Not Just Bikes / r/fuckcars / Urbanists / New Urbanism / Car-Free / Anti-Car - People and grifters who hate personal transport, freedom, cars, roads, suburbs, and are obsessed with city planning and urban design

It's worse than that even, he starts with the assumption that you'd want to walk or bike everywhere but why exactly would you?
No, like your city. Where I live gets pretty cold during the winters, and it would be a huge struggle. Biking constantly would be absolutely miserable. Walking IS possible, but highly unpleasant during these frigid weathers. During summers we get an influx of tourists so our sidewalks become crowded downtown and that is it's own breed of misery when everyone stops every few seconds to see something unremarkable. When it's spring, we get plenty of rain too, so it doesn't make sense for me to walk unless the day is truly beautiful. Oh, also we get really muddy post-winter, so that's fucking unpleasant to deal with if you want to walk.
 
Likewise, they sneer at car dropoffs for schools...except for the fact that neighborhood schools were largely legislated out of existence decades ago thanks to the Civil Rights Act and other court cases/city "leadership"/etc.
You can tell these people don't have families because as soon as you get beyond 1 child it starts to become a logistical nightmare. My kids school is in walking distance and I was determined to have my oldest walk as much as was possible, but for a while I had to drop my oldest off at school and then take my 2nd child to a daycare an additional 10 min walk away.

Remember that I'm taking them to school/daycare so that I can then go to work. Am I supposed to then walk home afterward to go to my normal bus route? Hope there's one near my kid's daycare? Then how long does it take? I could be looking at 30 mins of drop off, followed by waiting 15 mins for a crummy bus near there, followed by transferring to another bus (good luck on timing that), then 40 mins to get near my work followed by another 10 min walk.

You're stubborn, I get it, do it anyway and find ways to optimize it. But then little kids get sick all the time and you will get called by daycare or school to come pick them up and you will be expected to be there within 30 mins. Unravel that bus and walking I just mentioned and it's just not going to happen.

It's very hard to get a daycare spot and you absolutely do not just want to take whatever is closest as there are some shockingly scary daycare operations, which is what a "15 min city" version of this would look like. No real options, just misery.

Instead I drive and take kids into school then go to work. If you think about it at scale this is similar in efficiency to a bus (maybe even better) especially since I drop my wife off at her work too.
 
New CityNerd video:
I haven't watched the video but surely he comes to the conclusion that sprawl makes housing affordable while density makes it expensive...right?
lmao

On an unrelated and funny note, an Ivy League-educated viewer is too dumb to watch the video:
1748011201002.webp
 
Last edited:
I haven't watched the video but he must come to the conclusion that sprawl makes housing affordable while density makes it expensive...right?
I payed half attention while watching it and it was this retarded thing where cities will sometimes require the developer to pay for the traffic influx predicted by the (expensive) reviewer they hire, he gives the example of it being paying for another lane in traffic.
 
I payed half attention while watching it and it was this retarded thing where cities will sometimes require the developer to pay for the traffic influx predicted by the (expensive) reviewer they hire, he gives the example of it being paying for another lane in traffic.
Those are impact fees and are necessary for dense projects because they require far more infrastructure than the existing low density uses. It's not just roads, they need larger water/sewer pipes, more network cables, more power infrastructure, more police, more firemen, more teachers (optional if renting to bugmen), etc.

The (bad) alternative is to make everyone else pay for the new residents' services and infrastructure, which Texas has taken to the extreme by exempting large developers from property tax.
 
they need larger water/sewer pipes
This is often overlooked, and it isnt just the immediate pipe into the project every pipe up (supply) and downstream (sewage) is affected. In older city centers sewage and stormwater is usually mixed too which means an upgrade could require separating them. It's a lot of work, can mean years where a main street is dug up and completely redone.
 
Last month, NYC changed their traffic laws to make cycling traffic offenses criminal instead of civil penalties because there are no civil enforcement mechanisms for bikes (e.g. suspending license). The NYPD, now empowered to do something about the cyclist menace, has been setting up red light running traps to catch dangerous cyclists.

/r/NYCbike is outraged:
"Police enforcing traffic laws for the first time ever against us bikefags is just like racial profiling guise". These freaks are so out there man. But it's such a great picture of their mindset. They've already Done The Right Thing™ so they are entitled to further act in any way they see fit. It's very clear the simplistic and ill way they view the world around them. I believe "the kids" are simplifying this sort of behavior/lengthy explanation down to Main Character Syndrome?
 
This is often overlooked, and it isnt just the immediate pipe into the project every pipe up (supply) and downstream (sewage) is affected. In older city centers sewage and stormwater is usually mixed too which means an upgrade could require separating them. It's a lot of work, can mean years where a main street is dug up and completely redone.
I mentioned this in the Portland thread, Portland is one of the handful of cities (like seven) west of the Mississippi that have combined systems. When it comes to blue-state development, it means that it doesn't affect the Los Angeles area, Eugene, the rest of the Seattle area (besides Seattle), the Bay Area (besides San Francisco), Colorado in its entirety, or Nevada in its entirety.

Most of the red and swing states don't have this issue with any of their major cities (Idaho, Arizona, Utah, Florida, Arizona, Texas, South Carolina, North Carolina, Arkansas, the Dakotas) because their cities tend to be younger.

You can tell these people don't have families because as soon as you get beyond 1 child it starts to become a logistical nightmare. My kids school is in walking distance and I was determined to have my oldest walk as much as was possible, but for a while I had to drop my oldest off at school and then take my 2nd child to a daycare an additional 10 min walk away.

Remember that I'm taking them to school/daycare so that I can then go to work. Am I supposed to then walk home afterward to go to my normal bus route? Hope there's one near my kid's daycare? Then how long does it take? I could be looking at 30 mins of drop off, followed by waiting 15 mins for a crummy bus near there, followed by transferring to another bus (good luck on timing that), then 40 mins to get near my work followed by another 10 min walk.

You're stubborn, I get it, do it anyway and find ways to optimize it. But then little kids get sick all the time and you will get called by daycare or school to come pick them up and you will be expected to be there within 30 mins. Unravel that bus and walking I just mentioned and it's just not going to happen.

It's very hard to get a daycare spot and you absolutely do not just want to take whatever is closest as there are some shockingly scary daycare operations, which is what a "15 min city" version of this would look like. No real options, just misery.

Instead I drive and take kids into school then go to work. If you think about it at scale this is similar in efficiency to a bus (maybe even better) especially since I drop my wife off at her work too.

Part of that is that they can't imagine using a car for anything than going to work and occasional trips to the store, not realizing that many peoples' logistics, commutes, and lifestyles are more difficult than just going to pre-determined points A, B, and maybe C.

"Police enforcing traffic laws for the first time ever against us bikefags is just like racial profiling guise". These freaks are so out there man. But it's such a great picture of their mindset. They've already Done The Right Thing™ so they are entitled to further act in any way they see fit. It's very clear the simplistic and ill way they view the world around them. I believe "the kids" are simplifying this sort of behavior/lengthy explanation down to Main Character Syndrome?

When it comes to the "us vs. them" a lot of their attacks on others are projections on themselves. They think that motorists want to run down anyone slower than them because that's what they think. Losing a lane of traffic they think that motorists rise up in anger because losing a bike lane is basically the Holocaust.

The whole "cagers are angry, dangerous, and entitled" line probably comes from the fact that's what these sorts of cyclists are.
 
Part of that is that they can't imagine using a car for anything than going to work and occasional trips to the store, not realizing that many peoples' logistics, commutes, and lifestyles are more difficult than just going to pre-determined points A, B, and maybe C.
Which is because not only are they childless they are also intensely antisocial. For them that is their whole life, go to work then go home and maybe occasionally once in a blue moon go to the bar, probably alone or with like the one or two work friends they have.
 
Main Character Syndrome
Unrelated, but speaking of this, it reminds me I wanted to respond to another post where the other poster described how fuckcars sees cars like NPCs that serve as obstacles in a video game.

I was watching an analysis on Twisted Metal Black and the video creator described that in a way maybe the NPC cars are how the insane clown named Sweet Tooth views the warped twisted world. Where civilian cars drive around endlessly on a highway loop that goes no where and only serve as set pieces. Their only purpose is to get in the player's way or be blown up and destroyed.

No doubt that fuckcars views things similarly where they talk about cars vs people as if there aren't people driving the cars. They are just background set pieces that just get in the way and don't travel anywhere in particular. If you think about it that's sort of what a recreational cyclist is. Just getting in the way and not going anywhere in particular.
 
These activists can allay my concerns by banning everything above for any areas they want to turn into 15 minute cities.

I considered making a flowchart of how all their policies go against each other and eventually lead to total bans of what they don't like, including freeways should be removed for surface level streets, but those surface level streets are now wide ("stroads"), so they must be limited for bike lanes and slowed down dramatically. But why have streets at all? They should be pedestrian/transit only.

In another example, parking minimums are bad but so is on-street parking, which should go on parking lots. But parking lots also take up too much space and should be redeveloped into bughives themselves.
 
My issue with 15 Minute Cities:
View attachment 7403902
These activists can allay my concerns by banning everything above for any areas they want to turn into 15 minute cities.
The diagram is missing two of the most impactful urbanist policies: “Urban Growth Boundaries” and “Parking Maximums (for buildings)”.
 
New CityNerd video:
PreserveTube link
God Bless Greg Abbott
That's the thing that annoys me about blue states. Those who don't want to build houses in red states are open about their reasons and the argument, blue states will larp about it "Oh it's just the environment and gentrification" and hide their true intentions. But at the same time, put down their "In this house, we believe.." signs when living in an all white neighborhood, despite their progressive beliefs.
These activists can allay my concerns by banning everything above for any areas they want to turn into 15 minute cities.
>Removal of street parking
>Remove car lane for bus only lane
>Remove car lane for bike lane

I've seen more realistic wish lists from children. But they have a child's mentality anyways.
 
Courtesy of reddit lies. Some bike cuck retard took 10 hours to bike back and forth to carry 130 bricks home.
View attachment 7405419
Here's an archive to the actual post https://archive.ph/mX7sZ
From looking at his profile, he's German, socialist, vegan, biker who drinks huel (soylent competitor lol).
See, a kei truck would be better than this if you're a complete retard anyway.
 
Courtesy of reddit lies. Some bike cuck retard took 10 hours to bike back and forth to carry 130 bricks home.
View attachment 7405419
Here's an archive to the actual post https://archive.ph/mX7sZ
From looking at his profile, he's German, socialist, vegan, biker who drinks huel (soylent competitor lol).
a whole day wasted. What a life these people lead
 
Back