Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 20.4%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 85 27.2%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 49 15.7%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 111 35.5%

  • Total voters
    313
As much as I want it to happen, I don't think Nick has it in him.
His brain is so thoroughly fried from drug use I don't believe he has the capacity for deferring gratification for as long as it takes to see a lolsuit through to its conclusion.
I think he'll get his license back and make threats at least. I wonder what he'll try to threaten Josh with.
 
Oh noo's Nick is going to come after Josh and the Farms next!!!
Lawfare Pope is so back!
Reality...
Screenshot 2025-06-26 at 2.24.42 PM.webp
Screenshot 2025-06-26 at 2.27.34 PM.webp
 
I’m looking forward to Nick’s vexatious litigant arc.
It would be the most interesting heel turn he could make after ruining his and his family's life. He's going to try and wring that stone dry of blood for all it's worth and it will be the most entertaining thing he's done in the past 3 to 4 years.
 
If he's a victim of anything, he's a victim of his lawyer's incompetence. It was his lawyer's job to point out that court's demands are unconstitutional and oppose it. Instead he not only agreed to it but failed to instruct Aaron how to comply with it.
Shouldn't it be part of the court's job to not make unconstitutional demands in the first place? Seems like the bare fucking minimum. Pretty shitty if you need a crack lawyer (sit down Nick, not that kind of crack) just to battle an incompetent judge.
 
I mean if you go only one degree of separation from Aaron, who has already had two orders issued against him by former partners in two different MN counties preventing him from mentioning them on his online streams, Ethan Ralph has had three extremely similar orders issued against him involving three different former partners in three different states (Faith in California, Amanda in New York and Ade in Michigan) which prevent[ed] him from mentioning them on his online streams.

Anyone who says the order is "unconstitutional" is at best making a normative argument about what the constitutional interpretation should be. As a positive argument about what it is in practice, it's clearly wrong.
Obviously, I can't speak for everybody here raising that point, but the idea that it might be (I am not married to the idea, BTW, so understand I am not going full-on Barnes here) was something I pondered after reading this post by Null early this morning (likely a follow-on to this). I have no idea who Null is quoting there, but I know Null consults with various lawyers and referred to the "Kiwi Farms legal team." It may very well be incorrect legal conclusion, for all I know.

Aside from any debate that could occur as to whether the restrictions placed on Aaron pass Constitutional muster, one is still within their right to opine that it's shitty for the government to mute somebody like that while the other party can talk as much shit as they'd like. I can simultaneously acknowledge a restriction, while thinking the restriction is chickenshit. We're all required to follow the law, but nobody is required to like the law.

Now, if, in the course of saying this, I am inadvertently offering a defense of some sort for some of Ralph's behavior in his own legal dealings, then so be it I guess. I am certainly no stranger to the fact that Vickers is an asshole when it comes to trying to goad people into violating court orders so that he can pounce on them. I believe you have also acknowledged that yourself.

It sure would be funny and weird if somebody let Matsuri know about what Nick has been getting up to since his last appearance at that convention.
That somebody would probably be Vic himself. Quietly.

If push comes to shove, I simply can't see Deneice Leigh chosing Nick Rekieta over Vic Mignogna. She'd have to be braindead. One still has an extremely loyal fan base, and the other is circling the drain.

But I dunno. One of Vic's most charming (yet sometimes frustrating) qualities has always been that he's a just really nice guy. That's why a lot of people love him. He may very well say nothing at all.
 
Last edited:
Shouldn't it be part of the court's job to not make unconstitutional demands in the first place? Seems like the bare fucking minimum. Pretty shitty if you need a crack lawyer (sit down Nick, not that kind of crack) just to battle an incompetent judge.
Of course it should. But I think that if this thread teaches us something, it's that not a single person in law-related profession in Minnesota knows how to do their job.
 
I really don't think he gives a single solitary fuck that Geno saw Kayla nude.
Hell im willing to go a step further and say Nick would have smuggly enjoyed the knowledge that Aaron was showing off OUR wife and getting some sort of positive response from Geno if the polycule remained hidden and active; he's literally only mad because Aaron and him broke up
 
View attachment 7561125

He requires the downfall of his enemies to feel any sense of optimism, as he can no longer find joy or fulfillment through his own achievements or personal life. It's a sad state of affairs—but, perhaps, a deserved one.
Kids? What about em?
Now Aaron, on the other hand, that snake in the garden, that temptress, that Jezebel. I will never be whole until the man who inseminated me is dead! DEAD! He broke my heart! May he win a million cancers!
And people just cheer him on for God knows why.
 
Literally everyone remotely involved in this is an absolute fucking idiot. The judge, the prosecutor, Aaron's lawyer, Aaron himself, Geno, Keanu, every single one. Absolute clownshoes by every person.
It's like watching a long, intense, drawn out game of 6-way chess between a bunch of people that have no idea how to play chess.
 
Here’s how Steel Toe and Null can still win:

1. Steel Toe throws out his plea agreement and his new defense is that Kayla Rekieta explicitly gave him permission to share the photo with anyone in the bodycam footage during the house raid.

2. Nick Rekieta is forced between entering the bodycam into evidence or dropping all charges. He will, of course, enter the bodycam into evidence.

3. We get the bodycam footage, Steel Toe gets free room and housing for 1 year.
 
I'm genuinely curious what the actual relationship dynamic with his mother Celeste is?
Most narcissists are spawned by either absent/neglectful, or over doting mothers "golden child"
Bob Rekieta just seems like a passive sperm donor who just does what she says for inheritance gibs. When Nick cryptically blamed his father in a Tweet he was basically projecting his own deep well of shame for not being able to stand up to her. I think he really sees Bob as just as mentally weak as he is and hates him for it.
Just like he deep down loathes himself. I highly doubt his father ever physically punished him. Even Aaron said Bob was just a "nice all around guy"
If this is true in Nick's case then he is both resentful, and dependent on his mommy like a toddler even as an adult.
He's a literal man child who desperately wants to separate from her in his disordered head, and finally be a "big boy!" But bitter that he has to eternally suck her saggy fat tit until she dies for financial help because he never learned to be a "real man" as KarmicX would say.
 
I mean if you go only one degree of separation from Aaron, who has already had two orders issued against him by former partners in two different MN counties preventing him from mentioning them on his online streams, Ethan Ralph has had three extremely similar orders issued against him involving three different former partners in three different states (Faith in California, Amanda in New York and Ade in Michigan) which prevent[ed] him from mentioning them on his online streams.
Aside from any debate that could occur as to whether the restrictions placed on Aaron pass Constitutional muster . . . We're all required to follow the law, but nobody is required to like the law.
@Balldo's Gate has exactly the right take here, as much as I sometimes think his a-logging of Aaron gets out of hand. Unforced error by Aaron and his attorney. But it's not even that significant. Aaron got his bail revoked for a day, spent a couple hours in time out, and had to pay an increased bail. Kiddy-level consequences.

Boo-hoo. It's not the end of the American justice system. People should take a chill pill and remember that this is an unimportant case concerning an unimportant person with an unimportant offense. The value of this case to Stearns County was $50, and the only reason Aaron got in trouble here is because he's a dipshit.

The fact of the matter remains that Aaron's attorney should have challenged the conditions of release or not agreed to them if the order was constitutionally infirm. I am not convinced it is unconstitutional. Not my area of expertise, but judges tend to have a lot of latitude to impose conditions of release, including restrictions on constitutionally-protected rights or activities (i.e. having firearms, excluding you from certain places, prohibiting from talking to certain people, etc.). So, I would have to see some actual briefing with real research to be convinced that this form order was defective, no offense to whoever is giving their opinion to Null. But putting that aside, you waive your defenses when you agree to abide them anyways, so it's a complete non-issue.

What you shouldn't do is violate the order you agreed to abide by. What you shouldn't do is write a smarmy letter to the court who you've seen takes its own authority very seriously (see how this judge went after Ralph for rebroadcasting the stream). What you shouldn't do is concede that you violated the court's order, to the court, and expect that the court won't ream your asshole.
 
Last edited:
Back