Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

[Debbie Macomber]

ECF 292
View attachment 7366626
View attachment 7366625
Russ objection is barely mentioned.

This also basically denies Russ's request for a personal protection order against Hardin

Guess it didn't please the court

 

[HTTP Error 404]

This also basically denies Russ's request for a personal protection order against Hardin

Guess it didn't please the court

Oh that was never coming up in THIS court.

Russface will be making THAT attempt in his local jurisdiction, then he'll try bringing it up in court. "The neutral third party defending Null and those dang Kiwis has been BANNED by the POLICE from contacting me and thus he has to be REMOVED IMMEDIATELY and REPLACED with a new neutral third party who will HELP ME WIN."

I have to wonder what the fuck the judge would do if gimpy managed to trick and lie his way into getting a protection order against Hardin. Maybe Hardin just keeps emailing the Judge and the Clerk to have THEM tell gimpy things.

"Here comes the honorable defense, requesting the Judge, who still won't shut this mockery of a trial down, tell the pro se retard that he still has not responded to the previous 3 requests for information that he is required by law to respond to..."

 

[mindlessobserver]

I have to wonder what the fuck the judge would do if gimpy managed to trick and lie his way into getting a protection order against Hardin. Maybe Hardin just keeps emailing the Judge and the Clerk to have THEM tell gimpy things.

He would probably call the judge who issued the protective order to politely explain why they need to rescind the order immediately

 

[reptile baht spaniard rid]

Since divorcing spouses often get restraining orders against each other, and still somehow navigate the court process of the divorce, there has to be a way for a court to ignore or at least modify the order such that communications can continue, perhaps through the docket only.

This shit could get insanely lit and all it takes is one fucknut judge in Vegas.

 

[Dizzyuntildeath]

He would probably call the judge who issued the protective order to politely explain why they need to rescind the order immediately

History would suggest he just start filing things demanding the judge recuse himself because of bias rather than calmly explain why he was temporarily (permanently) retarded.

 

[Hunter Hearst Helmsley]

Since divorcing spouses often get restraining orders against each other, and still somehow navigate the court process of the divorce, there has to be a way for a court to ignore or at least modify the order such that communications can continue, perhaps through the docket only.

This shit could get insanely lit and all it takes is one fucknut judge in Vegas.

Against each other, not the lawyers!

 

[GenociderSyo]

Since divorcing spouses often get restraining orders against each other, and still somehow navigate the court process of the divorce, there has to be a way for a court to ignore or at least modify the order such that communications can continue, perhaps through the docket only.

The court has apps that are used for this situation with divorced parents with children where its a court monitored app to allow communication for pick ups, absences, etc.

 

[RodgerDodger]

Since divorcing spouses often get restraining orders against each other, and still somehow navigate the court process of the divorce, there has to be a way for a court to ignore or at least modify the order such that communications can continue, perhaps through the docket only.

This shit could get insanely lit and all it takes is one fucknut judge in Vegas.

That's spouse's. They cannot get restraining orders against each other's lawyers. The individual parties do not need to be able to directly communicate. But the lawyers do.

 

[Obnoxious Asshole]

What is the air speed velocity of an unladen genetic reject with a broken face?

When he hits the ground?

 

[reptile baht spaniard rid]

That's spouse's. They cannot get restraining orders against each other's lawyers. The individual parties do not need to be able to directly communicate. But the lawyers do.

Greer and Hardin forced to use the same court app that Ralph has to use to coordinate visits to his spawnson would be the cherry on this shitsundae.

 

[Hunter Hearst Helmsley]

Maybe the judge should order Greer and Hardin to visit a couples counselor? I feel like we can salvage this thing.

 

[HackerX]

Guess it didn't please the court

I'm still hung up on that retarded tidbit for two reasons.

1. It's grammatically retarded. Russ has plightsplained a bunch about Hardin wasting the court's time by filing frivolous motions (which always happen to be in response to Russ's retarded motions or actions), but the court hasn't taken a particular stance. Has it? I'm sure there's been a handful of times since the case started where the judge just said "stop being retards" to both of them, but nothing as far as "Hardin, stop being the hardship".

How is the court pleased by this if they hadn't done that??? If anything, it should read "If it please the Russ", which is more retarded, but at least makes sense.

2. Is "If it pleases the court" a phrase that's used outside of movies or TV shows? If so, is it ever used on paper instead of in person? Hell, it might be for all I know. My only experience with court is sitting around with a thumb up my ass while waiting on jury duty to tell me they don't need me, but it seems like that phrase is doubly retarded here.

 

[reptile baht spaniard rid]

https://todaysgeneralcounsel.com/do-judges-care-if-lawyers-say-may-it-please-the-court/ (probably slop, but decent enough) - it seems a formality that usually appear at the beginning of an argument (basically a form of "let me speak").

It's batshit where he has it, but it's clear what he's trying to say - "I'm going to ask for this, and if they give it to me, oh boyo, best watch out!"

I suspect he thinks it's like flirting with a girl (you have to put the right words in the right place).

 

[mindlessobserver]

"May it please the court" is more an introductory phrase in oral arguments that you can use as a more honorific "hello". Retards see it used in legal TV shows and assume it's works just as good in writing. Which it doesn't.

 

[Debbie Macomber]

I subscribe to the theory that Russ thought "if it pleases the court" was asking for the protective order in his opposition to the extension, so Russ must be crushed that the judge granted Hardin's extension and denied him

 

[AnOminous]

I subscribe to the theory that Russ thought "if it pleases the court" was asking for the protective order in his opposition to the extension, so Russ must be crushed that the judge granted Hardin's extension and denied him

Someone said those words, in a motion that was granted, therefore if Russhole mindlessly regurgitates those words, then his own motion will be granted. Duh.

 

[RodgerDodger]

I'm still hung up on that retarded tidbit for two reasons.

1. It's grammatically retarded. Russ has plightsplained a bunch about Hardin wasting the court's time by filing frivolous motions (which always happen to be in response to Russ's retarded motions or actions), but the court hasn't taken a particular stance. Has it? I'm sure there's been a handful of times since the case started where the judge just said "stop being retards" to both of them, but nothing as far as "Hardin, stop being the hardship".

How is the court pleased by this if they hadn't done that??? If anything, it should read "If it please the Russ", which is more retarded, but at least makes sense.

2. Is "If it pleases the court" a phrase that's used outside of movies or TV shows? If so, is it ever used on paper instead of in person? Hell, it might be for all I know. My only experience with court is sitting around with a thumb up my ass while waiting on jury duty to tell me they don't need me, but it seems like that phrase is doubly retarded here.

Yeah regarding #1. I notice that more recently the Magistrate has stopped being all "Play Nice Kids" and scolding both sides. In the hearing his only pushback on anything to Hardin was a minor comment that one of his points was probably getting too nitpicky, but he said it in a jovial collegiate way. Basically saying "Yeah man I get the point". Whereas Greer got hit repeatedly over the head with the Cluebat of Justice. There was no more "Both of You Play Nice" or any sense of equivalency to maintain any illusions of impartiality. Bennet had clearly twigged to who the Fuckwit in the room that was causing all the problems was. And it was not Hardin.

 

[waffle]

I also think that he thought his opposition counted as a motion for an order of protection against Hardin. Which is just flabbergasting, but whatever.

 

[reptile baht spaniard rid]

Someone said those words, in a motion that was granted, therefore if Russhole mindlessly regurgitates those words, then his own motion will be granted. Duh.

It doesn't matter what incantation he uses, Russ couldn't get a bowel motion passed even after night duty at Taco Bell.

 

[HackerX]

I also think that he thought his opposition counted as a motion for an order of protection against Hardin. Which is just flabbergasting, but whatever.

Then man thought that him saying he had an SPO on his filings meant he has an SPO on his filings. He absolutely thinks his protection order against Hardin has already been granted. Not filed, fuck that. GRANTED!