Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.4%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 56 12.0%
  • This Year

    Votes: 73 15.7%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 156 33.5%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 113 24.3%

  • Total voters
    465
I predict several, despite the court specifically saying:
The court further notes that the filing of any additional motions will not result in a delay of the date Mr. Greer is required to pay the sanctions
Ah, but if he appeals the order and it's reversed, then he can file all the additional motions he wants! Nevermind whether this counted as an appealable order or not.
 
Bennett's ruling was utterly unfathomable to me. Do we think he wants Hardin to file his request for dismissal at that point because he's going to deal with all the outstanding shit at the same time? Is this likely to be a good sign or a bad sign? I don't understand why he wouldn't want to have had rulings on all of the outstanding issues before he gets the request for dismissal, but the obvious implication is that he's just going to ignore all of that other shit and then make a decision at that point about the request to dismiss. (ie, also denied.)
I'm choosing to be a Positive Polly and interpret it as the judge implying Hardin already has plenty of ammo and should shoot already. I.E. he already sees plenty of grounds to dismiss like Hardin wants. If the motion to dismiss is sufficient, the pending motions are moot. If it is somehow insufficient then ruling on pending motions would give him another chance.
 
So the Honorable Judge decided that the document issue is completely irrelevant and not worthy of mention? Just another piece of shit in the toilet bowl that he has allowed this case to become?
 
So the Honorable Judge decided that the document issue is completely irrelevant and not worthy of mention? Just another piece of shit in the toilet bowl that he has allowed this case to become?
I'm choosing to be a Positive Polly and interpret it as the judge implying Hardin already has plenty of ammo and should shoot already. I.E. he already sees plenty of grounds to dismiss like Hardin wants. If the motion to dismiss is sufficient, the pending motions are moot. If it is somehow insufficient then ruling on pending motions would give him another chance.

ecf 340: Defandants are instructed to file a reply in support of their motion to dismiss (ecf 274). seems like a dismissal is being entertained and if granted the other stuff is moot.
 
Last edited:
Well he did interject himself to cut Hardin's original sanction request by 80%.
No. That was because Greer directly elevated his “Pwease Undo the Thing That the Meany Magistwate Has Done” with the District Judge in the period between when the Magistrate ruled he owed sanctions. But before the Magistrate set an actual number based on Hardin’s billing. Similarly the previous smackdown from 2 weeks ago was because Greer directly appealed to the District Judge. I think today is the first time Barlow has stirred without something being sent specifically to him. Well okay maybe the second in a week. He did get woken up and need to get involved in the issue with the clerks last week. But I assume that was by the Clerks.

So it appears, for the moment at least, that Barlow may be paying direct attention to the Docket.
 
The Nozzle Docket is now calibrating.
1749604606943.webp
Greee indicates where his business funds can be found, circa 2027 (colorized)
 
So if I'm reading this right (optimistically), this is basically a "please for the love of god stop filing bullshit. Defense, file your motion for dismissal. Plaintiff, pay those sanctions now (or 3 weeks from now ig)".

I'm putting on my rainbow hat for this, but maybe they're gonna rule on all the shit that's been pending and don't want even more stacking up.
 
Someone with whatever software can move/detect multiple images should check ECF 338 to see if Greer stacked the images again. The text in his response related to Exhibit A indicates that there should be a screenshot where Hardin indicates he would prefer to pay paid by check, but the actual image is just Greer asking that question to Hardin without showing Hardin's response.

View attachment 7483602

Exhibit A:

View attachment 7483603
Nah. Plaintiff Greee is a good boy who dindu nuffin and that nuffin includes fabricating evidence, again. Surely the court will understand that Greee sincerely believed that he is able to just say things to make the court believe it's true. Plaintiff has never done this before and frustrated and misspeaks about things that don't exist.
 
My understanding is that if the case is dismissed the docket becomes figuring out the penalty fees

You'd like to think so, but you're in clown court. Expect another dozen or so entries motioning for the court to reconsider and undo the thing that was already done, responses asking why the judges are being arbitrary, and notices of supplemental authority whining about Hardin being mean.

droolraiser.webp

50 hours in Paint GIMP
 
I'm re-reading ECF 341 and it's so goofy. The entire thing is explaining how Russell is a retard and feels like it's climaxing to something great. That Russ missed a deadline. Then another deadline. Then bam. "3 more weeks. For realizes this time." The judge cucked Hardin and Null so hard that it's impressive.
 
This just has to be part of the workflow in this thread now. @DavidS877 maybe you can just bake a 'check for porn' step into your PDF consolidation process? :biggrin:

As an aside I am not sure how far back you went, but I dug into all of the filings available on CourtListener (back to around 150-something or so) and I have not found anything else lulzy in Russ' submissions (beyond the actual writing, of course).
My workflow is mostly for Mr. Hardin's postings which come in zip.

All files should be in CourtListener but you'll need to start with the 2020 Utah case, then the Florida case then the 2024 Utah case.
 
That sounds like PDF software specifically designed for, and/or used by, the courts or intended for legal document handling. I believe all incoming documents regardless of format are eventually run though the court PDF software to standardize everything and add the Bates Stamp (blue header on the top of each document) as part of the process of electronically saving the documents.
i'm becoming strangely interested in exactly what greee's workflow for making these fucking motions is, like what actual iphone apps he is using

do we think it's google docs on the web or something? some free PDF maker?
 
You'd like to think so, but you're in clown court. Expect another dozen or so entries motioning for the court to reconsider and undo the thing that was already done, responses asking why the judges are being arbitrary, and notices of supplemental authority whining about Hardin being mean.

View attachment 7485786

50 hours in Paint GIMP
Your suffering will be legendary, even in Utah!
i'm becoming strangely interested in exactly what greee's workflow for making these fucking motions is, like what actual iphone apps he is using

do we think it's google docs on the web or something? some free PDF maker?
Sadly the PDF metadata for his filings contains info from whatever app the court system uses to process the document. Maybe a document of his from another source would reveal more.
Screenshot_20250610-222209.webp
 
Back