Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Youre an idiot and shes the ugliest korean girl i have ever seen.Inverse-racialist to Mongoloid women now, I see?
Yeah, your true scumminess and jealousy comes out, hypermasculine negroid. That's a physiologically low-DHT, high-T female face of the supreme systematizing racial archetype and you're jealous of its symmetries.
I'm not as badly sheltered as Chris-chan in this respect; I didn't wait until I was 16 to learn about porn and it was primarily literary or factual (encyclopedic). I started fapping what I guess is just right by biological male standards (13).The world's most cunning linguist, ladies and gentlemen.
Most namchogukeul (South Koreans) have Westernization surgery, twit.Youre an idiot and shes the ugliest korean girl i have ever seen.
That is an atrocious fucking achievement because most are wicked hot.
Christ, man. Get some better idols.
Citation needed. Or is this one of your myriad conspiracies?Most namchogukeul (South Koreans) have Westernization surgery, twit.
I'm not watching it. It makes me uncomfortable that it'd only remind me how much Britain wishes to seek emulation of a completely antithetical model based on Cohenitic retardation.A video about Autism and Transgenderism that is relevant to the thread subject:
Cuntster can learn from the American service providers.
It should be in the KCNA somewhere.Citation needed. Or is this one of your myriad conspiracies?
It should be in the KCNA somewhere.
It's a deliberate choice. Look a few hundred pages back where I speak or, really, sperg to Cuntster about the North Korean academic writing style.So in other words you yet again cannot cite anything.
That sounds like an obsession. You seem to take one custom above the others to be explicative of research ability. You're the kind of idiot dipshit sperg who can perfectly format a source citation and yet would have to hunt-and-peck whilst copying it rote-for-rote from the next window or from page to keyboard. Neurofeminine intellectual weakness! Kys.Remember Chris, I've been going through the whole thread, you never once bother to cite your sources, always expecting others to do it for you.
"how fucked"
They help me soothe my feelings.Just like your massive consumption of any kind of drugs. Really, I don't want to know the results of your liver function tests.
LOLCALMDOWNI can see Anonymus' intellect has now surpassed itself, debasing yourself to the same dumb-rating faggotry Cuntster had tried to back-seat with for a while as if it's equivalent to airing a well-substantiated opinion.
Yes, it's the rating I have a problem with; it's the fact that the rating serves a virtue signal for lazies that can't coherently address my remarks and resort to dismissing them as insane as cop-outs.
So yes, keep rating dumb, in that meaninglessly cathartic manner of yours, do that redundant exercise whilst actually forming a response (reasonable middle ground), or, drop the pretense altogether, James, and just go retire and fuck off somewhere.
Yeah, please. I hate you, and I hate your unreconciliatory ways. I'm hurt by them and can never forgive the 'tard wrangler caucus.
It certainly belies you to show these mid-witted slacktavisticological shit-posting and junk-retorts, but perhaps if you were able to challenge yourself, I might respect you more seriously enough to engage you in the sort of intrigue I doubt you'd even handle anyway.
That sounds like an obsession. You seem to take one custom above the others to be explicative of research ability. You're the kind of idiot dipshit sperg who can perfectly format a source citation and yet would have to hunt-and-peck whilst copying it rote-for-rote from the next window or from page to keyboard. Neurofeminine intellectual weakness! Kys.![]()
You're like a 14 year old Dawkinite. This is quite embarassing.No, I actually wanted to know why you were considered a Lolcow. As I've said before, I like to see the proof of such things myself instead of taking someones word for hit. I know research is too hard for you so you wouldn't understand someone actually smarter than you bothering to do such thing. After all Chris, you're just a pant's shitting moron who needs to take the time to go through a thesaurus before talking to someone.
Don't get me started on the fact you think you can get into a college let alone a university. You're insane Chris with a history of attacking people physically and a dropout. No school wants you.
You responded to 10% of my post to nitpick technicalities and dispute whodunit in a personal relationship instead of taking in the message as a whole. I have nothing more to say to you.Any more questions?
It was more like ~20-25% if we're going by semantic content rather than length.You responded to 10% of my post to nitpick technicalities and dispute whodunit in a personal relationship instead of taking in the message as a whole. I have nothing more to say to you.
That explains why the nation is an utter fucking abortion of science.It's a deliberate choice. Look a few hundred pages back where I speak or, really, sperg to Cuntster about the North Korean academic writing style.
They don't believe in peer-review, everything is sourceless, and typically the only attribution is the suryeong to anything. Haha.
30 points in the lowest negroid country's IQ average regardless.That explains why the nation is an utter fucking abortion of science.
30 points in the lowest negroid country's IQ average regardless.
I use it as an illustration that being a peer-review empiricist-sperg has nothing to do with intelligence. I'm sure there are plenty of dim mid-witted negroids going around perfectly able to format a source to something they've just read which they'll simply proceed to forget.
It's why people like @Anonymus Fluhre are thick, and why people like me grasp at the stars.