benefit of the doubt on something he might actually be guilty of doing.

It wasn't my intention to give him any benefit of the doubt on anything.

RustyNail(her)'s post is a clear example of what happens when people start saying "Well Russell may have done this" without any real evidence to back it up. Some people will regurgitate it as fact. This has been proven time and time again.

If there weren't a lot of retarded people here, this wouldn't be an issue at all. We could speculate the day away and everyone would understand that it's only speculation, not fact.

Unfortunately, there are a lot of retarded people here.

 

[AnOminous]

AGAIN: During his firing from one of the law firms he worked at, he claimed that his employer told him they were worried he MIGHT use their systems to mishandle client information,

THAT'S IT. He was never *caught* doing anything.

It's more we don't KNOW that he was. And it's from Russtard's own admission, so he may have slanted it.

However, we have no knowledge he actually did this, but he did admit they thought he MIGHT and that he was basically a liability.

Personally, I think he probably did, but there's no real evidence of him doing that, it's just something people assume a miserable, freakish retard like Russtard would do.

I'm that guy. And I don't want to give Greer the benefit of the doubt on something he might actually be guilty of doing.

Why would people who dealt with Russtard in person think he'd do something like that? It's not even like they're this thread which is inclined to believe the absolute worst about Russtard. These were people who actually willingly chose to pay this gimp-faced tard money to work for them, and after personal interactions with him, according to him, assumed he would misuse company resources to sexually harass people including celebrities.

They had no interaction with this thread or any anti-Russtard propaganda, and somehow, they came to that conclusion completely independently.

Even if he didn't actually do it, he did things that were so consistent with his pathological sexual harassment behavior that they assumed he would do it given the opportunity.

 

[StinkySnack]

Russell has showed up to Taylor Swift's house MULTIPLE times, hidden in the bushes, and spied on her through her windows.

He most likely did this.

Well, most likely because it seems like something he would do.

But yeah he did this.

ETA: I won’t be providing any accuracy checks from here on out. If y’all want to discuss fallacies as fact, and make up things to your heart’s desire, who am I to stand in the way.

 

[AnOminous]

ETA: I won’t be providing any accuracy checks from here on out. If y’all want to discuss fallacies as fact, and make up things to your heart’s desire, who am I to stand in the way.

Well why the fuck not? It is important to point out stuff posted as facts that's opinions, but pretending there's no basis for something that actually happened (Russ admitted his employer thought he might do such a thing and that did not come out of nowhere).

It's a clarification, though. Not a "this definitely didn't happen and is completely made-up bullshit."

I also don't know if you've ever used LexisNexis or West with the accounting features turned on, usually something at the billing end. They have an incredible level of granularity and keep track of basically everything, because most of your billable hours are going to be spent on either of those services, and if you have to do things like argue for a lodestar amount on fees, you're going to have to bill in detail, not just "researched ten hours" but "drafted memo on subsequent treatment of Retard v. Fuckbag and its relevance to motion to kiss my ass" and similar line items.

The only reason I think Russ might not have been caught is they wouldn't have simply said "we think you might" but they'd know exactly what he did.

 

[StinkySnack]

Well why the fuck not? It is important to point out stuff posted as facts that's opinions, but pretending there's no basis for something that actually happened (Russ admitted his employer thought he might do such a thing and that did not come out of nowhere).

It's a clarification, though. Not a "this definitely didn't happen and is completely made-up bullshit."

Because no one really seems to care? The point that I was trying to make was not whether or not he’s capable of doing it, the point was that we have no evidence that he did it, and that people latch onto these speculations as undisputed facts.

When you come back at a correction with a “well maybe he did”, it really devalues my attempts to deter people from straight up posting fiction/exaggerations/speculation as fact.

Almost every time I correct someone here, I get push-back and it’s just not really worth it. And then people have the nerve to randomly @ me asking for clarification when there are lore disputes. I know the facts in my head and I’m gonna keep it that way.

 

[YouTube Autist]

@StinkySnack I suspect I'm not alone when I say that I value many of your contributions to the thread, and I sympathize with your desire to weed out misinformation from the muddled lore of Russtory, but that I object to your Robespierre-like tub-thumping.

 

[StinkySnack]

@StinkySnack I suspect I'm not alone when I say that I value many of your contributions to the thread, and I sympathize with your desire to weed out misinformation from the muddled lore of Russtory, but that I object to your Robespierre-like tub-thumping.

It really doesn’t matter in the end. This is a thread about a funny retard, and I’m just not gonna worry about it as much.

I just would rather not be the “lore guy”.

Anyways, I really don’t see the purpose of discussing this any further as it’s shitting up the thread.

 

[obsdj]

Because no one really seems to care? The point that I was trying to make was not whether or not he’s capable of doing it, the point was that we have no evidence that he did it, and that people latch onto these speculations as undisputed facts.

When you come back at a correction with a “well maybe he did”, it really devalues my attempts to deter people from straight up posting fiction/exaggerations/speculation as fact.

Almost every time I correct someone here, I get push-back and it’s just not really worth it. And then people have the nerve to randomly @ me asking for clarification when there are lore disputes. I know the facts in my head and I’m gonna keep it that way.

You seem to have a defective Babelfish. Speaking only for myself, I just object to your insisting that "IT NEVER HAPPENED YOU ARE ALL STUPID AND SPREADING LIES GRARGH" as opposed to "We don't know for sure," that's all. When people talk about it as if it's just another Russtarded thing we have proof of, correct away: "Actually, we don't know for sure, BUT here are the circumstances to make us this he might have/probably did."

The only reason I think Russ might not have been caught is they wouldn't have simply said "we think you might" but they'd know exactly what he did.

Remember, he might've literally been caught and fired for misusing the widgets, we only have his unreliable story that they gave him some other reason. Even if we take him at his word FOR SOME UNACCOUNTABLE REASON that this was the cause for termination they gave him, you said yourself that it would have been sus as hell for them to think that, with no evil KiwiFarmers to poison his pristine reputation.

 

[StinkySnack]

it would have been sus as hell for them to think that, with no evil KiwiFarmers to poison his pristine reputation.

It would be sus as hell for his employer to think that he might misuse company resources in the midst of him publicly, frivolously, suing a celebrity for a date? Can you explain how that is sus? Because that’s pretty much the conclusion I would personally come to if I was the employer, without any input from Kiwi Farms or otherwise

 

[The Dude]

As far as we know, for the purposes of this thread, it did not happen. I'm not sure why you're concerned with semantics here. It's one of the oft repeated "RUSSELL ACTUALLY DID THIS THING" stories that is completely inaccurate and has been corrected numerous times.

When we start with the "oh maybe Russell did this" or "maybe Russell did that", people start interpreting it as "RUSSELL DEFINITELY DID THAT" and we end up with this exact issue of false information being repeated year after year.

Agreed. And this isn't the only example of this happening with Russhole. Look how many Kiwis are absolutely convinced that his parents have coddled him his whole life, insisting they would force other children to associate with him, and to this day are continuing to financially support him, when we have absolutely zero proof any of that happened. Or Kiwis who believe every member of the LDS Church believes the "God's Favorite Retard" thing. When it comes to Kiwis who follow Russhole, conjecture and assumptions have a way of taking on a life of their own.

 

[StinkySnack]

Agreed. And this isn't the only example of this happening with Russhole. Look how many Kiwis are absolutely convinced that his parents have coddled him his whole life, insisting they would force other children to associate with him, and to this day are continuing to financially support him, when we have absolutely zero proof any of that happened. Or Kiwis who believe every member of the LDS Church believes the "God's Favorite Retard" thing. When it comes to Kiwis who follow Russhole, conjecture and assumptions have a way of taking on a life of their own.

Thanks for the back-up.

It’s extremely difficult being an intelligent person (like you and I), and arguing with low-IQ, low effort, individuals. I think there must be some kind of correlation between low IQ and poor memory because I have a pretty full life outside of Kiwi Farms, and yet I can manage to remember these types of specific details about Russ, not to mention the fact that they’ve been corrected time upon time again.

Honestly, I’m getting exhausted with it, between the absolute retardation and uneducated, repetitive speculation in the other thread, and the StraightShooter2-level idiots in this thread.

People have acted like I’m some sort of genius for remembering details about Russ, and act like I’m this lore master. That’s always been funny to me because all I do is read the thread and not have IQ problems.

I’m truly sorry that a handful of you are literally fucking retards.

edit: Bring on the MATI stickers. Nothing can penetrate my Mensa IQ shield.

 

[Sexy Senior Citizen]

Bring on the MATI stickers. Nothing can penetrate my Mensa IQ shield.

Gunning for that halal thread, are you?

 

[StinkySnack]

Gunning for that halal thread, are you?

No no, I already get too much fame, adoration, and attention in my full and respected offline life. I couldn’t take any more. There’s only so much of me.

 

[The Dude]

Thanks for the back-up.

It’s extremely difficult being an intelligent person (like you and I), and arguing with low-IQ, low effort, individuals. I think there must be some kind of correlation between low IQ and poor memory because I have a pretty full life outside of Kiwi Farms, and yet I can manage to remember these types of specific details about Russ, not to mention the fact that they’ve been corrected time upon time again.

Honestly, I’m getting exhausted with it, between the absolute retardation and uneducated, repetitive speculation in the other thread, and the StraightShooter2-level idiots in this thread.

People have acted like I’m some sort of genius for remembering details about Russ, and act like I’m this lore master. That’s always been funny to me because all I do is read the thread and not have IQ problems.

I’m truly sorry that a handful of you are literally fucking retards.

edit: Bring on the MATI stickers. Nothing can penetrate my Mensa IQ shield.

Yeah, yeah...that's all well and good. But do you think Shit-Lips would ever rape a chick if he had the chance and believed he could get away with it? What if she was passed out drunk?