Skitzocow Chris Gillon / Autphag and Spergchan / Sophie Y’Israeli - Autistic North Koreaboo, Also a Man

Who passes better as a woman?

  • Autphag:

    Votes: 36 9.9%
  • Robert Wayne Stiles

    Votes: 327 90.1%

  • Total voters
    363
A video about Autism and Transgenderism that is relevant to the thread subject:


Cuntster can learn from the American service providers.
 
Inverse-racialist to Mongoloid women now, I see?

Yeah, your true scumminess and jealousy comes out, hypermasculine negroid. That's a physiologically low-DHT, high-T female face of the supreme systematizing racial archetype and you're jealous of its symmetries.
Youre an idiot and shes the ugliest korean girl i have ever seen.
That is an atrocious fucking achievement because most are wicked hot.
Christ, man. Get some better idols.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Ntwadumela
The world's most cunning linguist, ladies and gentlemen.
I'm not as badly sheltered as Chris-chan in this respect; I didn't wait until I was 16 to learn about porn and it was primarily literary or factual (encyclopedic). I started fapping what I guess is just right by biological male standards (13).

I was never attracted to Lagoona, don't you dare insinuate that. Walter's kindness in divulging what he had reveals to me the putrescence that undertaking would've entailed, but, if she really desperately wants my human company at any point, I'm not going to turn it away, I just refuse to allow her to acquiesce from responsibility for her games.

Until then, .25mg risperidone stat, nurse.

I'm not 100% sure if I am, speaking from the perspective of the gender identified (pre-emptive trigger warning for a following Cuntsterian cliche speaking against it; don't bother, you're giving me debate-fodder, you're not affecting me), lesbian. Not sexually, anyway. Ginger's was more a romance. Lagoona is somebody I considered a friend but who is too emotionally unstable to accept she can't read into people's intentions for shit and superimposes her own onto others.

Youre an idiot and shes the ugliest korean girl i have ever seen.
That is an atrocious fucking achievement because most are wicked hot.
Christ, man. Get some better idols.
Most namchogukeul (South Koreans) have Westernization surgery, twit.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
A video about Autism and Transgenderism that is relevant to the thread subject:


Cuntster can learn from the American service providers.
I'm not watching it. It makes me uncomfortable that it'd only remind me how much Britain wishes to seek emulation of a completely antithetical model based on Cohenitic retardation.

But, in general, he'll just use it as an excuse to highlight "how fucked" you over the other side of the Atlantic are.

Citation needed. Or is this one of your myriad conspiracies?
It should be in the KCNA somewhere.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So in other words you yet again cannot cite anything.
It's a deliberate choice. Look a few hundred pages back where I speak or, really, sperg to Cuntster about the North Korean academic writing style.

They don't believe in peer-review, everything is sourceless, and typically the only attribution is the suryeong to anything. Haha.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Begemot and Pikimon
Remember Chris, I've been going through the whole thread, you never once bother to cite your sources, always expecting others to do it for you.
 
Remember Chris, I've been going through the whole thread, you never once bother to cite your sources, always expecting others to do it for you.
That sounds like an obsession. You seem to take one custom above the others to be explicative of research ability. You're the kind of idiot dipshit sperg who can perfectly format a source citation and yet would have to hunt-and-peck whilst copying it rote-for-rote from the next window or from page to keyboard. Neurofeminine intellectual weakness! Kys. :)

Furthermore:

Arguments from origination don't require sources; they're intentionally my own say-so, because they're intentionally designed to critique on the basis of critical analysis rooted in logic. Again, a neurofemale sissy-boy like you, James, wouldn't understand what it would mean to critique anything, given your peer-review anal-fixation and source-citation centric special-obsession r3tardation.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I can see Anonymus' intellect has now surpassed itself, debasing yourself to the same dumb-rating faggotry Cuntster had tried to back-seat with for a while as if it's equivalent to airing a well-substantiated opinion.

Yes, it's the rating I have a problem with; it's the fact that the rating serves a virtue signal for lazies that can't coherently address my remarks and resort to dismissing them as insane as cop-outs.

So yes, keep rating dumb, in that meaninglessly cathartic manner of yours, do that redundant exercise whilst actually forming a response (reasonable middle ground), or, drop the pretense altogether, James, and just go retire and fuck off somewhere.

Yeah, please. I hate you, and I hate your unreconciliatory ways. I'm hurt by them and can never forgive the 'tard wrangler caucus.

It certainly belies you to show these mid-witted slacktavisticological shit-posting and junk-retorts, but perhaps if you were able to challenge yourself, I might respect you more seriously enough to engage you in the sort of intrigue I doubt you'd even handle anyway.
LOLCALMDOWN
 
That sounds like an obsession. You seem to take one custom above the others to be explicative of research ability. You're the kind of idiot dipshit sperg who can perfectly format a source citation and yet would have to hunt-and-peck whilst copying it rote-for-rote from the next window or from page to keyboard. Neurofeminine intellectual weakness! Kys. :)

No, I actually wanted to know why you were considered a Lolcow. As I've said before, I like to see the proof of such things myself instead of taking someones word for hit. I know research is too hard for you so you wouldn't understand someone actually smarter than you bothering to do such thing. After all Chris, you're just a pant's shitting moron who needs to take the time to go through a thesaurus before talking to someone.

Don't get me started on the fact you think you can get into a college let alone a university. You're insane Chris with a history of attacking people physically and a dropout. No school wants you.
 
No, I actually wanted to know why you were considered a Lolcow. As I've said before, I like to see the proof of such things myself instead of taking someones word for hit. I know research is too hard for you so you wouldn't understand someone actually smarter than you bothering to do such thing. After all Chris, you're just a pant's shitting moron who needs to take the time to go through a thesaurus before talking to someone.

Don't get me started on the fact you think you can get into a college let alone a university. You're insane Chris with a history of attacking people physically and a dropout. No school wants you.
You're like a 14 year old Dawkinite. This is quite embarassing.

Also, your Highers results were worse than mine, James, even if you got more of them.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Begemot and Keerakh
You responded to 10% of my post to nitpick technicalities and dispute whodunit in a personal relationship instead of taking in the message as a whole. I have nothing more to say to you.
It was more like ~20-25% if we're going by semantic content rather than length.
You're nowhere near as bright as you think you are, even if you can stats- and program-sperg.
 
It's a deliberate choice. Look a few hundred pages back where I speak or, really, sperg to Cuntster about the North Korean academic writing style.

They don't believe in peer-review, everything is sourceless, and typically the only attribution is the suryeong to anything. Haha.
That explains why the nation is an utter fucking abortion of science.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Vorhtbame
That explains why the nation is an utter fucking abortion of science.
30 points in the lowest negroid country's IQ average regardless.

I use it as an illustration that being a peer-review empiricist-sperg has nothing to do with intelligence. I'm sure there are plenty of dim mid-witted negroids going around perfectly able to format a source to something they've just read which they'll simply proceed to forget.

It's why people like @Anonymus Fluhre are thick, and why people like me grasp at the stars.

sorry,
30 points on*
 
30 points in the lowest negroid country's IQ average regardless.

I use it as an illustration that being a peer-review empiricist-sperg has nothing to do with intelligence. I'm sure there are plenty of dim mid-witted negroids going around perfectly able to format a source to something they've just read which they'll simply proceed to forget.

It's why people like @Anonymus Fluhre are thick, and why people like me grasp at the stars.

"Grasp at the stars" You mean cry on the streets until you're picked up and put back your meds?
 
Is there someone other than a support worker you can take to this meeting if admissions insist you bring someone?

Family member, friend? Is there someone who would write you a letter of recommendation if that would help? Perhaps your GP or another health worker?

I may be very wrong, but such experience as I have suggests to me they are looking for some sort of informal reassurance that you will be able to manage the course - in terms of its social and emotional demands, not its intellectual ones - from some sort of 'third party'.

A letter of recommendation might achieve that. If you were in a position to offer one, i think they would also find that reassuring. Of course, you would need to approach whoever you wanted to write the letter before offering to provide it.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Begemot
Back