Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 22.0%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.4%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 83 29.0%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 41 14.3%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 95 33.2%

  • Total voters
    286
To be fair they probably did keep it away from the kids until the nanny left. As soon as she left and "hired" the ape as the new nanny, they stopped giving all fucks.

Im tempted to print out the bodycam notes in mass, go to Spicer, leave them in public areas and hand them out like a 1920s newspaper boy on the corner. But thats obviously "pozloading my neghole" which I disavow. Just a funny thought

There is so much that could be done cheaply AND legally within his small community. Nick lacks the intelligence, imagination, or proper caution when dealing with those at who he cannot strike back easily.

I do not seem to encourage orncondone such behaviour, but merely to point out the restraint being shown by the vast majority of users here.

For context and those unaware. IIRC some dumbass self professed pedo tried accessing legal info on Rekieta during the early days of the arrest. When found out Null immediately banned the dumbfuck. Please correct me if Im wrong.

You are correct. It was a dumb thing to do, but I wish all paedos were of similar IQ to be caught more easily.

Nick Rekieta initially confirmed the accuracy of multiple and independent bodycam transcripts, and then backpedalled, falsely claiming he was responding to a nonexistent comment about April.
Yet in his most recent livestream, Rekieta proceeds to further reinforces the transcripts’ credibility by openly admitting he did told the officers who searched his house to “catch gonorrhoea and die.”
View attachment 7440257
So which is Rekieta? Are the multiple and independent transcripts accurate, or not?

But have you considered that they may have been correct, but it was written 'in a faggy way'?


I'm pretty sure he didn't stop voluntarily. Considering the absolutely insane shit he's said about the Bible on stream, he was almost certainly fired for trying to corrupt children with vile heresies.

He probably only even got into "teaching" to corrupt children into Satan's teachings.

And he was stopped in the Depp era or shortly after, based on my recollection. He was still maintaining a public façade at that point.

ETA:


This is gay and retarded. Don't touch the cow and expect assists for it, you faggot.
 
Listening to Josh and Kino's videos about the bodycam notes, and it's just that kind of depressing where how do you spin the way Rekieta is? I used to think I had some contrarian streak in me but good God seeing Nick's spiral has made me realize I'm a level 1 mafia boss. That even crackhead Warski is taking this like a scared straight moments says it all.

The mother's name on pill bottles is concerning. I really hoped his oldest son would be able to have someone in the family to lean on, to guide and channel his rage so he becomes a Chud who just beats up his dad for putting his siblings through hell, but at this point it seems like Nick will let his family spend all their money and MN Zoominati capital on helping (not) salvage his reputation and jailtime. Nick comes across like a fucking boomer in his mentality.
 
Nick: Kiwifarms is irrelevant and has no power. Nobody cares what they think. They are all losers and are lying.

Also Nick: I must now do an emergency stream in which I will try to refute written descriptions of the body cam footage, posted on Kiwifarms, as related by people that I openly concede have actually seen the footage.

:story:
 
The fire rises still, Nick the famously libertarian cuckold actively dives for the maternal skirt of US governance to shield him from the Big Bad Public Records Access Request.
1748808499006.webp
Nick all but admits tonights' stream is not about transparency, but a PR recovery attempt.
He sees his comments are once again violently calling for his grovelling prostration, like the days after his arrest.
He sees his stream numbers dying, over 10% loss a week, he desperately wants some kind of attention from the Youtube algo.

Enjoy this evening @Null, this stream will be entirely dedicated to you. Extra spicy seething, free of charge.
 
There was no trust fund.

Here is a link to his grandfather's will. With three children, the estate appears to have essentially been split into thirds.


I am going to point out again that there is no evidence for any kind of currently extant "trust fund" which Rekieta is a beneficiary of, certainly not any created by his grandfather. It's always seemed more likely that Nick has received ad hoc transfers from his parents.

On page 4, Section VI GIFT OF TAX EXEMPT AMOUNT, it says that he gives the maximum tax exempt amount to the Trustee of the Family Trust. It says right there that there was, at least at the time of the will, a Family Trust.
1748807497963.webp

Just prior to that, also on page 4, under Section V GIFT OF RESIDUARY ESTATE IF DEATH IN 2010 AND NO ESTATE TAX, it says that there is The John Owen 2010 Trust, The Celeste Rekieta 2010 Trust and The Paul Owen 2010 Trust. Each of which was created on the same date as the will.

1748807734689.webp
There's also Section VII GIFT OF GENERATION-SKIPPING AMOUNT, where it says that if his spouse does not survive him, then he gives the generation skipping amount ... in equal shares to (1) the Trustee of The John Owen Trust, (2) the Trustee of The Celeste Rekieta Trust and (3) the Trustee of The Paul Owen Trust. Each of said trusts was created on November 3, 2005, by me and my spouse ... and the child of mine whose name designates the trust, as Trustee.

1748807969083.webp

Section VIII is the Special Marital Trust. It says that there is a trust fund, separate and distinct from the Family Trust and the three Trust Funds for the separate children. It says that upon the death of his spouse, the remaining trust estate shall be distributed in equal shares to The John Owen Trust, The Celeste Rekieta Trust and The Paul Owen Trust.

Section IX is literally titled FAMILY TRUST.

It literally says that "The Trustuee shall pay so much or all of the annual net income of the trust estate to or for the benefit of my spouse and any one or more of my descendants in such amounts and proportions as the Trustee in its sole and absolute discretion shall deem necessary and appropriate (without regard to equality of distribution) for the health, education, support and maintenance of such beneficiaries according to their accustomed standards of living, considering all other sources of income available to such beneficiaries. My spouse shall be regarded as the primary beneficiary of these distributions during my spouse's lifetime."
1748808481329.webp

You tell me that the will is evidence of no trust fund, but by the fifth page of the will, it has explicitly said that there are individual trusts for each of the children, lists the date on which they were created, and also says there is a Family Trust, which suggests that it is a trust separate and distinct from the children's trusts. By page 8 we've gotten to the wife's trust fund, and gotten the details of how the Family Trust fund can be used exactly the way people here have speculated to maintain Nick as a permanent child. I'm going to keep reading - but can you tell me what it is you read, citing pages at the least, that led you to say that there is no trust? Because the first 8 pages are section after section saying literally the opposite.

((edited to fix a typo))
 
Nick: An autistic virgin with a God complex is suing my government to try and get footage of it.

Also Nick:

View attachment 7440569
Only Nick can hold government to full accountability to the extent of his rights.
Null and Hardin, both American citizens, are not allowed to do this.
 
I also have to applaud the decision to send women to do this, not because I care about the PEDOPHILES WANT TO SEE MY KIDS projection. But because being outsmarted and humiliated by females REALLY upsets him. Can you see him doing this if Jewsh himself went to see the footage? Don't think so. Same deal with Keanu, if a male said the same things there is no way he would have had the reaction he did.
 
1748808981313.webp

Its almost like...there is...public interest?

Nick all but admits there significant, current and wide-ranging public speculation as to the contents of the footage.
Perhaps, the county sheriff should release such public data?
1748809191723.webp

Technically, its the government, Nick.
We know how your fond of those little specificities.
1748809451592.webp

It was evidence you lying fuck, now you get to play wordgames because the prosecution and judicary illegally balldoguarded to deny Hardin access.
I hope this case proves something ugly.
 
Last edited:
Back