>You're claiming the defendant defamed your client
>Yes your honor, specifically stating that my client was using illicit substances and cheating on his wife
>Counsel, what is the basis for your clients claim that mister rekeita was abusing drugs and engaging in infidelity
>Thank you your honor I would like to introduce exhibits A through WG15
Some time passes
>Mr Rekeita did you recently agree to a stayed conviction with this court for felony levels of cocaine
>Yes your honor
>And did you engage in an extra marital affair with the defendants ex spouse
>well by my definition if your wife agrees to wife swap it's not really infidelity
>Did you engage in sexual relations with Mrs April SteelToe
>Oh hahaha yes of course, Aaron even ate my goo hahaha
Judge takes a recess
>So your contention is that Mr Imholte can draw no reasonable inference that you, a person who has plead guilty to charges of cocaine possession within weeks of the alleged defamation, who engaged in recreational drug use and with the defendant and also, as evidenced from the many exhibits and statements you yourself have publicly made, engaged in extramarital affairs with his ex wife...
Nick interrupts trying to explain his definition of extramarital affair but is cut off by Barnes
>you are saying he has no way to reasonably infer that you are a drug user as well as a adulterer
>That's correct sir
>Summary judgement in favor of the plaintiff, Mr Imholte is now betrothed to Mr Rekeita and I wish them both a million dollars
