- Joined
- Jun 23, 2021
In any event, $16 x 40 x ±50-ish = more than twice the federal poverty level in 2020.
Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)
- Thread starter AnOminous
- Start date
In any event, $16 x 40 x ±50-ish = more than twice the federal poverty level in 2020.
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2015
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
On 6/12/2025, The Supreme Court will consider whether they should take up a case of whether Sony can just steal your internet after allegations of infringement. Both Sony and its enemies have cited the Greer v. Moon case for their side.
Unknown God
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2025
I assume this means that the supremes will have a chance to crush this retarded precedent now. Or, God help us all, affirm it.
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2016
They already had the chance to crush it, but they chose not to pick the case for cert. Now they have to be the country's janny and figure out how to deal with the FUCKING MESS they helped create. God help us all!
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
They need not touch it at all to resolve the case (if they pick it up)
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2023
If only a certain slobbery mutt put in a writ of certiorari for the Supreme Court to handle this miscarriage of justice before it became a bigger problem
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2019
Because of the fact that the 10th's ruling is just being cited, and the fact that the ruling is not directly up in front of the supreme court as Mr. Moon attempted, I hope the side against Sony goes really fucking hard in pointing out how fucking stupid a ruling it is. Have cited cases been looked at again, after they've been cited and after it's been pointed out and hopefully made clear it's an abomination of a ruling? If it's not up to one of the original parties involved how would it be looked at and reviewed again?
Apologies for misuse of terminology or any misunderstandings of how exactly things work, not a lawyer, etc etc
Apologies for misuse of terminology or any misunderstandings of how exactly things work, not a lawyer, etc etc
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2023
Agree, these just feel low energy.
h3catoncheries
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2024
Did this nigger just 'Oh yeah and also:' twice or is this plightsperging burst just usual cargo cult understanding of what Hardin did: 'well Stalker Lawyer scored a couple of critical hits against me with motions supported by Notices of Supplemental Authority so if I do those too I will surely strike back'?
No matter that Hardin used those properly as new information came to light.
Anyway, just blast on you beautiful retard, ooooh yeah straight into my veins.
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2021
Probably not important, but is it odd that there's no green "filed by" stamp from the clerk on these latest three items from Greer, as there usually is? I do note that they all say they were filed on Saturday.
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2018
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2017
100% the moment it changes. This is made clear in the application. Failure to do so is supposed to mean dismissal.
- Joined
- May 16, 2019
If Scalia was still alive, he might've taken a swipe at it in passing. Alas, we are left with less cantankerous judges today.
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2021
If Greer can just get Trump to tweet about his Plights then the case will be his.
Didn't Greer admit in recently filed documents that not only did he have the money available to pay for filing in 2020 but he was actually making more money then than he is now?
To me it feels like the Chris-chan information overload thing where he's hoping to flood the court with so many batshit filings the judge will retard himself trying to make sense of whatever he's reading.
Alternatively it feels like a horror movie and Russhole is piling whatever he can grab up against the door to stop Hardin breaking through wielding his motion to dismiss.
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2017
Just based on Greers filings today, there is no reason to see ECF #1 any longer. He admits to IFP fraud repeatedly throughout today's filings. He filed IFP because he felt he had more important things to spend his money on. None of which were necessities. They were all elective discretionary expenses. Even the move. Does anyone believe Greer can produce a proffered job offer from a Vegas company with the expectation he relocate? Or some proof he was being transferred by his current employer to a Vegas facility?
Today he claimed he filed IFP because otherwise he would not have been able to both meet the statute of limitations in this case AND pay for all of his elective expenses. Like hiring a band. Like suing America's Got Talent. This is Improper Purpose. This is 100% fraud. IFP is not there to cover a shortfall because of your personal mismanagement. It's a safety blanket for the truly impoverished. It 's a fraud he carried on for 5 years. And presented as fact to the District Judge when arguing he should not be sanctioned. It's willfully fraud. And he makes it clear in these insane filings.
Null please tell us there is a picture of Hardins face when he opened these "Motions To Just Let Him Explain" and read them.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2020
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
People who live in Utah and would be willing to expend irl time to help me, DM me. Thanks.
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2022
The stimmy admissions might possibly be the funniest parts of this round of plightsperging.
The government can't tell you what to do with non-means-tested money unless you start panhandling for more gibs on the basis that you have no money. Every day I'm astounded by just how mentally challenged he is.
If moving house and trying to sue his way into the AGT finals was a bigger priority, then he had no right to bring the action via IFP status. He even says the reason he waited so long to bring the suit is because he couldn't stop spunking money up the wall long enough to pay his filing fee before he ran out the clock on the statute of limitations.
How many times can one man casually admit to fraud?
The government can't tell you what to do with non-means-tested money unless you start panhandling for more gibs on the basis that you have no money. Every day I'm astounded by just how mentally challenged he is.
If moving house and trying to sue his way into the AGT finals was a bigger priority, then he had no right to bring the action via IFP status. He even says the reason he waited so long to bring the suit is because he couldn't stop spunking money up the wall long enough to pay his filing fee before he ran out the clock on the statute of limitations.
How many times can one man casually admit to fraud?
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2013
Lots of times, apparently.