Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Why is Nicholas Rekieta offline?

  • He's spending time with his family, NERDS.

    Votes: 72 10.7%
  • He pissed hot and he's in trouble!

    Votes: 95 14.2%
  • Yet another "family incident" happened.

    Votes: 209 31.2%
  • His lawyer ordered him to shut up.

    Votes: 175 26.1%
  • He's busy procuring the 5k LOCALS gift.

    Votes: 68 10.1%
  • He's dead.

    Votes: 51 7.6%

  • Total voters
    670
🤔

**Harassment Restraining Order (HRO) and Probation in Minnesota:**

* If you have a Harassment Restraining Order (HRO) against you and you're on probation in Minnesota, it's essential to understand the implications.
* An HRO can be considered a new offense if you're on probation and you're served with an HRO or you're charged with violating an existing HRO.


Probation Violation:
* If you're on probation and you're served with an HRO, you may be considered in violation of your probation terms.
* You could face additional consequences, including:
+ New charges
+ Revocation of probation
+ Incarceration
That is pretty fucked up. The burdens of proof aren't the same and it's a civil setting.

No way in hell should that be grounds for a violation
 
That is pretty fucked up. The burdens of proof aren't the same and it's a civil setting.

No way in hell should that be grounds for a violation
Maybe it shouldn't generally, but for Nick I can make an exception.

(Yeah, I know you won't agree, my stance is different, he's gotten away with so much in his life, I feel sorry for his family.)
 
That is pretty fucked up. The burdens of proof aren't the same and it's a civil setting.

No way in hell should that be grounds for a violation
I imagine it is going to need to be fully granted until that applies?

Actually, I dug further. Merely being served isn't a violation automatically, only if you are on probation for something like harassment. Violating it would be.

So, can Nick not fuckup and break the HRO till his challenge? Hmm.

What are your thoughts on it being granted going forward ? To me it seems dubious considering the case against Aaron, but it already got to a more likely than not standard for an interim.
 
Maybe it shouldn't generally, but for Nick I can make an exception.

(Yeah, I know you won't agree, my stance is different, he's gotten away with so much in his life, I feel sorry for his family.)
I agree on merely getting served with a restraining order. The burden of proof is practically nonexistent and it's to maintain the status quo until an actual hearing. It's also ex parte in this case, meaning it was granted without the recipient, Nick, even having an opportunity to be heard in opposition.

However, the fact his immediate response to it was he THREW IT ON THE GROOOOUND and violated it kind of moots that, because valid or not, he willfully ignored it instead of going through the proper process of challenging it.
 
Aaron, what did most of the thread suggest, and your response was "public figure" huh? Did you lie or you just didn't bother to ask?
Was the extra $10 or fine, let's say $500 worth it? Who am I kidding.
Grow a fucking brain, I know it's hard for a dimwitted radio shockjock.
Remember that Aaron had a full year since that period of time where Melton was saying shit about Aaron's daughter where Aaron could have attempted to obtain an HRO, where many people in this thread were wondering why the fuck he didn't try to do something to stop at least Melton talking about Aaron's kids... but Aaron never bothered and as far as is known hasn't bothered to do that and even offered to participate in a boxing event in Vegas with the Hackamania hosts.

Aaron acts giddy every time he brings up how Melton mentioned his children on NLO. He doesn't care that Melton ruined his daughter's SEO with his shows talking about her, he just understands that other people care a lot about it and that that is an Aaron W and Melton L.

Sociopathic.

But as soon Aaron got utterly humiliated on Wednesday he spent the $5,000 to get out of jail with the understanding he may have blown his own plea deal he had a cuckold rage moment and ran to the courthouse to try and file an HRO against... Nick Rekieta, who has at least limited himself to talking shit about Aaron himself rather than his kids.

What happened to this?
I've seen this enough I feel inclined to respond. We have inquired about this but with me being a public figure it's really not an option.

Just to underscore the sheer stupidity of what Balldo is doing, he's entitled to a nearly immediate hearing to dissolve this RO and that very well may have been granted after a perfunctory hearing. All he had to do was sit on his hands, huff some Galaxy Gas, and wait a few days in silence.

Instead he's throwing a public tantrum and flipping off the judge with both hands.
These two screeching homos really are made for eachother.
They are both next level retards competing with each other to reach higher and higher levels of retardation. During this week of the feud, Aaron was comfortably ahead in retardation but Nick has clearly decided he needed to up his game.

Nick just needed to hang tight and point out that Aaron had talked shit about Nick at length for nearly every single weekday for the past year and had within hours of filing the order been slapped down in court for harassing his victim... who is also the wife of the person he claims is harassing him....

Like this whole thing is beyond retarded. Does anyone think that Aaron didn't actively love when Nick talked about him a week ago? It gave him free content and attention. He changed his mind when he got taken into jail on Wednesday.

Instead Nick potentially walked into a new charge which could ruin his existing plea deal.
 
But as soon Aaron got utterly humiliated on Wednesday he spent the $5,000 to get out of jail
Eh, I'd say it's not just "humiliation" when you go to jail and have to pay $5000, that's real consequences. And clearly it woke him up and made him realise just farming this shit for content isn't going to work anymore. I.e. if it was just humiliation he would continue to farm it like a retard. Nick made it very real.
 
Just a summary of Stallyn19’s clip (PreserveTube) of the members-only livestream of Melton’s show, for those interested:

Based on the way the petition was written, Rekieta believes Todd Peterson was not responsible for this HRO. Rekieta boasts about being knowledgeable on HROs because he has had to argue them in court multiple times.

[0:14] “All he got is that I [Rekieta] shall have no direct or indirect contact with petitioner. There is nothing that says that I cannot talk about him. Although I am, of course, not going to talk about him [...]. As soon as this is done, you know, I'm going to talk very candidly about what happened.” [...] “He [Aaron] is about to learn what it’s like to go in and actually have to answer for what you say.”

[2:03] Rekieta discusses how Aaron “accused” him of asking multiple people to file police reports against him. Rekieta says: “There are two problems with that. One, I [Rekieta] have not asked people to make police reports on your show after the court hearing [...]. I said what was relayed to me — that if people are making reports, it is helpful to have a timestamp and a date, and perhaps a link to the original stream. [...] I didn’t ask people to submit those; people are submitting those — that’s not my request.”

[4:20] Rekieta explains that he received this HRO from the sheriff not long before he tweeted about it. He claims that Aaron accuses him of criminal actions almost daily, allegedly trying to get Rekieta’s probation revoked. He strongly asserts that Aaron will soon learn such behavior is unacceptable — implying potential legal consequences.

[7:07] Rekieta reiterates: “I do not request anyone to contact him. I never have done that. I have never asked anyone to interfere with his life. [...] I have no desire, nor have I had any desire, to contact him in well over a year. I do not want to speak to him. I do not want to address him. I talk about him on occasion on Twitter. [...] I have no interest in talking to him or being near him or anything else.”

[8:41] Rekieta says his efforts are actually aimed at making Aaron stop talking about Kayla, stating that she is a private person who hasn’t been online since 2002 — though he immediately corrects himself, noting it was actually 2022.

[9:35] He reads from the petition, which alleges that Rekieta has appeared on numerous YouTube livestreams encouraging viewers to report Aaron to law enforcement, and that he has gathered people in public places to harass or intimidate Aaron (claims which Rekieta immediately denies). He states that when he went to Aaron’s boxing club, the first thing he did was check if Aaron’s car was in its usual spot to ensure he wasn’t there (he remembers where Aaron usually parks, very weird). During his attempt to disprove any intent to harass, Rekieta says that when he was at Stoney’s, he would leave if Aaron was there. He also notes that Kayla was with him and Melton on that occasion.

[13:37] Rekieta says the petition cites two specific incidents to justify the HRO: his appearance on Melton’s show on May 25th, and a text dated 04/11/2024 in which he allegedly told Aaron to kill himself after Aaron refused to come over his house. Rekieta disputes this characterization.

[14:24] He insists that he never encouraged others to report Aaron to the police — but then adds that even if he had, it would have been within his rights.

[18:28] He continues reading from the petition: “Respondent used the victim’s personal information without consent to invite, encourage or solicit a third party to engage in a sexual act with the victim, as follows [...] from April 11th, 2024 to November 10th, 2024 [...]” — referring to accusations that Rekieta accessed Aaron’s Google account without authorization and published search history and financial information on his X account. Rekieta says he doesn’t remember posting any financial data (but does not deny the search history).

[19:39] Rekieta claims this move by Aaron was a serious misstep, as it now allows Rekieta to file discovery requests: “Maybe who he’s talked about me with and what he said in private messages about me and Kayla. [...] And the judge may be interested in what comes out of a discovery request from this case. [...] I’m sure there are probably other YouTubers and such who are speaking behind the scenes and giving advice. And it’d be interesting to see what he said to close friends of his about a certain person — maybe, you know, Geno Bisconti and Keanu.”

[21:05] Rekieta speculates that Aaron filed the petition without the help of a lawyer and asserts that this HRO is unwise and ill-advised.
 
I'm going to have to question this. Do you seriously think anyone is going to give a shit about this in 2031?
Absolutely not (inshallah). I was pointing out that that certain takes on this judge are incorrect in addition to dumb.

Clarification: I am not referring to @Potentially Criminal's takes.
 
[0:14] “All he got is that I [Rekieta] shall have no direct or indirect contact with petitioner. There is nothing that says that I cannot talk about him. Although I am, of course, not going to talk about him [...]. As soon as this is done, you know, I'm going to talk very candidly about what happened.” [...] “He [Aaron] is about to learn what it’s like to go in and actually have to answer for what you say.”
I pulled up Ashley's HRO against Aaron from Sherburne County (from this post). That one specifically mentions that Aaron can't mention her on his show, or allow anyone else to mention her on his show either. If Aaron's order against Nick doesn't have this language it's possible he's on less obviously shaky ground than it appears, but it's still retarded to do this before it gets sorted out in court.

1751121095621.webpz
1751120872567.webp


By the way the language in that order from Sherburne County was identical to the language in Aaron's release conditions in Stearns County, meaning the language appears to be shared within Minnesota.

1751121131038.webp
 
[18:28] He continues reading from the petition: “Respondent used the victim’s personal information without consent to invite, encourage or solicit a third party to engage in a sexual act with the victim, as follows [...] from April 11th, 2024 to November 10th, 2024 [...]” — referring to accusations that Rekieta accessed Aaron’s Google account without authorization and published search history and financial information on his X account. Rekieta says he doesn’t remember posting any financial data (but does not deny the search history).
Can't believe Nick refused to deny male on male sexual harassment

HE'S GAY!
 
5:40 Nick addresses Aaron directly before stopping himself:
"Aaron, that's all... Well, I can't address him"

Naught, naughty. Sounds like a violation to me. Wonder what his PO thinks of that...
Now I see how Nick isn't the premier lawyer and that it makes him more interesting. He has his own view of what the rules are for this restraining order that Aaron filed against him. Under his own rules, he is fine to do anything but talk to Aaron or make statements addressing Aaron directly. Whether right or wrong, he thinks rounding up a digital posse is fine, talking to Melton about Aaron is fine.

If Nick was a great lawyer, he would shut up and get the restraining order thrown out. If Nick was a complete idiot, he would grab a shotgun, drive to Aaron's, and shoot Aaron in the face while standing in front of the ring camera in broad daylight. But he goes for the middleground - he violates his own version of the restraining order by ADDRESSING AARON DIRECTLY... but stops halfway through the sentence. Now what? did he violate the RO or not? hell if I know.

I like how he might have violated a restraining order that could get thrown out in the next couple weeks, but even if totally bogus the restraining order is legally(?) in place right now and can still be violated. If I am following this correctly, having the RO filed might be enough to violate parole? And violating the RO almost definitely would screw up his parole. No wonder Nick is freaked out. But how is this RO a shock to Nick? Neither of these two lovers can think 1 step ahead
 
I only just saw this, but Melton did post the full segment featuring Rekieta on his channel:

Rekieta joins @20:58.

EDIT:
  • Rekieta states at ~29:00 that Aaron had also requested protection for his minor children, but the judge granted the ex parte order solely on Aaron.
 
Last edited:
Now I see how Nick isn't the premier lawyer and that it makes him more interesting. He has his own view of what the rules are for this restraining order that Aaron filed against him. Under his own rules, he is fine to do anything but talk to Aaron or make statements addressing Aaron directly. Whether right or wrong, he thinks rounding up a digital posse is fine, talking to Melton about Aaron is fine.

If Nick was a great lawyer, he would shut up and get the restraining order thrown out. If Nick was a complete idiot, he would grab a shotgun, drive to Aaron's, and shoot Aaron in the face while standing in front of the ring camera in broad daylight. But he goes for the middleground - he violates his own version of the restraining order by ADDRESSING AARON DIRECTLY... but stops halfway through the sentence. Now what? did he violate the RO or not? hell if I know.

I like how he might have violated a restraining order that could get thrown out in the next couple weeks, but even if totally bogus the restraining order is legally(?) in place right now and can still be violated. If I am following this correctly, having the RO filed might be enough to violate parole? And violating the RO almost definitely would screw up his parole. No wonder Nick is freaked out. But how is this RO a shock to Nick? Neither of these two lovers can think 1 step ahead
Nick's addiction to rage is underrated in the hierarchy of Nick's issues. His addiction to rage means he acts purely out of id when challenged and he'll never make the right decision.
I only just saw this, but Melton did post the full segment featuring Rekieta on his channel:

Rekieta joins @20:58.
Melton kicks Nick off his show, citing his fans hating him, and then hosts the uncut, full stream of Nick potentially violating his RO.

Melton snake arc coming sooner than we thought?
 
Crazy world we live in where you can rape a man and then get a restraining order against him smh.
I don't think it's so bad. It would be great to set legal precedent to set up protection from crazy pussy (or crazy man ass in this case). The man can pay one or two KNUs as a fine for being stupid and sticking their dick in crazy, but if crazy keeps stalking them with an entire online community of sub-humans, they need protection.
 
Back