Carl Benjamin / Sargon of Akkad / Akkad Daily / The Thinkery / @not_sargon / @WarPlanPurple - Leader of the "Liberalists" & Droning Pseudo-Intellectual Boomer anti-SJW Activist, Applebees Waiter, Mass Shooter Whiteknight

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Would you rape Jess Phillips


  • Total voters
    2,409
I have a question: are those drama videos monetized, both by Sargon and Thunderfoot? I never Youtube without Adblock, so I can't really tell.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Koby_Fish

Goddamnit, Phil, just let it go already. If you're quitting this bullshit "community", then actually quit it rather than sitting on the fringe and roasting Sargon. Sure, it's mildly amusing, but it's also petty and kinda sad.

No response from Sargon yet, I give it a day at most.

Amazing that they both "Really didn't want to make this video, and just wanted to move on". LOL!

Yeah. It's pretty funny. It's obvious that both of these guys are getting off on this drama they have created around this. While both of them insist they are the one taking the moral high ground and the other guy is an asshole, they have and continue to overshadow this broad's death with their silly sewing circle bitch fight. They are both assholes.

Congratulations to both Sargon and Phil for co-opting a tragedy to make it about them, and essentially becoming Zoe, Anita, and/or Briana Wu. Brilliant!
 
I like a lot of his videos, but this one was pretty terrible.


I forgot all about this era of the internet, but I have to say that it's some cruel irony that the nerdgirl hate back in the day is the exact reason why people like Anita Sarkeesian were able to build a career off of sexism, and years later the same fags who hated nerdgirls took a 180 & kept insisting they weren't sexist only because they inadvertently gave SJWs six figure careers that entailed putting their asshole behavior in the spotlight. Sperging about girls being interested in your little fandom was apparently a bad idea, who would've fucking thought?

View attachment 150539

Sounds like a pretentious way of saying: "I know you are but what am I?"

Wouldn't this make him a massive hypocrite? He's made character judgments of how many people?
 
Last edited:
Sargon's in the comments on the newest video, accusing Phil of splicing the audio together to make it look like he was laughing at one of the jokes.

That is the most pathetic sentence I've ever written. Either Phil's gone pants-on-head exceptional just to get one over on Sargon, or Sargon's resorting to really crappy excuses to try and make himself look like the good guy.

Whichever it is, it's fucking terrible.
 
I have a question: are those drama videos monetized, both by Sargon and Thunderfoot? I never Youtube without Adblock, so I can't really tell.

You wouldn't have a way of knowing if you kept Adblock off either, Youtube displays ads on all their videos, not just for the channels that partnered up. The only way you could tell is if they directly showed you.

People genuinely getting upset at this dark humor for being offensive rather than being fucking awful? Color me shocked.

Seriously can't believe at how small potatoes this is. C'mon now, you're on the farms for God's sake. Most of you have probably seen much worse than this.

They're a bunch of hypocrites who make a big show about how morally superior they are & how they would never ever deign to such behavior & then cop out of it by accusing Thunder of quote mining when they're caught doing it. Kraut and Tea criticized SJWs for making fun of Thunderf00t's dead dad but made jokes about this dead girl. I wonder where he draws the line.
 
Last edited:
First thing he says he really didn't want to make this video, then why the fuck did he make it. Sargon's a faggot but he isn't going to change Sargon's fan's minds with these shitty videos.
Wonder how much ad money Thunderf00t and Sargon are making off this shit, because that is the only non-retarded reason I can see for this shit to keep going on.
Also thunderf00t needs to remove the bumfluff from his face
 
I for one am excited to see both of these sanctimonious douchebags carry on staging a public pissing match for our amusement. They deserve each other.

In Thunderf00t's own words: "I love the bloodbath. I love it when they start eating each other."

No, Thunderf00t was in the right in the beginning. Sargon's defense is "I said we shouldn't be doing this but went along with it anyway". After that he plays a clip of his friend saying "now that we've got the moral faggotry out of the way". Fuck him. Why should I care about what he said if he can't stand up to his word?

Only now that they've kept trading punches do I think Thunderf00t is making a bad move. He eviscerated Sargon & should've left it there. He even predicted that they'd make retroactive justifications and that's exactly what Sargon did. Fuck him & his "it was at our expense" mental gymnastics.
 
Last edited:
I have a question: are those drama videos monetized, both by Sargon and Thunderfoot? I never Youtube without Adblock, so I can't really tell.

Sargon clocks in about 4-5k in hipster welfare on patreon a month Thunderf00t more. Also thunderf00t has a real job. These two fucks are actually quite wealthy when you look into it.

Congratulations to both Sargon and Phil for co-opting a tragedy to make it about them, and essentially becoming Zoe, Anita, and/or Briana Wu. Brilliant!

If their's something beyond deathHarley might appreciate the damage it's doing to their mutual causes from themiscyra or wherever Nerdy SJW's women go when they die. I'm going to be honest I'd love the people I hate having an autistic shreiking contest as my final gift to world. The only way it could get better was if they had a fight pit with a starved Dobson and Chipman fighting over a cooked remains of Hilary clinton/terresa may at my funeral
 

Ivy is the one that was killed by Aleksandr though.

I'm going to be honest I'd love the people I hate having an autistic shreiking contest as my final gift to world.

One of the things I respected about TSF channel was that they never really hated anybody on the other side. Except maybe Russian Deadpool,, he seemed to have had a hate boner for Bearing. He seems really hateful and angry in general too looking back on things.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Tim Buckley
Sargon's in the comments on the newest video, accusing Phil of splicing the audio together to make it look like he was laughing at one of the jokes.

That is the most pathetic sentence I've ever written. Either Phil's gone pants-on-head exceptional just to get one over on Sargon, or Sargon's resorting to really crappy excuses to try and make himself look like the good guy.

Whichever it is, it's fucking terrible.

I have the distinct impression that most of the people saying "their both in the wrong" haven't actually watched the Sargon's videos where he responds to Thunderf00t.

Sargon's problem with Phil isn't that he thinks edgy humor is somehow ethically wrong, Phil's been like that for a while and there's never been any real animosity between them, or if there was it was entirely one sided. His problem is that Phil singled Sargon out of a group of people and edited his video to make it seem like Sargon was laughing at a joke when he was laughing at something else.

In this instance he wanted to paint Sargon as an edgelord who made off color jokes at a murder victims expense and listened to an hour long stream to find evidence. However he couldn't actually find an example of Sargon making any such jokes, so he decided that an example of him laughing at someone else's joke would be good enough. But he couldn't even find a good example of that so he edited his video to show somebody making a joke shortly after the stream started and cut to Sargon laughing at another joke that was made like 50 minutes later. And the joke he was laughing at was directed at the perpetrator and the media.

Like is said, if it was just a difference of opinion regarding whether its right to enjoy edgy humor then these two would have come to blows a long time ago. If he didn't make a very deliberate attempt at misleading people then Sargon probably wouldn't even respond. It just comes off as incredibly petty.

Its just like his incredibly grasping "take down" of Lauren Southern, were she called a group of Antifa "anti-Trump Communists". This apparently was such a massive mis-characterization that it warranted a 20 minute video and a follow up after Lauren correctly pointed out the Antifa are clearly just commies masquerading as anarchists. An observation that should be clear to almost anyone that does the slightest bit of research into the group.

Gamer Gate and Atheism+ were the beginning and end of his contributions to the skeptic/anti sjw community. Ever since Brexit he's been a John Oliver quoting remoaner with a stick up his ass, and its hurting his bottom line, his abysmal subscriber/views ratio and a patreon that's about half the size of a guy who's been around for less than half the time is proof of that. Remember, back when his research position was potentially on the line he stated that his online earnings were high enough that he could just quit and work for free. Now that his position is again in jeopardy on account of Brexit and his audience is looking elsewhere he's trying to appeal to anyone who doesn't want to be associated with Sargon and that whole sphere.
 
I have the distinct impression that most of the people saying "their both in the wrong" haven't actually watched the Sargon's videos where he responds to Thunderf00t.

Anyone who even watches half-hour long autistic rants by idiots ranting about other idiots who also put up half-hour long autistic rants is also an autist.

This is why I didn't read your textwall, too.
 
Anyone who even watches half-hour long autistic rants by idiots ranting about other idiots who also put up half-hour long autistic rants is also an autist.

that pretty much describes almost all media

its not like watching rachel maddow or anderson cooper is any better than any other random autist on facebook at this point

This is why I didn't read your textwall, too.

We all assume you're too busy posting to be reading in the first place tbh
 
Sargon's problem with Phil isn't that he thinks edgy humor is somehow ethically wrong,

Bullshit, nobody cares that they were making edgy jokes, the problem is they're making fun of a recent death. How are you gonna defend such tasteful quotes such as "too soon is five seconds before the shooting" & "keeping a lens of humor with the bodies still warm"? One of their excuses is that they had a long standing rivalry with the shooter himself, but that doesn't excuse shit when it's the corpse you're making fun of.
 
Bullshit, nobody cares that they were making edgy jokes, the problem is they're making fun of a recent death.

Who's "they/they're" ? Do you mean the other people in the stream who Phil didn't need to splice together different sections of the stream to make it seem like they were reacting to a joke that they didn't actually react to ?

I wonder why Phil didn't make a video directed at one of those people considering it was one of them who hosted the stream he used. Or for that matter if this offends you so much why haven't you created a thread covering them ? I mean we have threads covering Islamic terrorism here where we freely make "truck of peace" jokes. But a joke about a guy killing his girlfriend ? that's going waaaayyy to far.

How are you gonna defend such tasteful quotes such as "too soon is five seconds before the shooting" & "keeping a lens of humor with the bodies still warm"?

That's funny, i don't remember "defending" any joke nor do i recall Sargon doing it either, which is kinda the reason he has such a problem with Phil's disingenuous videos.

One of their excuses is that they had a long standing rivalry with the shooter himself, but that doesn't excuse shit when it's the corpse you're making fun of.

Its not the corpse their making fun of, its the perpetrator. If i make a joke about a failed suicide bomber who managed to stab and kill somebody before he was stopped, like pointing out how he won't get to watch anything other than evangelical TV programing in prison, how is that different from pointing out how this male feminist could be used as an example of "toxic masculinity" ?

Why is it acceptable to some people to make the first joke but not the second ?
 
Who's "they/they're" ? Do you mean the other people in the stream who Phil didn't need to splice together different sections of the stream to make it seem like they were reacting to a joke that they didn't actually react to ?

You're acting like Thunderf00t only criticized Sargon when he criticized all of them. He's already proven he didn't splice in any of Sargon's laughter like that. If anything, Carl is taking Phil out of context.

That's funny, i don't remember "defending" any joke

I never said you did, I was speaking in general. I should've wrote "how is anyone" instead.

nor do i recall Sargon doing it either, which is kinda the reason he has such a problem with Phil's disingenuous videos.

Yes he did, he spent a whole video making up shitty excuses explaining many of the jokes they made. He explained that "can I just praise the shooter" was somehow meant to be self deprecating. That's pretty akin to claiming you were only pretending to be retarded. I noticed he failed to explain away the "keeping a lens of humor while the bodies are still warm" joke, rather convenient to overlook, since that one indisputably made fun of the corpse.

Its not the corpse their making fun of, its the perpetrator.

Who says it can't be both?

If i make a joke about a failed suicide bomber who managed to stab and kill somebody before he was stopped, like pointing out how he won't get to watch anything other than evangelical TV programing in prison, how is that different from pointing out how this male feminist could be used as an example of "toxic masculinity" ?

If it were SJWs doing the same thing, they would've been on it like flies on shit, in a heartbeat. They wouldn't accept that they were just making fun of the killer, not when many of the jokes include making light of the newly dead. They'd vilify those SJWs up & down.

Why is it acceptable to some people to make the first joke but not the second ?

Because they already set the precedent that this kind of behavior was unacceptable, that they & other people hold themselves to a higher conduct. Kraut & Tea went to bat for Thunderf00t when SJWs were making fun of his dying father, but there he is doing something that's practically the same & you know what? Kraut has already apologized for it. He already said that the jokes he made were a mistake & reflected badly on him.

Edit: lol usual suspects can't find the disagree rating.
 
Last edited:
I think Kraut's response here is kinda interesting. He's taken a step back and decided apologise. WHether that's genuine or he's just doing damage control to save face, honestly doesn't matter. Either way, he's looked at the response to the stream and said "I fucked up".

Sargon, meanwhile decided to double down and fight his corner, which has now turned into an exceptional shit-slinging match wtih Phil, and the only people genuinely invested are Sargon's fanboys and us.

And yeah, they absolutely would tear any SJWs that did this a new asshole. Sargon would do exactly what Phil did here.
 
Back