US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have nothing positive to say about the welfare system. Everyone able bodied should work or die. Cripples should be forced to find a willing sponsor.
what about a welfare system where for 6-8 hours a day you are effectively slave labor that the government can send to do any task or contract out to private companies, with a very small list of allowed refusals?
 
poor white people (including single white mothers) are on welfare as well.
More reason to let them die. They should get like dogfood at a discount
small luxuries because muh health concerns
And those health concerns ballon into higher cost later. I know a few welfare recipients when they were kids who drank soda and had diabetes at 25. They also don't pay for healthcare.
(again, where have you people been for the last 50 years????)
The last iteration of the republican party was more concerned about foreign wars than the health of its citizens.
When we get to the fourth iteration of this thread can it be named US Politics General 4Ever?
US Politics General The Return
Am I wrong or hasn't the Atlantic been caught literally making up stories before?
They helped get us into the ME and had that quote where trump supposedly said troops were suckers
 
  • Agree
  • Dumb
Reactions: eDove and The Noise
- RFK indicating that pharmaceutical advertising will get banned -
It'll be interesting to see how the loss of pharmaceutical ad revenue will affect the media landscape. Unfortunately, I suspect it'll exacerbate America's obsession with youth culture, since the stuff young people watch doesn't need the support from drug ads as much as content aimed at 30+ year olds.

Then again, maybe most stuff is funded by subscriptions these days instead of ads, so maybe it won't have the effect I'm imagining. I will say, the last time I watched cable, almost every single ad was for drugs. This will probably be the last nail in the coffin for cable TV (outside of news bullshit, which I'm sure will still be on cable for as long as there's cable.)

- Tweet foretelling terrorist attacks at hospitals in the near future -
This smells a little fishy. If this guy has insider intel, why would he be tweeting this publicly, and thereby alerting the perpetrators? Is he getting inside intel without any more direct line to the authorities?

Did this guy seriously just tip off ISIS for Twitter clout?
 
average top secret planning session:

"this part in this top secret thing keeps breaking. we should probably do something about it"
Or they look like this:

2200 - Inform command that lock is busted
0100 - Informed that TS level briefing will be held at local MI unit at 0400 in secure area by ACQ with horrible breath
0101 - Start doing shots of Everclear
0300-0315 Quick shower and pull on uniform
0330 Arrive at MI building. Faggot at the fence can't read my ID because he usually is eating snakes
0345 Officer has to inform snake eating moron that I'm not a spy
0350 Stop real quick and alter duty schedule with a Skilcraft pen so snake eater at gate has CQ tomorrow
0400 - Show up for briefing
0401-0600 Nap and blow spit bubbles
0600-0700 Eat donuts set out by some chick with a fat ass and drink poorly made coffee
0700-0900 sleep
0900-1100 Listen to a bunch of SNCOs and Officers stroke each other's dicks about being there
1100-1130 Hurry through my part
1130-1300 Lunch
1300-1400 Realize with dawning horror that nobody understood what I was saying
1400-1500 do tequila in the bathroom with a CW5, titty fuck ugly MI chick and pull her t-shirt over her face, listen to officers complain they can't find maps of "Operational Area"
1500-1600 explain it again. Explain that "Operational Area" is literally 5 miles away and not in another country.
1600-1800 realize with even more horror that they STILL don't understand it.
1800 - Listen to SNCOs and officers congratulate each other on the briefing.
1800 - Realize none of them remember a fucking thing about the briefing.

Drive out and replace the lock myself. Drive home. Pass out on the floor of my barracks room.

Wake up.

Find out that Officers at briefing are trying to get permission to carpet bomb Pakistan or some dumb shit.

Drink tequila straight from the bottle.
 

Channel 5 video on the deportations, very good journalism, talks to people on both sides of the border, recently deported people and dives in deep about the real issues
His fans really got pissed at him for this one. He must have had a friend killed by illegals because it's a fox news tier hit piece it's actually crazy
Since you mentioned that the courts will have to end up interpreting the law I'm a little afraid now that Roberts will absolutely cuck if it goes to the supreme court.
spoiler alert, thats exactly what will happen.
Just drink water
just ask the people of flint michigan , its good tasty and has 0% health effects.
 
being based is not the problem. the problem is jd-hegesth were stupid enough to accidently included journo scum. what's next, gay ops from jd's discord server?
Neither of them did. Mike Waltz did. He apparently has Jeffrey Goldberg, one of the worst Russiagaters who also came up with the suckers and losers hoax, on speed dial.
I naively believed Trump has gotten over his desperate need for approval from people who want him jailed or dead and his family ruined. But once again his admin is full of them.
 
Or they look like this:

2200 - Inform command that lock is busted
0100 - Informed that TS level briefing will be held at local MI unit at 0400 in secure area by ACQ with horrible breath
0101 - Start doing shots of Everclear
0300-0315 Quick shower and pull on uniform
0330 Arrive at MI building. Faggot at the fence can't read my ID because he usually is eating snakes
0345 Officer has to inform snake eating moron that I'm not a spy
0350 Stop real quick and alter duty schedule with a Skilcraft pen so snake eater at gate has CQ tomorrow
0400 - Show up for briefing
0401-0600 Nap and blow spit bubbles
0600-0700 Eat donuts set out by some chick with a fat ass and drink poorly made coffee
0700-0900 sleep
0900-1100 Listen to a bunch of SNCOs and Officers stroke each other's dicks about being there
1100-1130 Hurry through my part
1130-1300 Lunch
1300-1400 Realize with dawning horror that nobody understood what I was saying
1400-1500 do tequila in the bathroom with a CW5, titty fuck ugly MI chick and pull her t-shirt over her face, listen to officers complain they can't find maps of "Operational Area"
1500-1600 explain it again. Explain that "Operational Area" is literally 5 miles away and not in another country.
1600-1800 realize with even more horror that they STILL don't understand it.
1800 - Listen to SNCOs and officers congratulate each other on the briefing.
1800 - Realize none of them remember a fucking thing about the briefing.

Drive out and replace the lock myself. Drive home. Pass out on the floor of my barracks room.

Wake up.

Find out that Officers at briefing are trying to get permission to carpet bomb Pakistan or some dumb shit.

Drink tequila straight from the bottle.
It's way more boring at a defense contractor. It's just Office Space in a windowless building. No tequila or tits. The coffee's okay, though.
 
Behind the Curtain: Dems' dark, deep hole
Axios (archive.ph)
By Jim VandeHei and Mike Allen
2025-03-24 10:15:21GMT
dems01.jpg
Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios

Top Democrats tell us their party is in its deepest hole in nearly 50 years — and they fear things could actually get worse:
  • The party has its lowest favorability ever.
  • No popular national leader to help improve it.
  • Insufficient numbers to stop most legislation in Congress.
  • A durable minority on the Supreme Court.
  • Dwindling influence over the media ecosystem, with right-leaning podcasters and social media accounts ascendant.
  • Young voters are growing dramatically more conservative.
  • A bad 2026 map for Senate races.
  • Democratic Senate retirements could make it harder for the party to flip the House, with members tempted by statewide races.
  • There are only three House Republicans in districts former Vice President Harris won in 2024, a dim sign for a Democratic surge. There were 23 eight years ago in seats Hillary Clinton won.
  • And, thanks to the number of people fleeing blue states, the math for a Dem to win the presidency will just get harder in 2030.
Why it matters: Both parties — after losing the White House, Senate and House — suffer and search for salvation. But rarely does healing seem so hard and redemption so distant.
  • Doug Sosnik — a senior adviser to President Bill Clinton, and widely followed thinker on political megatrends — told us this is Dems' deepest hole in at least the 45 years since Ronald Reagan's victory in 1980. Sosnik said the 2024 election was at least as much a repudiation of Democrats as it was a victory for Trump.
As Ezra Klein noted this month in his New York Times column, if current population patterns hold, Democrats will suffer a devastating blow after the 2030 census: The party will lose as many as a dozen House seats and electoral votes.
  • 🚨 He points out that in that Electoral College, Dems could win all the states Harris carried in 2024 — plus Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin — and still lose the White House.
The big picture: Democrats' dismal reality is not Republican spin. In fact, there's broad consensus among Democratic leaders that most current political, cultural, media and generational trends are cutting against them.
  • "Democrats are losing working-class voters," Klein, co-author with Derek Thompson of the new liberal blueprint "Abundance," said last week. "They're seeing their margins among nonwhite voters erode and vanish. They're losing young voters. Something is wrong in the Democratic Party."
By the numbers: A deep, comprehensive poll by Democratic pollster David Shor of Blue Rose Research captured vividly and empirically the daunting data.
  • For those skeptical of polls and sampling size, Shor's study is based on 26 million online responses collected over the course of 2024, and filtered to adjust to oddities of modern polling.
  • Shor said on Klein's podcast, "The Ezra Klein Show," that his most striking finding — and the one most worrisome to him — is the surging pro-Trump/MAGA/Republican views and voting patterns of young men, immigrants and anyone other than strident liberals.
Shor estimates a 23-point swing against Democrats among immigrants. The swing is very pronounced among Hispanics who consider themselves conservatives: Democratic support dropped by 50%.
  • But it's the rise of conservatism among young people, mainly men, that spooks him most. "[Y]oung voters — regardless of race and gender — have become more Republican," Shor writes in his 33-slide presentation. (Request the deck.)
  • Ali Mortell, director of research at Blue Rose Research, told Axios' Tal Axelrod: "Millennials were one of the most progressive generations, and it's looking like Gen Z is about to be one of the most conservative."
The thing he's been most shocked by over the last four years, Shor told Klein: "[Y]oung people have gone from being the most progressive generation since the Baby Boomers, and maybe even in some ways more so, to becoming potentially the most conservative generation that we've experienced maybe in 50 to 60 years."
  • A gender gap has exploded: 18-year-old men were 23 points more likely to support Donald Trump than 18-year-old women, which Shor called "just completely unprecedented in American politics."
  • Sosnik told us that young men who didn't go to college "are firmly for Trump, not just against Democrats." He said young white women who didn't attend college "may be as much anti-Democrat as pro-Trump. And then the outliers are college women, who are very pro-Democratic. But it'll be very hard to dislodge the Republicans' success with non-college white men under 30."
What's next: Rahm Emanuel — the former House Democrat, Chicago mayor, ambassador to Japan, White House chief of staff and possible 2028 presidential candidate — told us his party needs an emergency meeting of mayors and governors to rethink the party's perception and priorities, and see what's working in schools.
  • "The public has seen us as more focused around a set of cultural interests and issues — climate, 'woke,' DEI, abortion — than the American people," Emanuel said. "All those I care about. But they consumed both our intellectual and thematic energy. The American people said: You care more about that than everything else."
Emanuel told us Democrats have to stop being a liberal-only party for liberal-only voters: "We used to have liberal, moderate and conservative Democrats. Now we're basically a liberal party, because African American and Hispanic voters went out the back door. They're the ones who walked as we became more liberal."
  • Emanuel's big message in conversation after conversation: "The American dream is unaffordable and inaccessible. And that is totally unacceptable. ... The forgotten middle class has to be our North Star."
Axios' Tal Axelrod contributed reporting.
The plight of boys and men, once sidelined by Democrats, is now a priority
NBC News (archive.ph)
By Tyler Kingkade
2025-03-24 21:30:55GMT
For Democrats, reaching male voters became a political necessity after last fall’s election, when young men swung significantly toward President Donald Trump.

But for some — like Maryland Gov. Wes Moore — it’s also a personal goal. The first-term governor, who has spoken about his own struggles as a teenager, recently announced plans to direct his “entire administration” to find ways to help struggling boys and men.

“The well-being of our young men and boys has not been a societal priority,” Moore said in an interview. “I want Maryland to be the one that is aggressive and unapologetic about being able to address it and being able to fix it.”

In her State of the State address, Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer shared plans to help boost young men’s enrollment in higher education and skills training. And Connecticut Gov. Ned Lamont announced what he called “a DEI initiative, which folks on both sides of the aisle may appreciate,” to get more men into teaching.

The announcements come at a critical time. Researchers have argued that the widening gender gap reflects a crisis that, if not addressed, could push men toward extremism. And Democratic pollsters fret that if liberal politicians, in particular, do not address these issues, the party is at risk of losing more men to the GOP.

“When Trump talks about fixing the economy and being strong, they hear someone who gets it,” said John Della Volpe, director of polling at Harvard Kennedy School’s Institute of Politics, and an adviser to Joe Biden’s 2020 presidential campaign. “That doesn’t mean they trust him. But it does mean he’s speaking to their reality in a way most Democrats aren’t.”

On the campaign trail, Kamala Harris often spoke about issues of importance to women, emphasizing reproductive rights, for instance, and paid family leave policies. But soul-searching over her loss has prompted Democrats to reach out more aggressively to men, by engaging more with sports, for instance, and looking for ways to make the party seem less “uncool” to young voters.

Shauna Daly, a Democratic strategist and co-founder of the Young Men Research Project, said candidates need to do more than show young men that they can hang. “Where the Democratic Party has really fallen short with this cohort is that they don’t feel like Democrats are fighting for them,” she said.

They need policies like those the governors have proposed, Daly said, that address men's tangible problems.

In every state, women earn more college degrees than men. Boys are more likely to be disciplined in class, and less likely to graduate high school on time than girls. Men die by suicide at higher rates than women and are more likely to rely on illicit drugs and alcohol. And while women increasingly participate in the workforce at higher rates, men have steadily dropped out of the labor market.

The governors’ speeches touched on many of these issues, and earned cautious applause from masculinity researchers, who said they reflected a promising shift.

“I think it’s part of a growing recognition among Democrats that neglecting the problems of boys and men is neither good policy nor good politics,” said Richard Reeves, founder of the American Institute for Boys and Men, who has informally advised Moore’s staff. “If Democrats weren’t thinking about male voters, and especially young male voters, then it would be a pretty serious dereliction of duty, looking at the polls.”

In the past, Democrats might have been wary of targeting programs toward boys and men for fear of excluding girls. Whitmer seemed aware of this dynamic in her speech, when she followed her announcement about young men with a shoutout to women and a vow not to abandon her “commitment to equal opportunity and dignity for everyone.”

A handful of other states, including some run by Republican governors, have already launched initiatives targeting men in recent years. Utah established a task force that aims to help “men and boys lead flourishing lives,” and North Dakota created the position of a men’s health coordinator to study and raise awareness of disparities affecting men.

Moore said he was partly inspired by his own experience growing up in the Bronx after his father passed. He has described how troubles in his youth — including a brush with the police for vandalism, skipping school and getting poor grades — led his mother to send him away to military school, which he credits with helping him straighten up.

“It is very personal for me, because I was one of those young men and boys that we’re trying to reach,” he said. “And I felt like so many of the conversations that were being had about me were not being had with me.”

Moore will hold a cabinet meeting in April to discuss plans for the state agencies, but he has some initial goals: to encourage more men in his state to pursue jobs in education and health care, help boys within the juvenile justice system, and make sure he solicits input from boys and men on how the initiatives are designed.

For Della Volpe, from the Harvard Kennedy School, the governors’ announcements are encouraging. “The truth is, young men are speaking,” he said. “They’ve been telling us they want respect, opportunity, and strength. If Democrats don’t listen — and act — they’ll keep losing ground. But this moment offers hope.
Amid Donald Trump 2.0, Gov. JB Pritzker ponders running for third term and his national ambitions
Chicago Tribune (archive.ph)
By Rick Pearson
2025-03-25 00:28:33GMT
pritzker01.jpg
Gov. JB Pritzker speaks about the results of the election alongside Lt. Gov. Juliana Stratton on Nov. 7, 2024, at Illinois state government offices in Chicago. (Brian Cassella/Chicago Tribune)

The day after Donald Trump won the presidency last November, two-term Democratic Gov. JB Pritzker issued a statement that said as much about his plans for the state’s future as his own political future.

“In 2017, I sought public office in large part because of the threat Donald Trump and his allies posed to Illinois,” he wrote, citing his successful first bid for governor in 2018. “I have helped enshrine into state law protections that uphold our common Illinois values. That work will continue, and it remains my North Star.”

With less than a year before the March 2026 primary and only four months before the period to gather candidacy petition signatures begins, Pritzker has yet to say whether he will seek a rare but not unprecedented third term as governor.

But given his professed “North Star,” his sharp criticisms of the second Trump administration amid the listlessness of national Democratic Party leadership and a potential bid for the presidency in 2028, those who know and are close to the 60-year-old Pritzker say they expect him to seek reelection, with an announcement possibly coming after the legislature adjourns at the end of May.

Worth an estimated $3.7 billion, according to Forbes, and having spent $350 million to self-fund his two previous campaigns for governor, the heir to the Hyatt Hotels fortune finds himself with few political obstacles in the way of another run.

The man who controls and funds the state’s Democratic Party apparatus and has used his money to help numerous candidates and initiatives faces no intraparty challenge and so far has seen no significant, well-financed opposition surface from a moribund Illinois Republican Party.

That has allowed Pritzker to seek an outsize role in national Democratic politics in the early days of Trump 2.0. Seeking to fill a vacuum within a party struggling to respond to Trump and his efforts to dismantle the federal government, Pritzker has offered a message that attempts to recapture middle-class voters who abandoned the party in the 2024 elections.

Running for another term as governor also would provide Pritzker a dual track toward a presumptive look at a White House bid. And a victory in the sixth-largest state would continue to provide him a credible, high-profile platform from which to assail the actions of the Trump administration nationally in the run-up to the 2028 presidential election.

Just last Tuesday, speaking to the progressive Center for American Progress, or CAP, in Washington, Pritzker acknowledged that, as a Democratic governor, his ability to fight Trump’s downsizing initiatives in a GOP-dominated Washington was limited. But he also gave some insight into his mindset on why serving as governor during the second Trump era was important to Democrats.

pritzker02.jpg
Gov. JB Pritzker speaks alongside Neera Tanden, president and CEO of the Center for American Progress, at the center on March 18, 2025, in Washington. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty)

“The pushback that I can offer is, first, do the best I can to run a state that is really all about working people and the most vulnerable. But second, it’s I’ve got a bully pulpit,” Pritzker said.

“The bully pulpit that I get as governor gives me the opportunity at least to speak to what I think that our common American values are, and we are the center of the country, the heart of the country,” Pritzker said.

“In the state of Illinois, we also have a state that is most reflective of the population of the entire United States,” he said. “So it gives me that opportunity to talk about what I think is happening in the country and the dangers that I think we’re facing.”

But those dangers that Pritzker warns about — including the prospect of dealing with massive federal spending cuts affecting health care for the poor, education, housing, agriculture and grants to other areas of government — present hazards for someone trying to both carry out their duties as governor and pursue a national agenda.

“There are advantages and there are risks to running again — if his thought is to run for president,” said David Axelrod, a senior political consultant for CNN who was a senior political adviser to President Barack Obama.

“The question for him really is, being governor of a state is a hard job, and it’s likely to get harder these next few years and into the next term. Third terms have historically been challenging for governors,” said Axelrod, who has long served as a consultant on Democratic campaigns in Illinois and across the nation. “Given, you know, who he is and the resources he has and so on, is there more wisdom in spending two years traveling the country unfettered by the responsibilities of the governorship and the potential liabilities of the governorship?”

With his wealth, Pritzker has the resources to build a presidential campaign without the responsibilities of the governor’s office. But there is the example of former New York Mayor Mike Bloomberg, a billionaire whose 2020 bid for the Democratic presidential nomination lasted less than five months after he spent over $500 million of his own money.

Illinois does not have term limits for governor, but the only person to serve more than two four-year terms is the late Republican Gov. James R. Thompson. Thompson was the state’s longest-serving governor, holding the office for 14 years, from 1977 to 1991, including an initial two-year term that shifted the election of statewide officers to the nonpresidential midterm election. But in winning his third term in 1982, Thompson very narrowly defeated the late former U.S. Sen. Adlai E. Stevenson III by 5,074 votes, the closest governor’s race in Illinois history.

Like Pritzker, Thompson had presidential ambitions and also was courted as a potential vice presidential contender, though he took himself out of consideration. Pritzker has noted that his vetting to appear on the short list of vice presidential running mates for 2024 Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris was an indication of the belief that he had the qualifications to do the job of president.

But Pritzker has demurred on the question of his presidential ambitions, even as he has not publicly discussed his thoughts on a third gubernatorial term.

In August, speaking at the first Illinois delegation breakfast of the Democratic National Convention, Pritzker jokingly referred to his wife, MK, as his term limiter.

pritzker03.jpg
Gov. JB Pritzker arrives with his wife, MK Pritzker ,to deliver his annual State of the State address, Feb. 19, 2025, at the Illinois State Capitol in Springfield. (Brian Cassella/Chicago Tribune)

“I’m not suggesting that I want to try to beat Jim Thompson’s 14-year record,” Pritzker said. “My wife’s not here, and I don’t want anybody talking to her about this, but she is my term limit, so if all of you want to talk to her and convince her one way or another, by the way, you’re welcome to do that.”

Yet by looking at Pritzker’s collective comments since Trump’s Nov. 5 victory, as well as his travel and media schedule, it has become clear the Illinois governor relishes attacking the president and presidential adviser Elon Musk. He points to the state as leading the resistance in urging Democrats to focus their messaging on working families through such issues as increasing the federal minimum wage.

To Pritzker, Musk is “President Musk” and Musk’s associates in his Department of Government Efficiency are “DOGE-bags.”

“The meme lords and the minions in the White House conceive of themselves as kings and nobles who have the divine right to order the world in a way that best suits them and their fellow kleptocrats,” he said. “People’s lives are a game to them.”

“There’s no grand master strategy to improve the lives of everyday Americans. This is true, villainous cruelty by a few idiots who are trying to figure out how to pull off the scam of their lives. They’re armed with the power of the presidency, and their sights are aimed on working people, many of whom voted for them, never imagining what this would turn out to be. Here we are. Things are bad, and they’re getting worse,” he told CAP.

“This is all cruel, incompetent, recklessness, and 60 days in, the signs are there. It’s already pissing off everyday Americans,” he said.

With polls showing voter favorability for Democrats at record lows, Pritzker said, “If we want to regain the trust of the voters that we stand for, Democrats have to deliver. For sure, we have to call out the BS that Republicans have been selling, but meanwhile, Democrats have to make people’s lives better.”

pritzker04.jpg
Gov. JB Pritzker presides over the swearing-in ceremony on Jan. 8, 2025, in the newly renovated Senate chamber at the Illinois State Capitol in Springfield. (Brian Cassella/Chicago Tribune)

Contending that “the challenges that people are facing at the kitchen table are the very challenges that the Democratic Party is best at addressing,” Pritzker questioned, “Why are we not all screaming about the $7.25 (federal) minimum wage in this country?” and noted that Illinois’ minimum wage increased to $15 an hour Jan. 1.

Pritzker’s efforts to expand his national footprint include the creation of his Think Big America organization in October 2023 that helped fund abortion-rights ballot initiatives across the country. Since Trump’s victory, he’s appeared nationally on CNN, MSNBC, numerous podcasts, ABC’s “Good Morning America 3” and “The View” and has delivered speeches to Democratic advocacy groups. He’s also set to deliver the keynote address at the largest fundraiser for New Hampshire Democrats on April 27, though the state no longer plays as significant a role in the presidential primary process.

But there’s also the “bully pulpit” at home, where last week he conducted a three-day “Standing up for Illinois” tour of the state to lash out at Trump’s actions involving farmers, seniors and efforts to rebuild the state’s infrastructure.

“They hate that we’re succeeding in Illinois. They just hate it. It drives them absolutely crazy, and I love that it does,” Pritzker said of the Trump administration before a gathering of the Illinois Education Association earlier this month.

Axelrod said Pritzker’s aggressiveness on the stump “is something that undoubtedly will win him some followers” and is “appreciated by Democrats who are looking for someone to carry the fight.”

“He’s also been very supportive of Democratic causes and candidates around the country, and that always wins you friends,” he said. That includes a $500,000 donation in the battle over Democrats keeping a majority in a Wisconsin state Supreme Court race that has seen Musk invest millions of dollars into the Republican.

But Axelrod cautioned any national aspirations for Pritzker by questioning “what the country’s attitude toward billionaires is going to be in 2028? Elon Musk is not helping the brand.”

Still, he said, “there are billionaires, and there are billionaires,” and Pritzker’s willingness to be taxed at a higher rate based on his wealth stands in contrast to Musk and Trump allies who are “trying to cut everything that is meaningful to everyday people in order to pay for a larger tax cut” for themselves.

Among those who think Pritzker will seek reelection, there’s the belief that not only does a gubernatorial platform assist in any national ambitions, but it would also give him the opportunity to see some of his initiatives as governor come to fruition — most notably efforts to make the state a leader in emerging technology and a global center for quantum computing.

For his second-term reelection bid, Pritzker didn’t announce his candidacy until July 19, 2021, for a June 28, 2022, primary — an election delayed by the pandemic.

Looking ahead to 2026, Pritzker has not made a significant contribution to his political fund since dropping $13 million into it last August. He began this year with more than $4.1 million in his campaign bank account after spending $8.1 million in the final quarter of the 2024 general election period.

pritzker05.jpg
Gov. JB Pritzker and his wife, MK, walk off stage after dancing at the inauguration celebration on Jan. 14, 2019, at the Illinois State Fairgrounds in Springfield. (Armando L. Sanchez/Chicago Tribune)

Regardless of his decision, Pritzker will be the longest-serving Democratic governor in Illinois history at the end of his second term. Three other Democratic governors were elected to two terms, but none of them finished them.

Henry Horner died in office. Otto Kerner Jr. quit to become a federal judge. And Rod Blagojevich was impeached and removed from office before being convicted and imprisoned on federal corruption charges. Despite being pardoned by Trump, Blagojevich is ineligible to hold any public office in the state.

Pritzker said he still loves the job of governor, though he acknowledges “it’s become harder,” noting that with Trump, “the challenge is meaningful.”

“Look, whatever it is that I’m doing a year from now — or whatever announcements get made over the next bunch of months — I will be in this fight,” he told reporters earlier this month. “I have always been, as you know, an active participant in issues that matter to me. And the Trump presidency is attacking virtually everything that I believe in. So whether I’m in office or I’m not in office, or what office I am serving in, I will always be in this fight.”
From the first article:
Emanuel's big message in conversation after conversation: "The American dream is unaffordable and inaccessible. And that is totally unacceptable. ... The forgotten middle class has to be our North Star."
From the last article:
“In 2017, I sought public office in large part because of the threat Donald Trump and his allies posed to Illinois,” he wrote, citing his successful first bid for governor in 2018. “I have helped enshrine into state law protections that uphold our common Illinois values. That work will continue, and it remains my North Star.”
When did this term become popular for these slimy Jews and their cohort? This came from DEI/CRT, didn't it?
 
it's true, if you drink enough of it you'll have 0% health
"FUCK YOU ITS BETTER THAN DRINKING SODA" -90% of A&N the last 80 pages

speaking of which people act like drinking water is an obvious solution and not prone to getting fucked with, especially in the areas the poor live. i could taste the metal in the water fountains at school. And it will only get worse as years go by.

This also leads to the next point, if you can't drink water, and can't drink booze you're left with soda or juice or milk which has almost the exact same sugar content. at that point its a matter of preference and carbonated water does have benefits at least according to dr. faccui
 
what about a welfare system where for 6-8 hours a day you are effectively slave labor that the government can send to do any task or contract out to private companies, with a very small list of allowed refusals?
What are we, some kinda Hoodrat Squad?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: WhiskeyJack
The whole "vaccines cause autism" thing comes from that britbong fraud Andrew Wakefield who manipulated data in his study. It's been discredited for 25+ years but that factoid is still going around.
I can't believe some people think that vaccines make you autistic. Everyone know that they make you magnetic.
 
1742871897526.png

https://www.federalregister.gov/doc...the-attorney-generals-delegation-of-authority (A)

Blondie has revoked the ATF's ability to ban people from owning guns, or certain types of guns, as it was always something the Attorney General had delegated to them, and the AG can un-delegate it at any time. (The ATF was prohibited by law from un-banning people for decades.) I'm not sure but I think this kills red flag laws stone cold dead?

There's no way in hell they let her/Trump do this, so place your bets: Which corrupt judge announces the TRO preventing her from doing her job because it's not being done in a way the left approves of?
 
Back