View attachment 7479873
I've read this several times and still can't get over how grandiosely stupid it is. "If you say I'm retarded, then EVERYONE must be retarded!"
I don't think there is a greater insult you can throw at a judge than "you have the same legal understanding as Russell Greer".
I remember reading about some experiment done in developmental psychology to measure a child's mental development. The process goes something like this:
There is the child, the experimenter, a third party, and an object. With both the child and the third party in the room, the object is hidden somewhere, and both the child and third party see where. The third party leaves the room. The object is then moved and hidden elsewhere. When the third party returns, the child is asked where the third party thinks the object is.
Below a certain stage of development, the child will invariably answer the new location, because he has not yet learned that other people have minds separate from his own, and so assumes everyone has seen and knows everything he has. Only after a certain stage of development, will the child realize that the third party does not know that the object has been moved, and that the third party will think that the object is still in its previous location.
When Mr. Greee writes like like he did above, he comes across as genuinely retarded, like he never passed that stage of mental development.
Here's another example:
Sir, first of all: I'm a real person. Just because you can't see me, doesn't mean that I don't exist.
This sounds so much like a line that was used on Russel when he was a boy to dissuade him from the cruel behavior that ultimately arises from a young child's solipsistic mindset. Only, I don't know if he ever actually came to
understand the words. Rather, he seems to have learned that this is another magic spell that can be used to compel compliance.
A cashier's check or money order would mean "money being taken out of his account." The unspoken coda to which is, "And I would have no way to get it back by claiming the transaction was fraudulent."
Or alternatively, "and then I could no longer spend that money on
hookers my business ventures"
Greee's excuses made me curious, so I went back and kept track of some of them. All from Greee's filings.
This should sum it up:
View attachment 7484341View attachment 7484137View attachment 7484315
With the different block sizes, each snippet clearly removed from context, yet at the same time following a consistent theme, I know what this reminds me of. This looks like a piece of public art you'd find installed on a college campus or some renewed urban district. The kind that is confusingly non-representative of anything in particular, but at the same time, its bizarre non-aesthetic seems to hint at a deeper, more elusive and profound meaning. You know, the kind of stuff you stare at after taking a massive bong hit. It
just starts to make sense, and then the hit starts to fade, so you take another bong hit, because what does this thing
mean, man?
I think we have discovered a way to teach anti-drug education in schools. Teenagers are curious what drugs feel like? Make them read Greee's court filings.
