Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 18.5%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.2%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 92 27.1%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 54 15.9%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 127 37.4%

  • Total voters
    340
View attachment 7671335
He forgot to say he was fun. A fun guy. Very fun.
While staring into the camera with his misaligned rat eyes.

View attachment 7671385

THIS is Nick’s idea of humility?! And joy?! He is AT ALL TIMES a storm of arrogance and misery.

I need to lie down.

Is the New Age arc imminent? Will he ascend to a higher plane of Coom and reach the next stage of heightened narcissistic arousal?

Also, what does this admission say about his views on his little Locals venture. Looking backwards it is just about the entirety of the timeline he just cited since so much drama came from there directly. Arrogance and misery, indeed.
 
Am I avoiding finishing my note taking? Why yes, in fact, I am. You people are very distracting:

I don’t like Aaron but….”
Guilty as charged, and I'll take it. Meanwhile, Himedall said it best... coming in with the bangers lately. Namely this:
I would wager that there is nothing very dislikeable about Aaron as an abstract concept.
I don't dislike Aaron. I've played too many card games in college with Midwest boys at 2AM after the bars close while on our 6th, 10th or 12th beer. (I was the 6th - lightweight.) He's not my person, but I get him.

He's the meme of "I made bad choices." Also, considering the alternatives on Rumble, I'm surprised he doesn't have 100K subs. His work ethic and general take on the right wing zeitgeist is on point.

I'll just say it. I find him pretty funny and breezy. I am flabbergasted at the Dabbleverse or how he deserves a fucking weekend evesceration in Las Vegas. The man plays clips of The View and laughs at lefties for 85% of his content. I quietly root for Aaron (with strong reservations) and won't hide it anymore.

Women have these types of conversations, but I think that we tend to have a much deeper layer in private that what is shown there.
Exactly. I would go on a feminist rant about the 'spirit of the law' of HROs (for either gender but based on stats it's far more women who are victimized) and that its misuse undermines real victims (see Amber Heard)... but most people here understand that to be true.

Also, if anyone cares, the Destiny case is the real juggernaut in the RP issue as it pertains to the Internet. That girl should be able to win the case outright and is stumbling into failure. Cvil cases in this country are a trash fire. See Monty.

Do you know if there is a time limit to when Aaron can add additional evidence for the hearing?
Not officially. An attorney can bring in new evidence at the hearing.

Hey, remember LawTalkWithMike, a working Chicago defense attorney? (I barely watch his channel but when I do, it's pretty amusing.) He joined streams with Nick a few times. He's got quite the sidehustle going with 275K subs showing court footiage of hilarious judges dealing with the worst of American society in states that broadcast everything.

Plenty of times attorneys will bring up new evidence that pertain to crazy cases - child custody, TROs, a recent bar brawl that happened 5 days prior, etc. It tends to annoy judges and lead to a continuance but it happens all the time. I'm fairly sure Sean would concur.

Edit to Add: I have a feeling this upcoming hearing will be continued. There is no way that 30 minutes will be sufficient.
 
Last edited:
I would wager that there is nothing very dislikeable about Aaron as an abstract concept. Yes, he is disgusting and was a part of the polycule. Yes, he shared a picture of his partner. Yes, he is mostly unattractive.However, there is nothing that affects us personally nor makes us despise him as a general rule.
Aaron would be annoying in the way that people who chew with their mouth open or make groaning noises while they eat. They just don't understand why they are annoying but they are genuine. The handwritten HRO is part of the genuineness.

Nick will never understand that. Because Nick is always deceitful and conniving, he can't even tell if Aaron handwrote the HRO or it was part of a scheme. Nick fake laughs through his streams as he pretends to laugh at whoever he's trying to ridicule. He wants the audience to believe he's a happy-go-lucky funny-guy. But the real Nick shows through in moments of candor. The real Nick's personality was when he lost it with Keanu. When he was wishing cancer on Elissa. When he was telling the detective he hopes he dies of an STD. When he choke slammed his son. When he hired a top 1st amendment lawyer so he could continue calling someone a pedophile.

Nick has no friends. Nick would be shocked to learn that Kurt has more friends and closer friends than Nick. He can't comprehend this. He still hasn't figured out how toxic he is. He thinks he's on the inside of every nuanced human interaction and he's just not.

Just like how he fundamentally doesn't understand why his Frank's challenge failed. He still thinks his lawyer botched it, not that it was flawed from the outset.He doesn't understand why using Sean, Kurts and Aaron's likeness to make money on supertips was wrong. He simply doesn't understand the thought processes involved in understanding human behavior.

I have a feeling he's going to be shocked when the HRO judge hears all the HROs together and doesn't let him tag team Aaron with Melton. He's going to be really mad when a "preponderance of the evidence" standard is really touchy feely with the judge and not a computer program. And when the judge let's Ashley testify about harm to the daughter but doesn't let Nick call her to the stand or force them to talk about the daughter in court. Nick thinks Aaron will be forced to prove shit that will just be folksy common sense stuff. Celebrities get restraining orders against crazy fans all the time and Melton looks like a crazy fan. Just like every other court hearing, Nick's internal monologue is screaming at everybody that they don't understand the law. Nicks internal voice is what he directed at Keanu.
 
I have a feeling he's going to be shocked when the HRO judge hears all the HROs together and doesn't let him tag team Aaron with Melton.
Sean! is a real lawyer and I give his opinion weight for that reason but I've seen HRO type things get granted on weaker grounds than this. I still feel Aaron may win against Rekieta and Melton. And although Aaron's show is dull and unwatchable he can shamble along doing it without the constant horrorcow antics of Rekieta intruding. It might not be riveting content but he can keep his radio job delusion going pretty much forever. The HROs are a sign of a real change in Aaron.
Rekieta will never change. He will just age out of every possible excuse for his spoiled manchild adolescent nastiness. Rekieta's self entitled abusive acting out is the worst of all possible looks.
 
It wouldn't surprise me if the older one may already be lurking here; I'd wager whether it's shower texts or listening to shows or whatever, they probably know about that weird website dad talks about.
Remember, they have to hear this crazy freak screaming misogynist obscenities at the top of his lungs, apparently like a crazy person, at people who aren't there. He would seem like a schizo to someone who didn't understand the Internet.
 
Remember, they have to hear this crazy freak screaming misogynist obscenities at the top of his lungs, apparently like a crazy person, at people who aren't there. He would seem like a schizo to someone who didn't understand the Internet.
But, simultaneously, they've dealt with that all of their life so sadly, it probably has a degree of normalcy to it.
I think people don't understand that children often grow up not realising how much their parents are harming them. So they don't hate them, even though they probably should (when there is actual harm).
That doesn't mean they won't later realise how insane their parents are, though.
 
But, simultaneously, they've dealt with that all of their life so sadly, it probably has a degree of normalcy to it.
I think people don't understand that children often grow up not realising how much their parents are harming them. So they don't hate them, even though they probably should (when there is actual harm).
That doesn't mean they won't later realise how insane their parents are, though.
From the perspective of the abuser, a child's ability to normalize their abuse is their best feature.
 
I wonder if melton will move to prevent people from watching via the zoom link. His lawyer could ask for a different log in not available to the public, couldn’t he?
No, this is a public hearing.
They could ask for the hearing to be closed, but I don't see a reason why it should be granted.

The right for the public weighs more than whatever Melton could bring up as an argument.
 
No, this is a public hearing.
They could ask for the hearing to be closed, but I don't see a reason why it should be granted.

The right for the public weighs more than whatever Melton could bring up as an argument.
I'd wager that although we don't like aaron very much he probably wants this public on his end too because, boy howdy he knows we hate nick and mapton more.
 
Lets's compare Sean's AVVO profile to that Nick's, which epitomizes his work ethic. His professional persona is officially a hard(ly) working attorney with a ZERO rating, and in the 10 years of being licensed was too lazy/doing drugs to even put up a picture (should it be cokestream or arrest)?
 

Attachments

  • Messenger_creation_248F011F-FE0A-4F62-88DE-38DCA23552DC.webp
    Messenger_creation_248F011F-FE0A-4F62-88DE-38DCA23552DC.webp
    21.4 KB · Views: 14
  • Messenger_creation_248F011F-FE0A-4F62-88DE-38DCA23552DC.webp
    Messenger_creation_248F011F-FE0A-4F62-88DE-38DCA23552DC.webp
    21.4 KB · Views: 14
If the HRO gets thrown, I think it's important to remember that the waste of human progress that is Nick Rekieta is still staring down the barrel of a month in jail and is still on probation until 2030.

He also has to reconcile that he dosed his daughter with cocaine in lieu of her Adderall because of the cult of alternative medicine got a stranglehold on him and Our Wife. If that isn't the case, why did he feel the need to try to get in front of it in the CHIPS hearing that was more than a year ago?

I want another win for the Toe for the seethe it'll produce, but should it not happen I think there needs to be a reminder that Nick is a long ways from getting rid of the punishment he's going through now and what he may face in less than 2 weeks time.
 
I think it's important to remember that the waste of human progress that is Nick Rekieta is still staring down the barrel of a month in jail and is still on probation until 2030.
He's skirting probation high off his tits, and probably drinks. At this point if he gets both HRO's thrown i don't think he gets the jail either. Candied Yoshi county is completely negligent. Price of living in a state like that. Many such cases!
 
View attachment 7671335
He forgot to say he was fun. A fun guy. Very fun.
While staring into the camera with his misaligned rat eyes.

View attachment 7671385

He carefully elides the distinction that Sean (and the others cited) have practical knowledge of the operation of the legal system.

It is clear that this chases him, for whenever someone points out he is an NPL, he screeches 'IT IS THR LETTER OF THE LAW NOT UP TO INTERPRETATION'.

In response, I cite the 'mandatory sanctions' that were ignored in Greer v. Moon.

It would not be fun for them to read this thread someday. But I imagine it would also be helpful to have their feelings validated after a lifetime of their father denying that he and their mother had caused them any harm. Remember, Nick describes the police raid and arrests they witnessed — and them being torn from their home and placed with relatives for months — as “a rough summer.”

And he denies that moving April into into the home was disruptive of the family sanctuary the children needed and deserved.

So yeah this would be a real pain to read through, but the sad fact is that the only validation they’ll ever get — PROOF that their father was a degenerate who didn’t give a single shiny shite about them — might come from fucking Kiwi Farms.

I hope that they have a way to deal healthily with the fallout. I pray their church is not one of those 'you have to forgive amd treat them like it never happened' kinds.

Junior lawyers often fall into the trap of believing they can twist words away from their plain and ordinary meaning or into some contrived nonsense. It rarely works in front of a judge because they have heard it all before and understand that the law must function in reality. Its also why junior lawyers are supervised by more experience ones. Something he seems to have missed out on.

Common NPL L, and further proof he never truly practised and never had any special insight beyond the facial translation of legal terms.

I have a feeling this upcoming hearing will be continued. There is no way that 30 minutes will be sufficient.

I hope that Franks lets a tide of spaghetti flow from his pockets.
 
Back