With that, I'd say Star Trek is an idealized view of the future but other shit from then to now has happened to regress us in life.
And the lifting of several (but not all unfortunately) FDR era regulations and restrictions.
To be fair, there's an episode with non-binary identifying aliens and they're essentially depicted as villains and the plot revolves around one of them realizing she's actually a woman.
The Federation was formed only after an apocalyptic nuclear world war that killed off like 80% of humanity.
I don't even think it's "regression" from the societal changes between the 60s and now. I think it's because Star Trek portrayed a world where energy scarcity, food scarcity, and materials scarcity, didn't exist/were magically handwaved away with devices that could make all these things instantly. Most conflicts come from one or several of those things being disputed, but to build Star-Trek level replicators isn't possible (that we know of). Hence a Star-Trek-like resolution of human problems isn't going to happen because we can't make the tech they used to sidestep said problems.
Israel was winning the war at that point, why would they want America to get involved? Retards like you know nothing of the greater context of the war
I laid out my case with my posts pointing out how Qatar paid out billions to American universities to teach their narrative and how Tucker Carlson did a complete 180 shilling for foreign regimes after getting funding from Omeed Malik.
retard doesnt understand what lobbying is or how AIPAC is less influential than Christian Zionists while ignoring actual cases of corruption like when the Egyptians and Qataris bribed senator Menendez. AIPAC also doesnt spend hundreds of millions lol
these university activists were anti israel to begin with
Name a Jewish interest Epstein wanted to push.
Name a war that America fought for Israel. Iraq was not a war that America fought for Israel because Israel advised the US not to go through with it.
Well, you'd think fifty, sixty years from then, we'd be making several scientific breakthroughs in modern society especially with the invention of the Internet. Now, we have third world countries, inflations, people beating each other up and transitioning children.
Perhaps because they had object permanence, and knew their enemies weren't going to instantly vanish even if Israel "won"? As evidenced by the 1973 war a few years later?
And Israel paid nothing/did nothing to teach their own narrative in universities?
It is a form of advocating the interests of a particular group to politicians. Often campaign funding is involved, whether explicit or implicit.
>Jews by themselves are less influential than people paid/bribed/brainwashed to support Jews
>Instances of non-Israeli corruption instantly causes all the instances of Israeli corruption to vanish
War economies tend to be boom&bust. It's great for a while because it ramps up product and stimulates growth. The problem is eventually the bills come due, you may not have had a good return of investment, and all the able bodied men tend to be dead, crippled or burnt out.
It's almost like Tucker is a grifting moron who's entire worldview can be summed up as "who/whatever the establishment hate I shall like."
So then why would they immediately apologize and admit guilt instead of leaving it up in the air?
When was a pro Israel narrative ever taught in a university? The universities have been compromised by far leftists who hate israel since the 60s
Christian Zionists are now paid? Since when lmao
point out a case of pro israeli corruption. Legal lobbying is not corruption.
full article is behind paywall
Its also worth noting that according to several books in the setting, Replicator food never really tastes quite right. Very close, but never exact. And so things like homemade wine, proper steaks, just regular food you cook is in fact still preferred and there are markets for them.
That is so catastrophically stupid. It's sports, the different local communities have to interact in sports games which is the entire fucking reason it's an issue that needs a higher authority to resolve it.
It's funny watching them get stunlocked over something so retarded.
'good controversy' lol as she looks like she wants to run off and cry.
Hard disagree, if a politician is taking money to go directly against the will of their constituents by monied lobbyists, that's corruption, see taxation without representation and extrapolate.
Where can I collect my payments?
Where's the evidence that they're going against the will of their constituents? Americans overwhelmingly support Israel, especially Republicans. The only Republican that I know that "goes against the will of their constituents" is Massie who refuses to meet Jewish constituents like Rabbi Shlomo Litvin who heads the Kentucky Jewish Council. Massie refuses to meet him and accuses him of being an agent for a foreign country.
