- Joined
- Aug 15, 2024
No, it does not say that. Please don't distort the facts. They always only talked about pictures being shared, and conflated it with using Signal. At no point in time was it claimed the picture was from from a Signal group chat, from a Signal chat or even from any chat between all parties. They only brought the Signal Chats in to support the expectation of privacy argument, which is a required element for the initial charge. Nick arranged it so he had 3 people on his side claiming a privacy expectation based on direct agreement of all involved parties.Nick is once again lying about easily provable facts. In Aaron's arrest warrant, it is clearly defined as an image that was taken from their faggot swinger Signal groupchat.
[EDIT] For clarity, I am not saying this is the truth, I am simply restating Nick's narrative to put it in perspective how he is trying to spin the story.
The logic here being: "We were in a polyamorous relationship, having free marriage swinger sex with each other, and we sexted and talked about those activities on Signal and shared pictures, but we all agreed that all this would be PRIVATE among us four, therefore any picture of my wife's destroyed body is private too". Which I cannot fault Nick for, that logic is actually solid. Of course a nude is private by default imho.
We had this discussion before in this thread. Their statements to the police and this summary of those statements are not clear about where the supposed picture was from, because they did not have that picture and their only source for the info that a picture was shared were Geno and Keanu.
Last edited: