Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Intrusive Thinker]

My smooth-brain summary of where things stand:
Tomorrow, Aaron is officially charged with the RP case, dissemination of a picture
This 15 minute court appearance covers
-if 1 KNU is really == $50
-Kayla reading victim impact statement
-Nick reading victim impact statement?
-April? (are there really 3 victim impact statements? who would the 3rd be?)
-how long probation will be
-any new charges from the potential violations on Aaron's restrictions (to be addressed in the future? new court dates?)
-any jail time
-unless someone else attends, we will hear only from Nick and MAPton regarding the court appearance in the near future. Aaron will be restricted on what he can discuss.
Aaron can pull back his "guilty" plea tomorrow and go to trial if the judge does something over the top. But Aaron has made things worse for himself by appearing human and apologizing for the harm done by his actions related to COMMITTING THE CRIME (admission of guilt) after his last court date. Nick will use these weaknesses against his enemy.

Potentially tomorrow night, Nick rushes to the defense of ....wife.
-announces lawsuit on Kaylas behalf. probably slam dunk if Kayla agrees to file it
-MAXIMUM $10k statutory damages
-plus extra $$$ for pain and suffering type BS if they can swing it
-plus extra $$$ (within reason) for lawyers.
On twitter, Nick boasts of filing lawsuits against Aaron by Nick himself, Rekieta media (ha!), and other people (like who? for what?). I am calling his bluff. The laws in MN have changed between when Montagraph filed his case and now. Nick can try burying aaron in stupid lawsuits, but they now have the anti-SLAPP protection Nick is trying to find a way to use as a shield from Montagraph.
NICK - DO YOU SEE WHAT I AM TYPING? I CALL YOUR BLUFF! SHOW ME WHAT A BIG MAN YOU ARE AND FILE THOSE LAWSUITS AGAINST AARON!


Also - I cant imagine a better time than between now and mid-day Wednesday for MNPublicrecords to do the thing. If not now, then when? seriously.

PS: This angry Nick is still truly surreal to me. He is standing in front of the public admitting that it was fine that Aaron was having sex with HIS WIFE, but not OK that he sent her picture to a friend to brag about how great he did. Imagine these "parents" trying to explain this court appearance to their 5 kids.

Please correct where needed.

 

[Melty Butter]

Anyone a logging this have any idea when he last mentioned Kayla? And if he has done it that much, why wait until tomorrow to address it? Maybe it isn’t as unusual as what I think it is.

Since being charged, he hasn't. This is what he's done. He...

• Mistakenly showed her image in a video from this thread (Sharpeeter's) and then quickly closed it down. That was months ago.
• Discussed/joked about swinging, the polycule, and degeneracy. That obviously includes Kayla but he never referred to her at all directly.
• Appeared on Kevin Brennan's show, MLC, in which Kayla was being discussed. He left after a few minutes, clearly uncomfortable.

I don't watch every STMS but I watch a lot, as do a few people here. Also, Stallyn19 has had a pretty keen eye on this. If there was more, I think we'd know.

Edit to Add: He MAY have joked about Pawverbs, a gift book from Kayla, since being charged but I'm not sure of the timing.

 

[August Levasseur]

Going long on KNUs in anticipation of the judge being so moved by Nick's heartfelt Victim Impact Statement that he raises the fine to $150

 

[Soapmore]

I am not sure why consent to exchange nudes in an intimate relationship is viewed by some posters in this thread as consent to release nudes to the entire world.

Citation needed. By that I mean, who in the thread has actually said initial consent means it's ok to "release nudes to the entire world."? I'm only halfway pushing back on you because I agree that's not right and I agree with your description of the law's intent. And as for the particular point of Aaron, he wasn't releasing anything to the entire world, and he wasn't after revenge. I guess I don't know if you're strawmanning against no one in particular or if I have missed people actually saying consent = distribution.

 

[Fapcop]

PS: This angry Nick is still truly surreal to me. He is standing in front of the public admitting that it was fine that Aaron was having sex with HIS WIFE, but not OK that he sent her picture to a friend to brag about how great he did.

Minor correction. Nick has AFAIK never publicly admitted that Aaron filled every orifice on Kayla with his goo.

Instead, Nick has slyly implied that he somehow either “stole” April from his then friend, or that April just started having sex with him and Aaron was totally fine with it.

That Nick thinks that this story is credible, really shows just how far gone his broken brain is.

(are there really 3 victim impact statements? who would the 3rd be?)

I guess I might as well reveal it now, since you’ll all know anyways tomorrow.

The third victim speaking will be me, though arguably my statement can be more accurately described as “an angry rant”.

Mostly aimed at the fact that Aaron shared the pic with some rando boomer comedian and not me.

 

[Pelican Bones]

What violation does Nick believe was done exactly?

The greatest crime of all: a broken heart.

 

[SkuSucka]

I am not sure why consent to exchange nudes in an intimate relationship is viewed by some posters in this thread as consent to release nudes to the entire world.

I think that's a bit of an uncharitable read of what most of those posters seemed to mean. I think there is a tangible difference between showing one or two extra people but it still remains largely private and "releasing nudes to the entire world "

like I've seen that Pxie chick's dirty parts on Xitter without my consent/looking a handful of times, I've never seen the Toe's snapshot despite following the Crackets case since Drexel left

 

[Angry Shoes]

Nick forcing Aaron to see him one more time at the hearing is like a successful version of Greer's attempts to get pop stars to show up in court for his lawsuits.

 

[dustnight]

Potentially tomorrow night, Nick rushes to the defense of ....wife.

uh excuse me she's called the victim

 

[August Levasseur]

Citation needed. By that I mean, who in the thread has actually said initial consent means it's ok to "release nudes to the entire world."? I'm only halfway pushing back on you because I agree that's not right and I agree with your description of the law's intent. And as for the particular point of Aaron, he wasn't releasing anything to the entire world, and he wasn't after revenge. I guess I don't know if you're strawmanning against no one in particular or if I have missed people actually saying consent = distribution.

Hmm

I feel like if you're married with five kids and find yourself over at Aaron Imholte's basement posing nude for him just off camera while he live streams "The Steel Toe Morning Show" you should lose all rights to the image

In my opinion, if you willingly pose for/send the nude, it's no longer yours and the person you sent them to can do with them as they see fit. No different than giving someone a gift. If you are concerned they might spread it around or give it someone else, don't fucking do it to begin with. Simple solution, but it requires personal accountability which is kryptonite to certain demographics.

Hmm.

Gonna be honest I think a lot of ppl in this thread tend to sneed pretty hard whenever it looks like Nick has the possibility of a W. I think it's fair to state that what Aaron did was kinda gay, but also that a $50 fine is also appropriate. He did break the law, not in a super cereal way, but in an undeniable way. If a woman sends you a picture of her tits because she loves you (more than her husband) sharing that picture around is not a very based and/or chad thing to do, in fact it is pretty cringe, regardless of whether or not her husband uses a balldo or not. However, sharing it to only one guy is, while still cringe, not very high on the scale of cereals.

Nick is trying to act as if what Aaron did is Captain Krunch, when really it was more like plain Corn Flakes, a good source of dietary fiber, but not super cereal.

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

Nor should it be. The entire point of "revenge" pornography laws lie in preventing people from releasing nude pictures or videos obtained in the course of a sexual relationship as "revenge." The law recognizes that the vast majority of revenge pornography comes from initially willing participants who have partners who seek to extort, embarrass, or otherwise shame them after the relationship ends. These laws have a legitimate interest in preventing that behavior.

Look, I get your point. But as has been discussed in detail, MN law is what it is. Can intent be considered? Sure. But the misdemeanor doesn't require it.

I am not sure why consent to exchange nudes in an intimate relationship is viewed by some posters in this thread as consent to release nudes to the entire world.

Agree. But the comments add the context that Kayla did this or that and therefore she can't claim expectation of privacy.

I don’t see anyone saying that. The objection seems to be that if someone took the risk of sharing such sensitive material with another person, despite knowing how easily it could be shared, that the government shouldn’t waste resources cleaning up the mess they could have avoided.

Haven't seen that. What I've seen itt frequently is comments that Kayla is a whore so she has no expectation of privacy.

However, Aaron admitted to the misdemeanor so it's really quite moot.

 

[woodedbag]

@August Levasseur thanks for clearing that up bro. i was clearly being incredibly serious and not treating this as a quick laugh at Rekieta's expense on the internet thread based on generating laughs at Rekieta's expense. you are truly based!

 

[August Levasseur]

@August Levasseur thanks for clearing that up bro. i was clearly being incredibly serious and not treating this as a quick laugh at Rekieta's expense on the internet board thread based on generating laughs at Rekieta's expense. you are truly based!

thanks, I really appreciate it

 

[AltisticRight]

Has this been noticed yet? Some Aaron alog on Twitter says there's now a third victim impact statement.

View attachment 7551436

Archive/Archive2
View attachment 7551456View attachment 7551448View attachment 7551444View attachment 7551446

This faggot fucking skeleton freak is here publicly outlining his vexatious litigation plans against a literally who washed shock jock that streams to less than 500 people. He paid money to fly to Las Vegas where private photos of Aaron was exhibited to a crowd of losers. As if this in itself wasn't gay enough, he either paid freight to have the red cuck fridge delivered to the conference room or had it driven there across state borders.

Instead of mocking this equally pathetic shock jock faggot wannabe lawyer, these Diddleverse freaks eat up his cope slop because apparently Aaron Imholte is Adolf Hitler reincarnate.

As an onlooker, I'm supposed to believe it's Aaron who's harassing people, tarnishing the reputation of skelly's slattern doormat and he's the criminal. For what, sending one topless photo of skelly's perpetually in brain-stasis trollop of an enabler cunt? Give me a fucking break.

>120 days in jail, $3000 fine and 60+ hours of community service
Gotcha.
He's going to get zero days in jail, zero dollars in fines and zero community service. The same way Vic won his defamation lawsuit.
>10 years
10 years for showing one photo of your wife who's as sentient as a rockmelon sliced in half (with a bigger gaping vulva after Pan-African express ran on her in Jamaica).

Utterly delusional. Is he on psychedelics now?

“caused her significant harm”

Oh how would she recover, it's not like she ever sent lewds with a bottle up her butt for the entire world to see.

I don't believe "revenge porn" should be a civil or criminal matter, if you voluntarily take part in the production of porn, you deserve to deal with the shame of people seeing it, really sick of the government stepping in to stop people from having to deal with the consequences of their own actions.

Intent matters. If it was released for the purposes of intimidation and harassment (with an explicit or implicit call to action) then fine. Fuck that.
Aaron's a jock simpleton who tried to flex the lump of overgrown cells to an equally retarded streamer. He wasn't trying to shame or harass her, he even made compliments like "pretty good right" instead of "look at this skank with the tattooed up skin akin to the Berlin Wall graffiti".

Mr. Douglas complains about Nick Rekieta's use of vulgarity, mocks race (racism), sexual orientation, drunkenness, online legal advice, and complains the Lawyer's Professional Responsibility Office will not act against Nick Rekieta Lawyer's Professional Responsibility Office. Mr. Douglas continues to state Nick Rekieta is not a lawyer and Nick's audience claims he is a good lawyer.
This complaint was dismissed and was not investigated.

He says, "you're supposed to critique the decision, not the judge."

Quick reminder that this skelly faggot bitched about a self-proclaimed medical graduate over his use of the word "retard", as if all medical graduates are practitioners or work in psychology who usually don't engage in such verbiage. Do lawyers yell nigger faggot constantly and scream "bitch cunt slut" in drunken nitrous hazes? I don't think so but he's not a lawyer so I digress.

I wish there was a zoom link to tomorrows hearing. :/

You don't. It'll be filled with the unfunniest Diddleverse cretins doing their "comedy".

 

[SkuSucka]

Gonna be honest I think a lot of ppl in this thread tend to sneed pretty hard whenever it looks like Nick has the possibility of a W. I think it's fair to state that what Aaron did was kinda gay, but also that a $50 fine is also appropriate.

but consider; Crackets has hyped up the punishment Toe boy gets, so anything less than the "long road of discomfort" he was vagueposting about will still be an L, just one the two dudes share like it's one of their Qover whores.

 

[chalkyresidue]

It’s so heartwarming to see how the thread gets on the night before a big balldo happening. Everyone stays up late, comparing notes, speculating, arguing back and forth about the finest details of revenge porn laws, and generally making merry in the traditional kiwi fashion. It’s like Christmas Eve in other cultures. A harvest festival for corn.

 

[Intrusive Thinker]

Hate to say it but Nick could have a pretty solid case. WE all knew about the swinging but his normie viewers did not. Plenty of them have abandoned him. Nick can claim monetary damages from Aaron for exposing the degeneracy.

I thought you couldn't be sued if you tell the truth. Why is this allowed?

Also, Aaron pretty much said that Nick was abusive. Kayla can claim that was a lie. Ugh.

aaaand we get layers of abuse. Your abusive husband needs you to lie and accuse your boyfriend of being abusive after he protected you from your abusive husband

 

[Vibralldo]

Gonna be honest I think a lot of ppl in this thread tend to sneed pretty hard whenever it looks like Nick has the possibility of a W. I think it's fair to state that what Aaron did was kinda gay, but also that a $50 fine is also appropriate. He did break the law, not in a super cereal way, but in an undeniable way. If a woman sends you a picture of her tits because she loves you (more than her husband) sharing that picture around is not a very based and/or chad thing to do, in fact it is pretty cringe, regardless of whether or not her husband uses a balldo or not. However, sharing it to only one guy is, while still cringe, not very high on the scale of cereals.

Aaron getting off with the original agreed fine of 1 KNU with no jail time would be one of the funniest outcomes because of how hard Nick will seethe

 

[SkuSucka]

It’s so heartwarming to see how the thread gets on the night before a big balldo happening. Everyone stays up late, comparing notes, speculating, arguing back and forth about the finest details of revenge porn laws, and generally making merry in the traditional kiwi fashion. It’s like Christmas Eve in other cultures. A harvest festival for corn.

A merry Corn harvest to all lovely kiwis (including you @woodedbag <3) may you enjoy your mind altering substances of choice (got crappy Chinese beers myself) everyone, and laugh at how Crackets has been reduced to a sputtering gas-head

 

[Mr. Manchester]

When it comes to lolcow stuff, I like to get a little superstitious. Right now my superstition tells me two things:

1. Nick Rekieta is cursed to fuck up endlessly, Sonichu Medallion or not. Cosmic forces want him to suffer.
2. Aaron Imholte possesses some kind of mutant power that allows him to suffer from next to no consequences for his stupid actions. Other cosmic forces do not want him to suffer with the exception of embarrassment.

Based on this made up nonsense alone I believe that the price of a KNU will remain the same or be waved entirely, crashing the KNU market.