The only way a court can undo birthright citizenship is to interpret these words to mean something different than what they plainly mean:
People more powerful than Trump put him back in his place. Both the dems and repubs acknowledge the list existed. Maxwell was charged based on the list. Musk and Trump fell out over the list. Bondi and Patel said they had their list on the desk.
That cuts both ways. Trump could tell the lower courts to pound sand. "the lower courts have made there ruling, now let them enforce it".
That's bullshit. Musk fell out with Trump over Trump cutting subsidies for EVs and green energy in the BBB.
That data is either gone or actively being used by the glowies. Let's not mince words. It's not a list. It is tapes and recordings of politicians fucking kids. These files were used to control them. Either they got burned on the spot or they now have a new owner not named Mossad. The fact that their existence was ever disclosed to the public was a massive opsec fail. Nobody was supposed to know about Mossads little game. But then we did, and now they're trying to put the genie back in the bottle.
I'm going to go with the boring, 'nothing ever happens' answer and say it was probably all destroyed long ago. This is another case of Trump bloviating and promising to deliver on something he never really understood how to. Like claiming he'd deliver peace between Russia and Ukraine in 24 hours, but here he seems to have genuinely not understood the kind of backlash he'd get if he didn't deliver.
That bridge has already been crossed. 'Shall not be infringed' is pretty cut and dry yet we have reams upon reams of gun regulations out there. Speech has been violated multiple times, like the sedition act, or jailing journalists for publishing confidential material. Even the 'fire in the crowded theatre' line was originally used to shut up a bunch of Yids who were bitching about an ongoing war. Government regularly used religiously-motivated lists of 'hate groups' to try and quash advocacy in certain sectors. This idea that once a line is crossed it can never be uncrossed is a gross oversimplification. Just look at Roe and how they tortured the 14th amendment into a right to an abortion. Precedent can be set, and precedent can be overturned, because despite all the pomposity courts are at the end of the day just another political organ. And if you allow people to use the Bill of Rights to import millions upon millions of retarded jeets, spics, and niggers and make them, their spawn, and their entire extended family citizens you can just wipe your ass with the Constitution because that's all it will be worth at that point.
We need to bring in a team of rabbis specially trained to reinterpret and subvert plainly written laws, I agree. But I've studied the jewish mindset an awful lot, so let me give it a shot.
The new narrative is that "Everything Trump promised is just a meme bro lol" to excuse any possible fuck up from Trump. Pretty much Democrat levels of desperation and delusion from Trump's voters which is very demoralizing for me personally. I don't want to see trump's voters sink to the lows that typical leftist voters sink so they can be "True Believers" but here we are.
This is a small tangent, but the fifth amendment is airtight, and lawyers often get set on fire when they try to assume something from the the silence/invocation of the 5th. Here is one of the most well known times a judge was spitting fire over it.
I rate this post winner.
There's no need for wiggle room or creativity. Last I checked, they're still citizens of the country they came from, thus under their jurisdiction, no?
