US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Your entire worldview is shaped on "if it triggers the libs, it's gud" so I am adopting the same mentality only if it triggers you MAGA retards it's gud.

Driving up costs to pay for what it would cost would certainly upset you. It would be a lot more than the inflation in 2022, which was caused by corporate greed but sent you into a frothing tardrage and blaming Biden for it. Now you are suggesting that inflation is good as long as it's caused by an obese, elderly, incontinent man :story:

This bill is going to fuck Republicans hard in the midterms and 2028. Then you'll be seething with rage and coping about "MAH VOTING FRAUD" like you did in 2020, even after your waifu's own lawyers admitted that there was no fraud when under oath :story:

Who the hell are ETA and spoony?
You've been wrong about everything, you're fatpacks part 2. Sure sure, it'll costs 2026 and 2028.. Sure.

Good day my Hogan. I enjoy your rants sometimes, and the timing of how you come in is always.. 'kinda fun'? You win a lot saying we'll get more than bidenflation 2022, which I'm sure you were all back then 'that's GOP doings and goings on!'
 
I know you have an intellectual disability (I saw that message you sent to the group message) and brag about it, which makes you really gullible and thus you believe everything you read online, but I am actually white you retard. I have no idea why you retards think I am Indian. I mean, I know you think that because you're a mindless NPC who believes everything he reads on Kiwi Farms, but I am white.
Defend the pajeet become the pajeet. You maybe "white" but you're not a human, you're one of those creatures. Now go shid outside like the animal you are.
 
You are a zoomer if you didn't experience 9/11
Like I said, I originally had it explained to me in the late 90's that 1990-2005 is the range for 'millenial' with the explanation given that they were the generation around the turn of the millenium. I've watched it since over the years be pulled back from 1990-2005 to apparently 1980-1995.

Give it another twenty and I'll be a zoomer lmao. People are just allergic to getting old, and being lumped into a group everyone likes to blame everything on, there's not really any better answer as to why this has occurred. imo. To me, I'll always remember it as '95-'05.
The generation demarcations are consistent enough in recent times,
Clearly they're not.
They put the start point of Millennials as being 1982 and the end point being 2005, and gen Z as 2006 to 2029.
You're referencing shit that has all been posted or most likely altered in the past ten years. I very specifically looked for a web page that has almost certainly been unaltered prior to at least 2010, because I've even gone back to old articles around 2012 that I remember having the date the one I posted -
See an article from 2007 that has been unchanged, that has the date even in 2007 jumped forward five years:
https://tomorrowtodayglobal.com/2007/04/14/generation-y-theyve-arrived-at-work-with-a-new-attitude/ shiftinggenerationslol - Copy.webp
- here being 'silently' updated.

If you didn't know, this is a common phenomenon and has been since at least... 2014? 2017 at the latest, where various websites from wikipedia to news orgs will 'update' their old pages cryptically. I know wikipedia is supposed to have revision histories but they often don't for shit like this.

I mean I don't really freak out about it anymore, but we do in fact live in a form of that shit from 1984 where reality itself gets retconned. Sorry if that news alarms you.

Anyway, point being, to put it as bluntly and directly as I can to you; the point you keep trying to insinuate is incorrect. My memory on this is sterling because for whatever reason it really stuck in my craw when I first saw the date revised around 2006-2008 in various articles to the '1984-2000' number.
 
Meanwhile every decade I've been alive, Democrats have proven to be the actual fiscally conservative party.
Biden throwing billions and billions into prolonging the futile Russo-Ukrainian war and throwing almost as many billions to Israel so they can raze Gaza and indulge in the slaughter of women and children is the exact opposite of fiscal responsibility.

Abandon your false left/right dichotomy and embrace the truth of nationalism versus globalism.
 
Gambling tax is still because it's pretty much unenforceable. It's like taxing unrealized gains, it makes no sense in practice.

A very small amount of poker players, only those who do it as a full time job report earnings. Even then, there is no way to verify losses. What is the definition of a loss? Do u have to track every hand I lose, down to folded blinds?
Do I track losing sessions? The definition of a session is completely arbitrary. I could be down a few hundred, go to dinner for half an hour, the come back and end up in the green for the day. Do I have to separately track them separately and get taxes extra before dinner?
It might be easier to keep track of for tournament players, but they often fire multiple bullets in tournaments. It i buy in for 1000 5 times, and am end up winning 50,000, do I have 4k in loses or is it treated as a win overall.

All of those questions don't matter because noone is going to accurately report their earnings when there's a tax incentive not to.
 
You've been wrong about everything, you're fatpacks part 2. Sure sure, it'll costs 2026 and 2028.. Sure.

Good day my Hogan. I enjoy your rants sometimes, and the timing of how you come in is always.. 'kinda fun'? You win a lot saying we'll get more than bidenflation 2022, which I'm sure you were all back then 'that's GOP doings and goings on!'
Nah, I am not a retard and thus knew that 2022's inflation was corporate greed. It was literally price gouging that caused it.

It's funny how you're fine with inflation caused by Trump (and even cheering it on) after all of the tardraging you did about it in 2022.

I guess you want the Great Reset to happen afterall.

And yeah, 2026 is likely gonna be awful for Republicans. 2018 was and this will be much worse when people lose their health insurance and will be even worse if Trump brings the tariffs back
 
Gambling tax is still because it's pretty much unenforceable. It's like taxing unrealized gains, it makes no sense in practice.

A very small amount of poker players, only those who do it as a full time job report earnings. Even then, there is no way to verify losses. What is the definition of a loss? Do u have to track every hand I lose, down to folded blinds?
Do I track losing sessions? The definition of a session is completely arbitrary. I could be down a few hundred, go to dinner for half an hour, the come back and end up in the green for the day. Do I have to separately track them separately and get taxes extra before dinner?
It might be easier to keep track of for tournament players, but they often fire multiple bullets in tournaments. It i buy in for 1000 5 times, and am end up winning 50,000, do I have 4k in loses or is it treated as a win overall.

All of those questions don't matter because noone is going to accurately report their earnings when there's a tax incentive not to.
Yeah, I don't really get it either. I doubt it brings in that much revenue in the grand scheme of things, either. I don't see the point of them doing that.
 
Nah, I am not a retard and thus knew that 2022's inflation was corporate greed. It was literally price gouging that caused it.

It's funny how you're fine with inflation caused by Trump (and even cheering it on) after all of the tardraging you did about it in 2022.

I guess you want the Great Reset to happen afterall.

And yeah, 2026 is likely gonna be awful for Republicans. 2018 was and this will be much worse when people lose their health insurance and will be even worse if Trump brings the tariffs back
Says the guy who doesn't want Americans to make wages like we had before the Slavery system was put in place. Just admit you can't think beyond big line go up.
 
Like I said, I originally had it explained to me in the late 90's that 1990-2005 is the range for 'millenial' with the explanation given that they were the generation around the turn of the millenium. I've watched it since over the years be pulled back from 1990-2005 to apparently 1980-1995.
Who ever told you that was retarded. The Millennial range is typically 1980-1998, although I think Strauss and Howe put it at 1982-2000, which is reasonable, with some going as late as 1984, but that's a bit much. I prefer 1982-2000, since that means the generation started coming of age on the Millennium, but all generations get fuzzy around the start and end points. The real break in the Millennials is the ones who mostly grew up without smart phones and the ones who didn't. And the small batch at the start who are more like Xers than the later, insufferable soys.
 
Says the guy who doesn't want Americans to make wages like we had before the Slavery system was put in place. Just admit you can't think beyond big line go up.
It's cute that you think that deporting illegals will bring that back :story:

It's okay, we know you're just an NPC that parrots whatever talking points that Fox News and Kiwi Farm incels tell you. You're even saying that people losing their healthcare is a good thing because Trump is causing it :story:
 
Back