Diseased Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

  • 🔧 Actively working on site again.
IIRC he's also fairly wealthy himself, being a senior anaesthetist. They earn serious money, even in the NHS.

According to the troons, he's the one "enabling" her behaviour. The sheer seethe these people express at someone in a healthy relationship never ceases to amaze.
Could it be that Rowling had enough of TRAs and their bullshit because they've been harassing her non stop ever since she came out as critical of the transgender agenda?

No, it's her husband who made her dislike getting rape threats or having crazy people show up outside of where she lives.
She trash talks LGBT charities like Stonewall.

The TERF hatred of trans people also extends to anyone or any org who supports them, that includes most of the gay community.
Begone, tranny.
 
Could it be that Rowling had enough of TRAs and their bullshit because they've been harassing her non stop ever since she came out as critical of the transgender agenda?

No, it's her husband who made her dislike getting rape threats or having crazy people show up outside of where she lives.
Men are generally less woke and agreeable, pre 2018 her husband might very well have told her now and then that tranny-shit is retarded and she probably said saomething along the lines of "Well it is, live and let live, fiddle-dee-dee".

And when she got all the harrassment hiss support has probably contributed to the dam breaking and her being sure that she is not crazy and that it is in fact as stupid as it seems

So I would not count him out completely
 
Can always count on kiwifarms for a balanced approach to a debate.

/sneed
Go try your balanced approach on Reddit and tell us all how for you get.

Stonewall's initial big goal was legalizing same-sex marriage. That achieved, with anti-sodomy laws off the books, and discrimination based on sexual orientation illegal, Stonewall could have mothballed its operation -- "Mission Accomplished. " Instead, wanting to keep the money rolling in, they picked a cause that depends on people lying to themselves and each other.

Stonewall is simply a professionally done grift, nothing more.
 
Could it be that Rowling had enough of TRAs and their bullshit because they've been harassing her non stop ever since she came out as critical of the transgender agenda?

No, it's her husband who made her dislike getting rape threats or having crazy people show up outside of where she lives.
If she were single, it would be "She's a TERF because she's bitter and angry that nobody wants her." If she hadn't been abused by her ex, it would be "She's never experienced cisheteropatriarchal violence, that's why she thinks trans women are the problem." Any circumstance of hers will be used to delegitimize her opinions, because certain people can't just accept that she has legitimate reasons for disagreeing with them.
 
Are you a tranny or a pedophile?
If ever a comment cried out for this meme, it's your question here

1748548052115.webp
 
Do the goblins even have a bigger role in the books aside from "work at Gringotts"?

In book 7 (or maybe 6, been 15+ years) Harry needs godric griffondors sword to destroy voldemorts horcruxes. It absorbed the basilisk venom in book 2 and it is one of the few ways to destroy a horcrux. However, it is a goblin made sword and goblins do not believe in permanent ownership, after the buyer dies the ownership goes back to the craftsman. In the last book(s) there is a bit of tension about the position of non-wizards in the wizarding world. They're the ones with the most power. Voldemort is getting a lot of support from magical creatures as well since he promises to emancipate them. This tension also carries through in harry's refusal to give back the sword. It's not a lot.
 
In book 7 (or maybe 6, been 15+ years) Harry needs godric griffondors sword to destroy voldemorts horcruxes. It absorbed the basilisk venom in book 2 and it is one of the few ways to destroy a horcrux. However, it is a goblin made sword and goblins do not believe in permanent ownership, after the buyer dies the ownership goes back to the craftsman. In the last book(s) there is a bit of tension about the position of non-wizards in the wizarding world. They're the ones with the most power. Voldemort is getting a lot of support from magical creatures as well since he promises to emancipate them. This tension also carries through in harry's refusal to give back the sword. It's not a lot.
And in Hogwarts Legacy, the plot revolves around the goblin rebellions wherein a faction of goblins try to overthrow the wizards as a ruling class by acquiring an ancient magical artifact fueled by children's pain.
 
I know some members of the progressive lgbtq+ socially, and it is definitely a shibboleth in their every day discussion, even with outgroup people like me. If it comes up they will say 'ofcourse I want jk rowling to die' or 'id kill her if i had the chance' like it is a totally normal thing to say, without even thinking about what they are saying and then progress the conversation. I want to ask the baby hitler question about her and see what they say. They direct the conversation this way and have some preprepared speeches on the subject they enjoy repeating so I doubt it will take long.
 
Voldemort is getting a lot of support from magical creatures as well since he promises to emancipate them.
Only the giants, Griphook the goblin that Harry wants to withhold from the sword from says this:

“But it is, it is precisely that! As the Dark Lord becomes
ever more powerful, your race is set still more firmly above mine!
Gringotts falls under Wizarding rule, house-elves are slaughtered,
and who amongst the wand-carriers protests?”
 
goblins do not believe in permanent ownership, after the buyer dies the ownership goes back to the craftsman
If anyone needs any more proof that goblins are not an antisemitic caricature, here it is.

Jews believe in inheriting property of holocaust victims given even the slightest inheritance link, and they don't craft anything, only trade.
 
If anyone needs any more proof that goblins are not an antisemitic caricature, here it is.

Jews believe in inheriting property of holocaust victims given even the slightest inheritance link, and they don't craft anything, only trade.
I was gonna make the Jew joke about this part.
by acquiring an ancient magical artifact fueled by children's pain.
 
A lot of the slitty-eyed community got velly angly about that online, back in the day, even before the whole trans thing blew up - I vaguely remember some cringey slam poetry video called 'I Am Cho Chang' or something, that did numbers, back on Tumblr.
The funny this is it’s not actually Jews. It’s SJW types who just want something to be mad about.
I don’t remember anyone I knew actually getting upset about Cho Chang. We rolled our eyes, because of course a white woman would get the name wrong, but the character is totally fine and the name is minor.

Just like the alleged antisemitic portrayals of Goblins, it's just something for trannies and handmaidens to latch onto to try to hijack these other causes. At least when they complain about "Cho Chang" they usually don't end up being super racist towards Asians, though I did see one person complain that "Chang" was only two letters away from "chink" which was pretty insane. So is Cheng, Chong, Chung, Chen (if you add a letter), Chan, Chun, Chin... and there are a lot more that could be Romanized to be just as close to "chink", like Qing or Jang.

But the "goblins are antisemitic" thing has always been way more antisemitic than the goblins themselves. An example
@17:55

Only the giants, Griphook the goblin that Harry wants to withhold from the sword from says this:

“But it is, it is precisely that! As the Dark Lord becomes
ever more powerful, your race is set still more firmly above mine!
Gringotts falls under Wizarding rule, house-elves are slaughtered,
and who amongst the wand-carriers protests?”
In one of the later books one of the older Weasley kids mentioned trying to make sure the goblins didn’t side with Voldemort. Molly doesn’t think there’s any shot of them joining him since the Deatheaters killed goblins, but he points out that they’ve been treated pretty badly by wizards in general and aren’t keen to see them win either.
 
Last edited:
Jews believe in inheriting property of holocaust victims given even the slightest inheritance link, and they don't craft anything, only trade
Most Jews in Europe were farmers or craftsmen.
In its heyday, 50-75% of the clothing in the US was made by Jewish businesses in Manhattan. (That’s just the first examples I could think of.)
 
Most Jews in Europe were farmers or craftsmen.
In its heyday, 50-75% of the clothing in the US was made by Jewish businesses in Manhattan. (That’s just the first examples I could think of.)
Years ago I read a letter from an SS official in a Baltic city formally complaining that the Wehrmacht (yes, the Wehrmacht, not the SS) was killing too many Jews too quickly because nothing in the cities could get fixed anymore.
 
HBO already paid for her dues. There's Jack shit you can do, Orion.
Screenshot_20250531-010418_(1).webp
"Can we take away her rights"
They still aren't giving Neil Gaiman as much shit and he's an open sex pest.
Most Jews in Europe were farmers or craftsmen.
In its heyday, 50-75% of the clothing in the US was made by Jewish businesses in Manhattan. (That’s just the first examples I could think of.)
Interesting. Got a source for further reading?
 
Back