Assassin's Creed thread

  • 🔎 If you see an alert for analytics.usips.org, this is a self-hosted system I am running as a test. It is GDPR compliant and collects no invasive information.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Honestly, you could say that about a lot of AssCreed games. To a point, they largely play themselves. I'm interested in exploring the old towns of that era and exploring around doing cool side mission shit. You even get a prototype for what would become 4's sailing mechanics, even tho there isn't that much you can do with it here. Either way, gameplay is much more interesting and the game has infinitely more soul than what Shadows and all the new RPG-lite games have.
Yeah, AC3 was amazing because not many games let you explore those settings. At most you get strategy games, but never anything that close.
 
Can't speak as to Eivor because that game seemed like shit, but totally fits the escalating levels of seethe.
Valhalla was just garbage, the sand-nigger is the secret antagonist all game long and the story just strings you along without offering you any chance to do anything about him, only to then twist it making him your "ally" while the player should logically hate the fucking dumbass. Depending on who you play
he leads your "blood brother/sister" down the path of insanity to free his alien lover from an ancient artifact
. But hey, thats ok because you are supposed to somehow just "like" that guy anyway.

Ubisoft trying to shove the Middle Eastern sympathy down your throat while the character actually played you for the entire fucking story and somehow you are supposed to just be ok with that. And then they make the next middle eastern spin off trash game with him as the protagonist.

When I finished the story I was seething, because I wanted to join the Templars and murder everyone involved in that story line.
A female character in that story and culture makes no sense at all and how Ubisoft shoves their liberal approach to sexuality into every game, as if a female could just "fuck around" without consequences. It is hilarious tone-deaf and anachronistic and an obvious shove of modern politics and culture war trash into a historic setting it has no place in.
 
Every single problem with AAAAAAA game development in a reel longer than most feature films. Impressive.
41k at its peak, down to 33k now. Wonder what buzzwords the totally legit and no coordinated news articles are going to call the chuds who dared not buy the Ubisoft AAAA experience.
I'm still waiting for "IT BROKE NEW GROUND!"
Memes really cannot be forced, specially when they come from the sanitized soulless husk of an advertising firm.
 
Can't wait for Ubisoft to butcher central European culture of the medieval period for a change.
Now the big question is which ethnicity and gender we will get this time?

3rd gender choice, when Ubislop?????
 
Here comes the defense for the "optional romance options".
View attachment 7117352
I actually agree with the optional romance defense. I'm often told that engaging in romances in vidya is queer, so if you got to the point where you're bumping uglies with an ambiguous monstrosity you brought it on yourself for being a fag.
Seriously though, at least in KC2 you have the excuse that fags have existed since time immemorial. Somehow I feel enbies are historically even less prevalent, especially in Japan.
The climax of the game is tribal jungle beats literally chanting “Ching Chong Ching Chang.”
Don't mind the track, but it sounds wrong here. Maybe in a Call of Duty game this would work, or even my alternate universe blaxploitation version of the game, but something about it here simply doesn't gel.
what if i choose to not play the entire game over this faggotry huh?
That would be wrong too. You should choose not to play the game because it's part of a franchise that went to seed years ago from a company who haven't put out a good game since For Honor. The niggurai and his they/them fuckbuddy is just the icing on the cake.
 
I'm seriously hoping the owners of Ubisoft have put shorts on their stocks and are doing this intentionally as this is the only explination that makes sense as this retard singularity defies all logic and reason otherwise.
 
I'm seriously hoping the owners of Ubisoft have put shorts on their stocks and are doing this intentionally as this is the only explination that makes sense as this retard singularity defies all logic and reason otherwise.
If you think that you haven't been paying attention. Ubisoft was out-of-touch even when they were putting out half-decent games. Them making a retarded decision that makes no sense and chasing a trend that stopped being trendy a year ago is perfectly on-brand for Ubi.
 
I'm seriously hoping the owners of Ubisoft have put shorts on their stocks and are doing this intentionally as this is the only explination that makes sense as this retard singularity defies all logic and reason otherwise.
This dogshit, nigger-fetishizing slop started development during the height of the Floyd chimpouts.

Modern games take half a decade or more to develop, and by the time they're shat out the door whatever cultural zeitgeist they were trying to ride on has long since fizzled out.

Not to say that Ubisoft wouldn't have attempted to shove a gorilla in regardless, the company is run by subhuman leftists after all.
 
This dogshit, nigger-fetishizing slop started development during the height of the Floyd chimpouts.

Modern games take half a decade or more to develop, and by the time they're shat out the door whatever cultural zeitgeist they were trying to ride on has long since fizzled out.
I'm just trying to find some logical explanation here, this is even funnier.
 
This dogshit, nigger-fetishizing slop started development during the height of the Floyd chimpouts.

Modern games take half a decade or more to develop, and by the time they're shat out the door whatever cultural zeitgeist they were trying to ride on has long since fizzled out.

Not to say that Ubisoft wouldn't have attempted to shove a gorilla in regardless, the company is run by subhuman leftists after all.
Sort of, assuming the various insider leaks are true the game started development in 2017 as a sole protagonist game and then was rebooted in 2019 to include Yasuke in response to the George Floyd shit.
 
I'm seriously hoping the owners of Ubisoft have put shorts on their stocks and are doing this intentionally as this is the only explination that makes sense as this retard singularity defies all logic and reason otherwise.
The people that would have done this have already done this in like 2015 but the studio that's left keeps doing juuuust well enough to continue existing (until now, hopefully).

This is like putting a brick on the gas pedal of a car and jumping out, only to find that it's still driving 10 years later and people are collectively shocked it hasn't crashed yet.
 
Back
Top Bottom