- Joined
- May 17, 2021
Gotta look for the technicality
"Money given to me from the trust is still my money. You never specified that the money had to have been earned from a job."
Nick just lies now. It doesn't even have to make sense anymore. He has lost all will and intellectual ability to run the barest fig leaf excuse.
Rekieta's still trying to be Dax and he thinks he's found his own litigation epic arc. Rekieta is going to lose badly and so is Melton.
This was the winning strategy that Nick took with his Montagraph case. How is that one going...?
On Sunday's Viva-Barnes Locals show, guess what lawyer found Supertips to be a charming and humorous addition to Nick Rekeita's highly recommended legal analysis?
Robert Barnes! ...Is anyone surprised?
Just what does Barnes owe Nick anyway? Why lie so flagrantly, sweep so vehemently, herald so crassly? Is there something going on there we've missed? It seems weird.
Just wait until someone mocks him with it...
It's also almost exactly the fact pattern in the leading voice misappropriation case, Waits v. Frito-Lay, Inc. in which Tom Waits refused to do a Dorito's ad and the company instead hired a sound-alike. Kurt has clearly refused to allow his voice to be misappropriated in this way and they're still continuing to use it. Pedomelt and Cuckieta have essentially advertised exactly who this voice is.
Their gay little stunt of pretending it's a "parody" and now, pretending it isn't obviously Kurt, won't save them just like it didn't save Frito-Lay, who ended up shafted for over $2 million.
Both of these idiots have done the dumbest thing imaginable and walked straight into the fact pattern of the leading losing case of voice thieves.
Actually they can and they are. They're literally stealing from him.
It doesn't sound anything like him. Kurt should take the W and walk away.