Charlie Kirk: Aftermath, Gravedancing, and Manhunt

[Vespene]

No way the tranny booted up DBD 2 days after after his boyfriend killed Kirk lmao

 

[Catboy Ranch]

This split in white women is worth watching. A large number of them went "fuck this" last week.

June was one of them.

But they still have to live on PInterest with the ones determined not to leave the shitlib church. So lots of white female drama is still to come.

 

[mold]

I wouldn't go as far as to say he was this generation's MLK

well no, Charlie Kirk was faithful to his wife

 

[Fatpacks]

Reposting from USPG2

Kashapp wants to repeal Section 230

Charlie Kirk assassination reignites debate over Section 230 protections for social media companies​

L / A

The assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk last week has reignited the political debate over reforming a federal law that shields social media companies from liability over the content they post.
Videos of Kirk's assassination spread rapidly across social media following the shooting on the campus of Utah Valley University that took the 31-year-old Turning Point USA founder's life last week. That created an immense challenge for social media platforms to remove the video or implement content warnings or age gating to protect users from being exposed to it in their feeds.
The circulation of Kirk's assassination video on social media prompted renewed calls from lawmakers to address a federal law known as Section 230 that provides liability protections for social media platforms.
"Section 230 needs to be repealed. If you're mad at social media companies that radicalize our nation, you should be mad," Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said Sunday on NBC's "Meet the Press." "I have a bill that will allow you to sue these people. They're immune from lawsuits."
Section 230 of the Communications Act was enacted as part of the Communications Decency Act in 1996 and provides immunity for online services for content published by third-party users on their platforms.
It includes provisions that protect service providers from being liable for content posted by third-party users, as well as protection from liability for the voluntary good faith removal of third-party content the operator finds objectionable – whether it's constitutionally protected.
"At the end of the day, I think Section 230 does a couple of things," Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Commissioner Brendan Carr said during an appearance at the Politico AI & Tech Summit on Tuesday. "Some things it does very well. Some things there's a lot more questions about it."
He noted that there are two main provisions of Section 230 and explained that C-1 "says if you leave someone else's speech up, you're not liable for that content if it happens to be libelous or tortious in any way. I think that's generally a good provision. It's what I call a 'pro-speech' provision. It encourages people to post and express themselves."
"On the other hand, you have this provision C-2 that's been read by the courts as giving broad immunity to all sorts of content moderation and censorship. And I think that's where, over the years, we saw a lot of abuses," Carr said.
"We saw individual Americans participating in a digital town square that were getting censored purely for protected First Amendment speech for diversity of viewpoints on religious or medical issues."
The FCC chair said he's waiting to see how social media companies move forward with changes to moderation policies that are already underway but signaled the debate over Section 230 is likely to continue.
"I think the debate around Section 230 is still live, but I think, given the changes that we're seeing on social media, I think right now, for my part, I'm in more of a trust but verify posture," Carr said.
During a hearing on Tuesday, Graham asked FBI Director Kash Patel if he supports sunsetting Section 230 to increase the liability for companies whose platforms are used to disseminate content related to the sexual exploitation of children.
"I'm all in, I have been all in, and I'm happy to work with Congress to do so," Patel said.

Bipartisan Push in Congress to Weaken Section 230, Expand Online Surveillance, and Increase Platform Liability​

L / A

During this week’s testimony before both chambers of Congress, FBI Director Kash Patel and several lawmakers made a concerted push to weaken protections for online platforms, advance surveillance partnerships, and promote government intervention in digital speech spaces.
The hearings revealed a rare bipartisan consensus around dismantling Section 230 and tightening control over how people interact and communicate online.
In the Senate, Republican Senator Lindsey Graham opened his questioning by linking online platforms to the assassination of Charlie Kirk, then repeatedly pressed Patel on whether the internet was a breeding ground for radicalization and crime.
Throughout their exchange, Graham blurred the lines between criminal behavior, such as grooming or inciting violence, and broad categories like bullying.
“Is there any law that can shut down one of these sites? For bullying children or allowing sexual predators on the site,” Graham asked.
He repeatedly implied that websites hosting objectionable content should be held legally responsible, asking, “Would you advocate a sunsetting of Section 230 to bring more liability to the companies who send this stuff out?”
Patel replied, “I’ve advocated for that for years.”
Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act is a legal provision that protects online platforms from being held liable for content posted by their users.
It allows websites, forums, and social media services to host a wide range of speech without being treated as the publisher of that content. If Section 230 were repealed or weakened, platforms would face significant legal risk for everything users say or share.
This could push companies to aggressively censor user content to avoid lawsuits, leading to broader suppression of speech, fewer places for open dialogue, and less room for dissenting or controversial viewpoints online.
When Graham demanded action against platforms that allow bullying or grooming, Patel suggested that platforms cannot be sued under current law, adding that the explosion of AI-generated abusive material had worsened the problem.
Note that Section 230 does not give platforms immunity from federal criminal law. If a website is knowingly hosting or involved in illegal content, such as child exploitation, terrorism, or sex trafficking, it can already be held criminally liable under existing statutes.
Patel called the situation a “public health hazard” and stated, “I think not only are some of these sites designed to be addictive, unfortunately, the reality is some of these sites are designed to generate income, and many people are generating income based on this illegal trade.”
The hearing offered no engagement with the consequences of gutting Section 230. Instead, there was a clear push to strip away those protections in the name of safety.
Senator Amy Klobuchar, a Democrat, echoed that sentiment. “For years I have supported repealing Section 230,” she said, arguing that the law is outdated and was crafted for a different era.
While she prefaced her comments by claiming to oppose censorship, her solution was the same as Graham’s: eliminate legal protections for platforms to create a “better environment online.”
Klobuchar veered into broader political territory, citing a wave of threats and violence targeting lawmakers.
She asked Patel to commit to conveying her concerns to the White House and emphasized a need to “move forward” on both speech laws and gun control measures.
Republican Senator Marsha Blackburn seized the opportunity to promote the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA).
KOSA is a proposed law that presents itself as a measure to protect children but would fundamentally alter the structure of the internet by encouraging surveillance, forced identity verification, and government-influenced content moderation.
While the bill mandates that platforms shield minors from content deemed harmful, such as material linked to mental health concerns, it also gives the Federal Trade Commission the authority to penalize companies over subjective definitions of what constitutes harm.
KOSA directs federal agencies to develop age verification systems at the device or operating system level, setting the stage for a national digital ID regime that would eliminate online anonymity and expose users to deeper tracking and data collection.
Despite revisions and corporate endorsements, the bill continues to raise alarms among civil liberties advocates who warn it would pressure platforms to over-censor, chilling free speech under the pretense of child safety.
Blackburn described platforms like Discord as enablers of predation, referencing the Kirk assassination, and asked Patel what Congress could do to give the FBI more power.
Patel responded with a call for financial crackdowns and more legal obligations for tech companies, stating, “Nobody’s being held accountable. They’re making money and our youth is dying.”
During his exchange with Rep. Brandon Gill, Patel made one of the most interesting comments of the hearing.
Patel called for expanding surveillance partnerships between the government and private tech companies, including gaming and social media platforms.
“There is no way to triage the amount of information generated on these sites by the FBI alone,” Patel said.
He advocated renewing a law that allows companies to report users to the FBI without fear of liability, framing this corporate-government alliance as essential to national security.
This approach would effectively deputize tech companies as enforcers. No concern was raised about how such partnerships could be abused to monitor lawful political activity or dissent.
Despite the repeated invocation of safety and child protection, the hearings presented little evidence that any of the proposed changes would meaningfully prevent crime.
Instead, lawmakers from both parties appeared eager to empower both the FBI and online platforms to act as gatekeepers of acceptable discourse, with Patel affirming at every turn that the Bureau would welcome such powers.
The push to overhaul Section 230, pass KOSA, and institutionalize surveillance under the banner of public-private “partnership” may signal a dangerous change in how speech is treated online.
Rather than protect fundamental rights, lawmakers are pushing to dissolve long-standing legal safeguards in pursuit of control over what people are allowed to say, and where they’re allowed to say it.

View attachment 7935971

 

[Sexual Chocolate]

This one actually kind of passes because she started out looking almost like a man. 4/10 is generous. That smile is awful. I'm not sure what effect HRT has on the subdermal fat layer that women have, but that's probably why this person is kind of wrinkly now.

My dear nigger,

She's a typical pooner, i.e. now too ugly for your brain to immediately grok her as a woman in still photos. But like all pooners, she's about 3 feet tall and looks like Dobby the House Elf irl

Regarding Richard Dawkins, he had a stroke and I think his recovery has been really difficult. He has been out of the public sphere since then. I still think religions are bullshit that people made up. Lately one criticism of the left I have noticed repeated endlessly is that there is no one on that side that invites people of differing views to debate them. Dawkins was one of those people, but I figure his brain's too damaged to do it anymore.

That sucks but the Atheist fad, and his public influence, had already fizzled out before his stroke in 2016. He was featured on South Park in 2006, that would have been around the apogee of the new atheist movement.

Tbf to Dawkins, it wasn't all his fault. The early 2000's atheist scene was full of dorks and nerds with little experience of women. They were completely defenseless when plain Jane BPD bitches like McCreight and that elevator girl decided to hijack and then ruin their club for attention and drama.

Who even remembers "The God Delusion" now? It has less cultural influence than Avatar.

He was smart enough to "not need a god" but there sure are a lot of stupid people who are worse off without one to provide morals. He was a secular humanist primarily and thought he was unshackling people to intellectual freedom and mutual understanding. Turns out selfish, lazy hedonism is what usually replaces God and there's a reason why religions teach chastity and continence.

He is a fool and his arguments were always foolish, but the plummy English accent and his genuine scientific credentials fooled a lot of 120 IQ smart boys who also know nothing about religion except that they don't want to get up early to go to church, Moommmmmm.

Dawkins might be willing to "debate", i.e. condescendingly sneer at people of faith, but he never tried to understand them. His knowledge of Christianity is embarrassingly shallow, so his simplistic, strawman critique was only convincing to similarly ignorant people. You could read the writings of 5th century Church Fathers and see that they were a lot more sophisticated than the 21st century Oxford professor, but Dawkins and his acolytes never had the intellectual curiosity to read up on the subject they declared themselves experts on.

The entire shtick of the Atheist fad was that these were supposed to be the smart, rational guys. But they're mostly degenerate trannies or woke NPCs now, so how smart be they? Seems like it would be smarter to still have a functioning penis. As someone wise once said, you will know them by their fruits. And what ugly fruits they are.

Wikipedia must have gotten tired of being shit on for the double standard, because they finally changed the name of the damn article:

View attachment 7935750

Was "Killing of Charlie Kirk" up until a few hours ago.

View attachment 7935769

Now change it to "The Assassination of Charlie Kirk by the Coward Tyler Robinson"

I'm disappointed the trial won't happen for awhile tbh. It's going to be a joy to watch.

There's a good chance he kills himself in jail first. He is facing either the death penalty or being kept in a cage until he dies, and instead of being treated like a hero, everybody hates him and Charlie Kirk's murder has just motivated them to kick the Left's teeth in. Once it sinks in that he's completely fucked his life to the point his own father turned him in and his Antifa pals are pretending he's MAGA () I expect the faggot to try.

That's an anti-suicide vest. They're made so you can't turn them into a noose. But he won't be on suicide watch forever.

 

[Catboy Ranch]

Some Democrat plant thought it would be a good idea to jump in the middle of kids moved to create TPUSA clubs, to try to stop it. Very, very long winded word salad trying to claim these kids are inviting World War 3 at the high school.

She then started doxxing organizer kids.

And for even more fun, she's been working for a PAC that receives Soros money.

Spoiler: Warning, deranged fat PAPER-AMERICAN (she's a fucking dirty gypsy from Belgium, found a man and naturalized) rant she planted on FB incoming;

The parents doxxed her back in return.





13927 Saint Marys Ln
Houston, TX 77079




This bitch needs to be stripped of her citizenship, her cuck husband as well, and both their asses sent to Brussels to live with the homicidal Muslims that now rule it.

 

[LostLamb]

That's an anti-suicide vest. They're made so you can't turn them into a noose. But he won't be on suicide watch forever.

The implications of that vest make me smiles. He is given no privacy at all at any time, given no real utensils to eat with, he is treated worse than a dog while he suffers in a hole.

 

[BullfrogBill]

This was on that Tucker Carlson video someone posted. And I'm like… who's gonna tell them the gays and the trannies have been horrifying this entire time, by their own doing?

also are people really buying this stuff as fact? I mean I understand MK Ultra… but people would believe the oogie-boogie scary neo-MK Ultra than the fact that lefties are psycho and never had America or Americans in mind? Really?

(Also does anyone have a source to read about MK Ultra shit that isn't a bunch of weird creepypasta sounding stuff or does that exist?)

The thing people misunderstand about the modernization of MK Ultra is that all of these troons that are on these altering chemicals that haven't been properly tested or approved are already infiltrated. It's MK Ultra on a mass scale, people on KF and other places have known this for years. Troons are a dangerous death cult terrorist group that's propped up and paid for by rich powerful politicians and other entities and it spreads like a cancer to young impressionable people. A lot of them "did it on their own" sure, but there's no doubt that if this shit wasn't spread, promoted, and paid for by these elites then we wouldn't have nearly as many people chopping their cocks and tits off.

The Tranny Menace didn't just come from nowhere.

 

[Meat Grinder]

No way the tranny booted up DBD 2 days after after his boyfriend killed Kirk lmao

Spoiler: Well, we know his main....

 

[Apustajan apustaja]

Christianity is largely an American penomenon at this point.

Not to sound racist or anything, but many Americans stem from people that were too spergy about religion so they got kicked out of Britain, Germany or Holland. That is why they are still more religious, but also more fundamentalist about atheist leftist stuff like social justice. I think it is partially genetic.

 

[Hank J. Wimbleton]

If you feel strongly about the trans issue the FTC is currently looking for comments from the public on the transitioning of children. If this is an issue you care about a lot this is one of the best ways you can do something about it. It's been flooded by troons so far, and even a short comment could make a big difference. There is only a week left to leave comments, lets finish strong! Don't forget to share it with your friends who feel the same. Thank you for your attention to this matter

https://www.regulations.gov/document/FTC-2025-0264-0001/comment?pageNumber=5&sortBy=postedDate&sortDirection=desc

we're going backwards.... kids should be thousands of feet away from anything trans related.

 

[RX-78-2]

Some Democrat plant thought it would be a good idea to jump in the middle of kids moved to create TPUSA clubs, to try to stop it. Very, very long winded word salad trying to claim these kids are inviting World War 3 at the high school.

She then started doxxing organizer kids.

And for even more fun, she's been working for a PAC that receives Soros money.

Spoiler: Warning, deranged fat PAPER-AMERICAN (she's a fucking dirty gypsy from Belgium, found a man and naturalized) rant she planted on FB incoming;

View attachment 7936035View attachment 7936037View attachment 7936039View attachment 7936041

The parents doxxed her back in return.

View attachment 7936065
View attachment 7936071
View attachment 7936068

13927 Saint Marys Ln
Houston, TX 77079

View attachment 7936078


This bitch needs to be stripped of her citizenship, her cuck husband as well, and both their asses sent to Brussels to live with the homicidal Muslims that now rule it.

You know, I would be shocked that the house has a gay flag, but at this point it's just par for the course of these types of people.

 

[Lammy]

This bitch needs to be stripped of her citizenship,

So what you're saying is...

KICK THAT NIGGER BITCH OFF THE COUNTRY?

 

[AnOminous]

Wikipedia is so ass and its political articles are fucking horrible; btw if you're ever trying to get a laugh, look at their articles citations and you'll see some of the most unreliable websites EVER being cited.

Even worse is when you check citations, they look legit, but the wikipedo just outright lied about what the article said.

 

[Ted's Cabin]

As a woman, with no fellow female friends my age, just old women….. yeah this is fucking depressing. Fuck.

Women going full retard makes even less sense to me because they're the most dependent on a safe and stable society. I'm not trying to be snide to women here either, it just seems particularly self-destructive for the people most dependent on law and order to be celebrating every new breakdown of our current social order.

Whats crazy about the whole body language mourning bullshit is people on the left are the first to preach how trauma and horrible events impact people differently.

If I have to hear one more retard try to overanalyze body language I'm declaring total Thomas the Train Death (TTTD). I still think it was those damn Youtube crime shows that taught everyone to try to read every single spontaneous movement and and word as a puzzle you can figure out if you just reason it out. It's particularly bad because people always have the gift of hindsight and already "know" what results you should be looking for.

As you can see, she touched her again hair here, which is a way for her to self soothe. This implies she's feeling stressed about something, likely because she is being interrogated and lying about the body.

I was talking about how a lot of the less moderate right wing is abandoning upholding the 1st amendment simply because it hurts the left

Unfortunately, the first amendment has never meant that in spirit. The law never protected us from getting fired, and turning the other cheek here would mean inventing new rights for people who hate us and have been far more hostile to our speech than we are to theirs. These are rights that we never experienced in any capacity. It would be retarded to gift them to these people in the hopes they'll completely change their behavior from the past 15-20 years. If they really don't like it after experiencing it, we can discuss mutually passing new laws extending the first amendment.

But media is really good at trying to diminish the fact that most people don't actually want violence

I don't know if this is actually true. I've talked to a fair amount of people I've known for years who were very happy to see escalating violence for the sake of a fascist being btfo and that had nothing to do with how the media tried to portray them. The only question left is if they really know what they're asking for. For people whose only hobbies are anime and videogames, they sure are revolutionary.

The media is to blame for this.

The media is to blame for advertising school shootings as a valid exit for sick freaks with no future, but these are adults who are already in their 20s or 30s and have the ability to make their own decisions. Most of these reasons going around justifying political assassinations are just twitter or reddit talking points more than the news. Though that's just from my point of view where no one I know watches legacy media or talk shows.

Point is, unpredictable manic behavior can cause a person to do damage anywhere outside of a cell. And if they aren't a threat, taking their job certainly isn't going to change their mind.

Being in a position of power definitely gives people more opportunities to cause damage. You've probably seen all those recent cases of nurses stealing meds from suffering patients for years before getting caught, or teachers failing students for incorrect political beliefs. The worst McDonalds employees ever do is serve their slop to innocents and get fired if they try to start shit with customers. Most of these people aren't the same type of raving lunatic you see on a train stabbing white women but a different, more cultured raving lunatic. Either way it's more about punishing people and making them wageslave for fast food instead of their high paid comfortable office job.

i am entirely unsurprised to see retarded liberals who think nick fuentes is a decent talking head. i wonder what they'd say if they were reminded about this.

They did the same bit in 2016 a lot, where they'd momentarily drag George Bush out of the retirement home so he could make a few public complaints about trump. I have a theory for this: They're so marvel-brained that they think of everything in terms of movies and villains and think they're teaming up with last year's villain to btfo the newest biggest more evil villain.

Somewhat unrelated, but if you're unfamiliar with American politics there's an unwritten rule that once presidents leave office they fuck off from the political spotlight as much as they can. This hasn't been the case as much recently, but you can see generally see that former presidents are extremely politically inactive compared to how influential they could be. Thank god for that cultural norm too. Could you imagine every single living living former president showing up on a talk show every time something happened and getting clipped into opposing sound bites?

Okay not all of these posts are equal but why is the notion of "follow the money" so unacceptable to people here? That one post is absolutely right

Generally any time I see "follow the money" it's followed by the most insanely retarded post I've seen all day. Also assuming everything is based on money is annoying because there are some truly evil people out there whose goals often differ from making money, or converting money into something like political power or Epstein islands.

teachers get paid 6 figures in public schools? aren't they always complaining about their pay

They see pay as a function of certifications and years worked, so as long as they're making less than someone with similar certifications making more money doing non-teaching jobs they're going to be mad.

Remember, teachers only work about 8 months out of the year.

I worked at a school for a few years and was told teachers there used to actually only get paid the 9 months they worked, but too many of them couldn't figure out how to save or plan their spending and would end up destitute every summer they had off. I think it was also embarrassing to see their teachers work minimum wage jobs to get by each summer. They then eventually ended up paying them spread out whole year instead. Once you count their generous pensions and benefits (including health care for an aging working group) it costs something like $1.40-$2.00 to just pay them $1. That means that most of the money in those "per-student" cost calculations are just calculating how much it costs to pay pension debts. Whenever people say schools are bad because they need more money, they're indirectly stating that these schools are bad because they spent all their money funding pensions and healthcare for aging and unhealthy teachers.

Milwaukee? Is Fatrick starting his own psyop?

He's definitely starting something funny.

 

[1Tonka_Truck]

No way in fuck was that a 2k scope. Probably some $350 Leupold 3x9

Looks like it was a $1500 Leupold 2-10x42. More than I would spend on any Leupold, but it's not like this guy has a history of making good decisions.

 

[RX-78-2]

Looks like it was a $1500 Leupold 2-10x42. More than I would spend on any Leupold, but it's not like this guy has a history of making good decisions.
View attachment 7935851
View attachment 7935919

to be fair it was his grandpa's gun, so he (the shooter) probably didn't buy the scope.

 

[Turquoise]

Re: Dawkins, he didn't really get the memo on leftism. He's more like a 90s shitlib type, keeping company with Rowling, Gervais, Linehan etc. His position on trannyism is basically, "Yeah yeah gender expression, I get it, but as a biologist I only care about what's true."

Also, there is a theory that the 'new atheism' thing was pushed partly as a means to garner support for the post 9-11 Iraq war. "Backwards Arabs need civilizing" and all that. This was certainly Hitchens' position; less so Dawkins. I think there is some merit to this theory, especially since Piers Morgan wheeled Dawkins out again just as the Palestinian genocide was starting. "Fatwa's are bad, aren't they, Richard?"

 

[Penguin Soldier]

Women going full retard makes even less sense to me because they're the most dependent on a safe and stable society. I'm not trying to be snide to women here either, it just seems particularly self-destructive for the people most dependent on law and order to be celebrating every new breakdown of our current social order.

Because modern women famously tend to be attracted to safe/stable men, and don't have a tendency to make the worst decisions possible when it comes to who they choose for partners.

 

[Farm Hand]

A Warhammer community manager got suspended after some people sent emails to his employer. He’s the one behind the Warhammer is for everyone post as well as some other controversies.
View attachment 7935852

Is there any evidence that this Tom guy was behind GW's infamous "Warhammer is for everyone / You will not be missed" post? I don't recall any individual names being credited. That seemed more like an executive decision than something that was conceived and executed by a mere community manager.