Official Kiwi Farms Man-Hate Thread

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Josh said something on MATI about Matt Walsh complaining that he wasn’t getting credit for his efforts against the trans movement. This is a pretty retarded sentiment to anyone who knows where every persuasive argument against transgenderism originated: radfems.
Matt Walsh is sometimes right on "controversial" issues even, but he's a valor-stealing, petticoat-riding coward. He was right about troons, he's right about psychology, he's right about foreign aid, and he's right about selling babies. People try to get him with "what about Dave Rubin" and he points them to his xitter posts from 2011 (without calling out the trafficker by name, because that'd be *~*~impolite~*~*). But he's not willing to fight for it. I've followed him on xitter on and off for several years, because he's one of the rare anti-psych poasters and I want to keep up to date on developments in rhetoric, and he's never done anything about the issues that are at stalemate. As soon as women have started winning against troons, why, there he was.

And then he turns around and blabbers about muh bonding and other psych shit to justify a father (in a peddit ragebait post) dumping his tween daughter in favor of his tween nephew.
Moid has a son and a daughter, takes them fishing etc. Young nephew moves nearby, moid dumps daughter ("ew cunt"), spends time exclusively with son and nephew. Daughter sad. Wife sad, warns him to take daughter. Moid refuses. Daughter double sad, refuses to talk to moid. Moid blames wife for "parental alienation". Matt Walsh: "men need bonding", "wife can take daughter bra shopping".
But if/when the anti-psychology movement achieves something, he'll be the first to point out how he has the oldest xeet on the topic among his clique and therefore deserves all credit. He's like those people who post a flutter of fake predictions in private xeets, then reveal the one that turned out to be right and delete the rest.

Related to that and proving once more that Islam is the end stage of moidery if unchecked: Turkey is banning elective c-sections because 'women are able to conceive faster after a natural birth'.
I am so sick of this longing for the medival ages by men and muslims in particular.
MSN News:
Men’s interest in women’s decisions is not limited to Turkey. The World Health Organization (WHO) advises that 15% of total deliveries at most should be by caesarean.

The world rate rose from 7% in 1990 to 21% in 2021. In Turkey, it climbed from the 20%s in the early 2000s to 61% in 2023.
(This is not to absolve Muslims but to point out this is part of the globalist agenda, "the free world" is not going to object as it sometimes does.)

This was over 10 years ago and I still think about it sometimes.
A fanatical trad Christian girl (very trad pretty, borderline anorexic) I used to secondhand know regularly went to Christian slave camp and at 18 got assigned a (young) husband there, allegedly also a bible-believing Christian, he got cleared by priests and all. They married (she was a virgin of course), she got pregnant, he turned out to be a shitty coomer, moved in with her, never got a job, never cared for the baby, watched porn all day, tried to force her to do perverted shit in bed. She went to her priest for advice, the priest told her to comply and pray for god to help her stop being so uppity because "the husband is always right". She got slightly better, divorced him, and he never paid child support. She's still a Christian and goes to church but doesn't talk to priests.

Like, faggot, you laughed like a maniac when you harassed all the "foids" out of your "gaymur mayun onlee space" and then you cry that you can't meet wimmins??
"Fake geek girl! She's only pretending to like [retarded moid shit] because she wants to hang out with me! Get out! Unrelated, why am I still single? Life is so unfair reeeeee"

However, moids, in their naturally arrogant ways of thinking, assume that all women get these procedures (or just put on makeup and flattering outfits) only to impress them.
I don't want to bash women too much in this thread but I hate clumps of body hair, and some women told me I was pornbrained and whatnot. I've never watched porn, I hate it on me for me.

When asked if they're roiding themselves up to attract women, they respond in a familiar tone, "Uhhhh me do it for Iself".
Then they refuse to believe women! "Noooo, you're lying, you can't possibly prefer a normal-looking man signaling family orientedness over a roided dysmorphic possibly gae!"

Men expect we look like beautiful fertility goddesses forever and ever and are mad that we can't.
Men expect women to look like fertility goddesses but hate how pregnant women and new mothers look.

Women prefer athletic and lean bodies, something that is very rooted in reality and men can easily obtain in no time
To be athletic and lean, they need to exercise a little and stop stuffing their pig faces. This is hard for men, they lack temperance, they'd rather guzzle protein shakes by the gallon and chew troughs of techbro magic pill roids and fart in gyms with other men.
 
A fanatical trad Christian girl (very trad pretty, borderline anorexic) I used to secondhand know regularly went to Christian slave camp and at 18 got assigned a (young) husband there, allegedly also a bible-believing Christian, he got cleared by priests and all. They married (she was a virgin of course), she got pregnant, he turned out to be a shitty coomer, moved in with her, never got a job, never cared for the baby, watched porn all day, tried to force her to do perverted shit in bed. She went to her priest for advice, the priest told her to comply and pray for god to help her stop being so uppity because "the husband is always right". She got slightly better, divorced him, and he never paid child support. She's still a Christian and goes to church but doesn't talk to priests.
That's awful. That type of shit makes me sick. To help bring a life into the world and then to just not only ignore your child but to force someone else to look after you like a child as well. It really fucking sucks the church still has so much influence and can put people through something like that and then just tell them to deal with it. I'm glad she at least got her and her kid out of that situation anyway.
 
"Tee hee hee women fuck dogs, amirite moid bros?"
It's all projection. Men know they are disgusting creatures and NEED to project their nature onto us: "women fuck dogs," "women fantasize about rape," "women suck more than a billion dicks in their lifetime." These are all things men actually do disproportionately more than women. It's all so they can feel less dirty about how disgusting they are inside.
 
Literally 99% of all aviation disasters are men not communicating, men overlooking a small problem, men not dealing with repairs correctly, men murdering a plane load of people, men's egos, men playing around, men taking risks, men not following a checklist, men's culturally diverse screwed up chain of command, etc etc etc.
I cannot overstate how true this is. I also have a special interest in aviation crashes and it has been mind-boggling watching men pretzel themselves into insisting how obviously terrible female pilots are when these are some of the dumbest reasons male pilots have crashed planes:
  • Two retards at the controls failing to get out of a stall that a Flight Simulator greenhorn could have fixed, while their pilot naps after partying too hard with his mistress the night before
  • Pilot lets his kids into the cockpit and sit at the controls, then fails to recover the plane
  • Pilots make a bet to see if they can land the plane with the curtains closed
  • Multiple instances of male pilots being such egotistical mongs that they had to invent CRM just so they'll start listen to their subordinates
  • Pilots yapping so hard they don't notice they're taking off from the wrong runway
  • At least 5 examples off the top of my head of a male pilot, crew member or passenger suiciding the entire plane
Meanwhile two of the notable airplane crashes involving female pilots happened because of a massive fire in the hold (unavoidable) or the married male pilot flirting with his female subordinate.

I used to read Admiral Cloudberg posts but after the troonout and incessant soapboxing/defending the pilots at any cost even when they were clearly in the wrong, I needed new source material, so I appreciate the recommendations!
 
The problem is likely the client's issues with boundaries.

No, the problem is the man wanting to do gross, violent shit. Period.

"If a woman just.... if a woman would.... If a woman says... A woman should... A woman needs to...."
NO. The problem is the man.
MEN Need to Have Boundaries they Enforce on THEMSELVES.


You claim to want to use "neutral language" but then call this abuse "kink". Calling abusive behavior a "kink" is obfuscating what's actually going on and using the language of the enemy. Calling "kink" abuse isn't "emotional language", it's telling the truth.

I have no idea if you're a larping moid fig leafing his filthy desires or a retarded faggot pickme with a disgusting fetish, but I'll say - "He's not going to pick you, Becky", and mute out.
 
Every time there’s a choking thread, I point out that you cannot choke someone safely. It’s always dangerous
Every time, I am told, it’s safe! It’s breath play! And every single girl ever loves being choked and they beg for it. Every time I point out that I have NEVER met a woman who has said she likes it.
To me it’s like the poster child for the way porn has infiltrated society. NO jury would ever accept a defence of rough sex being routine twenty years ago, they just wouldn’t. I find it absolutely horrifying that acts like this are expected and normalised.
I have met women who have liked choking but only because they were forced into "liking" it by a bad boyfriend. I cannot imagine the thought process that makes a man get turned on by hurting his partner in this manner but I liken them to feral animals that should be culled.

Sex very easy. Say some nice things to the woman and thrust with penis. If a man cannot accomplish this simple task, he does not deserve to breed. There should be laws for this.
 
Any anons here who know any studies on animal sexual abuse statistics committed by each gender or any credible charts on this topic? I need that to post as a reply every time i see a scrote on social media making a "women fuck dogs" cope or lie.
I don't usually post here, but let it be said that the reason people think women fuck dogs is because these people see massive amounts of porn consisting of women being abused by—guess what—forcing them to partake in bestiality.

It's the same thing as saying women love being choked and fucked until they prolapse because all you watch is Blacked(tm) BDSM porn.
 
I actually watch disaster infotainment - some channels specialize in aviation disasters and breakdown the flight recorders and logs to find out what caused the crash such as Green Dot and Mentour Pilot. It's overwhelmingly men. Literally 99% of all aviation disasters are men not communicating, men overlooking a small problem, men not dealing with repairs correctly, men murdering a plane load of people, men's egos, men playing around, men taking risks, men not following a checklist, men's culturally diverse screwed up chain of command, etc etc etc.
Fun fact: In 1997 there was a plane crash that happened in South Korea where 229 out of 254 people got killed abroad. Aside from the bad weather, one of the reasons it crashed in the first place was because the captain gave the co-pilot retarded orders and that co-pilot having to put up with them because of South Korea's incredibly autistic obsession with hierarchy or he would face repercussions for not respecting his superior.

1745967651268.webp
Source

I don't want to hear shit about women being bad pilots when we have cases of men literally going with the choice of getting themselves killed along with others because
they didn't want to disrespect their superiors by questioning his dogshit choices.
 
Aight, I get to ask what I actually came here for.

I asked this in another thread, but might as well ask it here as well, what advice or suggestions would you people here give to men when writing female characters, particularly in a romantic setting? Doesn't matter if it's a book, a game, a movie, etc. (although for the sake of the question, let's just pretend anime doesn't exist).

I saw your post in the other thread and I thought, “ah, just let it go,” but then you came in this thread and I’ll tell you the real answer: Fuck you, don’t try. Maybe it’s the first day of my period, or maybe I’m just mad that Ovarit is gone, but try just leaving us alone for a while. I don’t want any woman, real or fictional, to get wrapped up in whatever romantic fantasy a man has for her.

Why do you need to write women at all? I get it: we’re most of the world’s population because we’re the human model meant to both give life and survive when life is hardest, and the male desire to peer inside of the sacred jewel that is a the adult human female—to describe us in ways men can understand, consume, and compare—is just so overwhelming that you lot will burn down the entire globe to contain us within yourselves (because you’re so uncomfortable with the fact that you were once contained within us), and it makes you curious, but maybe, just, could you not?

Now that I’ve seen what men like to see women do, I would prefer to not be represented by them, ever. A better idea would be to work with the men you know to end pornography.
 
Why is it always like this... The MEN ONLY space is for learning a trade, or going to school, or networking for business and NO WIMMINS ALLOWED.
Simple, it is like this because they are closeted homosexuals

Though, I've heard this story before and it doesn't really seem that the men care all that much. There's some other space on the compound specifically so men can sit down and talk to each other but the rest of the group is mixed sex. As a girl I understand why it's important to have female only spaces but why men only spaces? What are you protecting yourself from as a male? Cooties?



It's all projection. Men know they are disgusting creatures and NEED to project their nature onto us: "women fantasize about rape,"
There's a big difference between women who fantasize about rape and men who fantasize about rape. If a girl told me she had a thing for rape I would feel sorry for her, because she's imagining herself being raped in that scenario. If a scrote on the other hand told me he was into rape I would most likely assume hes the rapist in his fantasy. However, it is equally as likely that he wants to get his poop hole sodomized.

Though, I've never once met a woman say that she gets off on the thought of raping men unless it's a poorly disguised troon online.
 
Last edited:
Every time there’s a choking thread, I point out that you cannot choke someone safely. It’s always dangerous
Every time, I am told, it’s safe! It’s breath play! And every single girl ever loves being choked and they beg for it. Every time I point out that I have NEVER met a woman who has said she likes it.
To me it’s like the poster child for the way porn has infiltrated society. NO jury would ever accept a defence of rough sex being routine twenty years ago, they just wouldn’t. I find it absolutely horrifying that acts like this are expected and normalised.
"I only choke because my girl asks me too haha she's just a freak, I can't turn her down"

9858zspyhg771.webp

"BTW the sub is always the one in control and a good dom always has their best interests in mind"

fcn6ci0t5hwe1.webp
 
British zoologist sentenced to 249 years in jail for raping, torturing, killing dogs: Report
Britton's representatives claimed that he suffered from paraphilia between 2022 and 2024, when he committed the above acts.
Suffered from. The poor widdle dog fucking faggot suffered from his self inflicted paraphilia, guys. I fucking hate journos who dress up sex crimes like this.
 
I'll keep this short (haha) but I'm reminded of how fucking fragile male egos are thanks to this video (and naturally its comments):
"Yeah, men need MOAR safe spaces for their poor feewings, we're so sad and lonely and hurt by wimmin"
View attachment 7274181
(Man violates woman's physical boundaries and space)
"HE WAS PERSONALLY ATTACKED AND VIOLATED!"
View attachment 7274044
Remember ladies, YOU'RE the ones that are bitchy and hold on to grudges and mean things people say! Men are LOGICAL and FORGIVING and definitely NOT IMMATURE!
View attachment 7274051
I can't find the post now, but it's something along these lines: "the worst thing a man can do to a woman is abuse, rape, and murder her; the worst thing a woman can do to a man is insult him/set boundaries".
Fucking moids. Petulant manchildren by nature.

Besides the "WOMEN NEED TO CREATE SAFER SPACES FOR MEN"...I mean what? you need women to do what for you? I though you men were the independant force!!

Is funny how they expect all women go around him, calming and doing what he needs just because he exist. FUCK OFF really.
 
I don't want to hear shit about women being bad pilots when we have cases of men literally going with the choice of getting themselves killed along with others because
they didn't want to disrespect their superiors by questioning his dogshit choices.

I had to stop reading the helicopter crash thread because the moids there are absolutely insufferable. As soon as the pilot's identity was announced, it filled with sexist bullshit about how women should not be pilots because they are not as good as men, comments about 'women drivers' and generalized smug 'see, this proves that we are the superior sex' posts. (No, any facts about women being safer drivers, comparable-to-better pilots, and much less likely -as in, never- going to decide to kill themselves and take several hundred people with them because why not? count, because their feelings don't care about your facts).

The interesting thing is, you can see them spinning a fantasy and adding to it and refining it in real time, bouncing off each other to add ideas that would make the situation worse and generally whipping themselves up into more woman-hate based on believing each other's retarded and baseless speculation.

First, they speculated that she's a lousy pilot because she's a woman
Then she was a DEI hire
Then she was someone's 'Golden child' and fast-tracked through her career and totally underqualified for her job
Then the rest of the army management threatened her co-pilots to treat her specially and defer to her
Then the other pilots were too afraid for their jobs to question her even slightly

Then apparently they all flew straight into a plane because certain death and the death of dozens of others is preferable to questioning the DEI hire. I'm not kidding. That's where they arrived. Based on absolutely nothing except the fact that the pilot was revealed to be a woman.

No-one saw a pilot fly a plane deliberately into a mountain or crash one based on a retarded bet and said "See? This proves men shouldn't be pilots!" Because men are human beings and women are women. One man crashing something is one person being a retard. One woman crashing something is all women are retards.
 
NO jury would ever accept a defence of rough sex being routine twenty years ago, they just wouldn’t.

Girl, what are you talking about? Moids have been getting away with murder for decades under the guise of "rough sex".:lossmanjack:


Basic bitch Wikipedia rundown:
Screenshot_20250430_093350.webp

Edit: spelling
 
Last edited:
Girl, what are you talking about? Moids have been getting away with murder for decades under the
The uk I am talking about, and I guess.. sigh more than twenty years (am old.) thirty then.
The spanner case established you cannot consent to bodily damage, and that case shocked society. Over the last few decades we’ve seen a societal shift, where increased pornification has meant that juries are no longer shocked and horrified by this but they just shrug and accept it as normal. That’s horrendous and it’s a massive change in how society see that as a defence.
The Nathalie Donnelley case is one Ive talked about here quite a few time, and that was 2018 - she was raped and beaten to death and the cause of actual death was vaginsl haemorrhage from a spray bottle being rammed into her and pulled out, amd the (rich, coincidentally) man who killed her got a light slap on the wrists because ‘she liked it rough.’ And the jury bought that. My point is that thirty years ago, a jury would not have accepted extreme sex as so routine everyone did it.
Uk society did NOT accept this as a defence when I was young. We can’t consent to this have been instrumental in getting this loophole ‘sort of’ closed but it’s still being used. The more the victim can be painted as a slag the better - the recent uk one the article is at pains to point out her cheap dressing gown and primark knickers, rather than the fact she was strangled to death with a ligature in the bedroom of her child.
 
I used to read Admiral Cloudberg posts but after the troonout and incessant soapboxing/
What the fuck? That's really disappointing, I used to love reading his articles. But I guess it shouldn't be a surprise when a nerdy constantly online male troons out.
Uk society did NOT accept this as a defence when I was young. We can’t consent to this have been instrumental in getting this loophole ‘sort of’ closed but it’s still being used
The fact that courts and society seem to be okay with men strangling women to death as long as they stick their dick in them while doing it is so fucked up. In my country it also used to be seen as murder but in the last two decades men get away with it, "causing bodily harm" gets them one year in prison. FOR MURDERING A WOMAN WHILE FUCKING HER.
 
Back