- Joined
- Jul 22, 2016
Very true. But in this case, we can all agree that Russ is doing it wrong. lolDepends on the type of case. If I'm representing an estate, and need to kick the decedent's deadbeat kid off of the property in order to sell it, I'd file a motion for an order to show cause why they should not be removed from the property.
So back to the whole reason why Hardin focused laser-like on Winnemucca:
ECF 276 - wherein Russ requests to move the hearing


So here, "Plaintiff had this (the court hearing) calendared for two months... Plaintiff was informed that he had to be at a business meeting... very oddly taking place at the same time as the court hearing."
But what does ECF 299 say:

"Plaintiff HAD ACCIDENTALLY SCHEDULED a city council meeting on the same day as the court hearing."
So what was this, Russ? A "goof up" as you claim that "very oddly" fell on the same day? Or rather a WILLFUL SCHEDULING REQUEST that you then floundered about when you realized you double booked (deliberately or not)?
Make it make sense you drooly bamboon. Were you passive or active? I think we, and the court, know it was you actively doing things. You can't hide from your own foolishness when it's PUBLIC.