💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 155 22.7%
  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 275 40.2%
  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 92 13.5%
  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 162 23.7%

  • Total voters
    684
That's my only point, the LLC was established in 2019, not for his law firm, his law firm was a sole proprietorship established in 2015. If he had used the LLC for his law firm it would be reflected in him bar registration, it is not.
While you have revised what you said, what you actually said that people were disagreeing with was this:
You misunderstand what I'm saying, the state doesn't license individuals, the license is tied to a business entity.
That's completely wrong. The license is tied to the individual, in this case one Nicholas Robert Rekieta.
Just what is it with these brain-damaged junkies and all the constant psycho fidgeting?
The drugs they take have the immediate stimulant effect of agitating the nervous system. But when junkies like Nick vastly abuse them to the point of literal brain damage, the tics and manic behavior become permanent. That's why his gay eyes dart around like goldfish in a bowl of battery acid and he tweaks all the time, even when he's "sober." It's literal physiological brain damage.
 
- Nick claims that the Dorkbert drawing is of his attorney
If I ever discovered that my lawyer was doodling the opposing party instead of drafting motions or managing actual legal work, he could be certain he would not remain my counsel for long.

I had previously touched upon the fact that Nick felt the need to spin off social media operations into a separate corporate identity, registered elsewhere, because he he was worried certain KickVic defendants would go after him,
Isn't Rekieta's current Twitter attributed to his LLC as a workaround for a ban on his previous Twitter account?
 
That's my only point, the LLC was established in 2019, not for his law firm, his law firm was a sole proprietorship established in 2015. If he had used the LLC for his law firm it would be reflected in him bar registration, it is not.
Rekieta Law LLC was registered in 2019 as a "professional service - law" organization.
 
- "some dork" is saying Nick's holding himself out as a lawyer; sovcit argument again
His argument makes my head hurt.

He does not seem to comprehend that persons not authorized to practice law can not own law firms, and by stating he owns a law firm he is essentially claiming he is authorized to practice law. That applies even if you want to get into the obnoxious hair-splitting argument that somebody can not be authorized to practice law, but still claim the title of lawyer.

Maybe I'm wrong, but I think maybe it's the "owner of a small law firm in central Minnesota" part that is grinding their gears more than the "lawyer" part. You can't trust Nick to be truthful when he recounts any story.

I hope when this shit is all over, there is some sort of written decision we can all laugh at.

Isn't Rekieta's current Twitter attributed to his LLC as a workaround for a ban on his previous Twitter account?
That's suspected to be another reason why he did it, yes. It's not the sole reason though, as evidenced by the fact he branded his YouTube channel with the Rekieta Media LLC identity as well. It's been the same channel the whole time.
 
You sole point of argument to the contrary seems to be he did not update his contact information with the Bar to add "LLC" in the ADDRESS FIELD.
Rekieta Law (sole proprietorship):
7/4/2019 renewed doing business as
Principal Place of Business Address
2015 1st street s
willmar, MN 56201
USA

Rekieta Law LLC:
7/5/2019 creation of entity
Principal Executive Office Address
202 N Cedar Ave STE #1
Owatonna, MN 55060
USA

I mean starting the the LLC, (the day) after renewing the sole proprietorship, with different principle addresses (the only thing shared is the PO box but that's not uncommon) would seem to indicate otherwise. Why keep the sole proprietorship license open instead of dissolving it?

(I know Rackets is lazy and retarded, but paying to renew a license, and then the next day filing for a new entity to re-define the law firm, and not dissolving the old entity, that is still listed on the formal bar paperwork is INCREDIBLY lazy and retarded)

Edit to ask:
Would the entity that his insurance for his law firm covered be publicly available? That might settle this because he's renewed his license since. If it's the LLC, then I'm wrong, if it's the sole proprietorship tho..

@Friend of Dorothy Parker
I don't want to shit up the thread anymore than I have, but to clarify. Renewing Rekieta Law (the business) a day before starting the Rekieta Law LLC. Why register Rekieta Law in the first place if it was unnecessary? Much less renew it a day before starting the LLC, and 4 months before Rekieta Law would be administratively dissolved(terminated)?
 
Last edited:
Close, but inverse that. He was actually worried Jamie, Monica, Ron, and possibly Funimation we're gonna go after him. At that particular time, it would have been much better to be a defamation defendant in Texas than Minnesota (it might still be, given the revised Minnesota anti-SLAPP is pretty new). There is video posted here previously of him basically admitting to that from some hotel room.
Does it even work like that? He's still personally liable for what he says, the only thing I'd see an LLC doing is shield him from lability over what a guest on his channel might say.
I mean I'm retarded but Nick is also a terrible lawyer so I could see him fucking up what an LLC protects him from.
Can you really form an LLC in n Texas and say "that defamatory statement wasn't what I, retard in Minnesota said, this was what my LLC in Texas said."?
 
I don't know what the hell you are going on and on about.

All @Dixieland Buckaroo is saying is that Nick had an LLC for his law firm in Minnesota, and an LLC for his media empire (*snort*) in Texas, and both have lapsed. He's not wrong.

Nothing Nick does nowadays appears to be done behind a corporate veil. Nick is now as corporationless as he is Apeless (and soon, I guess, hairless).


He submitted this:

View attachment 8260785

Name, basic contact details, bar number. No firm, and it doesn't appear to ask for one.
I usually really hate it when people throw money at lolcows to 'felt' them, but knowing Nick is suckling at the teat of his family fortune anyway means $5 here and there don't annoy me as much. His ebegging isn't what makes him a lolcow, Rich or poor, he's just an obnoxious deluded arsehole.

This is beautiful. Regardless of how strong or weak the case is against him, the sure-fire way to lose is 'these magic words'. He acts like only he has the intellect to discover this catastrophic contradiction and all the other lawyers that went before him... the ones that did actually practice, and did have to apply laws to more cases in a day than Nick has in his career... all those lawyers missed it.

Good luck, Nick. Maybe the answer is somewhere in the CLEs he just can't manage to complete.
is Nick Gay
 
He does not seem to comprehend that persons not authorized to practice law can not own law firms, and by stating he owns a law firm he is essentially claiming he is authorized to practice law. That applies even if you want to get into the obnoxious hair-splitting argument that somebody can not be authorized to practice law, but still claim the title of lawyer.

Maybe I'm wrong, but I think maybe it's the "owner of a small law firm in central Minnesota" part that is grinding their gears more than the "lawyer" part. You can't trust Nick to be truthful when he recounts any story.
It is that, but also still that if you are not authorized to practice, you must disclose that in communications when the communication would reasonably cause someone to believe you are.

His violations are many and repeated. I'm heartened to hear from @RaptInPlastic if at least some of his egregious and unethical violations have been adjudicated, but that he continues to do so is mind boggling and makes me think that any violations determined might have been very narrowly drawn.


Rekieta Law (sole proprietorship):
7/4/2019 renewed doing business as
Principal Place of Business Address
2015 1st street s
willmar, MN 56201
USA

Rekieta Law LLC:
7/5/2019 creation of entity
Principal Executive Office Address
202 N Cedar Ave STE #1
Owatonna, MN 55060
USA

I mean starting the the LLC, (the day) after renewing the sole proprietorship, with different principle addresses (the only thing shared is the PO box but that's not uncommon) would seem to indicate otherwise. Why keep the sole proprietorship license open instead of dissolving it?

(I know Rackets is lazy and retarded, but paying to renew a license, and then the next day filing for a new entity to re-define the law firm, and not dissolving the old entity, that is still listed on the formal bar paperwork is INCREDIBLY lazy and retarded)
"Rekieta Law" was an assumed name he used as a solo, created prior to and continuing to exist after creating his LLC. Those are not inconsistent.

There is no "sole proprietor license." You just work, and file a DBA (assumed name). And you don't have to give up a DBA just because you created an LLC. There was also nothing to "dissolve." The status, as has been stated, is that the LLC has been administratively terminated, and the DBA has expired.
 
Also this argument has already been resolved against Rekieta. He doesn't have any sort of open complaint about holding himself out falsely, he has been found guilty. He is in the penalty phase for that. That is what he is hiding and dancing around about.
In the same way he is dragging out the HRO because law enforcement and prosecutors have told his lawyer that Rekieta can talk about Aaron but not physically approach him, and so Rekieta constantly pushes it in his usual faggot sociopath way, he is being childish and defiant against law licensing until the hammer falls on that one too.
I would love to read the filing on that some time.
 
Rekieta Law LLC was registered in 2019 as a "professional service - law" organization.
Nice catch!

(I know Rackets is lazy and retarded, but paying to renew a license, and then the next day filing for a new entity to re-define the law firm, and not dissolving the old entity, that is still listed on the formal bar paperwork is INCREDIBLY lazy and retarded)
My friend, I think you will find that Nicholas Robert Rekieta is... in fact... incredibly lazy, and exceptionally retarded.

For one thing, consider the fact he let his Rekieta Media LLC out of Texas lapse, despite the fact he still claims it holds ownership of his various social media accounts, and operating a business under an LLC affords certain benefits and protections he is now depriving himself of because of his own laziness and/or stupidity.

I rather think we're well beyond the point where "that's retarded" is a good argument as to why Nick would not do something.

Does it even work like that? He's still personally liable for what he says, the only thing I'd see an LLC doing is shield him from lability over what a guest on his channel might say.
I mean I'm retarded but Nick is also a terrible lawyer so I could see him fucking up what an LLC protects him from.
Can you really form an LLC in n Texas and say "that defamatory statement wasn't what I, retard in Minnesota said, this was what my LLC in Texas said."?
I can not say how sound Nick's legal strategy there was. Generally speaking, I tend to think the correct position to start from is "not very." For reasons which ought be obvious to long-time thread participants. Nick is not as well versed in the law as he wants people to think he is.

However, I can say I looked this up a while back, and corporate entities (which includes LLCs) are, in fact, covered under the Texas Citizen's Participation Act. It confers the same protections to both natural and corporate persons. Moreover, Nick was adamant that he would much rather be sued by the KV defendants in Texas than Minnesota. For the aforementioned reasons.

FWIW, @waffle, who is an attorney, proffered the followed the last time this came up:
The Texas LLC was made during Weeb Wars as an artifice to try and goad Jamie Marcie (IIRC it might have been Mars Girl or Monica Rial) into being forced to sue him in Texas and risk a TCPA loss. It was always a big brained bullshit plan that had low chances of working due to a lot of reasons that all boiled down to various instances of Nick not knowing law as good as he thinks he does.

Would it have worked? I dunno, but that was his major justification for incorporating Rekieta Media LLC in Texas, and not Minnesota.

Also, I just remembered that I pointed out a while back that the formation of the Rekieta Media LLC came before his Twitter ban. The Texas LLC was created in September of 2019. He lost his old Nick Rekieta account the following October.

So, while he did certainly leverage the LLC to keep posting on Twitter, it was not the primary reason for its creation.
 
He does not seem to comprehend that persons not authorized to practice law can not own law firms, and by stating he owns a law firm he is essentially claiming he is authorized to practice law.
We don't even need to split those hairs, he filed in open court (via "Razzle-Dazzle" Randazza) that he not only can, but does practice law.
 
I can't lie, I don’t remember seeing him this functional in a long time. Before, I couldn't stomach those boring, miserable streams for more than a few minutes, and I really struggled, especially after the arrest because they were just so depressing. But the members stream yesterday, and even before the switch to members only, he was genuinely on a roll. There was a noticeable change in his whole disposition, pretty confident, in control, high energy, laughing, ranting, vibing, genuinely engaging.


Since you watched this stream, and a lot of his others, is my impression off?

He had a lot less random-access humour, and had more cogent (f inane) lines of discussion and thought. He also seemed less manic, but the content was similar 'hurr durr Kurt does not know how to cook and is an incel! LOL LMAO X1000!'

- all his "other projects" are "completely backseated" until the Locals gift is done

How convenient! He has an excuse to do nothing now, because he has to focus his FULL attention on the LOCALS gift, you guys!

This will be the new 'driving muh keeds!'

Like, why would you do anything that makes you feel like that? So you can touch dicks with god?

He spoke about this experience in the stream and also shortly after return from Hedo and his ~1 month hiatus:

He and the wife locked themselves in a hotel room when taking shroom chocolate, and they took the full dose. Nick got hit very late, and he almost got swallowed up by the trip. He had to focus on a deck of cards as an anchor and kept repeating 'Jokers, Jokers, Jokers' as a mantra to ground himself. He saw the butterflies tattoos on his wife come to life, and he sat for a long time in the toilet on the floor--afraid to move. Eventually he moved to the bed where he lost feeling in his lower body and was terrified he would defecate and urinate on himself because he could not feel his lower half.

View attachment 8259538View attachment 8259539
It is 05:30 CST in Kandiyohi County, they have been on this stream for 8 fucking hours.
Don't worry KCHHS! The parents are fine! Its totally appropriate to be awake the entire night playing with fucking Legos before leaving the older kids to manage the younger ones while Mommy and Daddy have their mid-day scrip crashout.

The oldest is 18! He can drive them!

(I would no be surprised to learn Nick is foisting driving onto him)

I usually really hate it when people throw money at lolcows to 'felt' them, but knowing Nick is suckling at the teat of his family fortune anyway means $5 here and there don't annoy me as much. His ebegging isn't what makes him a lolcow, Rich or poor, he's just an obnoxious deluded arsehole.

I generally agree, but these chats are not to Nick, and that makes it slightly funnier to see him felted for free.

He does not seem to comprehend that persons not authorized to practice law can not own law firms, and by stating he owns a law firm he is essentially claiming he is authorized to practice law. That applies even if you want to get into the obnoxious hair-splitting argument that somebody can not be authorized to practice law, but still claim the title of lawyer.

Maybe I'm wrong, but I think maybe it's the "owner of a small law firm in central Minnesota" part that is grinding their gears more than the "lawyer" part. You can't trust Nick to be truthful when he recounts any story.

I hope when this shit is all over, there is some sort of written decision we can all laugh at.

But if I pretend to be a policeman, I cannot be held liable for my actions because I was not ACTUALLY a policeman, so I am not subject to the rules! Infinite law glitch!
 
He and the wife locked themselves in a hotel room when taking shroom chocolate, and they took the full dose. Nick got hit very late, and he almost got swallowed up by the trip. He had to focus on a deck of cards as an anchor and kept repeating 'Jokers, Jokers, Jokers' as a mantra to ground himself.
What a fucking lightweight. That's from candy shrooms made for amateurs. Imagine being this much of a pussy and boasting about your druglord history. Bitch, a real heroic dose is something over 7 grams pure. What a nigger.
 
Back
Top Bottom