💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 158 22.4%
  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 279 39.6%
  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 94 13.3%
  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 174 24.7%

  • Total voters
    705
Rekieta calls people names like a teenage girl—"No, you fat!" or "No, you nerd!" He can't even be creative about it. Such a miserable, pathetic loser, a failure of a father, and a garbage human being overall.
Fun fact: this is who is calling you a nerd on the Internet.
image (1).webp
And I'm sure we know exactly how he'd find a way to have "fun" in prison considering his proclivities.
 
It's not the majority of users in this thread, but some of the most vocal are full on delusional.
Literally nobody is saying "he's totally 100% going to federal prison."
I actually rather think he's not, in fact. I actually alluded to the fact I will not begin to seriously contemplate it unless and until an indictment drops. That's the smart move here, IMO.

Maybe it'll happen, as I think he certainly deserves it, but the world's facts do not care about my feelings.

The thing is, between what Aaron said on his show, and the fact that elb confirmed that Nick was taunting her that he was reading her mail (really stupid on his part), the whole hacking discussion understandably just got a shot in the arm.

Plus, independent of any any legal consequences, I 100% believe he obtained unauthorized access to one or more of Aaron's cloud accounts (presumably Google). Chalk up another example of him being a complete PoS.

At the rate it's going I give it 12 months or less before this thread has a worse reputation among forum users than the DSP dentractors.
Look, the single most important thing...

...is we don't become as bad as the vtuber thread. :story:

(But seriously, I think the thread is still fine).
 
Only because that's never been tested in court. For good reason too, the gov't would lose. There's a reason Glenn Greenwald and every other person who has reported on unauthorized info is still walking among us.

The portions of the CFAA covering knowingly transmitting, retaining, or using information obtained through unauthorized access are very real and have been used in court many times.. As I already said, they are not used against journalists and they are typically used in situations where there is a financial gain associated with use of the material. But if you are not a journalist and can't credibly show a journalistic use for the material, there are potentially serious legal consequences associated with this.

-----------
But again, prosecutions for this sort of thing are rather arbitrary. Even if there is an investigation showing serious wrongdoing, the decision to bring cases is rather arbitrary.

(note - I changed "serious legal" to :potentially serious legal" because there is no certainty of prosecution in cases like this.
 
Last edited:
But if you are not a journalist and can't credibly show a journalistic use for the material, there are serious legal consequences associated with this.
I doubt a guy (Melton) who repeatedly goes in hard on pedophilic sexual insults to Aaron's children, encourages police reports to make false police reports, uses "AI" to make sexual insults against his children, etc. can really claim a "journalistic" purpose for what is obvious harassment.

This may not be an international cybercrime ring, but it certainly isn't the fucking Pentagon Papers or anything.
 
I actually rather think he's not, in fact. I actually alluded to the fact I will not begin to seriously contemplate it unless and until an indictment drops. That's the smart move here, IMO.

Maybe it'll happen, as I think he certainly deserves it, but the world's facts do not care about my feelings.

The thing is, between what Aaron said on his show, and the fact that elb confirmed that Nick was taunting her that he was reading her mail (really stupid on his part), the whole hacking discussion understandably just got a shot in the arm.
I think that take is 100% correct. I don't think there's any doubt that Nick did something illegal with Aaron's account. I also think it's pretty clear from what Melton was saying, at least before Nick decided go full retard and expose his own crimes, that Nick had forwarded material to him too. I simply think people should slow their roll about speculating about what prison Nick is going to without any confirmation.

I've also stated repeatedly that Aaron should file an ethics complaint based on the fact that Nick publicly claimed to have spied on Aaron's attorney-client communications. That's in his power.

Literally nobody is saying "he's totally 100% going to federal prison."
The problem is that as soon as @SaidNoOneEver meekly questioned that narrative he got accused of potentially being a part of the vast anti-Imholte conspiracy and advised to lawyer up!

I don't think even the DSP people are that unhinged.

But if you are not a journalist and can't credibly show a journalistic use for the material, there are serious legal consequences associated with this.
That's interesting. By any chance do you happen to know if Melton is in good standing with his journalism license?

It would really suck for him if he let his journalism license lapse like Nick did with his law license.
 
I don't think Nick is going to prison because he would enjoy it too much, and real life doesn't work out the way he wants it to.
 
Circling back to my original post about this where I CLEARLY say the person who accessed the data originally and put it into the public domain is guilty of multiple crimes. The other people who then accessed it after those crimes were committed, not so much.
Probably. An exception is likely Melton, since Nick had ongoing access and Melton knew, which he was good enough to boast about and also post a sample of.

Other than that, I don't know how other people used the information.

Nick's defence is going to be it was all okay, because Aaron left himself logged in. That's a completely retarded argument. Worse, he made it in video already.
 
Fun fact: this is who is calling you a nerd on the Internet.
View attachment 7220160
And I'm sure we know exactly how he'd find a way to have "fun" in prison considering his proclivities.
That's what Nick looked like in high school????? I knew Kids who looked like him when I was younger, they were autistic and liked Legos.

Edit: I'm sure Nick would have SO MUCH fun in prison, for sure.
 
Here's my prediction for Nick Rekieta:
He's going to test positive on his first test but because it's the first test and he would have been using before his parole technically started, it won't count.













...Then he'll fail the second.
 
The problem is that as soon as @SaidNoOneEver meekly questioned that narrative he got accused of potentially being a part of the vast anti-Imholte conspiracy and advised to lawyer up!
Who is even saying he's going to prison? The most optimistic estimation is some white collar shit. Nobody is even saying that. He said some retarded shit and admitted he knew literally jack-shit about anything and took some flak. Wtf.

He didn't meekly do anything. He acted like an angry, aggressive retard.
 
I simply think people should slow their roll about speculating about what prison Nick is going to without any confirmation.
As I recall, there was merely some discussion that if... IF... he went to federal prison, based on what we know now, he'd be going to minsec. That was mainly to stave off the idea he'd be going someplace really bad like USP Florence ADMAX (basically the replacement for Alcatraz, where we put the worst people in the world we can't be bothered to simply execute). There were some of us that commented on that specifically as a slow roll to the idea he'd be headed to Rapeville.

I've also stated repeatedly that Aaron should file an ethics complaint based on the fact that Nick publicly claimed to have spied on Aaron's attorney-client communications. That's in his power.
Well, I will say, that if Aaron did that, it might heighten the chances of you getting a stream from Nick that you've craved for so long. He has, in fact, read every single one he's gotten (or nearly so), as MN OLPR is required to forward him a copy of each one. Plus he seems to hate Aaron more than anybody else in the world.

My best guess is he'd probably get totally shitfaced and scream about Aaron for multiple hours. Possibly even to the point he forgets to even read the full thing. It would be even worse if OPLR were to agree with Aaron, and escalate the matter.

Bearing in mind, OPLR can only handle lawyer discipline. Disbarment would be potatoes compared to the underlying criminal offense that was apparently committed here. Aaron is still doing the right thing in going to the cops, but I agree with you he could maybe take a more multi-prong approach to this matter. Assuming he hasn't done this already.
 
Who is even saying he's going to prison? The most optimistic estimation is some white collar shit. Nobody is even saying that. He said some retarded shit and admitted he knew literally jack-shit about anything and took some flak. Wtf.

He didn't meekly do anything. He acted like an angry, aggressive retard.
It woud be foolish to be certain.

HOWEVER, if he is charged at the federal level with the things he has certainly done, with all those beautiful enhancements, many certainly done, others likely, he will get jail time.

Yet he might not end up being charged with all those beautiful things. He might just get the base charge and he might get probation for that.

It might end up getting charged at the state level under § 609.891. And because Minnesota is weak on crime they might let him plea it down to a gross misdemeanor.

I'm just saying that Aaron was feeding the investigator everything that is known here and that investigator wrapped it with a bow for law enforcement. It just seems super unlikely nothing comes from it. Doing the crime AND advertising it on video usually causes problems. Nick should know that by now, as it's how the cops got a warrant to kick his door down based on an innocuous mandatory report in the first place.
 
I wonder if Melton used the illegally accessed pictures and videos from Aaron's account to train an AI to generate pictures/videos/voices of the people shown in them.
According to the fat nonce, a total of 28GB or so were acquired, illegally. This is pretty dire.
As I've previously stated, with an Android device having automatic backups, all the calls might be saved as audio files. Google offers a nifty feature where the calls can be searched in the form of raw text, this is opt-out only.
This means they have audio files of potentially Aaron's conversation with his attorneys, his family, friends, and that daughter they're sexually obsessed with. It could include family photos and videos as well, all backed up.

MElton's brown sheep-shagging retard from New Zealand can use the audio files to train that "girl" AI and photos to create whatever ghastly imagery they can imagine.

It's sick.

If anyone is using an Android, it might be a good idea to check your linked Gmail to see what's being saved. You don't want those audio files. If someone hacks into your account, they can search all sorts of shit. Think about words like nigger and faggot that can be used to screw with your real job, or cherry picked audio files of arguments with family to send you a nice police visit, or train your voice on AI for swattings. None of this is a conspiracy, does anyone remember that school principle who was lambasted for his racist speech which turned out to be deepfake audio by some disgruntled student?
 
What did anyone at Project Veritas get charged with? That was my entire point, thank you.

Has anybody suggested Melton would face charges? I thought the consensus was that Melton would roll over and snitch like O'Keefe did, and Rekieta is the one that could face charges like Aimee Harris did.

Edit: I hadn't noticed that you concede the person who initially accessed the data was guilty. Given that, we have no argument.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom