Official Kiwi Farms Man-Hate Thread

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
View attachment 7265032View attachment 7265031

Why are men so fucking retarded about this. Trump was SO CLOSE to fixing SOME of the problem with deporting unwanteds and potentially fixing the H1B issue........ but republicans banning abortion, hating maternity leave, and now making payouts for popping out kids isn't going to get them the BHBE little boys and girls they want.

Pairing those two initiatives will increase the number of brown, fatherless, low IQ high crime wastrels the US is already struggling with.

Women have more kids when they feel it's safe. When they're economically secure, the men aren't fucking porn addicted gaymur retards, and they don't think they'll lose out economically by raising kids... and that their kids have a future in an economy not shitwashed and undercut by foreign nationals. It's not just a 5k payout nonsense.

FFS. It's so fucking tiring.
MUH BIRTHRATES but entirely unwilling to change anything about moidself to help

Related to that and proving once more that Islam is the end stage of moidery if unchecked: Turkey is banning elective c-sections because 'women are able to conceive faster after a natural birth'.
I am so sick of this longing for the medival ages by men and muslims in particular. Fuck them. I don't want to see them, I don't want to hear them, I don't want to have to think about them. The fact that this is probably the only place on the entire Internet where I can even utter these thoughts is just about as upsetting as the fact that western men look at this shit and go 'they might be onto something'.
 
Brandy [◉ said:
The fact that this is probably the only place on the entire Internet where I can even utter these thoughts is just about as upsetting as the fact that western men look at this shit and go 'they might be onto something'.
Ovarit (sadly probably going to close down later this year) and mumsnet (maybe unexpected given the name) are two alternatives I know of.
 
1745396329066.webp
 
Brandy [◉ said:
It is borrowed from "Lolita Complex", an American book published in 1955 in which a 36 year old man falls in love with a 12 year old girl.
Good post and informative. Nabokovs book was called Lolita, not lolita complex.

I think the japanese name translates to lolita complex, as names often change with the translation of a book.

It's a perhaps a bit generous to describe it as a book where a 36 year old man falls in love with a 12 year old girl. Probably more accurate to say that he is obsessed with her and molests her. Calling it love is the self justification of the unreliable narrator.

One of the most disgusting things I know is how it was used as a kind of fashion subculture on tumblr which also tried to normalize the themes, in an attempt to groom the vulnerable, I presume.
 
IMG_9467.webp
That’s what they want you to believe, and then post shit like this:

IMG_9463.webp
IMG_9465.webp
IMG_9466.webp
If a man needs to tell you about how “nice and “loving” he is, chances are he’s not a good person.IMG_9464.webp
You should never trust someone who “jokes” about raping women for the same reason you shouldn’t tolerate someone joking about being a pedophile. Chances are very high that they themselves are a wannabe rapist, and are testing to see if you’re an easy target for them.
IMG_9468.webp
Never give an incel the chance. They’re always going to be an abuser in some shape or form. They’re bitter that they’ve been weeded out because women have gotten better at picking up red flags.
 
View attachment 7265729
That’s what they want you to believe, and then post shit like this:

View attachment 7265737
View attachment 7265739
View attachment 7265740
If a man needs to tell you about how “nice and “loving” he is, chances are he’s not a good person.View attachment 7265738
You should never trust someone who “jokes” about raping women for the same reason you shouldn’t tolerate someone joking about being a pedophile. Chances are very high that they themselves are a wannabe rapist, and are testing to see if you’re an easy target for them.
View attachment 7265762
Never give an incel the chance. They’re always going to be an abuser in some shape or form. They’re bitter that they’ve been weeded out because women have gotten better at picking up red flags.
There is literally an incel au version of Kiwifarms? Damn, maybe the Woman Hate user base would feel more at home there than here. So many like-minded, sane individuals, it's just as cosy as your average 4chan threads were!
 
There is literally an incel au version of Kiwifarms? Damn, maybe the Woman Hate user base would feel more at home there than here. So many like-minded, sane individuals, it's just as cosy as your average 4chan threads were!
I got some more screencaps where that came from:
IMG_9469.webp
IMG_9470.webp
IMG_9471.webpIMG_9472.webpIMG_9473.webp
Like I said, never trust anyone who “jokes” about raping women/being a rapist. Chances are, they at minimum are porn sick brained sadists who should be avoided. They’re lonely for a good reason, and it’s not because they’re ugly on the outside.

The sadistic Moid also has a pfp of a little girl of an anime character, so it’s safe to say he’s also a pedophile.

Isn’t it “funny” how sadism, porn addiction, pedophilia and sex offenders are all connected in one big Venn diagram?

Being “le edgy” doesn’t quite seem like a plausible deniability excuse anymore now that I think about it.
 
No idea why these Incels are mad about going to prison for rape. Prison should be a dream come true for Incels;
  • Don’t have to work.
  • Three meals a day made for you.
  • No “foids”.
  • Get to take the submissive role in a relationship.
  • Become desirable, people approach you!
  • Get to have sex all the time, even when your least expecting it!
 
I got some more screencaps where that came from:
View attachment 7265787

Dude like why would you call the cops after jewish nigger kike homo trannies gangraped your incelibate ass after beating you up to a bloody mess? Maybe they only wanted to do it once. Maybe they would have only raped other retarded chud incels later on, so having them arrested doesn't benefit you exactly. Look at the positives, you've technically had sex!

:story::story::story:

Nope, I refuse to believe these guys are for real. It must be a troll shitpost from a frustrated loser who typed it with one hand.
 
Good post and informative. Nabokovs book was called Lolita, not lolita complex.

I think the japanese name translates to lolita complex, as names often change with the translation of a book.

It's a perhaps a bit generous to describe it as a book where a 36 year old man falls in love with a 12 year old girl. Probably more accurate to say that he is obsessed with her and molests her. Calling it love is the self justification of the unreliable narrator.

One of the most disgusting things I know is how it was used as a kind of fashion subculture on tumblr which also tried to normalize the themes, in an attempt to groom the vulnerable, I presume.
Ohh, good catch, I didn't double check the book title. It is indeed just "Lolita" in Japanese. The Complex part from Lolicon comes from コンプレックス (Komplex) which they borrowed from German* to express a mental state that is not the norm. I think English uses it as well in stuff like Oedipus complex? *German has been for Japanese doctors what Latin was from Western doctors: you had to learn it during medicine because a lot of that is founded on books of that language. Japan borrowed most of its modern medicine from Germany during the Meiji era. If you visit an older doctor in Japan chances are his German is way better than his English.
I never read Lolita, is it really that sleezy?
Incels.ls
Amazing find. If I didn't know better I'd assume it all is parody.
346457568678.webp
Every time: The worst thing women can do to a moid is laughter and the only way to retaliate is murder.
 
( I could talk all day about how this type of erotica is a way for women to cope with the inherent abusive nature of men, but no one wants to read that shit)
I do! Please post at length about it!

Additionally, this reminds me of Twilight and the rash of similar romance novels (some being targeted at YA women, more recent others labeled as adult "spice") with extremely controlling and obsessive male leads, plus the "yandere!male character" fanfiction trend. I think this is a way women and teenage girls cope with lack of male sexual fidelity, not to mention the way men larp as The Protective Sex without ever intending to back that up. If he's dangerously obsessed with you, then he spends all his time making sure nothing can hurt you and you can never get away, and that means he's not whacking off to videos of other women.

Thread tax:
I can't stand how conversations about compensated dating/sugar babying/sugar daddying point the issue at the young women and teenage girls involved instead of the men. Every time I lurk a conversation about this or research the issue, the focus is on either "how much agency does the woman/girl have in this situation?" or "in some ways it eMpOwErS her" or "why does she make this choice?". As if the men aren't also making a choice. As if understanding and redirecting the female perspective is the only step. And sure, it's important to protect vulnerable women and girls, but what about ostracizing the gross old men that prey on them? Who figures them out? Who protects girls from them, and how?

99% of problems in society would be solved if justice systems held men accountable for their crimes, and gave the maximum penalty to male sex crimes. I'm barely exaggerating with that percentage. It should be so easy. And yet, so many social processes - even some conversations about women's issues and male-on-female abuse - start with the assumption that men (or a few men, enough men) are just a force of nature that runs roughshod over women's autonomy, and to focus on punishing them would be like punish a monsoon. So those processes become focused on how women change their lives in preparation for the monsoon, and not the very real choices those men have made or what kind of consequences they should get.

Sometimes I think feminists believe in male agency more than men themselves do, because giving men consequences for evil choices is acknowledging men choose their actions.
 
Brandy [◉ said:
I never read Lolita, is it really that sleezy
It is a multilayered, very well written novel, with very dark and dangerous undertones. At first layer it's about a vulnerable and amicable gentleman that accepts lodging from a woman named Charlotte Haze, who seems to quickly fall in love with him. At some point she gives him an ultimatum to marry her or move out. He marries her.

He writes horribly about her, though, calling her "the haze woman", "my fat wife" or the dismissive "lo's mother" in his writing.

She finds his writing one day, about his obsessive ideas about her 12 year old daughter. In many different ways he's been justifying why she is mature enough. The danger of the book is how persuasive he is to anyone who doesn't understand exactly what the things he describe means.

She angrily crying tells him she will expose him, runs outside, and tragically dies in a traffic accident, a truck that hits her.

Of course he's an unreliable narrator. He probably pushed her. It's all too convenient.

He becomes foster father to lola. Has, from his own twisted viewpoint, consensual sex with her. Tries to get the reader to see it that way. They go on a road trip, in part to get her away from her school and school boyfriend. He paints himself as a victim of her seduction and whimsy. He accuses her of being childish multiple times, which is a weird thing to accuse a child of.

One of the mildly redeeming features of the book is that instead of being fully committed to being pedophilia apologia, the young girl dolores (dolores = lola = lolita) responds more or less as you expect. Which is to say, she has the clear trauma build up of being abused and manages, in this case, to get away from him. I'm not sure that can be a plus in favor of the book, because I think without it, it wouldn't have been able to be sold in its time when it was written.

To answer your question, yes it really is that sleazy and the worst part is that it seems anything but sleazy on the surface. Like a gentleman's club usually being the least clean part of an entire city, sewer included.
 
Last edited:
I, yet again made the mistake of reading the news today. 13 years old boy stabbed an adult woman, out of a blue. He also had yelled (freely translated) "fucking whore, you're not walking here anymore". Thankfully the woman in question managed to get away, and is in therapy and afraid of going outside. When questioned why he did it, and what he think the victim felt he pretty much gave "I dunno" answers. Biggest point of said article is about how youth feels bad, how they're spending too much time using smartphones and whatnot. Worst part of this is that this is not first similar case of underage teens attacking someone (and one might think they don't pick bigger able bodied adult men).

Surely, this is the case of someone acting like a dog, and thus should be trained like a dog? Yes, I am mad, since this kid is just put on reform school for few years, while someone else carries physical and mental scars for this.

it really is that sleazy and the worst part is that it seems anything but sleazy on the surface.
I remember this being one of those books that made me simultaneously sad and hate the main character. Pretty decent read in that regard.
 
It was so transparently just a ploy for him to publicly humiliate her.
You'd think the fact that he was able to abuse the court system and manipulate the jury to humiliate his ex-wife would have caused at least some outrage. This whole thing stinks of corruption. So many things were stacked in his favor. Having tons of evidence thrown out (including medical records) that supported Amber, Allowing Depp to bring multiple witnesses that were on his payroll. The jury being non-sequestered and being brainwashed by pro-Depp propaganda. The last thing alone was reason enough to declare this a mistrial and make any fair trial by jury impossible. Every time I look into this kangaroo court I find some more bullshit:
There's more but I don't want to digress too much. It's clear though that Depp settled in Amber's favor because she had strong grounds for an appeal.
There's a good reason why Depp wanted cameras in the courtroom and Heard didn't.
The judge also rejected Amber's request to turn the cameras off for her sexual assault testimony. This judge is either a evil piece of shit, corrupt or both.

Josh said something on MATI about Matt Walsh complaining that he wasn’t getting credit for his efforts against the trans movement.
Matt Walsh doesn't get the same vitriol that women get for speaking out against trannies. He didn't get death and rape threats like JK Rowling did. He also never had trannies throw tomato juice at him like Posie Parker in New Zealand. He also never gives women credit instead he blames them for the tranny movement, so fuck him.
 
Back