This is where you fall down. The court didn't "recognise" them as a thing, because legally they are already protected by the gender recognition act 2004 and the equality act 2010. The UK supreme court isn't like the us supreme court; it can't overturn law and can't create new law from scratch. What it did was state that they can't claim equality act protections as women, as those protections are exclusive to biological females. This breaks the entire trans narrative and legally excludes them from all the places and positions they've been trying to claim as their own.
The problem is that you're viewing this in isolation, rather than seeing it as part of a broader realignment of the social order against trans.
You know I always appreciate your reasonable and level-headed responses to my posts. I've said it a few times, but I do appreciate it.
I think we are discussing two different views though. What you say is absolutely correct in the terms of law, but I don't agree that it changes anything. Trans still exist. Trans still have legal protection, even if it means they can't play the woman card, they can now play the "I am a real
women trans" card, which gives them the same protections as it did before.
They can wave some paper, or quote some bullshit about hate speech or whatever and they win. I don't much care that NHS staff now see women as women, because it should have never been anything different. That's their fault for being retarded.
On the ground floor, in the trenches, on the streets where it matters, I, a straight, white, English male, have no more protection against calling a tranny a tranny today, than I did last week. Can I call a tranny a man and keep my job? Maybe. Can I call trannies a freak of nature or say they're not whatever gender they are and not face scrutiny? Certainly not.
Legally something may have returned to normal, socially, nothing has changed. And seems as the most powerful court in the land is the court of popular opinion, this ruling changes nothing.
Nothing except empowering a lefty liberal who hates men and loves niggers.
View attachment 7239472
That's all very well and good, but I take the Precession of the Equinox as the real calendar of the ages, and that's a ~26,000 year cycle. Earth is incidentally ~26,000 light years from the Galactic Core as well. As Earth's own magnetic field changes alignment relative to the galaxy's field, we get significant events on Earth, and since this orientation completes a 90 degree change every 6,500 years, I'm quite partial to the 6.5, 13, 18.5, 26 partitioning of history.
I see you're a man of culture who enjoys The Why Files as well.
only to a certain degree. everyone likes to say "they hate whites" and "they want to genocide whites" and "theyre replacing whites with browns", but whats happening is poor whites are being driven out of cities and their jobs are being taken by third worlders. i dont think theres a war on all whites, just poor whites. most of the british aristocracy are white and theyre not being replaced anytime soon. its all very sinister though no matter which way you look at it.
This, unfortunately, isn't accurate. The Lords, MPs and Aristocracy ARE being replaced. The King held some paki festival for the first time since windsor castle (or wherever it was) in 1,000 years. Pakis are winning local elections left and right. Lord Ali is a lord, who replaced a white lord. Many, many rich people are being replaced, either directly, or because they're just fucking off abroad because of how shit the country has become.
The poor whites were replaced 20 years ago and nobody cared, or evidently even noticed, because they were poor, white and lived in the norff. The working class white have been replaced. The middle-class whites are currently in the middle of their replacement, and fringe cases of the upper caste are starting their own replacement.
People laugh, but the next election in this country (UK) will be between a nigger and a paki.
