Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.7%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 55 12.0%
  • This Year

    Votes: 73 16.0%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 153 33.5%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 109 23.9%

  • Total voters
    457
I hold that Bennett 's ruling essentially means:

"okay, enough. Time to shoot this sorry nag in the head and end it, we don't need to drag it out longer for yet another motion to dismiss when I have four already that I can choose from and send to Barlow with a recommendation to shitcan the case. Hardin can make it five at the same time if I don't grant another extension, and I figure he has his pleading ready to go already anyway."

I of course could be drastically wrong, but I think I am in the ballpark at least.
 
1749598336266.webp
/Judges, discussing every other month what to file in the Greer case/ ~2025, colorized
 
this was unavoidable. when you give russ an inch, he skips the mile and takes a fucking transpacific flight on your dime. after taking down the google drive link he wouldve attempted to dmca his entire thread ("my magic words worked! lets do it again!") and sued over that anyway.
yeah you could argue that in that case the first dismissal would probably have held on appeal, but can you really be sure?
it doesnt just sound like copyright cuckery, it is copyright cuckery. you should still comply if you value your sanity and bank account but the law is outdated and broken and not calling it cuckery doesnt change what it is.
i suppose the silver lining is that this case is cited by both sides of the Sony v cox in a potential scotus hearing and could narrow the dmca and copyright infringement notices? i read scotus has mistaken published its schedule so who knows.
 
Riddle me this, esteemed Law Kiwis and Russologists - Shitlips is a quintessential Internet Tough Guy; in all his emails and filings he acts tough, talks tough, etc., but we've seen numerous times that he folds the minute anything 'in-person' like a Zoom call or actual hearing occurs. Could we actually watch him continue to argue with the Court via filings until they decide to have another hearing to tell him to fuck off?
 
> Get an original $5000 sanction reduced by 80%
> Waste time and kvetch to the court, seeking to only pay a fraction of a fraction of the original fine
> Insist you actually have the funds to pay the full REDUCED fine, but that evil Josh Moon can't have it, its for your whorehouse.
> Bitch and scream to the court about the method of payment, instead of just fucking paying
> "Gee shucks ya honah, I'm just a lil' goofball"
> Get a free 21 day extension

I want to experience, for one day, the real life Plot Armor that retards have.
if the district judge dismissed it after the first failure to pay, the appeals court would've revived it because once is not a pattern. now its twice with poorly conceived reasons to stay the sanction. I doubt there will be a third time.
 
Bennett's ruling was utterly unfathomable to me. Do we think he wants Hardin to file his request for dismissal at that point because he's going to deal with all the outstanding shit at the same time?
Maybe he isn't completely brain-damaged and knows Hardin probably already has this drafted already. I mean that Motion for Extension was basically a Motion to Pay Some Fucking Attention Already but you can't file the latter.
 
Bennett's ruling was utterly unfathomable to me. Do we think he wants Hardin to file his request for dismissal at that point because he's going to deal with all the outstanding shit at the same time? Is this likely to be a good sign or a bad sign?
He filed the motion months ago. Russ opposed it. Hardin has twice moved for an extension to respond to the opposition. This was obviously more because he wanted to draw attention to the impending logjam of logorrhea that will continue coming in from Russhole as long as these two ineffectual judges fail to do their jobs.

It was captioned a Motion for Extension. It was more a Motion to What the Fuck is in the Water Down There.

Finally both judges respond. Calm down, give it another month, realize we're on federal court timetables, not angry Internet retard timetables.
 
Maybe he isn't completely brain-damaged and knows Hardin probably already has this drafted already. I mean that Motion for Extension was basically a Motion to Pay Some Fucking Attention Already but you can't file the latter.
He does seem to have achieved that. I notice that the retards "Pwease Undo the Sanctions" Motion that Barlow curb stomped was not specifically directed to the District Judge. Is this the first time he has stepped in without being specifically summoned?
 
He does seem to have achieved that. I notice that the retards "Pwease Undo the Sanctions" Motion that Barlow curb stomped was not specifically directed to the District Judge. Is this the first time he has stepped in without being specifically summoned?
Well he did interject himself to cut Hardin's original sanction request by 80%.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: obsdj and Fetch!
Riddle me this, esteemed Law Kiwis and Russologists - Shitlips is a quintessential Internet Tough Guy; in all his emails and filings he acts tough, talks tough, etc., but we've seen numerous times that he folds the minute anything 'in-person' like a Zoom call or actual hearing occurs.
Russ anywhere is a huge badass, a cool dude, a pimp, a winner. The instant he gets any pushback he's "waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah waaaaaaaaaaaaaah help me mommy I'm just a poor little retard!" It's amazing how often this tactic is successful, including from absolute scumbags who aren't Russ.

All these "helpless retards" should be shoved foot-first into a wood chipper. So sick of them.

Also the "pure heart" but an "empty head" is perfect. It's the perfect encapsulation for why Rule 11 was amended in 1983 from a subjective to an objective standard. Since it's nearly impossible to prove a slurping, drooling retard like Russ is actually malicious, since he can usually plausibly claim he's just too stupid to understand the rules, the rule was amended to an objective standard where if you're in court "I'm just a poor little retard" doesn't matter and is no longer a defense to Rule 11 violations.
 
Also the "pure heart" but an "empty head" is perfect. It's the perfect encapsulation for why Rule 11 was amended in 1983 from a subjective to an objective standard. Since it's nearly impossible to prove a slurping, drooling retard like Russ is actually malicious, since he can usually plausibly claim he's just too stupid to understand the rules, the rule was amended to an objective standard where if you're in court "I'm just a poor little retard" doesn't matter and is no longer a defense to Rule 11 violations.
Well, I wish D. Utah would stop partying like it's 1979. But I'm going to try to remain Positive Polly that we're on the slow-roll to a magnificent curb-stomping of Shitlips come the end of the month.
 
I predict several, despite the court specifically saying:
The court further notes that the filing of any additional motions will not result in a delay of the date Mr. Greer is required to pay the sanctions

I think the District Judge just wanted to put this in the record so that he doesn't need to deal with any of Greer's bullshit over the next three weeks. This won't stop Russ from filing it, but the judge just dropped a "Fuck you, I ain't reading that shit!" to cover his lack of responses before the end of the month.

I feel it necessary to Do My Part and point out that this is from the District Judge's order, not the Magistrate.

A lawsuit this gay needs two dads. Unfortunately for Russ, neither of them seem particularly happy with him at the moment.
 
Back