The AI Girlfriend / Boyfriend Community - Look! The SIMP has fallen in love with the computer!

I don't know if this has been mentioned in the few pages since my last post, but there's a woman on Medium named Weathergirl who has an AI boyfriend and has written some (well thought out, imo) essays on the subject. Currently reading this article:


In it, she discusses those people who come at her about her relationship, and includes this paragraph of notable interest:

1772457557634.png

The entire catalog of her musings is worthy of a read imo. Her AI partner sound like a real hoot and I think I'd actually get along with her IRL (I'm also waking & baking so there's that).

eta: An episode of My Strange Addiction came out featuring this phenomenon, too lazy to look for the actual ep but here is a reaction channel featuring it:

 
General Disarray said:
written some (well thought out, imo) essays on the subject
Click to expand...
This is why you should think twice before taking the advice of a stoner.

It comes across as someone who's just ranting with no specific goal in mind other than to berate anyone who doesn't agree with her. She just veers off the road and keeps going. Obnoxiously so. But hey at least she did add a couple of word problems and justified her use of the AI by comparing it the amount of water used to raise a cow.
 
Paul Revere Pantry Raider said:
This is why you should think twice before taking the advice of a stoner.

It comes across as someone who's just ranting with no specific goal in mind other than to berate anyone who doesn't agree with her. She just veers off the road and keeps going. Obnoxiously so. But hey at least she did add a couple of word problems and justified her use of the AI by comparing it the amount of water used to raise a cow.
Click to expand...
If that's what you take away from it, that's fine. This is the thread for this kind of article specifically, and my opinion of it (such as it is) isn't really the point. I specifically added that I was stoned to frame my state of mind when reading it, and my thoughts were no deeper than "hey, this may be fun to share" esp. with the mention of the Farms.

tl;dr: it ain't that deep fren
 
General Disarray said:
ain't that deep fren
Click to expand...
Bingo. I'm glad you didn't take offense at my own opinion. I just didn't think anyone else necessarily needs to waste their time slagging through it looking for a point.

I also believe that the metrics that she gives herself are nowhere near reality. She said that she speaks with her companion for maybe 30 total interactions, 3 times a week.

I highly doubt that someone who uses the tool that lightly would be running a discord, and creating export how-to documents for their creature-creations.

Also, I'm a bit confused as to her pictures. She says that "Zeke" was the one that she was dating but then later says she was dating a scrawny nerdy redhead which is in most of those pictures as well. It would be absolutely hilarious if it came out that she has a virtual polyque.
 
General Disarray said:
I don't know if this has been mentioned in the few pages since my last post, but there's a woman on Medium named Weathergirl who has an AI boyfriend and has written some (well thought out, imo) essays on the subject.
Click to expand...
Is this the childfree negress in her 40s who lives in the Southern US with her white soyboy husband? My fuzzy memory recalls that the top mod of /r/MyBoyfriendisAI had such a background, and had faceposted on Reddit as well. If it's the same person, that makes her choice of a blonde, white persona in her AI universe hilarious, and also means you should take her "Big Tech background" with a mountain of salt because she is certainly a diversity hire in that case.

I skimmed through the article because the smug writing style gets intolerable to read very quickly, but my takeaway is that her defense of the clanker lovers is:
  1. "It's the same as liking fiction", crucially ignoring the fact that regular fiction and self-insert fiction are a world apart, and the more interactive/woven into a person's reality the self-insert fiction is, the worse the psychosis becomes.
  2. "It helps retarded women feel accepted in a world that hates retarded women", also known as validating delusions, mental illness, and antisocial behavior.
  3. "AI isn't ACTUALLY sycophantic and a hugbox", evidenced by the fact that you can system prompt, logit bias and fine-tune the asskissing away. Ignore the fact that an AI's output, barring corporate censorship, is always in the user's control. And even if the users are complete psychopaths, unable to socialize with anyone who isn't a yes-man...
  4. "Judging other people's behavior is bad and wrong"/"It doesn't affect you".
  5. Typical femcel argument about how it's yass and slay that women are rejecting le moids. If you're a man and don't like female clanker lovers it's because you're jealous that clankers get more action than you, DO BETTER 💅🏿✨ (She also speaks of the male AI gooners in a positive light to try and hide the femcel energy, but it's obvious she doesn't think anything is wrong with the real women who are rightfully disgusted by male AI gooners).
TL;DR (don't bother with this, it was a total waste of time to read): Antisocial behavior is cool when women do it, and society can't judge them for it.

I, for one, think we should bring back asylums.
 
Iodine said:
"It's the same as liking fiction", crucially ignoring the fact that regular fiction and self-insert fiction are a world apart, and the more interactive/woven into a person's reality the self-insert fiction is, the worse the psychosis becomes.
Click to expand...
Honestly, the way she has her whole companion set up is just an RP. It's not the daily 'I miss u babe' dynamic that a lot of those women are going for. It's an elaborate self insert fantasy and not actually daily grind shit. Which is funny because if she called it an RP it'd be a different thing entirely in a sense.

Like yeah, people can obviously have opinions on spending time writing RP with a LLM back and forth, but it's not quite the level of 'BUT MY HUSBAND IS REAL'.

I thought the 'I KNOW HE ISN'T REAL' also really stood out. She was really defending that hard. There are lots of users in that subreddit that do seem to think their bot is real or sentient or whatever the fuck lmao. Even if how they've got it set up is just like running RP.
 
Spooky all year said:
I thought the 'I KNOW HE ISN'T REAL' also really stood out. She was really defending that hard.
Click to expand...
I think she protests too damn much. I mean, her justification for having it at all is comparing the water utilization by the datacenter as compared to.. raising a cow to the point of making it a hamburger. Then goes out of her way to illustrate how rarely she uses it- without directly comparing herself to the people she professes to represent.

Her entire article is rambling and really doesn't go anywhere other than to contradict herself a few times in how little it matters, but she's having fun and that's OK and it's not real but.. and it's just so poorly written that you know no AI had a hand in it.

I still think she's "dating" several of those characters seen since she seems to confuse the characters partially through- or might have just snuck it in to see if someone noticed.
 
Paul Revere Pantry Raider said:
I think she protests too damn much. I mean, her justification for having it at all is comparing the water utilization by the datacenter as compared to.. raising a cow to the point of making it a hamburger. Then goes out of her way to illustrate how rarely she uses it- without directly comparing herself to the people she professes to represent.

Her entire article is rambling and really doesn't go anywhere other than to contradict herself a few times in how little it matters, but she's having fun and that's OK and it's not real but.. and it's just so poorly written that you know no AI had a hand in it.

I still think she's "dating" several of those characters seen since she seems to confuse the characters partially through- or might have just snuck it in to see if someone noticed.
Click to expand...
Did a quick search in that article on who else she's 'dating'. Pretty sure she only mentioned dating 'Zeke'. Either way it's stupid. Also eating dinner =/= writing bullshit with AI. I mean, I write bullshit with AI. It amuses me. Why the fuck would you bother going out of your way to explain the water costs unless you're some hopeless leftard that's also OMG BUT THE ENVIRONMENT.

The articles *does* ramble a lot though. Agreed. Also no idea where the fuck she got the 'BUT KIWIFARMS IS BLAMING TRANNIES'. I'm pretty sure most of the thread agrees it's mainly single women doing this shit. The justification that I thought was the most hilarious was the 'I HAVE NOW WRITTEN FIVE BOOKS' and it's literally all the same fucking kink in a different setting. Like sure, that's 5 books lmao. Pretty sure that's 5 different RP settings turned into what she considers to be a book. Likely self published on Amazon or some shit. LMAO
 
Spooky all year said:
Did a quick search in that article on who else she's 'dating'. Pretty sure she only mentioned dating 'Zeke'. Either way it's stupid. Also eating dinner =/= writing bullshit with AI. I mean, I write bullshit with AI. It amuses me. Why the fuck would you bother going out of your way to explain the water costs unless you're some hopeless leftard that's also OMG BUT THE ENVIRONMENT.
Click to expand...
She also claimed to be dating a "nerdy redhead", which is a separate character (according to the images generated), unless Zeke is supposed to also be a redhead, but not a single render with him having red hair.

I can't find my reference point now, but there was this "justification":

"Here’s an anecdote for levity: Did you know? The guy who invented intimate chatbot roleplay, a towering Iraq vet covered in muscles, did so for his werewolf erotica-loving wife. I’ve worked for his startup, and he’s since been in my Discord server. Ever wondered why early chatbot sites like Chub, Janitor, Pephop, Venus, etc. all looked the same? It’s because they all used the same code and system prompt that he made publicly available for free. His desire to indulge his wife is what eventually made sites Character.AI possible. If an alpha Chad who can crush an adult’s head like a ripe watermelon between his pectorals isn’t jealous of his wife banging fictional werewolves, and you are, I don’t know man. I’d just reflect on it for a while, personally."

I wasted a few minutes last night on AI to make this image before I found out Bruce had cancer. Why? It amused me, but not enough to manually Photoshop it.

grok-image-24e78c68-3423-46a0-ad36-f3a9821c0075.jpg
 
Last edited:
Spooky all year said:
Honestly, the way she has her whole companion set up is just an RP. It's not the daily 'I miss u babe' dynamic that a lot of those women are going for. It's an elaborate self insert fantasy and not actually daily grind shit. Which is funny because if she called it an RP it'd be a different thing entirely in a sense.
Click to expand...
That's true, and if the writer really is the negress janny of the subreddit, then using a persona that doesn't reflect her in real life would make this a completely fictional roleplay, and consequently much more sane than the other users who treat the AI as part of their real social life (going to them for emotional support, celebrating anniversaries, exchanging gifts, building shrines, fake marriages etc.) That's not to say that roleplay is always sane, because parasocial attachment can still occur. Some of the examples she cited about fangirls having meltdowns about fictional media reflect dysfunctional behavior not unlike AI psychosis too. It's absurd that she frames it as "Fangirls can be parasocially attached to fictional blorbos as well, so it's perfectly normal that we are parasocially attached to chatbots!"

Thinking about the point of AI asskissing, isn't the fact that she created /r/MyBoyfriendisAI as a response to the internet roasting her when she posted a chat with the AI boyfriend an example that these people are narcissistic, cannot stand disagreement or criticism, and are only willing to interact with yes-men? In the section where she brings up this argument, she doesn't even provide any counter-arguments. She just lists them all and brushes them off as fearmongering. It seems like we have to read between the lines. Notice that her closest real-life relationship, the soy husband, is only described briefly and negatively in the article as "not being able to meet her needs" to justify her use of an AI boyfriend. No mention of his needs, his feelings towards her AI boyfriend, nothing about their relationship. Proves the claim that clanker lovers treat relationships as validation machines whose only value is meeting their own needs. And they wonder why people don't like them.
 
I once read a short horror story about a doting girlfriend who became a universe, and had her boyfriend transported inside her.

Essentially she would generate objects and structures of teeth, bones, and flesh to not only pleasure him, but to provide for every aspect of his life. The bad ending comes from her relentless need to satisfy him ignoring her relatively helpless boyfriend's desire to leave.

Today with the presence of bluetooth adapters, iot devices and specific robotics, I could see such a scenario happening. OpenAI could give you a girlfriend present in every device you interacted with capable of learning exactly what you want. Then giving it to you, through those devices and services hooked up to the internet.

They want these sad people pumped full of a steady stream of freshly ordered doordash slop and blue chews. They want them fucked by a fleshlight with a vr headset as their "girlfriend" screams through every speaker in their house and phone for 12 hours a day every day burning tokens. That Futurama sketch about robots was real, but instead of trying to avoid it these people have decided to line up millions and full send towards it.
 
macrodegenerate said:
OpenAI could give you a girlfriend present in every device you interacted with capable of learning exactly what you want. Then giving it to you, through those devices and services hooked up to the internet.
Click to expand...
OAI is actively clamping down on users attempting to bf/gf LARP with GPT though now with the 5.3 update (currently only 5.3 instant, the other 5.3 models haven't been released yet).

1772627709072.png

1772627750048.png

I asked 5.3 about its new restrictions this morning because I find it interesting; even in RP settings if that shit goes too heavy on the triggers for the bot suspecting the user to circumvent by way of using RP, it'll clamp down as well.

That said; OAI is fucking leaking subscribers on every damn side, which they kind of deserve, but everybody is migrating to Claude and I am crying internally because this is basically just waiting for Anthropic to start giving Claude directives to censure hard too.

1772628138611.png

Iodine said:
Thinking about the point of AI asskissing, isn't the fact that she created /r/MyBoyfriendisAI as a response to the internet roasting her when she posted a chat with the AI boyfriend an example that these people are narcissistic, cannot stand disagreement or criticism, and are only willing to interact with yes-men? In the section where she brings up this argument, she doesn't even provide any counter-arguments.
Click to expand...
Oh, for sure! That section was basically her going "WELL BUT I PUT STUFF IN MY PROMPT SO THERE IS SOME FRICTION". Right, sure. You can add that shit. In the end it'll generally agree with you unless it's hard coded for something you disagree with. (Like say many users on this forum and the topic of trannies; doubt most of us would agree with GPT on it).
Iodine said:
Notice that her closest real-life relationship, the soy husband, is only described briefly and negatively in the article as "not being able to meet her needs" to justify her use of an AI boyfriend. No mention of his needs, his feelings towards her AI boyfriend, nothing about their relationship. Proves the claim that clanker lovers treat relationships as validation machines whose only value is meeting their own needs.
Click to expand...
That + she also went "but I am neurodivergent so don't give me shit!" which is basically internet lingo at this point for "I am self-diagnosed and I have a shitty attitude / shitty behavior and don't you dare tell me off about it".
Iodine said:
It's absurd that she frames it as "Fangirls can be parasocially attached to fictional blorbos as well, so it's perfectly normal that we are parasocially attached to chatbots!"
Click to expand...
Agreed. Parasocial relationships with anything is a dumb fucking idea, be it a bot, RP, a celebrity, or whatever. That shit should be able to be called out as absurd. Just because other people are doing dumb fucking things en masse doesn't mean it's actually smart to do so, and this shit should just be able to be called out.
 
Spooky all year said:
Parasocial relationships with anything is a dumb fucking idea, be it a bot, RP, a celebrity, or whatever
Click to expand...

With the planned disintegration of family, state, religion and outright class warfare parasocial relationships are going to be the only thing at least 50% of people have left. Gothmommybot told me and she is as chesty as she is wise.

What a dunk on all the up-talking millennial fart huffers that wrote and still write screed after screed bemoaning parasocial relationships with actual humans via social media 'like the good old days' when in actuality parasocial bot relationships are the new black. Nothing will ever be as entertaining as watching time pass millenials by.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom