Women are anonymously spilling tea about men in their cities on viral app - The surveillance state equivalent of the mean girls burn book

When Cid Walker opens the Tea app, she’s greeted by a barrage of posts about men and their apparent "red" and "green" "flags."

“He’s a cheater,” Walker said, reading some of the comments on one post out loud.

"What clubs does he go to?" another person asked on a different post. "He’s cute."

The app, which appears to have been advertising itself online since at least last fall, allows users to solicit feedback about specific men they’re dating.

Walker, 22, is among the 4 million users on the women-only safety app, which this week became the No. 1 free app in the Apple App Store.

It picked up viral traction in the last month after some people began talking about it online on Reddit and TikTok. The app gained more than 900,000 new signups in the last few days, Tea said on social media. Getting off the waitlist can now take days, an inconvenience many new users complained about in comments on the app's Instagram posts.

Upon opening Tea, users are presented with local men whose photos have been uploaded, along with their first names. For each of the men, other women on the app can report whether they deem him a “red flag” or a “green flag” and leave comments about him, such as those recounting negative date experiences or vouching for him as a friend.

“I’ve seen so many people I know on the app, it’s crazy,” said Walker, a Cleveland-area user who joined the app last week after having seen multiple viral posts about it. “Like, oh my God, I would never think all this stuff about them.”

App users can look up individual names in the search bar or create custom alerts for specific men. The app also offers functions that let users run background checks, search for criminal histories and reverse-search photos to check whether a man is catfishing by using someone else’s photos on his dating profile.

The woman-only app was created by a man, Sean Cook, who said on Tea’s website that he was inspired after he watched his mother’s “terrifying experience with online dating,” including being catfished and unknowingly dating men with criminal records.

Cook’s profile on LinkedIn lists him as the founder of Tea since 2022. The description under his role says, “Tea was self-funded by Sean.”

Cook did not respond to a request for comment. A representative for Tea said the app isn’t offering interviews at this time.

Tea’s mission mirrors similar efforts that have gained popularity in other online forums, such as “Are We Dating The Same Guy?,” a Facebook community with millions of members across the country in localized offshoots.

While the communities have stated that their mission is to keep women safe, they have also faced backlash from men online who say they fear being misrepresented or doxxed on the platforms.

The Facebook groups, which advertise themselves as spaces for women to warn other women about “liars, cheaters, abusers, or anyone who exhibits any type of toxic or dangerous behavior,” have for years been criticized online for devolving into places for gossip or for spreading possible misinformation about people. Last year, judges dismissed two defamation lawsuits filed in Illinois and California by men who were posted in the groups.

With Tea, some men have posted in forums asking for others to report the app in hope of getting it shut down, and others have expressed interest in a men-only equivalent on which they could discuss and mock women.

One app has already tried to offer that. The Teaborn app climbed to No. 3 in the free apps chart Wednesday before it disappeared from the App Store.

Shortly ahead of its removal, the app had rolled out an update with “enhanced content moderation and reporting tools” after its creator condemned users for allegedly sharing revenge porn on the platform.

Teaborn told NBC News in a social media statement: “Apple just removed us yesterday because Tea app doesn’t like competition, but we are working to go back with a new brand!”

Apple didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Despite finding apps like Tea entertaining, users like Walker have expressed discomfort with the idea of allowing so many people to anonymously speak negatively about others online.

Signing up for Tea requires users to take selfies, which the app says are deleted after review, to prove they are women. All users who get accepted are anonymous outside of the usernames they choose. Screenshots are also blocked.

On its website, Tea describes itself as “more than an app; it’s a sisterhood.” The app claims it donates 10% of its profits to the National Domestic Violence Hotline.

A spokesperson for the hotline didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment Thursday.

“Together, we’re redefining modern dating,” the app says.

Walker said that she has noticed many users focus more on gossip than real safety concerns but that she believes some people have found Tea useful for exposing serious issues like abuse.

“I feel like if people were to use the app how it’s supposed to be used, this could actually save a lot of women from being hurt or harmed,” Walker said. “But at this point, I think it’s like a joke to everybody and just like cyberbullying.”



 
"Women wouldn't be whores if men weren't willing to pay them for it."

Well, yeah. That's what a whore is.
So what youre saying is women have no agency and are only whores because men want them to be? Interesting.
He's already posted his actual thoughts on what women in general are like.
Do I think women are retarded children? To a degree, yes. Woman are largely followers. If you present a vision for them, they will follow it.
it's like defending your dog for biting a kid because it doesn't know any better, which is more insane than anything i could say honestly
 

0 wins

zero-2.webp

zero-1.webp
 
The difference is the lefties have a lot of women, meaning there is a chance of getting laid. Null said this on his last stream and he was right: these retarded le ebin based redpilled "movements" will fail because they are hostile to women. You will not succeed without women supporting you. The Tea Party had women young and old. MAGA has women. The Nazis had women. Communists mobilize women. If you are inherently hostile to women like incels are and say shit like "repeal the 19th Amendment" and "your body, my choice," women gravitate elsewhere.
Because leftist troons and soyboys are much more welcoming to women, yeah.

If that fat fuck Rainbow can put up with everyone joyfully calling him a kike every time he wades into a thread to support the jews, then the women in KF can put up with being called whores every so often.
 
1.webp


This one isn't high in the looks dept (but better compared to some others I've seen) but I bet she'd be good at helping you with your math homework.

Taking a look at the bottom 50 on the leader board we've got this near the bottom. That unsettling smile itself is a red flag right there. Yikes.

a.webp


And this one is at the very bottom of the leader board, bless. She looks like she could make a good friend.

b.webp
 
Last edited:
This app is a white pill. When you hear there's an app where women are gossiping about how "mah man don't treat me rite, mmhmm" you picture young, attractive but catty women.

Seeing the pictures you realize it's the bottom of the barrel women crying about they baby daddies. Hideous genetic dead ends schizo posting about the desperate meth-head that shagged them once and fucked off. Non-humans, essentially (both the goblinas and the dumpster divers that fucked them).

This is just regular 51% certified muttoid behavior. The type you avoid at your local wal-mart.

Don't take this as a sample of reality. We're all gonna make it.
 
View attachment 7696220

This one isn't high in the looks dept (but better compared to some others I've seen) but I bet she'd be good at helping you with your math homework.
Good lord its the white girl version of Yakub.

how is this thread so long

no seriously how can you all have this much to say about how much you hate wahmens

Is gloating when people who hate you suffer not fun to you? Why are you even on this site?
 
You are clearly in the left wing sphere which runs none stop campaigns against men and saying how dangerous they are. The majority of women feel safer with conservative men than left wing men. They find masculinity protective and like being around a man who will protect them. They know left wing men are all creeps or weak and they don't appeal to them.

How are men shooting themselves in the foot? Look at who's having kids and who isn't. It's not the leftist men.
You are missing my point: if left-wing spheres are telling young women online that men are dangerous, and then right-wing nutjobs online say shit like "women are stupid" or "repeal the 19th" or "your body my choice," it reinforces the left-wing propaganda. There are not enough conservative men gatekeeping the retards. That is my point. If you don't think it's a problem then fine, but you don't get to bitch when women complain about it and have the receipts.
The left doesn't "have a lot of women", the left absolutely hates womanhood itself, and has a rapidly shrinking (and biologically timing out) pool of women gaslit (by themselves lmao) into hating being a woman.
I don't disagree with this statement but see the above: it's one thing for a conservative movement to celebrate womanhood and motherhood, which a lot of women find meaning in, and it's another thing for a conservative movement to be filled with jackasses who gendersperg all the time. The latter does exist - go on social media and you will find no shortage of it - and it is more deterring than you think.
If that fat fuck Rainbow can put up with everyone joyfully calling him a kike every time he wades into a thread to support the jews, then the women in KF can put up with being called whores every so often.
I agree with this 100%. Some users on this site whiteknight too much.
 
Is it because women are le heckin stupid?
Yes. They literally cannot be convinced that some guy named El Cuchillo del Diablo with tattoos of skulls on his eyelids, and a conviction in Costa Rica for septuple homicide, who got out of prison because his associates beheaded the governor's family, should not be allowed in the country, because he's an uwu smol bean and photos of ICE agents arresting brown-skinned smol beans gives them big sads. You're right that a political movement can't succeed without women, but what women want right now from the government is to never have to feel sad because the powiceman did a heckin' meanie boo boo to a smol beanie, enable them to do whatever fool thing comes into their heads at any moment without any consequences, and ensure they have special favors at work and school.

It's not a sustainable situation. Yes, the fact that we've allowed a coalition of bubble-brained 23-year-old women for whom "responsibility" is a dirty word and tight-lipped old cat ladies who hate joy to rule over us does mean we can't win without upsetting the women. But if sane governance didn't upset women, we wouldn't even be in this situation in the first place. Go one by one through every political issue where one side is barking mad insanity, and you will find that side relies almost entirely on women for its political weight. The reason things like letting cross-dressing freaks groom kids are even political issues at all is we let women run things.

It is incredibly sobering to realize that without the female vote, all this clown world stuff would just be swept right off the table. We wouldn't have to convince society to not let some freak in a pink dress call your ISP to have your website shut down, we could just go beat the fuck out of him, and nobody would get in trouble.

That's the one thing I want you to keep in mind.

If it wasn't for the shock and horror women feel at seeing violence, if it wasn't for their misplaced sympathy for freaks and deviants, when some asshole like "Lia" Thomas shows up in the women's locker room, one of the girls just calls her boyfriend, he calls five other guys in his frat, and the situation ends with a black eye and a busted nose. It doesn't make national news. It doesn't need executive orders. It doesn't result in absolute fuckin' tantrums on the House floor. It ends with the pervert going to the hospital, and nobody even knowing his name.

Agreed you should never say "repeal the 19th" in public. But we really do need to repeal the 19th. Our century-long experiment in rule by women has been a disaster.
 
So what youre saying is women have no agency and are only whores because men want them to be? Interesting.
So, what you’re saying is men have no agency and only enable women to be this way because they a slaves to vagina? Interesting.

"Women wouldn't be whores if men weren't willing to pay them for it."

Well, yeah. That's what a whore is.
Yeah, pretty much. If men didn’t reward the behavior, women wouldn’t do it.
 
There are not enough conservative men gatekeeping the retards.
I don't even consider myself conservative really, just a bit right of centre, but I don't really think there's much more conservative men even can do to gatekeep retards. The threads about the America First personalities, sektur orbiters etc. on this forum prove that moderates on the right will rip into retarded extremists if they're given the opportunity to, far more so than moderate liberals ever do with the radical trans activists and BLM rioters who drag their side down - but far right personalities don't really exist in mainstream spaces so it would be kind of strange to keep bringing them up unprovoked to talk about how much you dislike them.
 
I'm all for free speech, but does attempted/successful life ruination count as free speech? I honestly don't know. I'd think it would fall under defamation, but I'm not an expert. If it is legal, then I have no sympathy for those who are hoisted by their own petards.
You'd have to fill us in with the exact definition of free speech you use. There are so-called "free speech absolutionists" where anything goes, or there are those that exempt things like yelling "Fire" in a movie theater, or those that exempt hate speech, it goes on and on.

So if you clue us in on how you define "free speech" then we can consider whether given instances meet your definition or not. "Free software" has the same type of categorical issue where there can be 5 people all talking about it and they are using 5 different definitions.
 
one thing this leak has taught me is that the majority of women have no idea how to smile. while another majority smiles too much. all that aside genuinely who in their right mind would give away their ID like this? even if it was secure its astoundingly retarded to use any program or app that demands your drivers license of all things for photo ID. whats next? gonna ask for the birth certificate too?
 
Back