- Joined
- Apr 30, 2022
Hes homeless and living in his automobile. I don't think he, nor ViaTRON want this to drag out. ViaTRON made their own goof ups with the CEO going back and forth with Greer when it should have been handled by legal and HR, but here we are. I think this is a smart move by Hardin given the low stakes of the claim unlike Greer V. Moon.
You can call it a W for Greer that the case is over shortly since it gives him more time to focus on Greer V. Moon, but the monkeys paw is that if he loses this gamble, he owes ViaTRON and JAM money when he is homeless and has no source of income. I don't think you can do Uber when your car is your home. DoorDash at most. The other thing he is gambling on is his brothel dreams, no creditor of business partner is going to give you funds for a sketchy adult entertainment business with a judgement against you.
Someone with an actual law degree can critique my post since AI did the heavy lifting.
I disagree. Per some AI research and confirmation, JAMS is not a court so his pro-se tard guarding shield from Haines v. Kerner is non-existent here. Not entirely sure how the homeless plight will play out but that can't be helped at this point.Pretty big W for Greer here.
I stated before Greers main weapon is chaos via shitting up the docket with smeared filing of nonsense to confuse the court and its poor memory; JAMS appears to be fast, no bullshit. He has no opportunities to file garbage and slop.JAMS is not bound by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure's pro se accommodations, and not bound by any appellate court's instructions on how to treat unrepresented parties. If Greer submits something incoherent, the arbitrator can simply rule against him. No obligation to untangle it.
The arbitrator controls the flow, not the parties. In court, a clerk has to accept whatever Greer files. In JAMS, the case manager and arbitrator actively manage and can reject or ignore submissions that don't comply with the scheduling order.
One deposition per side, max. Greer can't demand 15 depositions he'll never actually take to harass the other side.
Under JAMS Rule 18, a party can seek early dismissal of a claim—similar to a motion to dismiss or summary judgment. Unlike court proceedings, which involve extensive briefing and potential appeals, JAMS permits a streamlined process—often involving only a short submission or call before a ruling. If Greer’s complaint is legally deficient, the case can end at this stage.
Greer stumbled into arguably the worst possible legal forum for someone with his specific set of problems. JAMS was built by and for corporate parties with legal representation. It rewards precision, preparation, credibility, and organization, things Greer is historically worst at. It eliminates delay tactics, docket bombing, and sympathetic pro se treatment, the three things he relies on most.
You can call it a W for Greer that the case is over shortly since it gives him more time to focus on Greer V. Moon, but the monkeys paw is that if he loses this gamble, he owes ViaTRON and JAM money when he is homeless and has no source of income. I don't think you can do Uber when your car is your home. DoorDash at most. The other thing he is gambling on is his brothel dreams, no creditor of business partner is going to give you funds for a sketchy adult entertainment business with a judgement against you.
Best case scenario for Greer is getting some settlement, at least that way he would come out richer and be off the hook for costs. I doubt it would be anything more than $20,000 and thats being generous. If he loses, hes fucked.JAMS Award → Court Confirmation → Judgment → Enforcement.
The stipulation Greer signed allows the arbitral award to be entered in a court of competent jurisdiction, including the District Court in Clark County, Nevada. Once confirmed, the award becomes a civil judgment enforceable like any other—though with far more limited grounds for appeal.
At that point, Viatron’s attorneys can pursue standard judgment enforcement remedies:
- Wage garnishment: Generally up to 25% of disposable earnings under federal law, subject to Nevada exemptions.
- Bank levies: Funds can be seized, though certain sources (e.g., federal benefits) are protected.
- Judgment liens: By recording the judgment, creditors can attach liens to real property in Nevada.
- Business levies: In commercial contexts, tools like till taps or keeper levies may be available with court authorization.
Someone with an actual law degree can critique my post since AI did the heavy lifting.
Last edited by a moderator:
