The Schizo Conspiracy Thread - The conspiracies that will get you laughed out of your friend groups and subreddits

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
3,000 years there would be little left
except maybe microplastics

or baciaslly anything made of teflon, that carbon-fluorine bond is almost unbreakable, i doubt there are things in nature that can break down teflon except maybe lightning strikes or volcano eruptions


thread tax: the world has already ended back in 2012, it's just that a world takes a long time to die out
we are living in a dead world, our reality is a corpse and we are the maggots, idk how lomg we have until we run out of world-flesh to devour, it can be anywhere from a few decades to 100 trillion years
 
  • Like
Reactions: 𖦹Junkpop𖦹
except maybe microplastics

or baciaslly anything made of teflon, that carbon-fluorine bond is almost unbreakable, i doubt there are things in nature that can break down teflon except maybe lightning strikes or volcano eruptions
How long until it breaks down? 10,000 years? 25,000 years?
 
How long until it breaks down? 10,000 years? 25,000 years?
PFOA is the main problem, i havnt been able to find exact time to breakdown, cuz nobody managed to detect it decomposibg naturally unless u heat it up to at least 400 degrees celsius (releasing a bunch of nasty flurocarbons) or use some very, very corrosive chemicals that would destroy everything that ur trying to decontaminate

and its in everything
Then as you say, and one thing I do believe, is that there was an advanced civilisation/s living in the pacific. I also believe that an aquatic species of primate existed or exists there. There are sea-faring cultures alive today who spend the vast majority of their time on and in the water. It wouldn't be illogical to assume a culture that spent their hunting and gathering days in the seas, only coming to land to sleep in safety.

there's a decent chance that we are the descendants of aquatic apes:

part of the reason why we are bipedal, is so we could wade around in shallow waters (the only semi-aquatic monkeys (proboscis monkeys) are also bipedal for that exact reason)

we have a layer of subdermal fat so we'd not sink like a rock (all other great apes can't swim at all)

we have very little hair not only because of endurance, but also for hydrodynamics (why dont dolphins have hair?, hair is very bad for swimming, increases drag)

it's why our digestive system is much better at handling meat than other apes (yeah, chimps eat meat, but they mostly eat fruit, meanwhile aquatic apes would eat a lot of fish, aka meat)

it's why we have a diving reflex which other apes lack but dolphins and other aquatic mammals do (even adult humans show some diving reflex response)

i unironically believe we are semi-aquatic
 
Last edited:
The Reset
89ujd98fh4.webpfallout-day-bombs-dropped-games-tv-guide-2560x1440-ae5b6772af44.webp
mt4345.webp

89uydf84.webp
o8dyasr.webpo89yf4.webp
vt90di.webp
vt98ujd8f.webp
vt98u8ug.webp
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
Reactions: FatalTater
I think we might be able to travel to different universes and timelines, I feel like time travel might even be possible. I’m not sure if it would follow the same rules it does in fiction, the only realistic take on it I’ve seen might be the grandfather paradox when it comes to time travel.

We could have the tech already and it’s just not accessible to the public. That and the public’s recent gaining of ai video and photo generation could explain the mandela effect. Maybe they’ve been using that to change shit for years and we didn’t even notice?
 
Do you guys think if we paid to feature a thread that we could get the rest of the site believing @Meriasek is Taylor Swift?
:thinking:
Lately, I can’t shake this feeling that everything around me is fake — like, painfully fake. I don’t even know how to explain it properly… it all feels so unnervingly off, almost hyperreal. Like reality itself is trying so hard to convince me it’s “real” that it starts to feel like a parody.
Have you had any extrasensory experiences? Bit of a trick question, as what you are describing already would fall into that category. I'm more referencing precognition, seeing other people's fields/thoughts, witnessing floating orbs of light or auras, etc.

I only ask, as you actually aren't wrong in your feelings. This experience, I would suggest, is however actually less "real" than what lies beyond.
I think we might be able to travel to different universes and timelines
You're constantly shifting your reality between all manner of probable existences already. I realize that's not the "fun" answer, but..you know..it's a thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NoBueno
Elon vs Trump is theater.
What is being put in place right now that They don't want us noticing and talking about?
Yes, this guy gives a decent overview. I rarely pay attention to the drama it since it's the distraction

While the systems are put in place:
 
  • Like
Reactions: 𖦹Junkpop𖦹
Do you guys think if we paid to feature a thread that we could get the rest of the site believing @Meriasek is Taylor Swift?
:thinking:

Have you had any extrasensory experiences? Bit of a trick question, as what you are describing already would fall into that category. I'm more referencing precognition, seeing other people's fields/thoughts, witnessing floating orbs of light or auras, etc.

I only ask, as you actually aren't wrong in your feelings. This experience, I would suggest, is however actually less "real" than what lies beyond.
Sometimes (not often i know exactly what will happen/what someone will say, its usually like a split second before it happens so it's hard to process beforehand), i also kinda see "shadows" or "movements" in the corner of my eyes. Although i have read those are quite usual as brain has hard time to recognise stuff sometimes and only has 0.00001 second to do it.

Would you mind going to DM? I always enjoy reading your posts and i would love to talk to you privately, if you don't mind.
 
i fuckin knew it man



edit: as for the aetheric leech and the balck eye,imo its not a release valve or a wound to weaken the prey

its there because of the symbolism, these beings arent really physical, theyre mostly spiritual, so its safe to assume they only interact with the world via symbolism and ideas

the left eye is marked, because the left eye is wired to the right hemisphere, these are left-hand-path beings, they already control the left half, as their hosts willed them into existance

its not a parasite, it's a neurally-transmitted disease, an idea so potent, it begins to influence those who truly conceptualize it, and those in poisitions of great power have access to great knowledge too, but they know too much, and birth an idea that grows like a tumor in their headspace

but being a left-path-aligned ideaform, it has limits, it cannot fully seize control unless they lower their vibrations down to its level, the black eye is a ritualistic gesture, to let the aethyric brainworm idea complex in

all the meanings u said for the black eye are equally true, what matters is the symbolism behind the actions


yeah, i havnt slept in 2 days, i will pass out for 12 hours after this comment has been posted

this is my epiphany, peace out
 
Last edited:
The question of what would be left to dig up is a good one. Take iron as an example. Iron rusts away pretty fast but even in the more amenable kind of burial conditions it’s a thousand or two years and then there’s nothing left. You need exceptional conditions like dry Egyptian tombs to preserve it. So no iron before a couple of k yo. How old is the Iron Age? Oh ….
And yeah I know this isn’t a solid example and we have decent evidence for the progression of smelting of various ores,and iron was being used in the Bronze Age just not widely, but it’s a thought. ‘How much do we really know about availability of materials?’ How reliable is that for dating civilisations?
There are meteorite iron objects much earlier than that Iron Age range - there’s an incredibly beautiful dagger from king tut’s tomb (actually there are multiple iron objects in his tomb materials, I think around twenty.) all are thought to be meteoric in origin. the dagger is exquisite and it’s supposed to have come from the mittani who we know very little about. They’re a fun rabbit hole too
There’s evidence of meteorite iron objects from about 3500 BC, so iron was clearly known about, maybe only as a celestial origin thing but they had the ability to work it.

But anyway - with an iron or Bronze Age local civilisation - What would remain? Granite, ceramics maybe. Gold. If we find them. I think we can say there was no modern level society worldwide, but I don’t think we can rule out local bronze/Iron Age type developments at all. Some of those megalithic structures may be much older than we think - some of the temple complex around the sphinx seems far older than the later stuff. We have this idea that civilisation is a constant ‘bettering’ and I don’t think that’s true at all. Fits and starts, little flourishings, grand empires that fall and decay and rise again is more likely.
 
The question of what would be left to dig up is a good one. Take iron as an example. Iron rusts away pretty fast but even in the more amenable kind of burial conditions it’s a thousand or two years and then there’s nothing left. You need exceptional conditions like dry Egyptian tombs to preserve it. So no iron before a couple of k yo. How old is the Iron Age? Oh ….
And yeah I know this isn’t a solid example and we have decent evidence for the progression of smelting of various ores,and iron was being used in the Bronze Age just not widely, but it’s a thought. ‘How much do we really know about availability of materials?’ How reliable is that for dating civilisations?
We only have what the authorities tell us is the truth, what schools tells us is the truth, but when you begin to dig yourself, the cracks start to show

 
As long as you are capable of existing now, it means you can exist again. And by extension of that, you have existed before.
wtf does it even mean to exist? is existence a property of an object or is it a precondition of having properties? is it tied to reality in any way or merely to our ability to describe things (e.g. "unicorns exist")? relatedly, do non-physical, non-actual things (e.g. an idea) "exist" in any sense (in which case it's almost a trivial property - pretty much anything can exist then) or is it something that distinguishes "real" entities? does it refer to something that just *is*, eternally, or does no such thing actually exist/does it refer to something constantly changing?
 
Back