I'm pretty sure that they call western shows anime as well, but he wouldn't know. He pretends to be an expert but provides 0 proof or showing of knowledge of Japan at all. He makes shit up, and convienently forgets that all anime isn't moe high school creep shit for weird adults, but there's shonen and pokemon and magical girl stuff, that has child fans. Apparently Pokemon is the largest media franchise ever, but 100% of the fans are made up of child predators, and the japs prefer our SUPERIOR NON-PEDOPHILIC CULTURE and anyone there who likes animation in-house is an untouchable
He literally made this argument about Pokemon lol
Because anime is made by/for otaku, and otaku are hated in Japan for being weird creeps? Anime is actively disliked by anyone anywhere who's not a retarded otaku; it's childish tripe that losers pass off as really deep and smart and well-written to cope (which you can do with anything, by the way, as long as your standards are low enough and you're stupid enough).
I don't. I played Mario Kart and Sonic a couple of summers ago for nostalgia, and I played an SRW six months ago, and that's it. Those were special exceptions; video games give me a headache and always leave me unsatisfied, so I avoid them.
So you do, just not often, and you used to. Thanks for proving my point. Also, that's an anecdote which doesn't disprove what I said.
I'll grant you that, but minds can change. When you've seen a certain amount of anime and see the same anime multiple times, the flaws become more and more difficult to ignore, and you realize it's really not that good.
But now you're just arguing that it's "really not that good", do you see how quickly you dropped the "anime is for pedophiles" line of argumentation the moment you were implicated?
Transforming robots never have accurately-animated transformations.
Okay, to be fair, I never actually watched the animation frame-by-frame so maybe that's true. It would make sense to do that, if only to save on time and effort.
Most of the "anime" on Japanese TV channels are Western cartoons like Spongebob
You ever gonna cite a source for any of your claims or...?
Null talks about how Grave of the Fireflies is a pedo movie because the little girl has a UTI and constantly has to pee, yet most people who watch it don't care about that.
Never saw it, but it depends very heavily on intent and execution, which you can usually glean quite easily by how something is depicted. If it's full of panty shots and stuff it's probably sexualization. But Goku pees in Dragon Ball with his dick out and has his ass out at several points, but you're not intended to derive any sexual pleasure from it, so even nudity in and of itself is not inherently sexual.
Urusei Yatsura was the first anime to use that artstyle, and Lum was called a loli when that came out
Anyone thinking Lum--a tall, voluptuous woman--is a loli design is retarded, lying, or projecting.
Even toku is tainted for me now since Kamen Rider Den-O had an episode where the monsters were leaking a clear white fluid and it ended up on a woman's neck; I don't need to see a very specific Japanese porn fetish in a children's superhero show.
Are you sure it wasn't just your mind in the gutter? Do you have a clip?
I am liberal, and I do hate myself for having ever been into anime and I always had guilt and shame as long as I liked anime, despite avoiding and ignoring the degenerate stuff. You should hate yourself and be ashamed if you're a weeb; that's your conscience speaking out trying to save you because you know it's wrong yet you can't or won't stop.
So you
can avoid the degenerate stuff by your own admission, only people who want it will watch it. And if you can avoid the degenerate stuff them what's to be ashamed of? What's shameful about liking Death Note or Mobile Fighter: G Gundam exactly?
Children's cartoons shouldn't have any romance at all, but Western animation isn't overrun with LGBT stuff like every anime nowadays uses the lolicon pedo art style.
There's nothing wrong with Peach kissing Mario when he saves her, showing romance in children's media is good, it shows them how to treat each other and establishes proper relations between the sexes with a positive example. That's entirely different than inappropriate material or propaganda. And you sound schizophrenic, an art style can't be pedo.
Also, by the way, I would shame you for liking those kinds of cartoons (as well as anything else with a massively degen fanbase, like Friendship is Magic and Bluey).
I'd shame
myself if I liked MLP
Dragon Ball has Bulma constantly being harassed by Roshi.
Bulma is visually indistinguishable from adults in Dragon Ball, her mother is literally just Bulma with blonde hair, and she acts just like an adult, so for all intents and purposes there's nothing "loli" about her and those types of fans wouldn't be interested in her. Canonical ages are mostly irrelevant, it's design and characterization that are more important. If you get hung up on canonical ages then you're in agreement with the lolifags that 9000 year old vampire girls are okay to sexualize.
For comparison, Goku looks like, behaves like, and is canonically a child, he is treated as one in the series, he is nothing like an adult. Roshi has never perved on child characters, not on Chichi, Bulla, nor Pan, so all the crocodile tears over him are retarded.
Naruto has that pink haired girl and sexy no jutsu
What about that pink haired girl? Her very existence is a problem? Lol. And sexy no jutsu is a joke, it's funny, not gooning material you autist.
Pokemon has has Misty designed as "eye candy" for creepy men.
Incorrect, she was designed to appeal to the target demographic, boys, not men. There's not anything inherently wrong with designing a character the male demographic will find pretty. She's never sexualized either (at least in the first two seasons, I didn't finish the 3rd one nor did I really watch after that), so you're grasping at straws. This is really desperate dude.
This argument has gone on and on and is getting really autistic, so I'll just say that you need to look at this objectively and dispassionately. Most of your arguments are either personal attacks, whataboutism, or false equivalencies because you know deep down I'm right, so you can't do anything but attack me, throw smoke bombs to distract me, and rationalize rationalize rationalize.
I'm being entirely objective, you're just delusional and paranoid of loli lurking in everything, and making dubious claims you can't cite sources for. I'm being logical, you are not.
how is romance degenerate? kids can handle that if the sex part isn't involved.
It can be degenerate even without sex, primarily LGBT shit.