- Joined
- Jun 1, 2020
He's bringing up old hat news about how Welper's previously confessed to being Mormon.Sorry, what?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He's bringing up old hat news about how Welper's previously confessed to being Mormon.Sorry, what?
OhHe's bringing up old hat news about how Welper's previously confessed to being Mormon.
also thisHe's bringing up old hat news about how Welper's previously confessed to being Mormon.
When someone brings up "You're a Mormon" my brain shuts off because that means they're a fucking retard. Double points if they bring up Joseph Smith, a man that's been dead for well over 100 years and has little bearing on current Church policy.He's bringing up old hat news about how Welper's previously confessed to being Mormon.
I got the answer I was looking for. He's defending him from those pedophilia accusations in that thread.
I'm not gonna lie, I don't even know how modern Mormonism works myself since it's outside of my own religious purview, but I'm at least willing to give benefit of the doubt as far as changes in policy is concerned.When someone brings up "You're a Mormon" my brain shuts off because that means they're a fucking retard. Double points if they bring up Joseph Smith, a man that's been dead for well over 100 years and has little bearing on current Church policy.
So, how about you post it for the class since you seem to have nailed him on something? This is an autistic Mass Debates thread, after all.I got the answer I was looking for. He's defending his pedophilia in that thread.
![]()
Mentioning Joseph Smith is like bringing up George Washington. Important, but others have come after him and changed things since, some for better, some for worse.I'm not gonna lie, I don't even know how modern Mormonism works myself since it's outside of my own religious purview, but I'm at least willing to give benefit of the doubt as far as changes in policy is concerned.
I mean i'd be happy to explain it. I'm not afraid of a assblasted pedophileSo, how about you post it for the class since you seem to have nailed him on something? This is an autistic Mass Debates thread, after all.
You're more than welcome to if he isn't going to present his evidence for himself. I'm just curious about whatever context he's pulling here and I don't feel like digging through your whole Q&A thread to see which part specifically he's referring to.I mean i'd be happy to explain it. I'm not afraid of a assblasted pedophile
I do, but then he decided to put me and everyone else who's been disagreeing with him on Ignore "until someone intelligent asks him a question".Remember when this thread used to be about @COME ON OUT YOU RAPIST?![]()
I'm still scanning the thread, but this is good enough for now:So, how about you post it for the class since you seem to have nailed him on something? This is an autistic Mass Debates thread, after all.
Wow. Imagine saying someone shouldn't have been executed by a mob. Such bravery. Unfortunately Abilmelech is a coward it seems and thinks people should die over religion.
Nice chart and links slick. You know what I think of them?
View attachment 6041185
Nothing but a big pile of bullshit.
Prove he had sex with them and it wasn't for financial reasons. I know a political marriage is beyond your Mormon hating mind, but fuck off.
I'm not a pedophile, nor do I run defense for pedophiles.I mean i'd be happy to explain it. I'm not afraid of a assblasted pedophile
"Child murder is illegal. The act of drawing little boys or girls being murdered implies that you are thinking of child murder or child murder-adjacent activities. Therefore it should be banned."CSAM is illegal. The act of drawing little boys or girls doing CSAM things implies that you are thinking of CSAM or CSAM-adjacent activities. Therefore it should be banned.
You brought up that sperg Abilemech! KINO.I'm still scanning the thread, but this is good enough for now:
I'm not a pedophile, nor do I run defense for pedophiles.
Are murder and sexualization the same things?"Child murder is illegal. The act of drawing little boys or girls being murdered implies that you are thinking of child murder or child murder-adjacent activities. Therefore it should be banned."
Correct. I'm glad we're all on the same page here."Child murder is illegal. The act of drawing little boys or girls being murdered implies that you are thinking of child murder or child murder-adjacent activities. Therefore it should be banned."
I have no interest in litigating Mormonism, but this is not an apt comparison.Mentioning Joseph Smith is like bringing up George Washington. Important, but others have come after him and changed things since, some for better, some for worse.
so when a pedophile jacks off to lolicon, are they not doing it for the expressed purpose of pleasure"Child murder is illegal. The act of drawing little boys or girls being murdered implies that you are thinking of child murder or child murder-adjacent activities. Therefore it should be banned."
nigga can't stop thinking about childrenAlso, why the fuck is child murder the first place you go to for comparison?
Nice info, but address the main point. Tell us more about how loli is pedophilia, but Joseph Smith's marriages with however many very young women were all celestial or whatever.You brought up that sperg Abilemech! KINO.. That fucker got banned.
but you do sure align with some of the lolicon defendersI'm not a pedophile, nor do I run defense for pedophiles.