US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

​

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/

 

[Party Hat Wurmple]

Images

Wait...THE FIRST NIGGA PLAYER TO PLAY BASEBALL WITH WHITE FOLK?! Nigga that's not an achievement! Are we gonna celebrate every damn nigga the first time they did it with white folk? Are we calling Magic Johnson a Hero for being the first nigger to give a white woman AIDS? Hell, we might as well rename every subway station the Harriet Tubman subway because she was the first nigga to work on a railroad.

 

[Betonhaus]

Why do you know this?

There's a little internet tool called Google that lets you search various websites for random facts.

 

[“Token” the Neigermiester]

This show why Trump is playing a dangerous game with the flurry of cuts, firings and EOs. All will be challenged by the leftist courts, and if the SC cucks, then all will be nullified, the Deep State and woke budgeting codified and protected, and the Executive Branch needed forever.

I support everything he's doing but I hope he's not flying too close to the sun...

A rough idea of how President Trump could go about this situation if he wanted to play dirty:

1.) Impeach the rogue judges. Putting them through the process is the point, not conviction.

2.) Effectively abolish said judges’ district courts by an act of Congress made in the background of the impeachment process. This could be done one of two ways:

a) By budget reconciliation to defund the specified district courts.*
Or
b) By outright abolishing the district courts in question through killing the filibuster.*

*Either of which are dependent on the Republicans in the Senate and House being in lockstep, which is obviously not the case at the moment.

3.) Arrest judges who try to impose injunctions on said Act of Congress.

4.) Invoke the Insurrection Act to clean up the aftermath, or help complete Step 3.

I’m no lawyer, so please highlight any legal/logical errors, aside from the obvious constitution crises this would raise (on top of the current situation).

Do I think this will be the case?

I would hope not, given the Left’s propensity to violence, but time will tell.

Though, another thing to consider is that the pressure the Judicial Branch could face from steps 1 and 2 might be enough to rein them in.

 

[Samuel Fuller]

*

A rough idea of how President Trump could go about this situation if he wanted to play dirty:

1.) Impeach the rouge judges. Putting them through the process is the point, not conviction.

2.) Effectively abolish said judges’ district courts by an act of Congress made in the background of the impeachment process. This could be done one of two ways:

a) By budget reconciliation to defund the specified district courts.*
Or
b) By outright abolish the district courts in question by killing the filibuster.*

*Either of which are dependent on the Republicans in the Senate and House being in lockstep, which is obviously not the case at the moment.

3.) Arrest judges who try to impose injunctions on said Act of Congress.

4.) Invoke the Insurrection Act to clean up the aftermath, or help complete Step 3.

I’m no lawyer, so please highlight any legal/logical errors, aside from the obvious constitution crises this would raise (on top of the current situation).

Do I think this will be the case?

I would hope not, given the Left’s propensity to violence, but time will tell.

Though, another thing to consider is that the pressure the Judicial Branch could face from steps 1 and 2 might be enough to rein them in.

*Rogue

Unless the judges are painted up like French whores.

 

[Party Hat Wurmple]

Set up by the po-po or guilty as sin?

Considering the age of consent is 16 in Minnesota, I'm going with set up by the po-po. I ain't gonna defend this guy because fuck him, but this reeks of retaliatory actions. Plus this is too close. The literal next day? Come on CIA, you're getting sloppy. Hire me and I'll at least try to make this shit convincing.

Edit: Just to sperg a little more. The laws are the way they are to do exactly this. There's no reason a woman who lies about her age and being under the age of consent shouldn't void the man of responsibility unless law enforcement wants it to be a tool to entrap people like this. Which I get, there's not really other ways to go about handling these operations from a cop's perspective. But it also leaves it as a convenient weapon if you have someone you want to get rid of who likes hookers like this guy.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

No idea if this has been discussed or shared yet, but the US clamp down on immigration seem to catch the right people.

Apparently this Burka was supposed to become a professor in the US, but likes Hezbollah and attended a rally to honor the passing of Nasrallah while in Lebanon.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NrZ_X8edIcM

I really question what the fuck the University was thinking. FBI should start looking into the University right away and check how much of its leadership is pro Islamic Terrorism if they fail so hard at running background checks during hiring.

Trump is a retard and Elon an autistic faggot, but the clamp down on Sandnigger Jihadist immigrants has been better than 4 years of Biden immigration policy combined.

 

[“Token” the Neigermiester]

*

*Rogue

Unless the judges are painted up like French whores.

Thanks, fixed the typo. And yes, they might as well be.

 

[MetokurGroomedMe]

I think it's more like this. We're not in the ring, we're in the audience.

The liberal audience wants only one thing, for their guy to win. Every time their guy hits below the belt, they cheer. Every time there's a news expose about how the ref was bought off by the mob, they laugh. Some of them will even pelt the rival boxer with peanuts to try and tip the match.

The conservative audience want primarily to watch a good boxing match, week after week. Yes, we also want our guy to win, but the fact our guy loses because of cheating and fuckery is increasingly angering. Moreover, our boxers keep saying, "Sorry, we can't do anything about the cheating or the bribes...that would be rude." I don't really want our side to start cheating. I want our side to jump the corrupt referee in an alley and beat the fuck out of him until he learns to start calling fair matches.

i'm not really sure how that can be done. there's no way the republicans can leech 14 votes from the dems to get 67 for an impeachment proceeding. the impeachments, as nice as they feel now, are basically DOA.

i ask this not to be a smartass, but as a real question; how do we jump the referee?

 

[Lian Xing]

i ask this not to be a smartass, but as a real question; how do we jump the referee?

Go full Jackson. The Court has no ability to enforce any of its rulings. What are they going to do? Send the U.S. Marshals to apprehend the President?

 

[30+GameOvers]

No idea if this has been discussed or shared yet, but the US clamp down on immigration seem to catch the right people.

Apparently this Burka was supposed to become a professor in the US, but likes Hezbollah and attended a rally to honor the passing of Nasrallah while in Lebanon.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NrZ_X8edIcM

I really question what the fuck the University was thinking. FBI should start looking into the University right away and check how much of its leadership is pro Islamic Terrorism if they fail so hard at running background checks during hiring.

Trump is a retard and Elon an autistic faggot, but the clamp down on Sandnigger Jihadist immigrants has been better than 4 years of Biden immigration policy combined.

Academia in US is beyond fucked. Deporting sand niggers will not do anything when faculty is full of open marxists for decades now, and Trump is only doing it because he loves jujucum so much. I don't expect much will come from this, unless more of these retarded sand niggers openly declare support for terrorist groups or punch jews.

 

[GunCar Gary]

Set up by the po-po or guilty as sin?

my prediction: he is a creep who enjoys having sex with 17 year olds that he meets on instagram or whatever, which is legal in Minnesota

the police ran some sting operation where they told him they'll put out if he buys them an iphone or something, and they use that to amp up charges as "prostitution"

in a year after court battles he will still be a creep and possibly divorced but because of his status and hoard of lobbyist money he'll be able to get the charges down to a misdemeanor and time already served or something by arguing entrapment and also the iphone is a gift and no reasonable person would assume buying small gifts for a girl counts as prostitution

 

[TheOtherSideofMakeBelieve]

i ask this not to be a smartass, but as a real question; how do we jump the referee?

Start holding congressional hearings, subpoena the judges nonstop so that their cases have to be reassigned, interrogate them for hours, throw them in jail if they don't show up. Just because the actual impeachments are DoA doesn't mean the process can't be used to punish the offenders

 

[MetokurGroomedMe]

Go full Jackson. The Court has no ability to enforce any of its rulings. What are they going to do? Send the U.S. Marshals to apprehend the President?

that's not jumping the referee, that's doing the cheating we're talking about. the cheating is ignoring the judiciary, which is exactly what trump is doing.

it's revealing the open secret to the public every time it happens. the judiciary has no power without the executive, which is on purpose. it's one of the checks of the judiciary that, while they have the power to decide sentences, the EXECUTIVE has the power to enforce them, and without the executive enforcing the decision, there is no enforcement power at all, like you say.

this is the checks and balances system working actively in front of our eyes, and it is a process to behold. only in America.

Start holding congressional hearings, subpoena the judges nonstop so that their cases have to be reassigned, interrogate them for hours, throw them in jail if they don't show up. Just because the actual impeachments are DoA doesn't mean the process can't be used to punish the offenders

this is also a fantastic option, and i'm behind it. bureaucratic warfare is stronger than any art sun-tzu might have taught us.

 

[Hunter Hearst Helmsley]

This thread's obsession with me is understandable but getting out of hand. Some of the stuff you guys write about me makes absolutely no sense. Please just try and stay on topic.

The conservative audience want primarily to watch a good boxing match, week after week. Yes, we also want our guy to win, but the fact our guy loses because of cheating and fuckery is increasingly angering. Moreover, our boxers keep saying, "Sorry, we can't do anything about the cheating or the bribes...that would be rude." I don't really want our side to start cheating. I want our side to jump the corrupt referee in an alley and beat the fuck out of him until he learns to start calling fair matches.

The issue is the two party system as currently implemented makes the two parties part of a toxic co-dependent relationship. The way to deal with a cheater is to ban them from the sport for life. The problem is, if the Democrats go something else replaces them which disrupts the two party system as it exists. There is no guarantee the REPUBLICAN party survives such a disruption, it might go down too. So, both parties are satisfied to just be trading power back and forth forever. In the current system, Republicans will always have somewhere around half the power. Really going hard against the Democrats risks that.

 

[Breadbassket]

Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt called out the Left’s legal tactics:

“It’s incredibly apparent that there is a concerted effort by the far left to judge shop — to pick judges who are clearly acting as partisan activists from the bench in an attempt to derail this president’s agenda.”

 

[Lian Xing]

that's not jumping the referee, that's doing the cheating we're talking about. the cheating is ignoring the judiciary, which is exactly what trump is doing.

it's revealing the open secret to the public every time it happens. the judiciary has no power without the executive, which is on purpose. it's one of the checks of the judiciary that, while they have the power to decide sentences, the EXECUTIVE has the power to enforce them, and without the executive enforcing the decision, there is no enforcement power at all, like you say.

If the faggots on the American left aren't going to play by the rules, why should the American right? That's not cheating; it's pragmatism.

The social contract has been used by the left to anally masturbate. It has been rendered null and void.

 

[MetokurGroomedMe]

Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt called out the Left’s legal tactics:

“It’s incredibly apparent that there is a concerted effort by the far left to judge shop — to pick judges who are clearly acting as partisan activists from the bench in an attempt to derail this president’s agenda.”

View attachment 7111341

it's funny how the crystal ball of kiwifarms has had us describing exactly what they are for a month already.

If the faggots on the American left aren't going to play by the rules, why should the American right? That's not cheating; it's pragmatism.

The social contract has been used by the left to anally masturbate. It has been rendered null and void.

totally agreed, and that was my major point. there's no point keeping the gloves on when every round your opponent takes them off and puts on successively more damaging knuckles. eventually you have to get sick of the shit and get your own spiked knuckles out; stop paying attention to what activist foreigner judges have to say about american politics. if they want to be a judge, they can self-deport with the CBP One app and go right back to their second 'homeland' and try and be a judge activising for cutting off little kids' body parts somewhere else.

 

[Breadbassket]

If the faggots on the American left aren't going to play by the rules, why should the American right? That's not cheating; it's pragmatism.

The social contract has been used by the left to anally masturbate. It has been rendered null and void.

Even if the future is not certain the current political situation is unsustainable for both sides.

 

[Lian Xing]

it's funny how the crystal ball of kiwifarms has had us describing exactly what they are for a month already.

The left has been committing lawfare by any means against Trump for a decade.

 

[MetokurGroomedMe]

The left has been committing lawfare by any means against Trump for a decade.

i'm referring to the specific language being used, and the way it's being illuminated to the public. i hope karoline leavitt secretly has a kiwifarms account.