Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.4%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 56 12.0%
  • This Year

    Votes: 73 15.7%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 156 33.5%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 113 24.3%

  • Total voters
    465
Depends on the type of case. If I'm representing an estate, and need to kick the decedent's deadbeat kid off of the property in order to sell it, I'd file a motion for an order to show cause why they should not be removed from the property.
Very true. But in this case, we can all agree that Russ is doing it wrong. lol

So back to the whole reason why Hardin focused laser-like on Winnemucca:

ECF 276 - wherein Russ requests to move the hearing
Screenshot 2025-05-19 141439.webp
Screenshot 2025-05-19 141452.webp
So here, "Plaintiff had this (the court hearing) calendared for two months... Plaintiff was informed that he had to be at a business meeting... very oddly taking place at the same time as the court hearing."

But what does ECF 299 say:
Screenshot 2025-05-19 141608.webp
"Plaintiff HAD ACCIDENTALLY SCHEDULED a city council meeting on the same day as the court hearing."

So what was this, Russ? A "goof up" as you claim that "very oddly" fell on the same day? Or rather a WILLFUL SCHEDULING REQUEST that you then floundered about when you realized you double booked (deliberately or not)?

Make it make sense you drooly bamboon. Were you passive or active? I think we, and the court, know it was you actively doing things. You can't hide from your own foolishness when it's PUBLIC.
 
You can but there are requirements Russ hasn't complied with at all. I can't really go into them because we don't want the thread to be Retard Pro Se Nursery School.
I mean, Greer could just directly order the judge to honor the show cause motion. The statute says that a prosecutor can legally demand this once per case, so if Greer were to just order the judge to grant the motion the judge would be required to comply.
 
New urgent poll request: What will the 300th docket filing be, presumably later today?

* Greer filing a motion to kick Hardin's Pro Hac Vice
* Greer filing untimely a motion for sanctions on Hardin again
* Greer appealing something, anything at all, to the District Judge
* Hardin filing a supplemental authority on the brand-new LLC that was registered in lieu of paying sanctions and filing fees
* Magistrate ordering Greer to knock it off already
* Magistrate ordering a mimosa
If I were the magistrate, it would be the mimosa. Holy fuck, I don’t know how he gets through Russ’s bullshit sober.
 
wot.webp
Even assuming Hardin was sending threats, what would that have to do with a supposed pattern of Josh refusing to remove copyrights?

1.webp2.webp
Which is it Russ? Is it a copyright case or an attempt to hold Jersh accountable for his many many stalker child crimes?.

3.webp
It does when you bring it up like say, lying about a business emergency in an effort to get a hearing rescheduled, then your whoremongering absolutely becomes relevant.
 
I'm doubling down on my theory that Greer has not yet told Scott Shady or Huber that he's trying to involve them in brothel business. In fact, I wonder if listing Huber as W.H. on the LLC was to prevent Huber himself from finding out he's on the LLC, not Hardin or KF.

This may all sound like a retarded, illegal scheme, but really it's just Russtarded.
RG's train of thought takes so many twists, turns, side trips, and detours that the most illogical possibilities can't be overlooked or dismissed.

Worst, his efforts to be sneaky or secretive end up backfiring in the most epic of proportions and tend to drag third parties into them like a strong black hole in outer space.

If it wasn't for the court case that should have been dismissed long ago, the rest of the antics are otherwise entertaining.
 
which is relevant to the request to review IFP.
He was IFP, that was revoked by the judge.
It was actually revoked by Russ himself. Which makes challenging it so much more difficult. Granted answering honestly was probably Russ's best option.

I believe the only open matter regarding IFP was Hardin informing the court just how far back the fraud went. By submitting that Russ was paying filing fees to other courts while claiming IFP in this one. Going as far back as 2022.
 
Man, Hardin has answers ready faster than I read what he responds too. And this thread.
I suspect that this is a fairly generic response Hardin has had more ir less cocked and loaded for some time now. Just needing the specifics. "Know the retard, know the retardation" so to speak. It's perfectly succinct and to the point.
 
Back