Leftist Dictatorship Apologists / Third-World Fetishists / Shithole Tourism / Tankies, Wumao, and Vatniks - Western democracy is DEAD!

[Wuhan Wet Market]

I've noticed lately that Indian nationalists have a funny tendency to worship North Korea.

Find one of the India Defense League reply guys on Xitter and look through his posts for a little bit. I guarantee you, you'll eventually stumble across him talking about how great the DPRK is or how their reputation is the fault of "the West".

indians manufacture rage slop for all audience.

 

[Silence of the Troons]

I unfortunately don't have any screenshots, but I have a few anecdotes to share about the one time I was in a chat server full of North Korea fans.

Sometime in 2015/2016, I was invited to a server for cinephiles. At the time, most people in there were normie American liberals and Asians, including the owner (who was the one who invited me). I didn’t agree with most of their opinions, but there weren’t a lot of political discussions and there were also multiple channels dedicated to pirated movie files, so I decided to stay.

Fast forward one year when I barely checked the server. When I came back, most of its members (including the owner) had somehow turned into tankies and put pronouns in their bio. The new members were also all invariably tankies with pronouns in their bio. Surprisingly, there were only a couple of full-fledged trannies in there. On the other hand, there was a shit ton of gender specials of the he/they and the she/he/they kind. The political/pro-tranny/anti West/anti white people discussions had increased drastically. also could no longer use words such as retard (predictably, words such as bitch were still allowed). I was surprised over how radically the server had changed, but I stuck around for a while anyway for the sake of having easy access to movie files.

First off, most of the members were now fans of the CCP and North Korea. It wasn’t uncommon for them to post videos from the Youtube channel ”Aramaki project” (to my knowledge, the channel is not run by a tankie, but it’s popular among tankies who are fans of North Korea) and soy over how beautiful Pyongyang was, and how it’s only Western propaganda that it’s a shithole and that North Koreans are actually thriving. Behold, the truth that the West is hiding from you:

During the pandemic, one of the he/she/theys (actual self-hating lesbian) posted a really tacky video that aired on North Korean TV and that was meant to encourage the population to practice gymnastics while being locked up in their own homes. She actually thought it was the cutest thing ever. Unfortunately I can’t find it anymore, but if you’ve seen one of their propaganda videos, it was on that level of tackiness.

There was one guy who was a hard left-winger, but also an actual Asian living in a 3rd world SE nation where the CCP has done a lot of harm. For that reason, he was very critical of them. However, the one time he tried to pipe up and argue with some of the CCP fans (all of them being privileged Asian Americans/Canadians), he was promptly shut down and told that he didn’t know what he was talking about.

Now, you might be asking yourselves ”as people of gender, how did they justify the fact that the regimes they worship don’t agree that TWAW or even support homosexuality?”. It’s quite simple: they just said that it’s Western overexaggerated propaganda. Furthermore, same sex marriage (or ”same sex” marriage as the aforementioned he/she/they lesbian called it because she’s not a dirty female, dangit) is just a ploy pushed by bourgeois white gays, because what Asian LGB people actually want is polyamory (?). To be honest, I’m not sure what their problem even was because their complaints made no sense. Meanwhile, they were sperging about J.K. Rowling and FUCKING WHITE WOMEN!!! every other week. Heaven forbid you call a misogynistic gay scrote a faggot though.

Needless to say, Islamophobia was absolutely haram. Shortly before I ended up leaving the server, they invited someone who was a Communist and a pro-Iran Lebanese Mudslime who was sperging about the shit that Mudslimes typically sperg about.

After I made the mistake of posting a (fairly milquetoast) opinion and being chewed out by one of the male tankies, as well as the fact that I’d found another way to easily download pirated movies and I’d had enough of the retards in the server in general, I finally ended up leaving. In hindsight, I should’ve done so earlier. They were incredibly tiring people to deal with.

 

[Skylavijas]

Stuff like what @Silence of the Troons talks about is the reason why certain western leftists get mocked actual communist party states. In Cuba, these people would get referred to as "ideologically blind" (Ciegos ideológicos) or "Revolutionary romantics" (Románticos revolucionarios). In China, it has actually become a derogative term to refer to somebody as part of "white left" (白左).

So that's right, tankies are so obnoxious and delusional, not even communist party states like them. At best, they see them as useful idiots.

 

[Skylavijas]

Found a youtube video that is the perfect material for this thread

I decided to click it out of curiosity, expecting a historical video, but it ended up being a leftist diatribe about how great USSR was and how cringe USA is.

What threw me massively off guard was the claim at around 3:19-4:07 that USA currently has literacy rate of 79%, while USSR in the 60s had achieved nearly full literacy. I decided to immediately check the sources. The American source in the description does indeed claim that 21% of people are illiterate, but it doesn't link to any sources or research backing up that claim. So I decided to try and find data on American literacy that contain the same percentages and I found one that details the statistics, however, in that data analysis 21% of people are referred to as possessing low-level literacy (level 1 literacy and bellow), not outright illiteracy. Checked the OECD citation within the analysis, which is where the data was gathered from, which led me to a beefy PDF file (attached down bellow), where level 1 literacy at page 69 (nice) is described as follows:

At Level 1, adults can read relatively short digital or print continuous, non-continuous, or mixed texts to locate a single piece of information, which is identical to or synonymous with the information given in the question or directive. These texts contain little competing information. Adults performing at this level can complete simple forms, understand basic vocabulary, determine the meaning of sentences, and read continuous texts with a degree of fluency.

To break it further down, that 21% number is made up of 12,9% people who possess level 1 literacy, 4,1% bellow that and the other 4% could not participate due to physical or cognitive impairment or lingual barriers (only spoke Spanish).

So my only assumption is that the source she used simply equated low-level literacy with functional illiteracy, which is a blatant misuse of the data, particularly since it didn't even link any sources to it.

I decided to check out other links concerning Russian literacy and I kid you not, one of them is an archive link that leads you to this page.



SHE DOESN'T KNOW HOW TO PROPERLY ARCHIVE LINKS, IT JUST LEADS YOU TO A RUSSIAN REGISTRATION PAGE. I had to search up on google to find the original link where I was able to find the statistics mentioned in the video... although once again, none of them are cited, so their validity can't be verified, but I'm not gonna bother fixing somebody else's poorly done homework in citation. What's notable about the text, is how it details and describes 2 opposing viewpoints as for how effective USSR's literacy campaign was, with one viewpoint glazing Soviet achievements and another, by Kerry Foley from Georgetown University, says that soviet literacy achievements were a byproduct of tsarist educational legacy. In that same article she cites for her video, Kerry says this:

Another problem with conceiving of Soviet educational achievements as exceptional is that the statistics used to prove their success simply cannot be trusted at face value. The Soviets were so intent on proving that theirs was a modern, progressive state that they had every incentive to inflate the statistics on education, just as they did with statistics on public health and industrial output.

Kerry goes much further detailing his skepticism in soviet achievement in education, but you get the point... The exact source she uses to make a point in her video simultaneously disproves it.

Another link about literacy under USSR leads you to an article written by International Socialist Review. It mentions that more than 60% of the population is illiterate and that the communist party government underwent great lengths in fostering literacy, even in the face of war and famine. Once I got to the section mentioning statistics of literacy after these soviet programs, I was left further disappointed:

While the adult literacy campaign’s accomplishments were thus limited, and much of the data is hotly contested as a result of Stalinist distortions, it had important successes.

Yet despite full acknowledgement of some of the data being a Stalinist distortion, the article goes on to conclude...

The complete transformation of education and literacy during the Russian Revolution exposes the lies at the heart of American education—that competition drives innovation, that punishments and rewards are the only motivations for learning, and that schools are the great levelers that provide every child with an equal opportunity to succeed.

Absolutely nothing is cited about the American education or any detailed description of how it developed in contrast to Soviet education or even why it is inferior, besides "muh competitiveness". You're just supposed to take the article's word for it, that the American education system sucks.

There's just so much wrong in the few first minutes alone, before she even gets into actually describing the darn cartoons. I didn't even get into the section starting at 7:01-8:46 where she discusses how stealing public property is good, if it's done in the name of public good (although to be fair, that's not exactly beyond Bolshevik ideology). Watching that section I was left utterly flabbergasted that people like her, who screech online about media literacy or how all cops are bastards, uncritically fall for pro-cop propaganda meant for fucking toddlers, just because the officer is wearing a red uniform, instead of blue. No really, she doesn't even cite any sources or mention any concrete historical example of how the Soviet police functioned in real life whatsoever. Maybe because if she did, she'd have to contend with the fact that as late as the 1970s the soviet police would crush political dissent by having dissidents jailed in psychiatric hospitals and pumped with mind altering drugs and engaging in large scale arrests of human rights activists like Helsinki watch group. Not to say that American police was all nice and dandy, particularly when it came to hippies and black rights activists, but depicting the force of communist party autocracy as a substantially more human alternative is the equivalent of trading in being cuffed outdoors by heaped rope in exchange of being locked up in a cellar by steel chains.

I'm gonna leave the rest of the video for you guys to decimate, because it's filled to the brim with just about EVERYTHING wrong with western leftists and has loads of material to make fun of.

 

[Silence of the Troons]

she

Woah, did you just misgender this individual? "She" isn't an icky female, revoltionarythot is a they/them.

Stalin and Lenin would've misgendered her.

 

[Skylavijas]

Woah, did you just misgender this individual? "She" isn't an icky female, revoltionarythot is a they/them.
View attachment 7247438
Stalin and Lenin would've misgendered her.

Is that a fucking "I stand with Palestine" profile pic...

You couldn't make this up for satire... dare I say, if she can be milked enough for lols, she could have her own thread.

 

[Sargon's wife's son]

No my favorite are the Khmer Rouge apologists I mean to be fair some days I want to purge all of the intellectuals as well as all of the people live in cities but I generally don't think you can really defend a country that literally has mountains of skulls.

Like I don't even think anybody in Cambodia defends him I mean hell even the worst presidents of warlords in any region lease has one guy willing to defend him that's just the Western white person thing to defend the guy who literally a would kill hundreds of people each day in a random **** field

 

[Vriljami]

No my favorite are the Khmer Rouge apologists I mean to be fair some days I want to purge all of the intellectuals as well as all of the people live in cities but I generally don't think you can really defend a country that literally has mountains of skulls.

>Killing intellectuals is....le good!
>"Okay, face the wall."
>NOOO NOT LIKE THIS

 

[Sargon's wife's son]

Killing intellectuals is....le good!
>"Okay, face the wall."
>NOOO NOT LIKE THIS

Damn it we should have just deployed all of the weatherman underground to Cambodia a friend of mine actually came up with that theory of howled to deal with all the cultural Marxists in 1960s you said they should all been shipped off to the Soviet Union where most of them would have had bullets put in their heads.

Because even the Soviets find their path sees annoying

 

[Skylavijas]

View attachment 7250541

>Killing intellectuals is....le good!
>"Okay, face the wall."
>NOOO NOT LIKE THIS

We need to start distributing these t-shirts as a reward for dedication in these sorts of dangerous mental gymnastics

 

[Vriljami]

We need to start distributing these t-shirts as a reward for dedication in these sorts of dangerous mental gymnastics
View attachment 7251593

Gays for Russia demo:



The profile of the editor-in-chief of Socialist Unity Party's Struggle:



I know, "If you love [shithole] so much, why don't you go be gay there" is sort of boomer own...but yeah. If you're curious, "Melinda" was born as Greg.

 

[Skylavijas]

View attachment 7251630View attachment 7251631View attachment 7251632View attachment 7251633View attachment 7251634

View attachment 7251639

I am so tempted to post these images in some pro-Z Ukraine war thread, just to see what happens

 

[Frederica Bernkastel]

This is one of the funniest feuds these retards have. I have no problems with Stalin murdering people, but Pol Pot? He was a genocidal manic who worked for the CIA! But the bigger thing here is the schism Infrared/Hinkle created by making their own consensus reality on the left. It totally broke and fractured them.

 

[Vriljami]

View attachment 7259901
This is one of the funniest feuds these retards have. I have no problems with Stalin murdering people, but Pol Pot? He was a genocidal manic who worked for the CIA! But the bigger thing here is the schism Infrared/Hinkle created by making their own consensus reality on the left. It totally broke and fractured them.

When you're in a sectarianism competition and your opponent is a leftist:

 

[Skylavijas]

The world of /leftypol/ shitposting is truly something else

 

[TaimuRadiu]

No my favorite are the Khmer Rouge apologists I mean to be fair some days I want to purge all of the intellectuals as well as all of the people live in cities but I generally don't think you can really defend a country that literally has mountains of skulls.

Like I don't even think anybody in Cambodia defends him I mean hell even the worst presidents of warlords in any region lease has one guy willing to defend him that's just the Western white person thing to defend the guy who literally a would kill hundreds of people each day in a random **** field

pol pot did nothing wrong especially when he started killing zipperheads from viet nam

 

[Sargon's wife's son]

This is one of the funniest feuds these retards have. I have no problems with Stalin murdering people, but Pol Pot? He was a genocidal manic who worked for the CIA! But the bigger thing here is the schism Infrared/Hinkle created by making their own consensus reality on the left. It totally broke and fractured them.

These people are counter evolutionaries paul Pot was the truest communist and Ho Chi Minh was a imperialist who was something.

pol pot did nothing wrong especially when he started killing zipperheads from viet nam

Seeing how Vietnam is now one of the most capitalistic countries in Asia The Khmer Rouge was just trying to liberate them from capitalistic pressure men is a capitalist and a counter evolutionary long live the Khmer Rouge Comrade

 

[Skylavijas]

View attachment 7259901
This is one of the funniest feuds these retards have. I have no problems with Stalin murdering people, but Pol Pot? He was a genocidal manic who worked for the CIA! But the bigger thing here is the schism Infrared/Hinkle created by making their own consensus reality on the left. It totally broke and fractured them.

 

[Viliamo]

Ah yes, you are telling me that the alliance made up of member states that include two, which continue to have medieval battles over at their borders while supplying proxies on each side to weaken their rivals would not be that interested to act as friends for the sake of some third worldism nonsense?

China has been selling Drones to Ukraine and continues to deny acess to their banks to a lot of Russian companies, India and China have been killing eachother over at their borders for decades while Pakistan continues to be supplied by Xi, Brazil was thrown under the bus by Russia as soon as they tried to float the idea of some Brics currency, Egypt and Ethiopia are one drought/dam away from starting a new war over in the Middle East. Why are third worldists surprised that Regional Powers are highly pragmatic and are more interested in safeguarding their interests then uniting against some "Big Satan".

 

[Sargon's wife's son]

China has been selling Drones to Ukraine and continues to deny acess to their banks to a lot of Russian companies, India and China have been killing eachother over at their borders for decades while Pakistan continues to be supplied by Xi, Brazil was thrown under the bus by Russia as soon as they tried to float the idea of some Brics currency, Egypt and Ethiopia are one drought/dam away from starting a new war over in the Middle East. Why are third worldists surprised that Regional Powers are highly pragmatic and are more interested in safeguarding their interests then uniting against some "Big Satan".

Because these people are ideologically driven and don't understand the concept of real politic