William James Mitchell vs. Twin Galaxies LLC, Jeff Harrist & Jeremy Young & donkeykongforum.com, Benjamin Q Smith

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Billy was never defamed in any legally meaningful sense. I know this because I'm not a lawyer, a judge, or even a citizen of the country where this case is being adjudicated.
I know this because random people commenting on my own article are randomly accusing Billy of being an evil bastard who manipulates people into suicide.

What a fucking clown, lol.
You're missing the point. Billy Mitchell submitted a Donkey Kong high score achieved using MAME.

MAAAAME!!!!!!!!
 
Cucking to shitlibs fails, 100% of the time.

Mercy is for "brothers and sisters in Christ", not hostile aliens (like shitlibs).

For good reason: They see mercy (and apologies) as a sign of weakness and an admittance of failure, and so they attack ever-harder.

Just picture it in your mind's eye: If Billy Mitchell actually forgave Karl Jobst....do you picture these Reddit troons and spergs all suddenly dropping their 15 year jihad and saying, "Billy The Merciful! All hail!" Absolutely not. They'd say, "I bet Billy knew that Karl had more dirt on him and was going to nail him in court and Billy did this to try and save his own ass. Bend over, Billy, we're still comin' for ya!"
THIS USER HAS BRAIN ROT
 
If I had to speculate, I'd bet he threatened to sue them unless they provided him some statement it was about the Apollo Legend shit (and not that they found out he was the fake "King of Kong").
Literally made-up idiocy.

"I imagine that Billy Mitchell is, uh, threatening people to sign affadavits, under penalty of perjury. They perjure themselves for Billy Mitchell, risking contempt of court charges, jail time, and lawsuits, because, uh...."
 
No.

The judge awarded the damages for more than one action of defamation. Karl repeated the claim, so the amount is increased.
If he had only said it once maybe he would only ow Billy half?
View attachment 7172496(Source: Ruling)

The majority of money awarded is for general damages, which is NOT economic damages. Those fall under aggravated damages, for which Billy was "only" awarded 50000$AU.
So the primary harm Karl did to Billy was emotional and reputational. Which I agree with given what we now understand to be true.

View attachment 7172501(Source: Ruling)
View attachment 7172504(Source: Ruling)
View attachment 7172511(Source: #35 of the Defamation Act)
View attachment 7172525(Source: Ruling)

So the 50000$AU are for the economic loss and everything else is for Billy's hurt feelings and as a sign to the public to show that he has been vindicated.

[EDIT] Karl is actually lucky that Billy did not ask for more in aggravated damages and the judge stuck to the asked amount. He seems to have been inclined to reward more.
View attachment 7172540
[EDIT2] Added the ruling as an attachment for those interested.

No.

The judge awarded the damages for more than one action of defamation. Karl repeated the claim, so the amount is increased.
If he had only said it once maybe he would only ow Billy half?
View attachment 7172496(Source: Ruling)

The majority of money awarded is for general damages, which is NOT economic damages. Those fall under aggravated damages, for which Billy was "only" awarded 50000$AU.
So the primary harm Karl did to Billy was emotional and reputational. Which I agree with given what we now understand to be true.

View attachment 7172501(Source: Ruling)
View attachment 7172504(Source: Ruling)
View attachment 7172511(Source: #35 of the Defamation Act)
View attachment 7172525(Source: Ruling)

So the 50000$AU are for the economic loss and everything else is for Billy's hurt feelings and as a sign to the public to show that he has been vindicated.

[EDIT] Karl is actually lucky that Billy did not ask for more in aggravated damages and the judge stuck to the asked amount. He seems to have been inclined to reward more.
View attachment 7172540
[EDIT2] Added the ruling as an attachment for those interested.
Well one thing I found insightful here is that these emotional damages seem to hinge on the defamer not retracting his statement or apologizing. " Particularly if the defended has not apologized and withdrawn the defamatory statement"

I was under the impression this was something that can be mandated by the court, but I guess it is true that if slander is found they can't order Karl to issue a formal and public apology to Billy and retract his statement -- Karl needed to do this beforehand. I can see that the judgement being so sizable is simply to convince the public Karl is wrong.

Karl is a tremendous retard.
 
Nobody "hates" Billy Mitchell besides Redditors. Literally nobody.

Why do you hate him?
I hate every vexatious litigant, and you should too. I don't care about the Donkey Kong scores, but suing people into oblivion because they called you a cheater is retarded and evil, just like suing a certain website for calling you a gimp faced moron. This is the one time where the person he is suing actually deserved it, and since it actually went to trial he wasn't utilizing "the process is the punishment" so he get's a win but it doesn't excuse all of his other vexatious bullshit.
 
>"Billy"
are you on a first-name basis with him?

srsly tho, what'd he lie about, specifically?
He used an emulator but really that doesn't matter a man getting a record in the funky chunky monkey game means jack fucking shit, the real reasons people disliked him is his go to for negative publicity was just to sue and threaten people with lawfsre bs

That being said most people realize now you can just let him throw his tard tantrums as most people who even know of him hate him and the people obsessed with him like jobst wanted total life ruination and supports things like hate speech laws, so their problem isn't even fuck the rules I have money to compel your speech bs it's that they can't wield it to be even more cruel than Billy who actually showed a ton of patience and mercy and reason in this case surprisingly especially when it's the most serious thing he's been accused of from someone trying to ruin his life
 
I hate every vexatious litigant, and you should too. I don't care about the Donkey Kong scores, but suing people into oblivion because they called you a cheater is retarded and evil, just like suing a certain website for calling you a gimp faced moron. This is the one time where the person he is suing actually deserved it, and since it actually went to trial he wasn't utilizing "the process is the punishment" so he get's a win but it doesn't excuse all of his other vexatious bullshit.
The complete opposite. People need to fight these mobs of pompous degenerates by any means, including lawsuits. Going back to the Duke Lacrosse Case, these self-righteous bugman hordes have always pissed me off.

The right wing reaction to these people is to never pick a side, but just always fence-sit:
>"Well, Reddit is right that Billy Mitchell is an evil cheater and files friviolous lawsuits, but perhaps Karl Jobst just took his insults a bit too far."
>"Well, Trayvon Martin might not have been an angel, but that doesn't mean George Zimmerman had the right to shoot him."
>"Well, the Duke Lacrosse players might not have technically gang raped the exotic dancer, but they probably did other bad things."
>"Well, Donald Trump might not technically be a Russian spy, but his relations with that evil tyrant Putin are too cozy, and where there's smoke, there's fire."

It's a pussy cope by right wingers. Just a way to avoid taking the side of justice and fighting for it, aggressively.

Reddit, obviously, has radically increased the frequency and power of these bugman witchhunts. Billy Mitchell, God bless him, is a rare person who just stood up for himself (and, by extension, the truth) against these psychopathic bugmen.
 
He used an emulator but really that doesn't matter a man getting a record in the funky chunky monkey game means jack fucking shit
Donkey Kong is only mentioned because these Bugmen live their lives on screens and watch 'The King of Kong' on a loop. It was a lesser arcade game, relative to Pac Man, Frogger, Centipede, and others. In the 1980s, Billy Mitchell literally went on road shows with other elite-tier gamers. He was the undispisputed best player at virtually every game. Including fucking pinball.

Then Reddit watched some Jew documentary on Netflix in 2008 or whatever, and they've tried to turn his life into a living hell. Because he told a fib about playing games on emulators.
 
You should be questioning online investigators on principal, they are wannabe jurnos and jurnos are scum.
That's what I meant. Not that I think Jerard is innocent, but both Karl and Mutahar have shown they aren't very honest and are hypocrites. I guess I focused on the wrong thing in my post.
 
jobber1.png
>Betray Chud friend that helped make you popular
jobber2.png

>Simp for trannies
jobber3.png
>Play a role in causing the suicide of a fellow speedtroon autist
>Use his suicide which you played a part in to frame Billy while not saying a word about the true culprits
>Steal 200k from subscribers by lying what the lawsuit is about
>Merciful Billy still offers you a 50k settlement
>Refuse
>GET BTFO

merciful billy.png
>Merciful Billy shows mercy AGAIN and spares your life

jobber4.png
Billy is a fucking HERO, the only thing Billy did wrong is showing mercy to the Albino grifter scum.
 
Last edited:
I hate every vexatious litigant, and you should too. I don't care about the Donkey Kong scores, but suing people into oblivion because they called you a cheater is retarded and evil, just like suing a certain website for calling you a gimp faced moron.
And Billy, quite sensibly, took his lawyers' advice to drop those suits. The only claim remaining was the one where Karl falsely accused him of causing someone's suicide. Karl basically lied about what the lawsuit was about, while providing no legal documents to support his giddy crusade that Billy (provably) cheating at vidya was the sole basis for the case. It wasn't. Karl lied, Karl died.
Ahh, you're schizophrenic, I get it now.
This dude is a legit gibbering retard, ignore.
 
And Billy, quite sensibly, took his lawyers' advice to drop those suits. The only claim remaining was the one where Karl falsely accused him of causing someone's suicide. Karl basically lied about what the lawsuit was about, while providing no legal documents to support his giddy crusade that Billy (provably) cheating at vidya was the sole basis for the case. It wasn't. Karl lied, Karl died.
Billy Mitchell didn't "drop" most suits, they were settled, like 95% of civil cases.

The U.S. courts - and I assume Australian, too - aggressively encourage settlements. Settlements save the courts millions of dollars in trial costs, save the plaintiffs and defendants millions of dollars in attorney costs, and save everybody thousands of hours of time. In my state, if you're involved in civil court, everybody in the court system, at every step of the way, will be demanding that both sides make every good faith effort to reach a settlement. You'll have to sign tons of forms with clerks saying that you've tried to reach a settlement. You'll have to talk to the judge and explain how in the hell you haven't reached a settlement, etc.

Karl Jobst was caught dead-to-rights, was encouraged to settle by the court and, most likely, his own attorneys, and only offered what the judge deemed to be an absurd, bad faith settlement offer.
 
Most lawyers usually work on multiple cases if we're assuming the standard fare my loyal friend says he walks maybe 20 hours on more important cases.
Let's say 20 hours a week for four years
My rough estimate would be that jobs owes Billy about$700,000 in court fees and Lawyers bills

Keep in mind that in Australia, you hire an even more expensive specialist to argue for you in court. A barrister (the fags with the wigs) will cost $300-500 an hour. Or up to $1000 an hour if they have QC/KC next to their name.

That's on top of what you're already paying your solicitors. It makes having a trial on purpose even more retarded than doing so in the US.

Queensland guidelines state that Karl's lawyers had to warn him just how much it might cost him if he lost. And he chose to humiliate himself to the entire world anyway.
 
The complete opposite. People need to fight these mobs of pompous degenerates by any means, including lawsuits. Going back to the Duke Lacrosse Case, these self-righteous bugman hordes have always pissed me off.

The right wing reaction to these people is to never pick a side, but just always fence-sit:
>"Well, Reddit is right that Billy Mitchell is an evil cheater and files friviolous lawsuits, but perhaps Karl Jobst just took his insults a bit too far."
>"Well, Trayvon Martin might not have been an angel, but that doesn't mean George Zimmerman had the right to shoot him."
>"Well, the Duke Lacrosse players might not have technically gang raped the exotic dancer, but they probably did other bad things."
>"Well, Donald Trump might not technically be a Russian spy, but his relations with that evil tyrant Putin are too cozy, and where there's smoke, there's fire."

It's a pussy cope by right wingers. Just a way to avoid taking the side of justice and fighting for it, aggressively.

Reddit, obviously, has radically increased the frequency and power of these bugman witchhunts. Billy Mitchell, God bless him, is a rare person who just stood up for himself (and, by extension, the truth) against these psychopathic bugmen.
More buzzwords please. Btw nobody ever said “you can’t fight them”
 
Back