Diseased Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

[LateNightMuffin]

I don't even like JK Rowling, 99% of the problems she complains about she directly caused and only started caring about trannies as long as it started personally affecting her, while refusing to admit her retarded politics (that she still supports) are what caused it in the first place and will innevitably cause it again if it ever goes away.

Thank you for sharing one of the most retarded and counterfactual opinions on this thread. Point by point you're wrong.
"99% of the problems she complains about she directly caused"
She directly caused male rapists to be put in women's prisons? Wow, she's powerful!
"only started caring about trannies as long as it started personally affecting her,"
I never knew JK Rowling had done time in a women's prison and been forced to share her cell with a male rapist. Learn something new every day, I guess.
"refusing to admit her retarded politics (that she still supports) are what caused it in the first place and will innevitably [sic] cause it again if it ever goes away."
Oh, so her "retarded" belief that men can't be women caused transgenderism? Got it, Chief!

 

[Oilspill Battery]

Thank you for sharing one of the most retarded and counterfactual opinions on this thread. Point by point you're wrong.
"99% of the problems she complains about she directly caused"
She directly caused male rapists to be put in women's prisons? Wow, she's powerful!
"only started caring about trannies as long as it started personally affecting her,"
I never knew JK Rowling had done time in a women's prison and been forced to share her cell with a male rapist. Learn something new every day, I guess.
"refusing to admit her retarded politics (that she still supports) are what caused it in the first place and will innevitably [sic] cause it again if it ever goes away."
Oh, so her "retarded" belief that men can't be women caused transgenderism? Got it, Chief!

She is in full throated support of every single gay rights movement that has ever existed and in half her comments decrying the troons she talks about how much they affect the poor gays.

She supports lgb unconditionally not caring that it is the source of the T instead of a seperate entity and after T goes away she will continue to support lgb until it innevitably respawns the T.

Her retarded belief that unlimited sexual permissiveness in society A-OK and that buttsex is the most wholesome thing in the world after rainbows as well support of all the organizations that believe it is what propped up transgenderism.

 

[Marvin]

She is in full throated support of every single gay rights movement that has ever existed and in half her comments decrying the troons she talks about how much they affect the poor gays.

She supports lgb unconditionally not caring that it is the source of the T instead of a seperate entity and after T goes away she will continue to support lgb until it innevitably respawns the T.

If it's true that supporting LGB encourages T (debatable, not necessarily true), then at best that would mean that she indirectly contributed to it. Not directly.

Words have meaning, y'know.

Her retarded belief that unlimited sexual permissiveness in society A-OK and that buttsex is the most wholesome thing in the world after rainbows as well support of all the organizations that believe it is what propped up transgenderism.

You're taking giant leaps of assumptions here. You're assuming she's super enthusiastic about sexual permissiveness because she's a liberal.

Most likely she has fairly mundane, liberal soccer mom (or whatever the British analog is) political opinions. Something like "consenting adults should be able to do what they please privately". Which is the most boring, harmless dumb opinion out there.

She's not like a blue haired college student writing essays about the philosophical value of pegging and sounding. She's just a "be nice" moron, which is harmless and uninteresting.

 

[Wooper]

I don't follow Ms. Rowling, but whenever she pops up on my feed she seems to be enjoying herself.

 

[Oilspill Battery]

If it's true that supporting LGB encourages T (debatable, not necessarily true), then at best that would mean that she indirectly contributed to it. Not directly.

Words have meaning, y'know.

You're taking giant leaps of assumptions here. You're assuming she's super enthusiastic about sexual permissiveness because she's a liberal.

Most likely she has fairly mundane, liberal soccer mom (or whatever the British analog is) political opinions. Something like "consenting adults should be able to do what they please privately". Which is the most boring, harmless dumb opinion out there.

She's not like a blue haired college student writing essays about the philosophical value of pegging and sounding. She's just a "be nice" moron, which is harmless and uninteresting.

I don't mind her having support the lgb in the past then understanding the error of her ways, I assume a lot of people even here were like that, I was like that at one point.

My issue is that she still supports it pretty vocally. I've gone through most of the thread because it is funny to watch her dunk on trannies, but there's a decent ammount of her tweets where she talks about how the troons are oppressing the poor gays by forcing them to have heterosexual sex.

Yeah of course she's doing good work by pushing back against the trannies, but its all for naught because she's only intrested in a specific symptom instead of the cause.

She's still watering the tree who's branches she's simutaneously trying to cut down and wondering why they keep regrowing.

 

[Feels Badman]

innevitably

With that out of way

ammount

sitiuations

you retarded opinion

mysoginistic

innevitably

as well support of all the organizations

having support the lgb

ammount

intrested

who's

Fortunately, it doesn't seem you're from an English-speaking country, so you can rest assured that JKR's tweets haven't affected your government's policy towards fags in the slightest.

 

[Oilspill Battery]

Fortunately, it doesn't seem you're from an English-speaking country, so you can rest assured that JKR's tweets haven't affected your government's policy towards fags in the slightest.

Oh no, I spelled some words wrong, cause and effect has been now been completely invalidated.

 

[Feels Badman]

Oh no, I spelled some words wrong, cause and effect has been now been completely invalidated.

To be clear, are you arguing that fag rights where you live (or anywhere, for that matter) hinge on what a popular children's author posts on X, formerly known as Twitter? You do realize that a large part of RDS is the delusion that Rowling is able to bestow or strip people's rights by tweeting?

 

[Oilspill Battery]

To be clear, are you arguing that fag rights where you live (or anywhere, for that matter) hinge on what a popular children's author posts on X, formerly known as Twitter?

I'm not arguing that JK Rowling is going to make sodomy legal globaly with her tweets, I'm pointing out that the ideology she heralds is self defeating and any good she does will inevitably end up being undone by that very same ideology.

I like to think the average person in the farms is capable of second order thinking, I don't see why you need this explained to you.

You do realize that a large part of RDS is the delusion that Rowling is able to bestow or strip people's rights by tweeting?

Not really? Its pretty clear that Rowling yields at bare minimum soft political power using her enormous platform and wealth. Its pretty stupid to deny that, she HAS donated to lgb charities.

RDS is people being so angry that they openly shout from the rooftops how they want to murder-rape a middle aged woman for not wanting men in the women's restrooms.

 

[LimeRikki]

I don't follow Ms. Rowling, but whenever she pops up on my feed she seems to be enjoying herself.
View attachment 7580459
View attachment 7580460
View attachment 7580461

She's more than earned it.

She still has more vitriol directed at her than Neil Gaiman, a rapist. There is something about a Woman who won't back down when she knows she's right, that drives a certain percentage of the population completely insane.

 

[Feels Badman]

I'm not arguing that JK Rowling is going to make sodomy legal globaly with her tweets, I'm pointing out that the ideology she heralds is self defeating and any good she does will innevitably end up being undone by that very same ideology.

Wow, so cool that you can see the future. I had no idea that when JKR finally manages to use her immense political power to put all the troons in camps and gas them, men who like buttsex with other men will "innevitably" fill the void by entering women's prisons and raping them (thus making JKR a cultural rapist). That's a neat ability you have there.

I like to think the average person in the farms is capable of second order thinking, I don't see why you need this explained to you.

Second order consequences, in addition to being much easier for you to argue in favor of, would mean she isn't directly responsible like you said.

Not really? Its pretty clear that Rowling yields political power using her enormous platform and wealth.

She has yielded a fair amount of her wealth to charity, but so far I haven't seen her yield political power.

RDS is people being so angry that they openly shout from the rooftops how they want to murder-rape a middle aged woman for not wanting men in the women's restrooms.

Just because you aren't exhibit A doesn't mean you aren't a sideshow.

 

[Oilspill Battery]

Wow, so cool that you can see the future. I had no idea that when JKR finally manages to use her immense political power to put all the troons in camps and gas them, men who like buttsex with other men will "innevitably" fill the void by entering women's prisons and raping them (thus making JKR a cultural rapist). That's a neat ability you have there.

You don't see how social permissiveness around sex and sexuality leads to troons? That's a pretty disingenuous take if I ever saw one.

Second order consequences, in addition to being much easier for you to argue in favor of, would mean she isn't directly responsible like you said.

I think liberalism which she supports is directly responsible for both.

She has yielded a fair amount of her wealth to charity, but so far I haven't seen her yield political power.

That's like arguing bill gates has no political power because he isn't a politician and only has charities.

 

[Feels Badman]

I think liberalism which she supports is directly responsible for both.

Right. So she isn't directly responsible.

That's like arguing bill gates has no political power because he isn't a politician and only has charities.

Look up what yield means if you're confused.

 

[Sourceress]

I'm not arguing that JK Rowling is going to make sodomy legal globaly with her tweets, I'm pointing out that the ideology she heralds is self defeating and any good she does will inevitably end up being undone by that very same ideology.

The bottom line though is that you're wrong. Trans shit has absolutely nothing to do with the LGB past trying to exploit them for their own gains. For the most part (obviously there are outliers who suck just like any group) the gay rights movement has simply been about wanting to be allowed to love who you love and live your life normally without being like, burned at the stake or beaten to death in an alley about it. Unless you're a violent psychopath who considers being asked not to kill people a restriction of your personal rights, the gay rights movement doesn't ask or instruct you to actually change anything about your own life or do anything differently. Gay men aren't trying to intrude on women's bathrooms or insist that you address them as His Lordship The Gayest Man Ever or some stupid shit like that. The elements of social control, coercion and invasion into private spaces that don't belong to you are entirely absent.

The trans "rights" movement attached itself to the gay rights movement because they felt they could exploit people's reasonable sympathy for a group that just wants to live safe and normal lives in order to further their goal of social control and coercion, but they aren't at all similar. Trans rights activists want to control everything about people's social lives right down to what they think and how they speak and act, invade single-sex spaces and put the people (particularly women) there in danger, chemically castrate children to use them as props to push their agenda, and more. While trannies desperately try to tie their movement to the LGB, they actually have nothing in common whatsoever. Something JKR has pointed out several times iirc as well.

Put simply: All the LGB activists are really asking you to do is not to murder them and maybe consider not torturing your kid if they come out as gay. Trans activists want you to chemically castrate your kid if they step outside strict gender role "boundaries," want to control how you think to make sure you don't accidentally thought crime a stunning brave transwoman, and want to leer at your wife in the gym locker room while she's getting undressed. Not really related at all.

She still has more vitriol directed at her than Neil Gaiman, a rapist. There is something about a Woman who won't back down when she knows she's right, that drives a certain percentage of the population completely insane.

Well you see, Neil Gaiman says Trans Women Are Women and murders icky transphobic terf lesbians in many of his books, so even though he's a rapist he's on The Right Side Of History. Everyone knows thought crimes like JKR's evil terfiness are WAY worse than actual crimes against real living women!

I swear if I hadn't already peaked, watching people respond to Gaiman's reveal as a sex pest rapist with "oh no he's just as bad as JKR now, rape is on the same level as thought crimes" would have done it.

You don't see how social permissiveness around sex and sexuality leads to troons?

My brother, the social permissiveness around sex and sexuality that leads to troons is social permissiveness around heterosexual sexuality. The vast majority of trannies are porn-addicted straight men. If you want to make a dent in this trans bullshit you have to put your eyes not to ending the acceptance of gay men and women, but rather to ending the acceptance of porn addiction and easy access to pornography.

* edited for typos, new laptop's autocorrect doesn't know how to talk around here lol

 

[Oilspill Battery]

Right. So she isn't directly responsible.

I don't even understand what argument you're trying to make here. "She isn't directly responsible for troons existing, she is only directly responsible for continuing to support the ideology that keeps spawning them."

I mean ok, sure I agree, maybe its because english is my second language, but I don't see how its a significant distinction.

My brother, the social permissiveness around sex and sexuality that leads to troons is social permissiveness around heterosexual sexuality.

My brother, the sexual revolution didn't make a distinction between one type of sexual permissiveness and another. There's being normal, and then there's everything else. Trying to claim otherwise is just cope.

a group that just wants to live safe and normal lives

Put simply: All the LGB activists are really asking you to do is not to murder them and maybe consider not torturing your kid if they come out as gay.

This argument may have worked in the 80s, but everyone who isn't blind knows this is bullshit at this point.

Its exceedingly clear that no, they don't just want to live their lives.

There is no "safe and normal lives" the aids epidemic alone is proof that "safe and normal" was never a thing to begin with and was just a lie to fool normies into supporting them.

The end goal for both groups is breaking down of any societal restrictions around sex and sexuality. Trans activists also claim they just want to live their lives, but we all know that's a lie too.

 

[Feels Badman]

I mean ok, sure I agree, maybe its because english is my second language, but I don't see how its a significant distinction.

Don't worry, neither do most people who get posted on here. Cultural rape, real rape, after all what's the difference?

If you want to make a dent in this trans bullshit you have to put your eyes not to ending the acceptance of gay men and women, but rather to ending the acceptance of porn addiction and easy access to pornography.

No, but you see, this is demonizing heterosexual male sexuality, and it's causing men to become gay and trans. Before feminazis started complaining, men could goon to barely legal porn all day with no problem. Now they've started chopping their dicks off out of guilt. So you see, it's really women's fault.

 

[squidward tentacles]

The trans "rights" movement attached itself to the gay rights movement

Historically (like, in the 60s?), 'trans' woman were just very effete gay men who dressed in drag and usually engaged in some level of prostitution. Since probably the 80s (?) they are majority straight men with a crossdressing and lesbian fetish. How otherwise would you explain the surge in 'transbians'? Why would a crossdressing gay man want to date women? The vast majority of trans men are either straight women with a gay fetish, or women who are the victims of sexual harassment or assault who are trying to distance themselves from their bodies.

But because of the historic connection, they are latched onto the gay rights movement like a tick. Obviously there are gay trans women and lesbian trans men (the hsts vs apg stuff), but these are outnumbered by the outright fetishists (and you can argue that a gay guy trying to turn himself straight through semantics also has a fetish).

 

[Oilspill Battery]

Don't worry, neither do most people who get posted on here. Cultural rape, real rape, after all what's the difference?

You think there's a difference between supporting a thing, and supporting ideologies that support, prop up, promote and create that thing?

No, but you see, this is demonizing heterosexual male sexuality, and it's causing men to become gay and trans. Before feminazis started complaining, men could goon to barely legal porn all day with no problem. Now they've started chopping their dicks off out of guilt. So you see, it's really women's fault.

I don't support pornography, I'm perfectly fine with all forms of it with being banned.

 

[Sourceress]

My brother, the sexual revolution didn't make a distinction between one type of sexual permissiveness and another. There's being normal, and then there's everything else. Trying to claim otherwise is just cope.

Being gay or lesbian (while not being a freak, I mean just being exclusively attracted to the same sex) is literally normal. Gay and lesbian people have existed throughout all of human history, and homosexual behavior including exclusive homosexuality has been observed in many animal species as well.

Also, if you believe that anything short of heterosexual missionary-position sex in the dark once a fortnight is overly sexually permissive, why are you only targeting support for LGB people here, and not talking about the dangers of excessively permissive heterosexual sexuality? You claim to be against anything that isn't what you consider "normal," but you're singling out only one thing.

This argument may have worked in the 80s, but everyone who isn't blind knows this is bullshit at this point.

I already addressed that every group has freaks and bad actors in it, that doesn't mean the entire group is made up of freaks and bad actors. Since you're presumably a straight man I would warn you not to go down this road, because most of the absolute most degenerate, disgusting freaks who have ever inhabited this planet were/are straight men. Do you want me to start bringing up examples? Shall we advocate for straight men to lose their rights because of their history of sexual degeneracy and general filth? Somehow I don't think you want that.

Glass houses, big ol' rocks, my friend.

Also, your examples only concern gay men, and have nothing to do with lesbians, but you're using them to advocate for less tolerance and rights for all homosexual and bisexual people. Care to square that circle for me?

 

[Silence of the Troons]

I don't even like JK Rowling, 99% of the problems she complains about she directly caused and only started caring about trannies as long as it started personally affecting her, while refusing to admit her retarded politics (that she still supports) are what caused it in the first place and will innevitably cause it again if it ever goes away.

She supports lgb unconditionally not caring that it is the source of the T instead of a seperate entity and after T goes away she will continue to support lgb until it innevitably respawns the T.

The tranny rights movement is a movement that exists because of male sexologists, autogynephiles, and other powerful fetishists with an agenda. It has been around since at least the 1950s, when trannies were commonly known as transvestites. To think that Rowling is so powerful that she caused Charles "Virginia" Prince to publish "Transvestia" years before she was even born and before second wave feminism was invented.